Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of clonal fragmentation and nutrient availability on the competitive ability of the floating plant Salvinia natans

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Floating plants are widespread in aquatic ecosystems. Most floating plants are clonal and their clones can be easily fragmented as a result of natural events or human activities. Such clonal fragmentation may decrease the growth and thus the competitive ability of floating plants. We tested these hypotheses with the widespread floating, clonal plant Salvinia natans. We simulated disturbance-mediated fragmentation of S. natans clones at two levels (low or high) by cutting clones initially consisting of six connected ramets into two fragments with three connected ramets each or six fragments with one ramet each), with no fragmentation as the control. These fragmented or intact clones were grown under two nutrient levels (low or high) in the presence or absence of the floating plant S. polyrhiza. High nutrient availability significantly increased the biomass and ramet number of S. natans, and the presence of S. polyrhiza reduced them. Furthermore, the negative effect of competition of S. polyrhiza on S. natans was greater under high than under low nutrient availability. Clonal fragmentation of S. natans significantly decreased its growth, but did not affect its competitive response or effect. Thus, nutrient availability can affect competition between S. natans and S. polyrhiza, but clonal fragmentation cannot. Our results suggest that clonal fragmentation and decreasing nutrient availability can decrease the spread of some clonal floating plants in aquatic ecosystems and that increasing disturbance to fragment clones and reducing nutrient load in water could be efficient at controlling the spread of some floating plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert P (1996) Nutrient sharing in natural clonal fragments of Fragaria chiloensis. J Ecol 84:395–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain MH (1996) Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: a review. Pl Ecol 123:13–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain MH, Bornette G (2000) Regeneration and colonization abilities of aquatic plant fragments: effect of disturbance seasonality. Hydrobiologia 421:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornette G, Puijalon S (2011) Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquatic Sci 73:1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Březina S, Koubek T, Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2006) Ecological benefits of integration of Calamagrostis epigejos ramets under field conditions. Flora 201:461–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk JK, Fennessy MS (2001) Wetland plants: biology and ecology. Lewis publishers, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H, Fransen B, van Rheenen JWA, van Dijk A, Kreulen R (1996) High levels of inter-ramet water translocation in two rhizomatous Carex species, as quantified by deuterium labelling. Oecologia 106:73–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble KL, Pooler PS, Meyerson LA (2013) Impacts of plant invasions can be reversed through restoration: a regional meta-analysis of faunal communities. Biol Invasions 15:1725–1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong B-C, Alpert P, Guo W, Yu F-H (2012) Effects of fragmentation on the survival and growth of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Biol Invasions 14:1101–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong B-C, Alpert P, Zhang Q, Yu F-H (2015) Clonal integration in homogeneous environments increases performance of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Oecologia 179:393–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gałka A, Szmeja J (2012) Distribution, abundance and environmental conditions of the clonal aquatic fern Salvinia natans (L.) All. in the Vistula delta (Baltic Sea Region). Biodivers Res Conserv 28:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gérard J, Triest L (2014) The effect of phosphorus reduction and competition on invasive lemnids: life traits and nutrient uptake. ISRN Bot 2014:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover R, Drenovsky RE, Futrell CJ, Grewell BJ (2015) Clonal integration in Ludwigia hexapetala under different light regimes. Aquatic Bot 122:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (1993) The adaptive significance of clonal reproduction in angiosperms: an aquatic perspective. Aquatic Bot 44:159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratio in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman WS (1961) The Lemnaceae, or duckweeds: a review of the descriptive and experimental literature. Bot Rev 27:221–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houser JN, Giblin SM, James WF, Langrehr HA, Rogala JT, Sullivan JF, Gray BR (2013) Nutrient cycling, connectivity and free-floating plant abundance in backwater lakes of the Upper Mississippi River. River Systems 21:71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs DL (1947) An ecological life-history of Spirodela Polyrhiza (greater duckweed) with emphasis on the turion phase. Ecol Monogr 17:437–469

    Google Scholar 

  • James JJ, Richards JH (2007) Influence of temporal heterogeneity in nitrogen supply on competitive interactions in a desert shrub community. Oecologia 152:721–727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FA, Ansari AA (2005) Eutrophication: an ecological vision. Bot Rev 71:449–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L, Klimešová J (1994) Biomass allocation in a clonal vine: effects of intraspecific competition and nutrient availability. Folia Geobot 29:237–244

  • Lauridsen TL, Jeppesen E, Andersen FØ (1993) Colonization of submerged macrophytes in shallow fish manipulated Lake Væng: impact of sediment composition and waterfowl grazing. Aquatic Bot 46:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Zhou D-W, Sheng L-X (2011) Density dependence-determined plant biomass allocation pattern. Chinese J Ecol 30:1579–1589

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H-L, Xu Y-S, Wang Y-Y, Yu N-Q, Zhang M-X, Lei G-C, Yu F-H (2015) Does clonal fragmentation of the floating plant Eichhornia crassipes affect the growth of submerged macrophyte communities? Folia Geobot 50:283–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H-F, Alpert P, Yu F-H (2012) Effects of fragment size and water depth on performance of stem fragments of the invasive, amphibious, clonal plant Ipomoea aquatica. Aquatic Bot 99:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H-F, Alpert P, Zhang Q, Yu F-H (2018) Facilitation of amphibious habit by physiological integration in the clonal, perennial, climbing herb Ipomoea aquatica. Sci Total Environm 618:262–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo F-L, Chen Y, Huang L, Wang A, Zhang M-X, Yu F-H (2014) Shifting effects of physiological integration on performance of a clonal plant during submergence and de-submergence. Annals Bot (Oxford) 113:1265–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Magone I (1996) The effect of electromagnetic radiation from the Skrunda Radio Location Station on Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleiden cultures. Sci Total Environm 180:75–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mony C, Koschnick TJ, Haller WT, Muller S (2007) Competition between two invasive Hydrocharitaceae (Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) (Royle) and Egeria densa (Planch)) as influenced by sediment fertility and season. Aquatic Bot 86:236–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody GJW, Byrne MC, Marcus ES, Touchette (2013) Water integration in the clonal emergent hydrophyte, Justicia americana:;benefits of acropetal water transfer from mother to daughter ramets. Hydrobiologia 702:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Netten JJC, Arts GHP, Gylstra R, Nes EHV, Scheffer M, Roijackers RMM (2010) Effect of temperature and nutrients on the competition between free-floating Salvinia natans and submerged Elodea nuttallii in mesocosms. Fundam Appl Limnol 177:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters ET, Neefjes RE, Zuidam BG (2016) Competition between free-floating plants is strongly driven by previously experienced phosphorus concentrations in the water column. PLOS One 11:e0162780

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piqueras J, Klimeš L, Redbo-Torstensson P (1999) Modelling the morphological response to nutrient availability in the clonal plant Trientalis europaea L. Pl Ecol 141:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall GW, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace JB, Wissmar RC (1988) The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J N Amer Benthol Soc 7:433–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Roiloa SR, Retuerto R (2007) Responses of the clonal Fragaria vesca to microtopographic heterogeneity under different water and light conditions. Environm Exp Bot 61:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Roiloa SR, Retuerto R (2012) Clonal integration in Fragaria vesca growing in metal-polluted soils: parents face penalties for establishing their offspring in unsuitable environments. Ecol Res 27:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Roiloa SR, Retuerto R (2016) Effects of fragmentation and seawater submergence on photochemical efficiency and growth in the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis. Flora 225:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Korall P, Schneider H, Wolf PG (2006) A classification for extant ferns. Taxon 55:705–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SDP (2014) The roles of nitrogen and phosphorus in regulating the dominance of floating and submerged aquatic plants in a field mesocosm experiment. Aquatic Bot 112:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song M-H, Dong M (2002) Clonal plants and plant species diversity in wetland ecosystems in China. J Veg Sci 13:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Hou W, Wang Q, Wang J, Jin X (2006) Effect of low temperature on eutrophicated waterbody restoration by Spirodela polyrhiza. Bioresource Technol 97:1865–1869

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y-B, Yu F-H, Keser LH, Dawson W, Fischer M, Dong M, van Kleunen M (2013) United we stand, divided we fall: a meta-analysis of experiments on;clonal integration and its relationship to invasiveness. Oecologia 171:317–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnová M, Diggelen RV, Klimešová J (2010) Distribution of clonal growth forms in wetlands. Aquatic Bot 92:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Stomp AM (2005) The duckweeds: a valuable plant for biomanufacturing. Biotechnol Annual Rev 11:69–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuefer JF, During HJ, Hde K (1994) High benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments. J Ecol 82:511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuefer JF, Gómez S, Mölken TV (2004) Clonal integration beyond resource sharing: implications for defence signalling and disease transmission in clonal plant networks. Evol Ecol 18:647–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, LeJeune KD, Seastedt TR (2004) Competitive impacts and responses of an invasive weed: dependencies on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Oecologia 141:526–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Święta-Musznicka J, Latałowa M, Szmeja J, Badura M (2011) Salvinia natans in medieval wetland deposits in Gdańsk, northern Poland: evidence for the early medieval climate warming. J Paleolimnol 45:369–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo S, Scheffer M, Roijackers R, Waluto B, Braun M, Nagy PT, Borics G, Zambrano L (2010) Strong growth limitation of a floating plant (Lemna gibba) by the submerged macrophyte (Elodea nuttallii) under laboratory conditions. Freshwater Biol 55:681–690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B (2010) Clonal integration in Ranunculus reptans: by-product or adaptation? J Evol Biol 13:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan L-Y, Huang K, Hu Z-Y, Miao S-L, Qi S-S, Dai Z-C, You W-H, Du D-L (2017) Clonal integration is beneficial for resource sharing in a creeping amphibian herb (Alteranthera philoxeroides). Folia Geobot 52:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L-W, Showalter AM, Ungar IA (2005) Effects of intraspecific competition on growth and photosynthesis of Atriplex prostrata. Aquatic Bot 83:187–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Yu FH, Li PX, He WM, Liu J, Yu GL, Song YB, Dong M (2008) Clonal integration supports the expansion from terrestrial to aquatic environments of the amphibious stoloniferous herb Alternanthera philoxeroides. Pl Biol 11:483–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Xu Y-S, Dong B-C, Xue W, Yu F-H (2014) Effects of clonal fragmentation on intraspecific competition of a stoloniferous floating plant. Pl Biol 16:1121–1126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Jiang X-X, Zhang Q-Q, Zhou J, Li H-L, Luo F-L, Zhang M-X, Yu F-H (2015) Nitrogen addition increases intraspecific competition in the invasive wetland plant Alternanthera philoxeroides, but not in its native congener Alternanthera sessilis. Pl Spec Biol 30:176–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Alpert P, Yu F-H (2016) Clonal integration increases relative competitive ability in an invasive aquatic plant. Amer J Bot 103:2079–2086

  • Wang YJ, Müller-Schärer H, van Kleunen M, Cai AM, Zhang P, Yan R, Dong BC, Yu FH (2017) Invasive alien plants benefit more from clonal integration in heterogeneous environments than natives. New Phytol 216:1072–1078

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5:360–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfer SR, Straile D (2012) To share or not to share: clonal integration in a submerged macrophyte in response to light stress. Hydrobiologia 684:261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood KA, Stillman RA, Clarke RT, Daunt F, O’Hare MT (2016) Water velocity limits the temporal extent of herbivore effects on aquatic plants in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 812:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C-Y, schooler SS, Van Klinken RD (2010) Effects of clonal integration and light availability on the growth and physiology of two invasive herbs. J Ecol 98:833–844

    Google Scholar 

  • You WH, Han CM, Liu CH, Yu D (2016) Effects of clonal integration on the invasive clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides under heterogeneous and homogeneous water availability. Sci Rep 6:29767

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yu F-H, Dong M (2003) Effect of light intensity and nutrient availability on clonal growth and clonal morphology of the stoloniferous herb Halerpestes ruthenica. Acta Bot Sin 45:408–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H-J, Liu F-H, Wang R-Q, Liu J (2016) Roles of clonal integration in both heterogeneous and homogeneous habitats. Frontiers Pl Sci 7:551

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y-Q, Lu J-B, Zhu L, Fu Z-H (2006) Effects of nutrient levels on growth characteristics and competitive ability of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), an aquatic invasive plant. Biodiversity Sci 14:159–164

  • Zhou J, Li H-L, Alpert P, Zhang M-X, Yu F-H (2017) Fragmentation of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides decreases its growth but not its competitive effect. Flora 228:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutshi DP, Vass KK (1971) Ecology and production of Salvinia natans Hoffim in Kashmir. Hydrobiologia 38:303–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870610), the Ten Thousand Talent Program of Zhejiang Province (2018R52016) and the Joint Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LTZ20C030001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei-Hai Yu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Fig. S1

(DOCX 297 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, LM., Yao, SM., Jin, Y. et al. Effects of clonal fragmentation and nutrient availability on the competitive ability of the floating plant Salvinia natans. Folia Geobot 55, 63–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-020-09365-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-020-09365-5

Keywords

Navigation