Skip to main content

Life Forms of Aquatic Organisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Freshwater and Marine Ecology
  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives a kind of minimal introduction to the organisms living in water, as far as it is needed for an ecology textbook. It will not focus on taxonomy, because this would just be a repetition of a taxonomy textbook. All phyla and most of the classes and orders have representatives living in water (Sect. 3.1). Instead of a taxonomic approach, a “life form” approach will be taken, focusing on the traits most important for growth and survival in the aquatic realm.

Classification of life form types starts with basic nutritional types (Sect. 3.2). The next most important dimension of a functional characterization is body size (Sect. 3.3), an ecological “master trait” with far-reaching consequences for many other traits, like metabolic rates, growth rate, and longevity. A further functionally important trait is the stoichiometry of biomass (Sect. 3.4) which defines the elemental requirements of organisms.

The remining sections are devoted to a grouping by major habitats, in pelagic waters plankton (drifting organisms, Sect. 3.5) and nekton (swimming organisms, Sect. 3.6) and benthos on solid substrates (Sect. 3.7) and benthos on soft substrates (Sect. 3.8).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

b:

allometry coefficient

I:

ingestion rate

L:

body length

Ra:

absolute metabolic rate

Rs:

specific metabolic rate

References

  • Alldredge AL (1977) House morphology and mechanisms of feeding in the Oikopleuridae (Tunicata, Appendicularia). J Zool Lond 181:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson MJ, Smith SV (1983) C:N:P ratios of marine plants. Limnol Oceanogr 28:568–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Ray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 10:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CS (1980) Whale migrations. Mother (Nature) calls. Nat Geogr Mag 178

    Google Scholar 

  • Båmstedt U (1986) Chemical composition and energy content. In: Corner EDS, O’Hara SCM (eds) Biological chemistry of marine copepods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh O, Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M (1989) High abundances of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature 340:467–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi R, Arndt C, Sommer U (2012) Stoichiometric responses of phytoplankton species to the interactive effect of nutrient supply rates and growth rates. J Phycol 48:539–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bratbak G, Jacobsen A, Heldal M, Nagasaki K, Thingstad F (1998) Virus production in Phaeocystis pouchetii and its relation to host cell growth and nutrition. Aquat Microb Ecol 16:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning K (1991) Effects of phosphorus limitation on the epidemiology of a chytrid phytoplankton parasite. Freshwat Biol 25:409–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Droop MR (1983) 25 years of algal growth kinetics. Bot Mar 26:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleton P, Gaton KJ (1990) “Parasitoid” species and assemblages: convenient definitions or misleading compromises? Oikos 59:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Urabe J (1999) The stoichiometry of consumer-driven nutrient recycling: theory, observations, and consequences. Ecology 80:735–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl D, McKay NA, Schampel JH (1996) Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: towards a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. Bioscience 46:674–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham S, McCauley E, Schulz KL, Siemann EH, Sterner RW (2000) Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408:578–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest SKM, Enquist BJ, Brown JH, Charnov EL, Gillooly JF, Savage V, White EP, Smith FA, Hadly EA, Haskell JP, Lyons SK, Maurer BA, Niklas KJ, Tiffney B (2003) Thermodynamic and metabolic effects on the scaling of production and population energy use. Ecol Lett 6:990–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel T (1969) The ecology of marine microbenthos. IV. Structure and function of the benthic ecosystem, its chemical and physical factors, and the microfauna communities with special reference to the ciliate protozoa. Ophelia 6:1–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn KJ, Mitra A et al (2019) Mixotrophic protists and a new paradigm for marine ecology: where does plankton research go now? J Plankton Res 41:375–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman JA (1999) Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects. Nature 399:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton J (1973) Some aspects of the life history of Calanus plumchrus in the Strait of Georgia. J Fish Res Bd Can 30:811–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller W (1975) Die Nahrungsaufnahme von Daphnia in Abhängigkeit von der Futterkonzentration, der Körpergröße und dem Hungerzustand der Tiere. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 48:47–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller W, Müller H (1985) Seasonal variability in the relationships between body length and individual dry weight and individual dry weight as related to food abundance and clutch size in two coexisting Daphnia species. J Plankton Res 7:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere O (1992) Benthic life in sulfidic zones of the seas - ecological and structural adaptations to a toxic environment. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 85:77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere O (1993) Meiobenthology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillooly JF, Brown JH, West GB, Savage VM, Charnov EL (2001) Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293:2248–2251

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman JC, McCarthy JJ, Peavey DG (1979) Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature 279:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen JA, Winget DM, Tian X, Suttle CA (2014) High temporal and spatial diversity in marine RNA viruses implies that they have an important role in mortality and structuring plankton communities. Front Microbiol 5:703

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsen A (1960) Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surface, and its evolution. Report of Steno Memorial Hospital (Copenhagen) 9:1–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie JB, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence. Appl Environ Microb 33:1225–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochstädter S (2000) Seasonal changes of C:P ratios of seston, bacteria, phytoplankton and zooplankton in a deep, mesotrophic lake. Freshw Biol 44:453–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Holfeld H (1998) Fungal infections of the phytoplankton: seasonality, minimal host density, and specificity in a mesotrophic lake. New Phytol 138:507–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou CC, Guttal V, Couzin ID (2012) Predatory fish select for coordinated collective motion in virtual prey. Science 337:1212–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen P (1987) Differences in microhabitat, abundance, biomass and body size between oxybiotic and thiobiotic free-living marine nematodes. Oecologia 71:564–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer ML, Caudill CC (2014) Homing and straying by anadromous salmonids: a review of mechanisms and rates. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:333–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Kils U (1986) Verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen pelagischen Schwärmen, Schwarmbildung als Strategie zur Orientierung in Umweltgradienten, Bedeutung der Schwarmbildung in der Aquakultur. Ber Inst Meereskunde, Kiel 163:1–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein WE, Paterson DM, Stal LJ (1994) Biostabilization of sediments. BIS-Verlag, Oldenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann KH (1984). Fish production in open ocean ecosystems. In: Fasham MJR (ed) Flows of energy and materials in marine ecosystems. NATO Conf Ser 4, Mar Sci V. Plenum, New York, pp. 435–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Marañón E (2015) Cell size as a key determinant of phytoplankton metabolism and community structure. Annu Rev Mar Sci 7:241–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus MD (2017) Bridging the gap between knowing and modeling viruses in marine systems—an upcoming frontier. Front Mar Sci 3:284

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal KH, Peckarsky BI, Likens GE (2005) Stable isotopes identify dispersal patterns of stonefly populations living along stram corridors. Freshw Biol 50:117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Möbius K (1877). Die Auster und die Austernwirtschaft. Wiegandt, Hemple & Parey: Berlin. English translation: The Oyster and Oyster Farming. U.S. Commission Fish and Fisheries Report (1880) 683–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustaka-Gouni M, Kormas KA, Scotti M, Vardaka E, Sommer U (2016) Warming and acidification effects on planktonic heterotrophic pico- and nanoflagellates in a mesocosm experiment. Protist 167:389–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor LM, Fuhrman JA (1990) Viral mortality of marine-bacteria and cyanobacteria. Nature 343:60–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield AC (1934) On the proportions of organic derivatives in seawater and their relation to the composition of plankton. In: Daniel RJ (ed) James Johnstone memorial volume. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, pp 176–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield AC, Ketchum BH, Richard FA (1963) The influence of organisms on the composition of seawater. In: Hill MN (ed) The Sea. Wiley, NY, pp 26–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees HC, Maddison BC, Middleditch DJ, Patmore JR, Gough KC (2014) Review: the detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA - a review of EDNA as a survey tool in ecology. J Appl Ecol 51:1450–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise K, Ax P (1979) A meiofaunal “thiobios” limited to the anaerobic sulfide system of marine sand does not exist. Mar Biol 54:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J (1924) The breeding of the eel. Smithonian Report, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth JMN, Smetacek V, Lenz J (1978) Pelagic ecosystem structure: heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1256–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1988a) Does nutrient limitation of phytoplankton occur in situ? Verh internat Verein Limnol 23:707–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1988b) Some size relationships in phytoflagellate motility. Hydrobiologia 161:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1991) A comparison of the Droop and Monod models of nutrient limited growth applied to natural population of phytoplankton. Funct Ecol 5:535–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1994) Planktologie. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (2005) Biologische meereskunde, 2nd edn. Springer, berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Stibor H (2002) Cladocera – Copepoda – Tunicata: the role of three major mesozooplankton groups in pelagic food webs. Ecol Res 17:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U, Charalampous E, Genitsaris S, Moustaka-Gouni M (2017) Benefits, costs and taxonomic distribution of marine phytoplankton body size. J Plankton Res 39:494–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern R, Kraberg A, Bresnan E, Kooistra WHCF, Lovejoy C, Montresor M, Moran XAG, Not F, Salas R, Siano R, Vaulot D, Amaral-Zettler L, Zingone A, Metfies K (2018) J Plankton R 40:519–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe WHJ (1970) Relationships between growth rate and ribonucleic acid concentration in some invertebrates. J Fish Res Boar Can 27:606–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttle CA (2005) Viruses in the sea. Nature 437:356-351

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait RV (1981) Elements of marine ecology, 3rd edn. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Utermöhl H (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplanktonmethodik. Mitt internat Verein Limnol 9:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldhuis MUV, Kraay GW (2000) Application of flow cytometry in marine phytoplankton research: current applications and future perspectives. Sci Mar 64:121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling. Some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 58:175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsby AF, Reynolds CS (1980) Sinking and floating. In: Morris I (ed) The physiological ecology of phytoplankton. Blackwell, Boston, pp 371–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward BB (2013) How nitrogen is lost. Science 341:352–353

    Google Scholar 

  • West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science 284:1677–1679

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart G, Crump BC, Agterveld MPKV, Hagen F, Han SK (2002) Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aqu Microb Ecol 28:141–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Exercise Questions

Exercise Questions

The right-hand column of the table below indicates the place where the answer can be found or deduced logically from the information contained in the text.

Question

Section

1. Which major group of plants is not represented in water?

3.1

2. Which is the most important underrepresented animal higher taxon in water?

3.1

3. What is the meaning of the terms “photolithoautotrophic” and “chemoorganoheterotrophic”?

3.2

4. What is the carbon source of mixotrophic organisms?

3.2

5. Explain the difference between the photosynthesis of purple bacteria and cyanobacteria

3.2.1

6. Why is chemosynthesis bound to redox gradients?

3.2.2

5. Explain the difference between osmotrophy and phagotrophy.

3.2.3

6. How are absolute and specific metabolic rates related to body mass?

3.3.1

7. Can relationships between metabolic rates and body mass depend on food supply?

3.3.2

8. Which major groups of organic substances increase C:N ratios in biomass?

3.4.1

9. Which major groups of organic substances decrease C:P ratios in biomass?

3.4.1

10. Why is the C:N:P ratio of primary producers more variable than the C:N:P ratio of animals?

3.4.2

11. What is the numerical value and what is the biological basis of the Redfield ratio?

3.4.2

12. What distinguishes plankton from nekton?

3.5

13. How does plankton size relate to the methods of sampling, identification, and counting?

3.5.1, Box 3.2

14. Which higher taxon of phytoplankton has the biggest range in sizes?

3.5.2

15. Which higher taxon of phytoplankton is more diverse in freshwaters than in the ocean?

3.5.2

16. Which phytoplankton groups are mineral skeletal substances and which are the minerals?

3.5.2

17. What is the usual abundance and the main role of heterotrophic nanoflagellates?

3.5.3

18. What are the main functional differences between cladocerans, copepods, and appendicularians?

3.5.3

20. Which zooplankton taxonomic groups are gelatinous?

3.5.3

21. What is the difference between lecitotrophic and planktotrophic larvae?

3.5.3

22. How is the ontogenetic vertical migration of long-living copepods related to their life cycle?

3.5.3

19. What are the proximate and the ultimate causes for the diel vertical migration of zooplankton?

3.5.3

20. What is the usual abundance of heterotrophic bacteria in surface waters?

3.5.4

21. Can aquatic fungi have negative effects on phytoplankton? If yes, which groups and why?

3.5.5

22. Are viruses a problem for other plankton? If yes, why?

3.5.6

23. Which are the major higher animal taxa belonging to nekton?

3.6

24. Which nektonic animals breed on land?

3.6

24. Do pelagic fish have a typical shape? If yes, why?

3.6

25. Why do whales have no fur and seals have fur?

3.6

26. What is the difference between anadromic and catadromic migrations? Provide examples!

3.6

27. Why do humpback whales perform long north–south migrations?

3.6

28. Explain epibiosis

3.7.1

29. How can flat rock surfaces become a three-dimensional habitat for benthos?

3.7.1

30. Which are the most important primary producers in periphyton?

3.7.2

31. Which are the most important groups of benthic macroalgae?

3.7.2

32. What determines the upper limit of macroalgal distributions in the eulittoral?

3.7.2

33. Which major taxa of zoobenthos are exclusively marine and which contain also freshwater representatives?

3.7.3

34. Compare the mobility patterns of the various groups of mollusks and crustaceans

3.7.3

35. Explain the uniqueness of the locomotion of Echinodermata.

3.7.3

36. Are benthic fish morphologically distinct from pelagic ones?

3.7.3

37. Which effects have microbial mats on sediments?

3.8.2

38. Describe the life forms of flowering plants in water.

3.8.2

39. Can you find protists and animals in reduced sediment layers?

3.8.3

40. What are the morphological adaptations of animals living in the interstitial space?

3.8.3

41. How do buried polychaetes and bivalves get oxygen?

3.8.3

42. Give examples for endo- and epibenthic fish.

3.8.3

43. Why do sediments contain the biggest diversity of bacterial metabolic types at small spatial scales?

3.8.4

44. How many heterotrophic bacteria are found in oxidized sediments?

3.8.4

45. What are the reduced end products of nitrate and sulfate respiration?

3.8.4

46. Which oxidized and reduced substances are necessary for >N-based and for S-based chemosynthesis?

3.8.4

47. Compare the larval and the adult life spans of aquatic insects.

3.9

48. How do stream insects cope with the problem of the downstream drift of larvae?

3.9.1

49. Which aquatic insects can cause human health problems?

3.9.2

Glossary

abundance

number of individuals per volume or area

aerobic

in the presence of oxygen

ammonification

production of ammonium by →nitrate respiration

annamox: anaerobic

bacterial oxidation of ammonium by nitrate

anadromous migration

spawning migration from the sea to freshwaters

anaerobic

in the absence of oxygen

autotrophic

using carbon dioxide or bicarbonate as C-source for biomass production

bacteriochlorophyll

chlorophyll of photosynthetic bacteria, without Cyanobacteria

bacterivory

feeding on bacteria

bacterioplankton

bacterial plankton, usually excluding Cyanobacteria

benthos

organisms living at the bottom or at the margin of water bodies

biomass

mass of living organisms, usually expressed as fresh weight, dry weight, carbon content

carnivory

feeding on animal material

catadromous migration

spawning migration from freshwaters to the sea

chemolithoautotrophy

production of biomass using redox reactions as energy source, inorganic substance as electron donor, and carbon dioxide or bicarbonate as carbon source

chemosynthesis

chemolithoautotrophy

chlorophyll

primary photosynthetic pigment of plants, algae, and Cyanobacteria

C:N:P ratio

here used for the elemental composition of body mass

denitrification

production of N2 by nitrate respiration

detritus

dead organic matter

detritivory

feeding on detritus

DIC

dissolved inorganic carbon

DOC

dissolved organic carbon

endobenthos

benthos living within the substrate

endopelon

benthos living within mud

endopsammon

benthos living within sand

epibenthos

benthos living on the substrate

epipelon

benthos living on mud

epipsammon

benthos living on sand

eulittoral

intertidal zone

femtoplankton

plankton <0.2 μm (viruses)

fermentation

energy gain by splitting organic molecules into an oxidized and a reduced component

filtration

feeding by taking food particles from a suspension by sieve- or filter-like structures

flagellate

unicellular organism moving by flagella

gas vacuoles

gas-filled vesicles in cells of Cyanobacteria

herbivory

feeding on plant material

heterotrophy

biomass production by using organic substances as C-source

HNF

heterotrophic nanoflagellate (2–20 μm)

holoplankton

organisms with complete life cycle in plankton

induction

triggering of morphological or behavioral changes by environmental stimuli

intraspecific

within species

interspecific

between species

interstitial

space between sediment grains

kairomone

substance released from a predator which induces responses by a prey

lithotrophy

biomass production using inorganic electron donors

littoral

marginal zone of water bodies

macrobenthos

benthos >1 (2) mm

macroplankton

plankton 2 mm–2 cm

megaplankton

plankton >2 cm

meiobenthos

benthos 100(200) μm–1(2) mm

meroplankton

organisms with part of their life cycle in plankton

microbenthos

benthos <100(200) μm

microplankton

plankton 20–200 μm

mixoplankton

mixotrophic plankton

mixotrophy

combination of auto- and heterotrophic nutrition

nanoplankton

plankton 20–200 μm

nekton

swimming open water organisms

nitrate respiration

respiration using nitrate as oxidative agent

nitrogen fixation

use of N2 as a nitrogen source for biomass production

organotrophy

biomass production using organic substances as electron donors

osmotrophy

heterotrophic nutrition based on DOC

parasite

heterotrophic organisms feeding on body substances of the (usually bigger) host

parasitoid

lethal parasite

phagotrophy

heterotrophic nutrition based on POC

photosynthesis

biomass production using light as energy source

phototrophy

photosynthesis

plankton

drifting open water organisms

POC

particulate organic carbon

POM

particulate organic matter

proximate factor

environmental trigger for morphological or behavioral changes

Redfield-ratio

C:N:P ratio (106:16:1) typical for phytoplankton under sufficient N and p supply

respiration

oxidation of organic matter to gain energy for vital processes

reef

hard bottom structure built by benthic organisms

specific metabolic rate

metabolic rate per unit body mass

sulfur bacteria

bacteria using redox reactions of sulfur for energy gain

sulfate respiration

respiration using sulfate as oxidative agent

ultimate factor

environmental factor which has selected for morphological or behavioral traits in evolutionary past

vertical migration

diel up and down migration of plankton and nekton or ontogenetic shift in vertical position

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sommer, U. (2023). Life Forms of Aquatic Organisms. In: Freshwater and Marine Ecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42459-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics