Academia.eduAcademia.edu
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 9(5): 1129–1131, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Chec List Journal of species lists and distribution Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes, 1846 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae): New record in rio Sergipe basin, northeastern Brazil Marcelo Fulgêncio Guedes de Brito1*, Marlene Silva de Almeida Pereira1 and Carlos Augusto Figueiredo2 1 Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação. Av. Marechal Rondon s/n, Rosa Elze. CEP 49100-000. São Cristóvão, Sergipe, SE, Brazil. 2 Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biociências, Núcleo de Gestão Ambiental, Av. Pasteur, nº 458, Sala 512-F. CEP 22290-240. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. * Corresponding author. Email: marcelictio@gmail.com Abstract: The present paper reports the first record of non-native species Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes, 1846 in northeastern Brazil in rio Sergipe basin, a coastal drainage of the Sergipe state. This species was collected at seven sites in the Caatinga biome. The cause of the introduction is not known, but we believe it is a direct impact of the aquarium trade through the aquarium dumping performed by hobbyists. The presence of P. sphenops in natural waterbodies increases concerns for interference with native ecosystems, and the risk of eggs predation in native species with low fecundity and absence of parental care such as Astyanax lacustris and Serrapinnus heterodon, competition and hybridization with the native poeciliid Poecilia vivipara. Poeciliidae is the most important family of Cyprinodontiformes, represented from eastern United States to South America and Africa including Madagascar (Nelson 2006). Three subfamilies are recognized: Aplocheilichthyinae (22 species), Procatopodinae (61 species), and Poeciliinae (273 species) (Eschemeyer and Fong 2013). Members of the subfamily Poeciliinae have a modified anal-fin with a copulatory organ called the gonopodium, which makes internal fertilization possible (Parenti 1981) (see Figure 1, inset). Embryos develop internally in this subfamily, varying from matrotrophic to lecitotrophic types (Kunz 2004). Owing to their attractive appearance, some species are important in the aquarium trade (Axelrod et al. 2007), where, in Brazil, the most common species being the guppy (Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859); the black molly (melanic variety of Poecilia sphenops); the swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri Hekel, 1848); the platyfish [X. maculatus (Günther, 1866)]; the variable platyfish [X. variatus (Meek, 1904)], and the sail-fin mollies [P. velifera (Regan, 1914), and P. latipinna (Lesueur, 1821)] (Alves et al. 2007; Magalhães and Jacobi 2008). In addition to the aquarium trade, it is not uncommon for some species to be used as biological controls of mosquitoes such as P. reticulata (Sherley 2000; Chandra et al. 2008). Figure 1. Adult male of non-native Poecilia sphenops (31.8 mm SL) and tip of the modified anal-fin (gonopodium). Scale bar = 1 mm. 1129 Brito et al. | New record of Poecilia sphenops in northeastern Brazil The molly Poecilia sphenops occurs from Mexico to Colombia (Lucinda 2003). Presents greater plasticity and survival at different gradients of temperature (Báron et al. 2002; Hernández and Bückle 2002; Evans et al. 2011). This paper reports the first record of non-native P. sphenops in water bodies at northeastern Brazil. Poecilia sphenops (Figure 1) was collected at seven sites in the rio Sergipe basin, Sergipe state, northeastern Brazil (Figure 2) under SISBIO permit # 20104-1. This is a small coastal drainage of Sergipe state, limited to the north by São Francisco and Japaratuba basins, and south by Vaza-Barris basin (Rocha 2006). The region of sampled sites is typical of the Caatinga, a unique Brazilian biome, where the climate is semiarid and the rivers are subject to hydrological stress (Prado 2003). Voucher specimens used in this study are deposited under their respective catalogue numbers CIUFS 581, CIUFS 589, CIUFS 647 and CIUFS 681, in the Universidade Federal de Sergipe fish collection (CIUFS). Trawl (5 mm mesh) and sieve (4 mm mesh) were deployed in shallow waters during the day (four persons during 20 minutes), catching 348 specimens of P. sphenops. Fishes were euthanized (Borsky and Hodson 2003), fixed in 10% formalin and later stored in 70% ethanol (Uieda and Castro 1999). It was syntopic to native species the lambari Astyanax lacustris (Lütken, 1875), piaba Serrapinnus heterodon (Eigenmann, 1915), barrigudinho Poecilia vivipara Bloch and Schneider, 1801 and the cará Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1824). Two Figure 2. Map of records of non-native Poecilia sphenops in rio Sergipe basin, Sergipe state, northeastern Brazil. other non-native species were recorded at the same sites: guppy Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859; and Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758). The collection included 204 females (13.70 – 47.70 mm SL), 78 males (13.70 – 44.12 mm SL) and 66 juveniles (8.00 – 13.52 mm SL). The analysis of some ovaries (n= 50) revealed reproductive females and embryos in distinct developmental stages (sensu Haynes 1995). These records and the presence of juveniles suggest natural recruitment of P. sphenops in rio Sergipe basin. The presence of P. sphenops in Brazil was recorded in Rio de Janeiro state at rivers in the urban region of Japarepaguá at Rio de Janeiro city (Bizerril and SilveiraPrimo 2001), and Minas Gerais state at Paraíba do Sul, and São Francisco basins (Alves et al. 2007; Chaves and Magalhães 2010). These introductions were associated with the aquarium trade as people gave up the hobby and released them into public waters through the aquarium dumping (Bizerril and Primo 2001; Padilla and Williams 2004; Alves et al. 2007; Chaves and Magalhães 2010). Poecilia sphenops probably reached the rivers of rio Sergipe basin the same way. Alternatively, owing to its reputation as a voracious fish, it was released to control for mosquito larvae. The highly larvivorous capacity of fish belonging to Poeciliidae family led to the introduction in several countries (Sherley 2000; Chandra et al. 2008), wherein fishes find suitable conditions they can become invasive (Puth and Post 2005). The possible establishment of P. sphenops should be verified to evaluate its effects on native species with low fecundity and absence of parental care such as A. lacustris and S. heterodon, and especially P. vivipara, a species of same genus and similar life history attributes. It is generally acknowledged that closely related species compete for similar resources (Hutchinson 1959), and invasive species, especially cultivated ones, selected for their resilience, are more prone to be invasive, and may outcompete native species using the same niches (Alves et al. 2007). The hybridization between invasive and native species is a threat to conservation. Genetic introgression cannot be dismissed because hybrids between native P. vivipara and non-native P. mexicana were already recorded by Courtenay and Meffe (1989), and the same may be true with the invasive P. sphenops and the native P. vivipara. This case deserves attention since there are records of establishment of Poecilia with consequences to native fauna (Sherley 2000; Evans et al. 2011). The probable establishment of P. sphenops in rio Sergipe basin is of concern, because where this poeciliid become established, they tend to disperse naturally and colonize new areas, and these areas are mangroves of rio Sergipe estuary. According to Petrescu-Mag et al. (2008), this species are capable of surviving in coastal brackish waters. Finally, the presence of P. reticulata, another non-native poeciliid species in Sergipe’s drainages also needs to be investigated. Acknowledgments: We thank all the members of the Laboratório de Ictiologia (UFS) who helped us with the field work. Fapitec (#019.203.00909/2009-8) and CNPq (#483103/2010-1) for financial support. Special thanks to Hans Kelstrup for revision of the English version, and for the suggestions of an anonymous reviewer. 1130 Brito et al. | New record of Poecilia sphenops in northeastern Brazil Literature Cited Alves, C.B.M., F. Vieira, A.L.B. Magalhães and M.F.G. Brito. 2007. Impacts of non-native fish species in Minas Gerais, Brazil: present situation and prospects; p. 291-314 In T.M. Bert (ed.). Ecological and Genetic Implications of Aquaculture Activities. New York: Springer. Axelrod, G.S., W.E. Burgess, H.R. Axelrod, N. Pronek and J.G. Walls.2007. Dr. Axelrod´s Atlas of Freshwater Aquarium Fishes. Neptune City: T.F.H. Publications Inc. 1160 p. Báron, S.B., R.F. Bückle and S. Espina. 2002. Environmental factors and sexual differentiation in Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Aquaculture Research 33: 615-619. Bizerril, C.R.S.F. and P.B. Silveira-Primo. 2001. Peixes de águas interiores do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável – Projeto Planágua SEMADS/GTZ. 417 p. Borski, R.J. and R.G. Hodson. 2003. Fish research and the institutional animal care and use committee. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research 44(4): 286-294. Chandra, G., I. Bhattacharjee, S.N. Chatterjeeand and A. Ghosh. 2008. Mosquito control by lavivororous fish. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2008: 13-27. Chaves, M.R. and A.L.B. Magalhães. 2010. Peixes ornamentais nãonativos introduzidos por aquaristas em um parque urbano de Belo Horizonte, MG. Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia 101: 6-7. Courtenay, W.R. Jr. and G.K. Meffe. 1989. Small fishes in strange places: a review of introduced poeciliids; p. 319–331 In G.K. Meffe and R.F. Snelson (ed.). Ecology and evolution of live bearing fishes (Poeciliidae). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Eldredge, L.G. 1994. Perspectives in aquatic exotic species management in the Pacific Islands. Vol. 1: Introductions of commercially significant aquatic organisms to the Pacific Islands. Hawaii: Pacific Science Association. 127 p. Eschemeyer, W.N. and J.D. Fong. 2013 Catalog of Fishes. Electronic Database accessible at http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/ research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp. Captured on 22 October 2013. Evans, J.P., A. Pilastro and I. Schulpp. 2011. Ecology and evolution of Poeciliid fishes. Chicago: The University Chicago Press. 409 p. Haynes, J.L. 1995. Standardized classification of poeciliid development for life-history studies. Copeia 1995(1): 147-154. Hernández, M. and L.F. Bückle 2002. Temperature tolerance polygon of Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes. Journal of Thermal Biology 27:1-5. Hutchinson, G.E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist 93(870):145-159 Kunz, Y.W. 2004. Developmental biology of Teleost fishes. Dordrecht: Springer. 636 p. Lucinda, P.H.F. 2003.Family Poeciliidae; p: 555-581 In R.E. Reis, S.O. Kullander and C.J. Ferraris-Jr.(ed.). Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs. Magalhães, A.L.B. and Jacobi, C.M. 2008. Ornamental exotic fish introduced into Atlantic forest water bodies, Brazil. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 3: 73-77. Nelson, J.S. 2006. Fishes of the world. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 601 p. Padilla, D. K. and S. L. Williams. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Frontier in Ecology and the Environment 2(3): 131-138 Parenti, L.R. 1981. A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of cyprinodontiform fishes (Teleostei, Atherinomorpha). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 168: 335-557. Petrescu-Mag, I.V., L.R. Lozinsky, L. Csép and R.M. Petrescu-Mag. 2008 Vegetation and predators mediate color pattern frequencies in Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation Bioflux 1: 51-61. Prado, D. 2003. As caatingas da América do Sul; p. 3-73 In I.R. Leal, M. Tabarelli and J.M.C. Silva (ed.). Ecologia e conservação da Caatinga. Recife: Editora Universitária UFPE. Puth, L.M. and D.M. Post. 2005. Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecology Letters 8: 715-721. Rocha, A.F. 2006. Caracterização da bacia hidrográfica do rio Sergipe; p. 23-63 In Alves, J.P.H. (org.). Rio Sergipe: importância, vulnerabilidade e preservação. São Cristóvão: Editora UFS. Sherley, G. 2000. Invasive species in the Pacific: a technical review and draft regional strategy. New Zeland: SPREP´s Publications Unit. 190 p. Uieda, V.S. and R.M.C. Castro. 1999. Coleta e fixação de peixes de riacho; p. 01-22 In E.P. Caramaschi, R. Mazzoni and P.R. Peres-Neto (ed.). Ecologia de Peixes de Riachos. Série Oecologia Brasiliensis (vol VI). Rio de Janeiro: PPGE-UFRJ. Received: July 2013 Accepted: September 2013 Published online: October 2013 Editorial responsibility: Tiago Pinto Carvalho 1131