International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2016; 4(3): 528-531
ISSN: 2347-5129
(ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62
(GIF) Impact Factor: 0.352
IJFAS 2016; 4(3): 528-531
© 2016 IJFAS
www.fisheriesjournal.com
Received: 06-03-2016
Accepted: 07-04-016
M Raja
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636 011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
R Karthik Raja
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636 011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
R Ramkumar
Department of Biotechnology,
Padmavani Arts & Science
College for Women, Salem 636 011, Tamil Nadu, India.
M Kavitha
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636 011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
D Aiswarya
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636 011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
P Deepak
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636 011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
P Perumal
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636 011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
Correspondence
P Perumal
Department of Biotechnology,
Periyar University, Periyar
Palkalai Nagar, Salem - 636011,
Tamil Nadu, India.
First report on the occurrence of abnormal vertebraecontaining Giant Danio-fish, Devario aequipinnatus
(McClelland, 1839) in Stanley Reservoir of Cauvery
River, Tamil Nadu (India)
M Raja, R Karthik Raja, R Ramkumar, M Kavitha, D Aiswarya, P
Deepak and P Perumal
Abstract
Vertebral deformities in a wild specimen of Giant Danio- fish, Devario aequipinnatus (McClelland in
1839) (Cyprinidae: Danioninae), are reported for the first time from Stanley reservoir of Cauvery river.
Radiological and morphological study of a normal and deformed fish revealed vertebral malformation in
the caudal to the dorsal fin. Adverse environmental factors, such as chemical pollution of the habitat, are
considered to be the cause of such deformities.
Keywords: Malformation, X-ray image, Western Ghats, India.
1. Introduction
The Giant Danio (Devario aequipinnatus) is a tropical fish belonging to the minnow family,
Cyprinidae and it is one of the big sized among Danionins. This Giant Danio- fish, was
described by McClelland in 1839 [1] from Assam and its members are distributed throughout
the freshwaters of South and Southeast Asia, from Pakistan to Thailand [2]. It is a hill stream
fish, inhabits streams as low as 300 m elevation. Its size ranges from around 40 to 80 mm in
standard length and exhibit a colour pattern consisting of a series of bars and/or stripes [3].
Along the sides of the body. The fish is naturally accustomed to life under varying stream
habitats. Also it has been found to be peaceful and hardy in aquaria. Giant Danios is abound in
running streams and rivers, and are generally adopted to moderately cool and well-aerated
water. It is a least concern species IUCN [4]. The Giant Danio species Devario aequipinnatus is
intended to be a model species as it has gained a great importance in the field of
developmental genetics, functional genomics, aquatic toxicology, neuro science and in many
areas of biomedical research [5]. More recently, the Giant Danio has been proposed as a model
to study skeletal muscle growth [6], cardiac remodeling and regeneration [7], visual impairment
of retinal layer associated with diabetic retinopathy [5].
Deformities in teleosts have been occasionally found in wild populations [8, 9], and several such
studies have focused on the deformities of the skeletal region and wide range of causes has
been reported [10, 11]. Many such malformed fishes belonging to other orders have already been
reported. Viz, Labeo fimbriatus, Catla catla, Labeo rohita [12]. Cirrhinus mrigala and
Hypothalmichthys molitrix [13]. Ompok bimaculatus, Mystus cavasius, Channa punctatus,
Channa striatus, Heteropneustes fossilis, Notopterus notopterus [14]. Bagarius bagarius [15];
Mystus gulio [16]. Puntius denisonii [17]. Catla catla [18]. Clarias gariepinus [19]. However,
information about the abnormalities of Devario aequipinnatus is scanty and this is being
reported for the first time, a case of deformity in wild populations of D. aequipinnatus from
Stanley reservoir of Cauvery River.
2. Materials and Methods
During the course of regular fish samplings, a deformed specimen of Devario aequipinnatus
(n=1) was caught by cast net from Stanley reservoir of Cauvery river, (11° 53' 21.33" N, 77°
50' 33.12" E), on 12th November. 2015. after taking photograph of the morphological
abnormality with a digital camera (Canon 1100 Digital SLR), the fish was preserved in 7%
Formalin solution.
~ 528 ~
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
The deformity was further examined by digital X-ray system
(Fujifilm FCR Capsula XL II Reader). For the comparison
purpose, a normal fish (Figs. 1 A & B) of same catch (Total
Length= 89.1 mm, Standard Length= 73.1 mm, Total
Weight= 7.495 g) was also collected. The collected specimens
were transported to the Department of Biotechnology Cum
Laboratory Museum of the Periyar University Museum of
Natural History (PUMNH), Salem, Tamil Nadu (India). The
specimens were with catalogue numbers (PUMNH 251/2015
& PUMNH 252/2015). The species identification and
confirmation were carried out using the available literature [20,
21]
. Morphometric measurements and meristic counts for
taxonomic identifications were carried out by the following
methods of Hubbs and Lagler [22]. Measurements were taken
to the nearest 0.1mm using digital calibers. Head characters
are expressed as proportion of Head Length (%HL), Head
length and body characters are expressed as proportion of
standard length (%SL).The species valid nomenclatural
names were adopted as per the Catalogue of Fishes of the
California Academy of Sciences [23] and fish status was
checked in IUCN red list (IUCN, 2013).
margin of lower jaw.
When compared to the normal fish the deformed specimen of
D. aequipinnatus possessed vertebral abnormality in the postdorsal fin region. Further the radiological examination has
revealed the presence of 35 and 34 vertebrae, in normal and
abnormal fish, respectively (Figs.2 A & B). Vertebral column,
in the aberrant fish, between 1st to 12th vertebrae, formed an
arc giving the appearance of a dome. Between 13th to 27th
vertebrae, vertebral column formed a semi-circular trough,
13th to 15th vertebrae formed the anterior limb of trough, 16th
to 25th vertebrae the bottom and 26rd to 28th vertebrae formed
the posterior limb of trough. Vertebrae have reduced
intervertebral space and vertebral thickness. Posteriorly,
vertebral column between 29th to 34th vertebrae slightly
truncated and vertebral thickness and intervertebral spaces
reduced.
3. Results
3.1 Description of the deformed specimen
The collected solitary aberrant specimen of Devario
aequipinnatus, measuring total length of 82.9 mm, standard
length of 64.6 mm and total weight of 7.105g was recognized
by the presence of post-dorsal dome and a trough between
dorsal and caudal regions (Figs. 1 A & B). The number of
lateral line scales was 34 in both normal and abnormal fish.
The lateral line scales was normal and have run from anterior
to the posterior end of the body. In this aberrant fish
specimen, lateral line, after 17th scales, posteriorly formed a
trough follows by a dome between 18th to 34th scales. Number
of fin rays in paired and unpaired fins of this aberrant fish
showed no deviation from the normal fish (Table. 1). Dorsal
fin with iii.12 rays; anal fin with iii.13 rays; principal caudalfin rays 10+9; pelvic-fin rays i.7; pectoral-fin rays i.12.
Pectoral-fin origin slightly anterior to vertical through
posterior- most point of opercular opening, not reaching to
pelvic-fin origin when depressed. Pelvic-fin origin well in
advance of dorsal-fin origin, posterior most tip of pelvic fin
reaching to vertical through dorsal-fin origin. Dorsal-fin
origin anterior to anal-fin origin, its distal margin straight to
weakly convex. Anal-fin origin opposite to point of insertion
of 4th branched dorsal-fin ray, its distal margin straight.
Caudal fin forked, its lobes rounded distally, upper lobe
slightly longer than lower lobe. Lateral line complete,
declining steeply for first 7–8 scales, perforating 33 body
scales along its length. 12 scale rows around caudal peduncle;
pre-dorsal scales 16.
Body ratio showed a well-marked variation from the normal
fish (Table 2). Head and body compressed. Body depth was
greatest at pelvic-fin origin. Dorsal body surface profile
slightly more rounded than ventral body surface profile. Snout
was shorter, slightly greater in length than eye diameter. Cleft
of mouth oblique and extending to under the anterior margin
of the orbit; a bluntish knob at symphysis. A large, rounded
symphysial knob present on lower jaw, fitting into shallow
groove on inner margin of upper jaw with mouth closed. Two
pairs of barbels. Rostral barbels reaching to or slightly past
anterior margin of orbit. Maxillary barbels short, less than
half as long as rostral barbels. Dorsal surface of head with
well-developed skin grooves along supraorbital shelves. A
single row of small, conical tubercles present along upper
~ 529 ~
Fig 1: Normal (A) (live) and Deformed (B) (Formaldehyde fixed)
specimens of Devario aequipinnatus
Fig 2: Digital X-ray image of Devario aequipinnatus Normal (A)
and Deformed (B)
Table 1: Meristic counts of normal and abnormal specimens of
Devario aequipinnatus. NS: Normal specimen; DS: Deformed
specimen.
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Meristic counts
Unbranched dorsal fin rays
Branched dorsal fin rays
Unbranched anal fin rays
Branched anal fin rays
Unbranched pelvic fin rays
Branched pelvic fin rays
Unbranched pectoral fin rays
Branched pectoral fin rays
Caudal fin upper lobe
Caudal fin lower lobe
Lateral line scales
Predorsal scales
Upper transverse rows
Lateral line to pelvic scale rows
Lower transverse rows (anus)
Circumpeduncular scales
Anal scale rows
NS (n=1)
3
12
3
13
1
7
1
12
10
9
34
14
6.5
4.5
3.5
12
2
DS (n=1)
3
12
3
13
1
7
1
12
10
9
33
14
6.5
4.5
3.5
12
2
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
Table 2: Morphological measurements of normal and abnormal
specimens of Devario aequipinnatus. NS: Normal specimen; DS:
Deformed specimen.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Morphometric counts
Total length (mm)
Standard length (mm)
Snout to urocentrum
Preanal length
Predorsal length
Prepelvic length
Prepectoral length
Peduncle length
Dorsal origin to pelvic insertion
Dorsal spinous height
Anal fin height
Peduncle depth
Caudal fin length
Dorsal fin height
Pectoral fin length
Pelvic fin length
Pelvic auxiliary scale length
Occiput to dorsal origin
Occiput to pectoral insertion
Occiput to pelvic insertion
Dorsal insertion to pelvic insertion
Dorsal origin to pectoral insertion
Dorsal origin to anal origin
Dorsal insertion to caudal base
Dorsal insertion to anal insertion
Dorsal fin base length
Anal fin base length
Pectoral insertion to pelvic insertion
Pectoral insertion to anal origin
Pelvic insertion to anal origin
Post dorsal length
Body depth
Distance b/w pectoral fin to vent
Distance b/w pelvic fin to vent
Head length (mm)
Snout to opercle
Upper jaw length
Snout length
Prenasal length
Orbit width
Interorbital width
Internasal width
Preoccipital length
Head width
Lower jaw to isthmus
Head depth at nostril
Head depth at pupil
Head depth at occiput
NS (n=1)
89.1
73.1
98.5
62.9
59.2
34.4
25.8
27.1
29.7
19.7
15.8
11.4
25.2
20.1
21.8
14.2
4.7
42.7
20.7
36.4
18.6
27.1
27.4
22.1
17.6
22.5
21.2
21.5
40.7
14.2
43.3
26.4
38.2
17.4
18.7
87.8
30.9
18.0
15.9
35.0
29.4
24.6
76.4
94.5
103.6
39.6
61.6
90.7
4. Discussion
In fish, individual and population levels of abnormality have
been shown to be positively related to a wide range of abiotic,
biotic and genetic stresses. Environmental stress can give rise
to decreased developmental stability of individuals, which
may result in reduced performance of fitness components [24,
25]
. Abiotic factors such as acidification, toxic chemicals or
heavy metals are considerable to be the common stressors that
produce an elevated levels of deformities [26, 27, 28]. From the
present study, it is clear that the fish teratology is very
complex and cannot be attributed to a single factor but it
would have been due to the effect of multiple factors such as
pollution, salinity fluctuations, low level of dissolved oxygen,
radiation etc. However, genetic study of these fishes would
help us to find out the exact cause of these abnormalities and
still further study is needed.
DS (n=1)
82.9
64.6
98.6
67.2
62.5
50.3
27.5
23.1
32.9
28.7
18.6
11.5
30.9
25.0
23.5
17.0
4.7
40.9
45.7
45.7
25.1
31.1
31.0
30.0
17.8
19.0
16.0
19.6
35.8
15.9
33.7
35.8
36.0
17.1
18.3
67.9
30.1
24.7
11.8
31.9
28.5
25.1
75.5
84.1
69.2
37.5
63.6
83.6
5. Acknowledgements
The first author is grateful to SERB- DST (Government of
India) – for approval of Startup Research Grant for Young
Investigators (File No. DST No. SB/YS/LS-36/2013) to carry
out this study. The authors of this research work are thankful
to Tamil Nadu - State Inland Fisheries Department, and Mr.
S. Mathiyalagan Mettur Dam for their kind support fish
samplings.
3.2 Coloration
In life, yellowish white; a wide bluish band extends along the
body from the eye to the centre of the base of the caudal fin;
in its course are sometimes several round silvery spots; below
it was another narrow band (which occasionally joined the
central one anteriorly); there were two other lighter bands
above the central one. The intermediate ground colour was
yellow. Fins yellowish. Dorsal and anal fins each with a broad
bluish band along their outer half. In some specimen there
was a dark mark behind the gill opening. Median fins with
light scattering of small melanophores along interradial
membranes, except anterodistal most tips of dorsal and anal
fins, which are devoid of pigment. Pectoral and pelvic fins
without pigmentation.
6. References
1. McClelland J. Indian Cyprinidae. Asiatic Researches,
1839; 19:217-471.
2. Barman RP. A taxonomic revision of the Indo-Burmese
species of Danio, Hamilton Buchanan (Pisces:
Cyprinidae). Records of the Zoological Survey of India.
Occasional Paper 1991; 137:1-91.
3. Fang F. Redescription of Danio kakhienensis, a poorly
known cyprinid fish from the Irrawaddy basin. Ichthyol.
Explor. Freshw 1997a; 7:289-298.
4. IUCN. Red List of Threatened Species. 2013. Version,
2013.
Electronic
Database
accessible
at
http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
5. Raja M, Kavitha M, Ramkumar R, Anandhi M. Perumal
P. The ‘Giant Danio’ (Devario aequipinnatus) - Another
Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Study: Induction of
Hyperglycemia and Resultant Retinal Impairment.
Endocrinol Diabetes Res., 2015; 1:2.
6. Biga PR, Meyer J. Growth hormone differentially
regulates growth and growth-related gene expression in
closely related fish species. Comp Biochem Physiol A
Mol Integr Physiol., 2009; 154:465-473.
7. Lafontant PJ, Burns AR, Grivas JA, Lesch MA, Lala TD,
Reuter SP, et al. The Giant Danio (D. aequipinnatus) as a
model of cardiac remodeling and regeneration. Anat Rec
(Hoboken) 2012; 295:234-248.
8. Sennar IW. An Evolutionary Ecological Perspective. In:
Soule, M.E. and Wilcox, B.A. (Eds.). Conservation
Biology., California University Press, California. 1980,
161.
9. Tutman P, Glamuzina B, Skaramuca B, Kozul V, Glavic
N, Lucic D. Incidence of spinal deformities in natural
populations of sandsmelt, Atherina boyeri (Risso, 1810)
in the Neretva River Estuary, middle Adriatic. Fish. Res
2000; 45:61-64.
10. Orska J. Anomalies in the Vertebral column of the pike
Esox lucicus. Acta Biological Cracovtenym Series of
Zoology 1962; 5:327-345.
~ 530 ~
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
11. Koumoundouros G, Gagliardi F, Divanach P, Boglione
C, Cataudella S, Kentouri M. Normal and abnormal
osteological development of caudal fin in Sparus aurata
L.fry. Aquaculture 1997; 149:215-226.
12. Pilli CT, Thampy DM. Cases of deformities in some
cultivable fishes. Indian J Fish. 1990; 37:171-173.
13. Panday KD, Awasthi SK. In: Dehadari PV, Das P,
Verma, SR. (Eds.). Threatened fishes of India Nature
conservators, Muzaffarnagar, 1994, 480.
14. Raj AJA, Seetharaman S, Haniffa MA. Skeletal
deformities in few freshwater fishes from Bhavani River,
Tamil Nadu. J Zoos print. 2004; 19(9):1628-1629.
15. Subba BR. Abnormality in Bagarius bagarius (Ham.)
(Cypriniformes: Sisoridae) from Nepal. Our Nature.
2008; 6:26-29.
16. Marimuthu K, Haniffa MA, Muruganandam M, Raj AJA,
Johnson A. Vertebral column deformities in a freshwater
catfish Mystus gulio. Indian J Fish. 2000; 47(4):391-393.
17. Sajan S, Anna-Mercy TV, Malika V. Record of a wild
specimen of Redline torpedo fish, Puntius denisonii
(Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) with vertebral deformity
Anales de Biología. 2014; 36:33-35.
18. Wani MA, Dutta SPS. First Record of an Anomalous
Catla catla (Ham. Buch) in Fresh Water Fish Ponds of
Gurdaspur District, Punjab (India). J Aquac Res
Development. 2014; 5:246.
19. Alarape SA, Hussein TO, Adetunji EV, Adeyemo OK.
Skeletal and Other Morphological Abnormalities in
Cultured Nigerian African Catfish (Clarias Gariepinus,
Burchell 1822). IJFAS 2015; 2(5):20-25.
20. Talwar PK, Jhingran AG. Inland fishes of India and
adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New
Delhi. 1991, 2000; 1, 2:1-1158.
21. Jayaram KC. The freshwater fishes of the Indian Region.
Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi, India. 2010,
616.
22. Hubbs CL, Lagler KF. Fishes of the Great Lake region.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press. 1964, 213.
23. Eschmeyer WN, Fricke R. Catalog of Fishes electronic
version. Electronic database accessible at 2011, 2016.
http://research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/
catalog/ fishcatmain.asp/.
24. Clarke GM. Relationships between developmental
stability and fitness: application for conservation biology.
Conserv. Biol 1995; 9(1):18-24.
25. Moller AP, Swaddle JP. Asymmetry, developmental
stability, and evolution. Oxford Series in Ecology and
Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York. 1997,
291.
26. Allenbach DM, Sullivan KB, Lydy MJ. Higher
fluctuating asymmetry as a measure of susceptibility to
pesticides in fishes. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 1999;
18:899-905.
27. Franco A, Malavasi S, Pranovi F, Nasci C, Torricelli P.
Ethoxyresorufin Odeethylase (EROD) activity and
fluctuating
asymmetry
(FA)
in
Zosterisessor
ophiocephalus (Teleostei, Gobiidae) as indicators of
environmental stress in the Venice lagoon. J Aquat.
Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 2002; 9(4):239-247.
28. Estes ECJ, Katholi CR, Angus RA. Elevated fluctuating
asymmetry in eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki)
from a river receiving paper mill effluent. Environ.
Toxicol. Chem., 2006; 25:1026-1033.
~ 531 ~