Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Characeae, 1951

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Agardh, C. A. 1824. Systema Algarum. Lund.

  • - ex Bruzelius. [cf. Bruzelius].

  • Allen, G. O. 1925. Notes on Charophytes from Gonda, U. P. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.30(3): 589–599, pl. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1927. [cf. Groves, J., and G. O. Allen].

  • —. 1928. Charophyte notes from Saharanpur, U. P. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.7(2): 49–69, fig. 1–13, pl. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1935. [cf. Groves, J.].

  • —. 1936. Charophyte notes from Bareilly. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.15(1): 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • - ex Filarszky. 1936. [cf. Filarszky].

  • —. 1938. Notes on British Charophytes. Jour. Bot.76: 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. Charophyta.In The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to Lake Titicaca in 1937. Trans. Linn. Soc. [London], (Bot.) III,1(2): 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1942. On the distribution of some Indian Charophytes. Royal Bot. Garden, Calcutta, 150th Anniv. Vol., Part 2: 183–189.

  • -. 1950. British stoneworts (Charophyta). Haslemere. Figs. 1–52.

  • —. 1951. Notes on Charophyta from British Columbia. Proc. Linn. Soc. [London]162(2): 148–152, 2 figs.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andW. G. Herter. 1934. Charales Uruguayensis. Revista Sudamer. Bot.1(3): 87–91, 1 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. 1880. Characeae Americanae Exsiccatae. Fasc. I and II. [for dates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948].

  • —. 1882. Development of the cortex inChara. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club9(4): 37–47, pl. 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1883. Notes on the American species ofTolypella. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club10(10): 109–117, pl. 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1887. Some notes on Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club14(10): 211–215, pl. 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. 1888a. Characeae Americanae Exsiccatae. Fasc. III and IV. [for dates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948].

  • —. 1888b.Nitella (notTolypella) Macounii. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club15(1): 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. 1888c. The Characeae of America. Part 1: 1–64, fig. 1–54. New York.

  • —. 1889. Characeae.In N. L. Britton, Catalogue of plants found in New Jersey. Geol. Survey N. J., Final Rep. State Geol.2: 356–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1892a. Notes on some Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club19(7): 230.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1892b. The Characeae of America, Part2, Fasc. 1: 1–8, pl. 1–8. New York. [for numbering of plates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948c: 334–335].

  • —. 1893a. Notes on new Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club20(3): 119–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1893b. Notes on some Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club20(6): 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1894a. Remarks onChara gymnopus A. Br. with descriptions of new species ofChara andNitella. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club21 (4): 162–167, pl. 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1894b. Japanese Characeae. I. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club21(12): 523–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1894c. Notes onChara sejuncta A. Br. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club21(12): 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1894d. The Characeae of America, Part2, Fasc. 2: 9–17, pl. 19–17. New York. [for numbering of plates, cf. Wood, R. D., 1948c: 334–335].

  • —. 1895. Japanese Characeae. II. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club22(2): 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1896a.Nitella subspicata sp. nov. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club23(1): 6–7, pl. 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1896b. A new species ofNitella belonging to theN. flexilis series, with a review of allied species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club23(12): 533, pl. 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1896c. New species ofNitella belonging to the monoecious acuminatae group, with a review of allied species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club23(12): 534–536, pl. 285, 286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. 1896d. The Characeae of America. Part2, Fasc. 3: 19–28, pl. 18–27. New York, [for numbering of plates, cf. Wood R. D., 1948c: 334–335].

  • —. 1898. Contributions to Japanese Characeae. III. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club25: 73–82, 18 unnumbered plates. [the plates appeared only with reprints].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1900. Three new charas from California. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club27(6): 299–304, pl. 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G. E. 1935. Weed growths in reservoirs and open canals. Jour. Am. Water Works Ass’n.27(12): 1684–1693.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascherson, P. 1878. Noch einige Bemerkunge über die orientalischen Schismus-Formen und über Pflanzen der kleinen Oase. Oesterr. Bot. Zeits.28: 254–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspegren, G. C. 1823. Försök till en Blekingsk Flora. Carlskrona.

  • Avetta, C. 1898. Nuova specie dieChara (Chara Pelosiana mihi). Malpighia12(5–8): 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. G. 1887. Further contributions to the Flora of Madagascar. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)22: 441–537. [cf. p. 537, by H. & J. Groves].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer ex Reichenbach. 1829. [cf. Reichenbach].

  • Blinks, L. R. andM. J. Pickett. 1940. The effect of oxidants and reductants upon the bioelectric potential ofNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.24(1): 33–34, 8 figs.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, A. 1834. Esquisse monographique du genreChara. Ann. Sci. Nat. II. Bot.1: 349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1835. Uebersicht der genauer bekannten Chara-Arten. Flora18(1): 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1843a. Charae Preissianae adiectis reliquis speciebus e nova hollandia hucusque cognitis. Linnaea17: 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1843b.In Drége und Meyer, Zwei pflanzeng. Documente. Flora2: 1–230. [cf. C. grandis, p. 137].

    Google Scholar 

  • - ex Kützing. 1845. [cf. Kützing].

  • -. 1845. [Additional notices of the North American Characeae].In G. Engelmann and A. Gray, Plantae Lindheimerianae. Boston Jour. Nat. Hist.5(2): 264, footnote.

  • —. 1847a. Uebersicht der schweizerischen Characeen. Neue Denkschr. Schweiz. Ges. Naturw.10(3): 1–23. [for date, cf. Bot. Zeit.7: 872, 1849. Signature date on reprints, 1847].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1847b.Chara Kokeilii, eine neue deutsche Art, beschrieben von Alexander Braun, Professor der Botanik in Freiburg in Breisgau. Flora30(2): 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1849a. Charae australes et antarcticae, or characters and observations on the Characeae of Australia and the southern circumpolar regions. Hooker Jour. Bot. & Kew Gard. Misc.1: 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1849b. Characeae Indiae orientalis et insularum maris pacifici; or characters and observations on the Characeae of the East Indian Continent, Ceylon, Sunda Islands, Marians, and Sandwich Islands. Hooker Jour. Bot. & Kew Gard. Misc.,1: 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • - ex Kützing. 1849. [cf. Kützing].

  • —. 1852. Plantae Muellerianae. Linnaea25: 704–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • - ex Wallman, 1853. [cf. Wallman].

  • — 1858 [?]. [Characeen aus Columbien, Guyana und Mittelamerika]. Monatsber. Künig. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1858): 349–368. 1859. [confirmation for 1858 has not been obtained].

    Google Scholar 

  • - ex Brébisson. 1859. [cf. Brébisson].

  • -. 1860. Characeae.In J. D. Hooker, Flora Tasmaniae Vol. 2: 159–160. London.

  • - ex Leonhardi. 1863. [cf. Leonhardi].

  • - ex Leonhardi. 1864. [cf. Leonhardi].

  • -. 1866. Characeen.In G. von Marten, Die Preussische Expedition nach Ost-Asien. Bot. Theil. “Die Tange”. Berlin. [cf. p. 143].

  • —. 1867[?]. Die Characeen Afrika’s. Monatsber. Künig. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1867): 782–800, 873–944. [reprinted and repaged consecutively 782–872, and possibly issued in 1867; the journal appeared in 1868].

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1873. Characeae.In G. Zeller, On Burmese algae. Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal42: [cf. p. 193, appendix].

  • - in Cohn. 1876. [cf. Cohn].

  • - in Ascherson. 1878. [cf. Ascherson, p. 257].

  • - in Nordstedt. 1880. [cf. Nordstedt, p. 16].

  • - andC. F. O. Nordstedt. 1882. Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. Nach der hinterlassenen Manuscripten A. Braun’s, herausgegeben von Dr. O. Nordstedt. pp. 1–211, pl. 1–7. Berlin. [also, Abh. König. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1882): l–211.pl. 1–7, 1883].

  • Brébisson, A. de. 1859. Flore de la Normandie. 3d ed. Caen.

  • Britton, N. L. 1918. Flora of Bermuda.

  • - andC. F. Millspaugh. 1920. The Bahama Flora. New York. [cf. pp. 617–618, largely by C. B. Robinson].

  • Brooks, Matilda M. 1927. Studies on the permeability of living cells. VIII. The effect of chlorides upon the penetration of dahlia intoNitella. Protoplasma11: 420–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. 1810. Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae van-Dieman. London.

  • - ex Braun. 1843. [cf. A. Braun, 1843a: 118].

  • Bruzelius, A. 1824. Observationes in genusChara. Dissert., Lund. pp. 1–24.

  • Caballero, A. 1919. LaChara foetida A. Br., y las larvas deStegomyia, Culex yAnopheles. Bol. Royal Soc. Española Hist. Nat. Madrid19: 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedercreutz, C. 1933. Die Characeen Finnlands. Mem. Soc. Fauna et Flora Fennica8: 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier, F. E. 1827. Flore Générale des environs de Paris. Vol. 2: 123–128. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1836. Flore Générale des environs de Paris. ed. 2. Paris. [non vidi].

  • Cohn, F. 1876. Kryptogamen-Flora von Schlesien. Vol. 1. [Characeen, by A. Braun, pp. 355–411]. Breslau.

  • Collins, F. S. andA. B. Hervey. 1917. The algae of Bermuda. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci.53(1): 1–196, 6 pl. [cf.Chara on p. 67].

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmeiro, A. M. 1867. Enumeracion de las Criptógamas de España y Portugal. Vol. 2. Madrid. [cf. pp. 222–224].

  • Cook, S. F. 1926. The toxic action of copper onNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.9(6): 735–754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corillion, Abbé R. 1946. Contribution à l’étude des Charophycées du Massif amoricain. Bull. Soc. Sci. Bretagne21: 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947. Addition à la flore Charologique de l’Ouest de la France. Bull. Soc. Bot. France94: 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crepin, F. 1863. Les Characées de Belgique. Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg.2(2): 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, W. 1948. Growth of plants. Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, Fay Kenoyer. 1949.Chara Kieneri, a new species from Nebraska. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud.9: 127–130, 1 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCandolle, A. R. 1813. Catalogus Plantarum Horti Botanici Monspeliensis. Monspelii. [cf. Chara, p. 12].

  • Desfontaine, R. 1800. Flora Atlantica, sive Historia Plantarum quae in Atlante, Agro Tunetano et Algeriensi Crescunt. Paris.

  • Desvaux, A. N. 1810.In J. L. A. Loiseleur-Deslongchamps, Notice sur les plantes à ajouter à la Flore de France. [cf. pp. 135–138]. Paris.

  • Detharding ex Willdenow. 1809. [cf. Willdenow].

  • Dixit, S. C. 1931. Some Charophyta from Salsette. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.10: 205–208, figs. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1935. Charophytes of the Bombay Presidency. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.14(3): 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940a. Algal investigations in the Bombay Presidency. Current Sci. (Bangalore)9(10): 453–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. The Charophytes of the Bombay Presidency. II. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.18(4–6): 231–239, 1 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durieu de Maisonneuve, M. C. 1846–1849. Exploration scientifique de l’Algérie. Botanique. Tom. 1. Cryptogamie. [non vidi].

  • —. 1859. Note sur une nouvelle espèce du genreChara (Ch. jragijera DR.). Bull. Soc. Bot. France6: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • - et Cosson. 1859. [cf. preceding].

  • Engelmann, G. andA. Gray. 1945. [cf. Braun, A. 1845].

  • Feldmann, Geneviève. 1945. Deux nouvelles espèces deChara de l’Afrique du Nord. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique du Nord37(8–9): 168–173, figs. 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946. Les Charophycées d’Afrique du Nord. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique Nord37: 64–118, figs. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filarszky, F. [or N.]. 1893. A charafélék (Characeae L. Cl. Richard) különös tekintettel a Magyarországi Fajokra. [Die Characeen (Characeae L. Cl. Richard) mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die in Ungarn beobachteten Arten]. pp. 1–229, 5 pl. [German summary]. Budapest.

  • -. 1926a. Chlorophyceae.In Ernö Csiki, Sándor Jávorka és Jenö Kümmerle. Adatok Albánia Flórajához (Additamenta ad floram Albaniae). Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Balkan-Kutatásainak Tudományos Eredményei (Budapest)3: 122–128.

  • —. 1926b. Charafélék Szeged vidékén. Folia Cryptogamica1(4): 229–236. [cf. 1934a for summarization].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1926c. A magas Tátra alján termö néhány Charaféléröl. (Ueber einige Characeen am Fusse der Hohen Tátra). Magyar Botanikai Lapok 1/12: 5–14, pl. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1930. A Budai Höforrások Nyélt Vizeinek Chara-Félée és néhány más érdekesebb, Ritkább Algafaja. (Die Characeen und einige andere seltenere Algen der ofener Thermalgewässer.) Matematikae és természeltudomaniji értesitö47: 652–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931. Adatok Horvát-Szlavonország és a Balkán néhány más országának Chara-vegetációjához. (Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Charenvegetation Kroatien-Slavonien’s und einiger anderen Länder der Balkan-Halbinsel.) Magyar Botanikai Lapok (1931) (1/12): 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934a. Enumeratio specierum et formarum Characearum in regionibus oppidi Szeged hucusque cognitarum et collectarum diagnosisque formarum novarum. Folia Cryptogamica1(10): 1307–1316. [summarizes earlier Hungaria work in Latin].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934b. Die Characeen der deutschen Limnologischen Sunda-Expedition. Archiv. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 12. Tropische Binnengewässer4: 705–726, fig. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1936. Idegenföldi charafélék határozása (Determinatio Characearum Exoticarum). Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Matematikai és Természettudományi Értesítöje55: 476–497, 8 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • - etG. O. Allen ex Filarszky. 1936. [cf. Filarszky, 1936].

  • - etJ. Groves. 1936. [cf. Filarszky, 1936].

  • Formiggini, L. 1908a. Revisione critica della Caracee della Flora Veneta. Atti Accad. Sci. Veneto Trent.-Istri. III.1: 110–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1908b. Contributo alla conoscenza della Caracee della Sicilia. Bull. Soc. Bot. Ital. vol. ?: 81–86. [non vidi].

  • Fries ex Aspegren. 1823. [cf. Aspegren].

  • Fritisch, F. E. 1935. The structure and reproduction of the Algae. Vol. 1. Cambridge.

  • —. 1944. The present-day classification of algae. Bot. Rev.10(4): 232–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gain, L. 1912. La flore algologique des régions antarctiques et subantarctiques. Deuxième expédition Antarctique Française (1908-1910). [not verified].

  • Ganterer, U. 1847. Die bisher bekannten österreichischen Charen. Diss., Vienna. pp. 1–21, 2 pl.

  • Gibbs, L. S. 1914. [cf. Groves, H., 1914].

  • Gmelin, C. C. 1826. Flora Badensis Alsatica. Vol. 4: 643–647. Carlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K. 1930. Die Deutung der Characeen-Antheridien. Ein Versuch. Flora124: 491–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves da Cunha, G. A. 1934. Liste des Characées du Portugal. Arq. Univ. Lisboa15: 1-?[non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. Additions à la flora Charologique du Portugal. Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat.13(27): 153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. Contribuição para o estudo des Carófitos Portugueses. Rev. Fac. C. Lisboa2: 227-? [non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943a. Additions à la flore Charologique du Portugal. II Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat.14: 87-? [non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943b. Additions à la flore Charologique du Portugal. III. Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat.14: 139–143. [non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. 1943. Charales; plant benefactors of fishes. Aquarium12(7), 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. F. 1821. A natural arrangement of British plants. Vol. 2. London.

  • Griffith, W. 1849. Posthumous Papers. (Assembled by J. M. McClelland). I. Notulae ad Plantas Asiaticas. Part II. On the higher cryptogams [cf. pp. 275–283]. II. Icones Plantarum Asiaticarum. Part II. On the higher cryptogamous plants. [cf. pl. 63, 64]. Calcutta.

  • Groves, H. and J. 1880. A review of the British Characeae. Jour. Bot.18: 97–103, 129–135, 161–167, pl. 207–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J. 1881. Notes on British Characeae. Jour. Bot.19: 353–356, pl. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  • - in Baker. 1887. [cf. Baker].

  • — and J.. 1890. Notes on the British Characeae for 1887–9. Jour. Bot.28: 65–69, pl. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J.. 1895. Notes on the British Characeae, 1890–1894. Jour. Bot.33: 289–92, pl. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J.. 1898. On the Characeae collected by Mr. T. B. Blow, F.L.S., in the West Indies. Jour. Linn Soc. [London] (Bot.)33: 323–6, pl. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1906. On Characeae from the Cape Peninsula collected by Major A. H. Wolley-Dod, R.A. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)37: 285–287, pl. 11.

  • -. 1911. Characeae.In Ignaz Urban, Symbolae Antillanae, seu Fundamenta Florae Indiae Occidentalis7(1): 30–44. Berolini.

  • — and J.. 1912. Characeae from the Philippine Islands. Philippine Jour. Sci. C.7(2): 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, J. 1914. Characeae.In Lillian S. Gibbs, A contribution to the flora and plant formations of Mount Kinabalu and the highlands of British North Borneo. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.) 42: 1–240, pl. 1–8. [cf. pp. 16, 213].

  • —. 1915. A new nitella. Jour. Bot.53: 41–43, pl. 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1916. On the nameLamprothamnus Braun. Jour. Bot.54: 336–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1919. Notes onLychnothamnus. Jour. Bot.57: 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1921. Charophyta from Annam and Guam. Philippine Jour. Sci.19: 663–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1922a. Charophyta.In W. H. Pearson, A systematic account of the plants collected in New Caledonia and the Isle of Pines by Mr. R. H. Compton, M.A., in 1914. Part III. Cryptogams (Hepaticae—Fungi). Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)46: 69–70, pl. 5.

  • —. 1922b. On Charophyta collected by Mr. Thomas Bates Blow, F.L.S., in Ceylon. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)46: 97–103, pl. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1924. Notes on Indian Charophyta. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)46: 359–376, pl. 35, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1927. A new species ofNitella (Characeae) from southern Queensland. Proc. Royal Soc. Queensland38: 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1928. On Charophyta collected by Mr. Thomas Bates Blow, F.L.S., in Madagascar. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)48: 125–137, pl. 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - ex Filarszky. 1936. [cf. Filarszky].

  • — andG. O. Allen. 1927. On some Indian Charophyta. Jour. Bot.65: 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1935. A review of the Queensland Charophyta. Proc. Royal Soc. Queensland46: 34–59, 3 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andG. R. Bullock-Webster. 1919. A new Nitella. Jour. Bot.55: 1, pl. 551. [Also in Irish Nat.28: 2, pl. 1].

    Google Scholar 

  • -and-. 1920. The British Charophyta. Vol.1. London.

  • -and-. 1924a. The British Charophyta. Vol.2. London.

  • —. 1924b. Notes on British Charophyta. Jour. Bot.62: 33–35, p. 570.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andEdith L. Stephens. 1926. New and noteworthy South African Charophyta. I. Trans. Royal Soc. So. Africa13: 145–158, pl. 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1933. New and noteworthy South African Charophyta. II. Trans. Royal Soc. So. Africa21: 271–289, pl. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulia, G. 1919. Le Caracee Maltesi. Bull. Soc. Bot. Italy.68: ? [non vidi]

  • Halsted, B. D. 1879. Classification and description of the American species of Characeae. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist.20: 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. J. 1843. Handbok i Skandinaviens Flora. 4th ed. Stockholm.

  • Harvey, E. N. 1942. Hydrostatic pressure and temperature in relation to stimulation and cyclosis inNitella flexilis. Jour. Gen. Physiol.25(6): 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasslow, O. J. 1931. Sveriges Characeer. Bot. Not. (1931): 63–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. Några characeer från Amerika. Bot. Not. (1934): 346–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1936. Norges Characeer. Nyt Mag. Naturvidensk.75: 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939a. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. Bot. Not. (1939): 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939b. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. II. Bot. Not. (1939): 817–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. III. Bot. Not. (1940): 287–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1945. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. IV. Bot. Not. (1945): 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hate, V. N. 1909. Two species of “Chara” from the Bombay Island. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.19: 762–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herter, G. 1933. Estudios botanicos en la region Uruguaya. III. Florula Uruguayensis, Plantae Avasculares. Montevideo. [non vidi]

  • -andG. O. Allen. 1934 [cf. Allen].

  • Hertzsch, —. 1855. ZurChara filiformis Hertzsch. Hedwigia1: 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E. 1941. The relation between protoplasmic streaming and the action potential inNitella andChara. Biol. Bull.81(2): 296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirn, K. E. 1900. Finska Characeer. Meddell. Soc. Fauna et Flora Fennica26: 91–99. [non vidi]

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1906. Suomen Näkinpartaiset (Characeae). Luonnon Ystävä (1905): 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, A. S. 1898. A list of cryptogams collected in the Bahamas, Jamaica, and Grand Cayman. Missouri Bot. Gard., Ann. Rep.9: 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland, D. R. andT. F. Broyer. 1942. Accumulation of salt and permeability in plant cells. Jour. Gen. Physiol.25(6): 865–880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — andA. R. Davies. 1929. The intake and accumulation of electrolytes by plant cells. Protoplasma6: 616–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, L. 1906. Ueber Characeen gesammelt in Australien und auf Sizilien. Mitth. Naturw. Verein Neuvorpommern und Rügen37: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn af Rantzien, H. 1950a. Studies in the series pluricellulatae ofNitella with special reference to American species. Meddel. från Göteborgs Bot. Trädgård18: 199–212, 17 figs.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950b. Charophyta reported from Latin America. Arkiv för Botanik. II.1(8): 355–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. A. 1929. Two new species ofChara from tropical America. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser.,4(6): 159–161, pl. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hy, F. 1889. [Species of Characeae found in Haute-Vienne by M. Malinvaud]. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, seance du Décembre 1889: 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1890a. Sur quelques Characées récoltées à la session de la Rochelle. Bull. Soc. Bot. France37: 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1890b. Sur les caractères généraux de la famille des Characées et leur importance taxonomique. Rev. Bot.8: 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1913. Les Characées de France. Soc. Bot. France., Mém.26: 1–47, pl. 1–3 [explanations for plates published in 1914].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1914. Les Characées de France, note additionnelle. Bull. Soc. Bot. France61: 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imahori, Kozo. 1949. Notes on the asiatic Charophyta. Bot. Magazin62: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Marian. 1926. On the accumulation of dye inNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.8(2): 147–182, 12 figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzigsohn, H. 1850. Charologisches. Bot. Zeit.8: 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jao, Chin-Chih. 1947a. Some Characeae from Kunming, Yunnan. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica1: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947b. Studies on the freshwater algae of China. XIV. Some freshwater algae from Kansu. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica1: 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josing, E. 1901. Einfluss der Aussenledingungen auf die Abhängigkeit der Protoplasmaströmung vom Licht. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.36: 197–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein in Willdenow. [cf. Willdenow].

  • Kornas, J. andA. Medwecka-Kornas. 1948. Les associations végétales sous-marines dans le golfe du Gdańsk (Baltique). Bull. Int. Acad. Polonaise Sci. et Lettres B. (1): 72–88.

  • Kosanin, N. 1907. Characeen Serbiens. Oesterr. Bot. Zeits.57: 280–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. 1883. [cf. Nordstedt].

  • Kundu, B. C. 1932. A new species of polyarthrodactylousNitella with a review of the allied species. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.16(5): 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937. A new Nitella from Rajshahi, Bengal. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.15: 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. Two new Nitellas. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.42(4): 843–846, pl. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kützing ex Reichenbach. 1832. [cf. Reichenbach].

  • Kützing, F. T. 1834. Beschreibung einiger neuen Arten der GattungChara. Flora17: 705–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1843. Phycologia Generaiis, oder Anatomie, Physiologie, und Systemkunde der Tange. Leipzig, [cf. pp. 313–321].

  • -. 1845. Phycologia Germanica. Nordhausen, [cf. pp. 255–260].

  • -. 1849. Species Algarium. Leipzig, [cf. pp. 513–526].

  • —. 1857. Tabulae Phycologicae, oder Abbildungen der Tange7: 10–32, pl. 26–81. Nordhausen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakowitz, K. 1907. Die Algenflora der Danziger Bucht. Danzig. [cf. pp. 46–49].

  • -. 1929. Die Algenflora der gesamten Ostsee. Danzig. [cf. pp. 193–204].

  • Lam, H. J. 1934. Materials towards a study of the flora of the island of New Guinea. Blumea1(1): 115–159. [non vidi]

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, J. 1856–59. Haandbog i den danske Flora. 2nd. ed. (cf. pp. 696–710). København.

  • Leonhardi, H. F. von. 1863a. Ueber die böhmischen Characeen. Lotos13: 55–80, 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1863b. Weitere Characeen-Fundorte. Lotos13: 129–132, 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1864. Die bisher bekannten österreichischen Armleuchter-Gewächse besprochen von morphogenetischen Standpuncte. Verhandl. Naturf. Vereins Brünn2: 122–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenbein, W. 1927. Beitrag zur Zytologie der Charales. Planta4(4): 438–466, 22 fig.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Vol. 2. Stockholm. [cf. pp. 1156, 11547].

  • Loiseleur-Deslongchamps, J. L. A. 1810. Notice sur les plantes à ajouter à la Flore de France (Flora Gallica). Paris. [cf. pp. 135–139].

  • McAtee, W. L. 1939. Wildfowl food plants. Their value, propagation, and management. Ames.

  • MacCaughey, V. 1918a. Algae of the Hawaiian Archipelago. I. Bot. Gaz.65: 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1918b. Algae of the Hawaiian Archipelago. II. Bot. Gaz.65: 121–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino, T. 1929. Why do not study about Japanese Characeae. Jour. Jap. Bot.6: 369–402, 29 pl. [In Japanese. Plates are duplications of T. F. Allen’s Japanese Characeae].

    Google Scholar 

  • Migula, W. 1890–1897. Die Characeen.In L. Rabenhorst, Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. Vol. 5: 1–765, 149 fig. [for dates, cf. Groves and Bullock-Webster, 1924a: 111].

  • —. 1904. Characeae Rossicae. Act. Hort. Petrop.23(3): 535–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1914. … Hedwigia55: [incl. p. 183] [fide G. O. Allen, corresp.,non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1925. Charophyta (Charales).In A. Pascher, Die Süsswasserflora Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz11: 207–250, fig. I-XIV. Jena.

  • —. 1930. Ueber einige japanische Characeen. Hedwigia70: 211–215, 1 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miquel, F. A. G. 1840.In H. C. van Hall, Flora Belgii Septentrionalis sive Florae Batavae Compendium. Vol. 2: [cf. pp. 422–433]. Amsterdam.

  • Morioka, Hideo. 1940.Nitella jallosa Morioka (Characeae). Iconographia Plantarum Asiae Orientalis3: 293–295, pl. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941a. Charophyta Japonica. Jour. Jap. Bot.17: 57–70, fig. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941b.Chara Benthamii Al. Braun. Iconographia Plantarum Asiae Orientalis4: 335–336, pl. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller ex Braun. 1852. [cf. Braun].

  • Müller, J. 1881. Les Characées genévoises. Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève2: 42–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstedt, C. F. O. 1878. De algis aquae dulcis et de Characeis ex insulis Sandvicensibus a Sv. Berggren 1875 reportatis. Symb. Soc. Physiog. Lund. Vol. ?: 23–24, 1 pl.

  • - in T. F. Allen. 1880. [cf. Allen, T. F.].

  • —. 1880. De Algis et Characeis. 2. Characeae Novae Zeelandiae. Lunds Univ. Årsskr.16(4): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1882. Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. [cf. Braun, 1882].

  • -. 1883. Characeae.In M. Kuhn, Ueber Farne und Charen von der Insel Socotra. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.1(6): 238–243.

  • —. 1888a. Einige Characeenbestimmungen. Hedwigia27(7 &8): 181–196, 2 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • - in T. F. Allen. 1888. [cf. Allen, T. F., 1888a].

  • —. 1889. De Algis et Characeis. Lunds Univ. Årsskr.25(4): 2–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1891. Australasian Characeae. Part L, 10 pl. Lund.

  • —. 1900. Characeae. Mém. l’Herbier Boissier20: 2–3. Genève.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1918. Australasian Characeae. Proc. Royal Soc. Victoria, n. s.,31: 1–6[a synopsis to supplement plates of 1891].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, C. F. 1884. Conspectus Florae Europaeae. Suppl. 1: 859–879, and index, pp. 882–1046. [cf. pp. 874–9].

  • Olsen, S. 1944. Danish Charophyta, chorological, ecological, and Biological investigations. Kongel. Danske Vidensk. Selskab., Biol. Skrifter3: 1–240, 2 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophel, I. L. 1947. Notes on the generaLychnothamnus andLamprothamnium (Characeae). Trans. & Proc. Royal Soc. So. Australia71(2): 318–323, 2 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, W. J. V. 1939. Changes of apparent ionic mobilities in protoplasm. IV. Influence of guaiacol in the effects of sodium and potassium inNitella. Jour. Gen. Physiol.22(3): 417–427, 6 fig.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, B. S. 1932. Burmese Charophyta. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)49: 47–92, pl. 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascher, A. 1925. [cf. Migula, 1925].

  • Petkoff, S. 1914. Les Characées de Bulgarie. Nuova Notarisia, ser. 25 (1914): 35–56. (Modena) [In Russian; transi.: Révue Acad. Bulgarie Sci. 7].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1922. La végétation des eaux de Vitocha. Ann. Univ. Sofia (1912–2),18: 1–270 [non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • Prósper, E. R. 1910. Las Carofitas de España. Madrid. 280 pp.

  • Quortrup, E. R. andR. L. Sudheimer. 1942. Research note on botulism in western marsh areas with recommendations for control. Trans. North Am. Wildlife Conf.7: 284–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafay, S. A. 1933. A survey of the flora and fauna of the water-supplies of the Madras Presidency. Indian Jour. Med. Res.20(4): 1083–1100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature; ou Tableau de l’univers et des corps organises. Palerme. [cf. p. 209].

  • Reichenbach, H. G. L. 1829. Mössler’s Handbuch der Gewächskunde. ed. 2. Altona. [cf. pp. 1592–1601].

  • -. 1832. Flora germanica excursoria. Vol. 1: [cf. 147–150]; 2: [cf. 843]. Leipzig.

  • -. 1834. Mössler’s Handbuch der Gewächskunde. ed. 3. Altona. [cf. pp. 1662–71].

  • Reinsch, P. F. 1876. Species ac genera nova algarum aquae dulcis quae sunt inventa in speciminibus in expeditione Vener. transit. hieme 1874–75 in Insula Kerguelensi a clar. Eaton collectis. Jour. Linn. Soc. [London] (Bot.)15: 205–221. [cf. p. 219].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickett, H. W. 1951. Some changes in the International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature made at Stockholm in 1950. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club78(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. B. 1906. The Chareae of North America. Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gard.4: 244–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann ex Braun. 1835. [cf. Braun].

  • Samano Bishop, Amelia. 1932.Chara tehuacanensis Samano ad interim. Anal. Inst. Biol. (Mexico)3: 233–234, 3 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. A. 1901. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition. 25. The Algae. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci.3: 391–486, pl. 43–62. [cf. p. 416]

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner ex Nordstedt. 1882. [cf. Braun, 1882].

  • Schleicher, J. C. 1821. Catalogus Plantarum in Helvetia ciset transalpina sponte nascentium. ed. 4. Gamberi. [cf. p. 13].

  • Schur, F. 1870. Phytographische Fragmente. Oesterr. Bot. Zeit.20: 200–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, W. A. andN. L. Gardner. 1903. Algae of northwestern America. Univ. Cal., Pub. Bot.1: 165–418, pl. 17–27. [cf. p. 233].

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M. 1938. Cryptogamic Botany. Vol. 1. Algae and Fungi. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. The Fresh-Water Algae of the United States. ed. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonder, C. 1890. Die Characeen der Provinz Schleswig-Holstein und Lauenburg nebst eingeschlossenen fremden Gebietstheilen. Diss. Kiel. 63 pp.

  • Soulat-Ribette, -. 1892. Famille des Characées, description et analyse des espèces et des genres observés dans les Departements de la Haute-Vienne, de la Correze, de la Crouse, de la Charente et de la Dordogne. Limoges. 40 pp.

  • Spfxazzini, C. 1883. Characeae platenses. Anal. Soc. Cient. Argentina15: 218–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroede, W. 1931. Ökologie der Characeen. Diss., Univ. of Berlin. pp. 1–119, 2 pl.

  • —. 1933. Ueber die Beziehungen der Characeen zu den chemischen Faktoren der Wohngewässer und des Schlammes. Arch. Hydrobiol.25: 192–229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, P. 1882. Die bisher bekannten europäischen Characeen. Berlin. 104 pp.

  • Teleźyński, H. 1929. Garnitures des chromosomes et synchronisme des divisions dans les filaments d’anthérozoides chez certaines espèces du genre Chara Vaill. Act. Soc. Bot. Poloniae6(3): 230–247, 2 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodoresco, E. C. 1907. Matériaux pour la flore algologique de la Roumanie. Ann. Sci. Nat. IX. (Bot).5: 1–155, pl. 1–7. [cf. 125–135].

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuillier, J. L. 1799. La Flore des Environs de Paris. (Paris) [cf. pp. 471–474].

  • Trabut ex Feldman. 1946. [cf. Feldman].

  • Turpin, P. E. 1817.In Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles [Paris] Vol. 18 [pl. at p. 164].

    Google Scholar 

  • Uechtritz, R. von. 1866. Aufzählung der Schlesischen Characeen. Jahrb. Schles. Ges. Vat. Kulture44: 88–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umrath, K. 1930. Untersuchungen über Plasma und Plasmaströmung an Characeen. IV. Potentialmessungen anNitella mucronata mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Errungserscheinung. Protoplasma9(4): 576–597, 14 fig.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. Der Einfluss der Temperature auf das elektrische Potential, den Aktionsstrome und die Protoplasmaströmung beiNitella mucronata. Protoplasma21(3): 329–339, 3 fig.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdam, H. D. 1938. The Netherlands’ Charophyta. Blumea3: 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilhelm, J. 1907. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Charophyten von Bulgarien, Montenegro,und der Athos-Halbinsel. Hedwigia47: 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1912. Zweiter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Charophytenflora von Montenegro und Bulgarien. Hedwigia53: 23–33, 3 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1914. Monografická Studie o ceskych paroznatkách (Bohemian Characeen). Vštník Král. České Spol. Nauk. (1914): 1–168, 41 fig. [In Czech., with no summary].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1923a. Novae species et formae Characearum. I. Characeae bohemicae. Hedwigia64: 148–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1923b. Nouveau Chara d’eau thermale et radioactive des bains de Pištany en Slovaquie. Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Bohême (1923): repr. p. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1928 [?]. Characeae Europae orientalis et Asiae ex herbario instituti cryptogamici horti botanici reipublicae rossicae (ante Petropolitani). Spisy vydávané přírodovědeckou fakultou karlový university (Publ. Faculté des Sci. l’Univ. Charles) (1928?): rep. p. 1–24, 1 pl.

  • —. 1930. [Additional study of the Characeae of the U.S.S.R.] Bull. Jard. Bot. Princ. URSS29(5–6): 582–596. [Russian, with French summary].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstedt, L. J. 1862. Bidrag till kännedomen om de Skandinaviska Arterna af Vaxtfamiljen Characeae. Diss., Lund. 43 pp.

  • —. 1875. Monografi öfer Sveriges och Norges Characeer. Aftryck ur Christianstads Högre Elementar-Läroverks Inbjudningskrift (1875): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallman in Zetterstedt. 1839. [cf. Zetterstedt].

  • Wallman, J. 1853. Försök till en systematisk üppställning af växtfamiljen Characeae. Stockholm [also in Kongl. Vets.-Akad. Handl. (1852): 230–331. 1854].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallroth, K. F. G. 1815. Annus Botanicus sive supplementum tertium ad Curtii Sprengelii Floram Halensem. Halsae. [cf. pp. 175–194, pl. I–VI].

  • -. 1833. Flora Cryptogamica Germaniae. Vol. 2. Norimbergae. [cf. pp. 101–114].

  • Warming, E. 1876. [cf. Zeller, C., 1876].

  • Whelden, R. M. 1946. Note on Argentine Charas. Farlowia2: 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947. A note on a Chara new to the Philippine Island. Farlowia3: 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willdenow, C. L. 1805a. Du genre nomméChara. Mém. Acad. Royal Berlin (1803): 79–90, pl. 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1805b. Caroli a Linne Species Plantarum. Vol. 4. Berlin. [cf. Chara, pp. 183–7].

  • —. 1809. Fünf neue Pflanzen Deutschlands. Ges. Nat. Freunde3: 296–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womersley, H. B. S. andI. L. Ophel. 1947.Protochara, a new genus of Characeae from Western Australia. Trans. & Proc. Royal Soc. So. Australia71: 311–317, 2 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. D. 1948a. On Rafinesque’s names for the Characeae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club75: 282–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948b. Proposed dates for T. F. Allen’s exsiccatae (Characeae). Farlowia3: 327–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948c. A review of the genusNitella (Characeae) of North America. Farlowia3: 331–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Monographic studies on the Characeae. I. Emendation ofNitella Morongii Allen. Rhodora51: 13–18, pl. 1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Stability and zonation of Characeae. Ecology31(4): 642–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952. An analysis of ecological factors in the occurrence of Characeae of the Woods Hole region, Massachusetts. Ecology33(1): 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaneveld, J. S. 1939.Nitella madagascariensis, nov. spec., with notes on the Charophyta of Madagascar. Blumea3: 372–378, 1 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. The Charophyta of Malaysia and adjacent countries. Blumea4: 1–224, 20 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942a. Some notes on Charophyta collected in the Netherlands West Indies, North Venezuela and Colombia. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.38: 141–146. [1941 ?].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942b. An historical review of the identification of the Netherlands’ Charophyta. Blumea5: 257–267. [also inHet Nederlandsch Kruidk. Arch.,52: 114–142, 1942, in Dutch].

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, G. 1873. On Burmese Algae. Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal42: 193-? [cf. p. 193] [non vidi].

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1876. Algae Brasiliensis.In E. Warming [Edit.], Symbolae ad Floram Brasiliae Centralis Cognoscendam. [cf. p. 428].

  • Zetterstedt, J. W. 1839. Berättelse om en Natur-Historisk resa genom några Provinser af Nordligare Skandinavien, och särdeles Jemtland. år 1840. Kongl. Vet. Acad., Års Berättelse om Bot. Arb. (1838): 567–639. 1842. [commonly cited as “Wikstrom’s Års-ber.”]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziz[iani?] ex Braun. 1834. [cf. Braun, A.].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Rhode Island, Kingston, R. I.

    R. D. Wood

Authors
  1. R. D. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported in part by the Research Fund of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Rhode Island.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, R.D. The Characeae, 1951. Bot. Rev 18, 317–353 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02957549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02957549

Keywords

Search

Navigation