Skip to main content
Log in

Testing Wickler’s hypothesis: cichlids are unable to distinguish eggs from egg spots in the wild

  • Advances in Cichlid Research V
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cichlid fish have undergone explosive radiation in a process aided by sexual selection. Thus, phenotypes that contribute to reproduction may partially explain the rate of radiation. One such phenotype is the presence of circular spots on the anal fin of the haplochromine cichlids. In 1963, Wickler postulated this phenotype acts as an egg mimic which enhances male fertilization success. However, it remained unclear whether cichlids can distinguish between eggs and egg spots in their natural environment. Further, studies have found differing effects of egg spot characteristics in female mate preference. In this study, we quantified the color of eggs, egg spots, and anal fins of two haplochromine species (Metriaclima benetos and Astatotilapia burtoni). Using a receptor noise limited (RNL) visual model, we found that these species are unable to distinguish the colors of eggs and egg spots in the lighting of their natural habitat. Further, only M. benetos could distinguish the color of egg spots from anal fins. This study supports Wickler’s egg spot mimicry hypothesis and potentially explains species differences in the roles of egg spots as sexually selected traits. It further points out the importance of avoiding human biases in quantifying what colors fish can and cannot distinguish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Light and reflectance spectral data are available in the supplement.

Code availability

All scripts are available at https://github.com/cichlidzeke/chromatic-distance.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Molly Westbrook and Kristen Behrens for their assistance with data collection and Daniel Escobar-Camacho for the use of his scripts and recommendations for the visual model. Underwater light spectra were collected with the help of Walter Salzburger, Tod Thiele, Venkatesh Subramanian, Nicholas Guilbeault, and Thomas Musisha.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Eye Institute at the National Institutes of Health (R01EY024639B; KC and SJ) and the Human Frontiers in Science Program grant (RGY0079/2018; SJ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.G. and K.L.C. conceptualized and designed the study. All authors contributed to data collection. Z.G. performed analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the article. All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeke M. Gonzalez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This work has been completed under the approval of the University of Maryland’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (R-JUN-21–44).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Guest editors: S. Koblmüller, R. C. Albertson, M. J. Genner, K. M. Sefc & T. Takahashi / Advances in Cichlid Research V: Behavior, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1082 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 408 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez, Z.M., Juntti, S.A. & Carleton, K.L. Testing Wickler’s hypothesis: cichlids are unable to distinguish eggs from egg spots in the wild. Hydrobiologia 850, 2355–2369 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05113-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05113-2

Keywords

Navigation