19.05.2013 Views

Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College

Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College

Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Volume <strong>68</strong> July <strong>2001</strong> Number 2<br />

Formerly the<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

A semiannual journal of research devoted to<br />

Helminthology and all branches of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

CONTENTS<br />

CRISCIONE, C. D., AND W. F. FONT. Development and Specificity of Oochoristica<br />

javaensis (Eucestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae: Linstowiinae) . 149<br />

CRISCIONE, C. D., AND W. F. FONT. Artifactual and Natural Variation of Oochoristica<br />

javaensis: Statistical Evaluation of In Situ Fixation 156<br />

BOLEK, M. G., AND J. R. COGGTNS. Seasonal Occurrence and Community Structure of<br />

Helminth Parasites in Green Frogs, Rana damitans melanota, from Southeastern<br />

Wisconsin, U. S.A „ 164<br />

FORRESTER, D. J., G. W. FOSTER, AND J. E. THUL. Blood Parasites of the Ring-Necked<br />

Duck (Aythya collaris) on Its Wintering Range in Florida, U.S.A 173<br />

CARKENO, R. A., L. A. DURDEN, D. R. BROOKS, A. ABRAMS, AND E. P. HOBERG.<br />

Parelaphostrongylus tennis (Nematoda: Protostrongylidae) and Other Parasites of<br />

White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Costa Rica 177<br />

JOY, J. E., AND R. B. TUCKER. Cepedietta michiganensis (Protozoa) and Batracholandros<br />

magnavulvaris (Nematoda) from Plethodontid Salamanders in West Virginia,<br />

U.S.A x 185<br />

AGUIRRE-MACEDO, M. L., T. SCHOLZ, D. GoNzALEZ-SoLfs, V. M. VIDAL-MARTINEZ, P.<br />

POSEL, G. ARJANO-TORRES, S. DUMAILO, AND E. SIU-ESTRADA. Some Adult<br />

Endohelminths Parasitizing Freshwater Fishes from the Atlantic Drainages of<br />

Nicaragua .. 190<br />

SALGADO-MALDONADO, G., G. CABANAS-CARRANZA, J. M. CASPETA-MANDUJANO, E.<br />

SOTO-GALERA, E. MAYEN-PENA, D. BRAILOVSKY, AND R. BAEZ-VALE. Helminth<br />

Parasites of Freshwater Fishes of the Balsas River Drainage Basin of Southwestern<br />

Mexico 196<br />

SALGADO-MALDONADO, G., G. CABANAS-CARRANZA, E. SOTO-GALERA, J. M. CASPETA-<br />

MANDUJANO, R. G. MORENO-NAVARRETE, P. SANCHEZ-NAVA, AND R. AGUILAR-<br />

AGUILAR. A Checklist of Helminth Parasites of Freshwater Fishes from the<br />

Lerma- Santiago River Basin, Mexico . 204<br />

CURRAN, S. S., R. M. OVERSTREET, T. T. DANG, AND T. L. NGUYEN. Singhiatrema vietnamensis<br />

sp. n. (Digenea: Ommatobrephidae) and Szidatia taiwanensis (Fischthal<br />

and Kuntz, 1975) comb. n. (Digenea: Cyathocotylidae) from Colubrid Snakes in<br />

Vietnam . ; 219<br />

KUZMIN, Y., V V TKACH, AND S. D. SNYDER. Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. (Nematoda:<br />

Rhabdiasidae) from the North American Spotted Salamander Ambystoma maculaturn<br />

(Amphibia: Ambystomatidae) 228<br />

(Continued on Outside Back Cover)<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON<br />

THE SOCIETY meets approximately five times per year for the presentation and discussion of papers<br />

in any and all branches of parasitology or related sciences. All interested persons are invited to attend.<br />

Persons interested in membership in the Helminthological Society of Washington may obtain application<br />

blanks in recent issues of COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY. A year's subscription to<br />

COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY is included in the annual dues of S25.00 ($30.00 after December<br />

31, <strong>2001</strong>) for domestic membership and $28.00 ($33.00 after December 31, <strong>2001</strong>) for foreign membership.<br />

Institutional subscriptions are S50.0Q ($55.00 after December.31, <strong>2001</strong>) per year. Applications for<br />

membership, accompanied by payments, may be sent to the Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer, Nancy<br />

D. Pacheco, 9708 DePaul Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, U.S.A.<br />

The HelmSoc internet home page is located at http://www.gettysburg.edu/~shendrix/hehnsoc.hrml<br />

OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY FOR <strong>2001</strong><br />

President: DENNIS J. RICHARDSON<br />

Vice President: WILLIAM E. MOSER<br />

Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer: NANCY D. PACHECO<br />

Recording Secretary: W. PATRICK CARNEY<br />

Archivist/Librarian: PATRICIA A. PILITT<br />

Custodian of Back Issues: J. RALPH LICHTENFELS<br />

Representative to the American Society of Parasitologists: DENNIS J. RICHARDSON<br />

Executive Committee Members-at-Large: ALLEN L. RICHARDS, <strong>2001</strong><br />

BENJAMIN M. ROSENTHAL, <strong>2001</strong><br />

PETER J. HOTEZ, 2002<br />

RONALD C. NEAFIE, 2002<br />

Immediate Past President: ERIC P. HOBERG<br />

COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY<br />

COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY is published semiannually at Lawrence, Kansas by the<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington. Publication of COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY is supported<br />

in part by the Brayton H. Ransom Memorial Trust Fund.<br />

MANUSCRIPTS should be sent to the EDITORS, Drs. Willis A. Reid, Jr., and Janet W. Reid, 6210<br />

Hollins Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817-2349, email: jwrassoc@erols.com. Manuscripts must be typewritten,<br />

double spaced, and in finished form. Consult recent issues of the journal for format and style. The<br />

original and three copies are required. Photocopies of drawings may be submitted for review purposes<br />

but glossy prints of halftones are required; originals will be requested after acceptance of the manuscript.<br />

Papers are accepted with the understanding that they will be published only in the journal.<br />

REPRINTS may be ordered from the PRINTER at the same time the corrected proof is returned to<br />

the EDITORS.<br />

Manuscripts are received with the understanding that authors, or their institutions, will contribute to<br />

the partial payment of the PUBLICATION COSTS of the manuscripts. Authors' contributions to<br />

publication costs (currently $50/page for members, $100/page for non-members) will be<br />

billed by Allen Press and are payable to the Society.<br />

BACK ISSUES and VOLUMES of COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY are available. Inquiries concerning<br />

back volumes and current subscriptions should be directed to the business office.<br />

BUSINESS OFFICE. The Society's business office is at Lawrence, Kansas. All inquiries concerning<br />

subscriptions or back issues and all payments for dues, subscriptions, and back issues should be<br />

addressed to: Helminthological Society of Washington, % Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire St.,<br />

Lawrence, Kansas 66044, U.S.A.<br />

EDITORIAL BOARD<br />

<strong>2001</strong><br />

WALTER A BOEGER<br />

WILLIAM F. FONT<br />

DONALD FORRESTER<br />

J. RALPH LICHTENFELS<br />

JOHN S. MACKIEWICZ<br />

BRENT NICKOL<br />

WILLIS A. REID, JR. AND JANET W. REID, EDITORS<br />

2002<br />

DANIEL R. BROOKS<br />

HIDEO HASEGAWA<br />

SHERMAN S. HENDRIX<br />

JAMES E. JOY<br />

DAVID MARCOGLIESE<br />

DANTE S. ZARLENGA<br />

© The Helminthological Society of Washington <strong>2001</strong><br />

ISSN 1525-2647<br />

2003<br />

ROY C. ANDERSON<br />

DIANE P. BARTON<br />

LYNN K. CARTA<br />

RALPH P. ECKERLIN<br />

FUAD M. NAHHAS<br />

DANNY B. PENCE<br />

This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 149-155<br />

Development and Specificity of Oochoristica javaensis (Eucestoda:<br />

Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae: Linstowiinae)<br />

CHARLES D. CRISCIONE' AND WILLIAM F. FONT2<br />

Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana 70402, U.S.A.<br />

(2 e-mail: wffont@selu.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: Because assumptions of strict host specificity and geographic isolation apparently have been used<br />

as criteria in determining species of Oochoristica, studies were conducted to address the effects that these<br />

assumptions could have on resolving the taxonomy of Oochoristica. Experimental infections of native fence<br />

lizards, Sceloporus undulatus imdulatus, and Indo-Pacific geckos, Hemidactylus garnotii, demonstrated that the<br />

exotic tapeworm Oochoristica javaensis lacked host specificity. In addition, tapeworms with gravid proglottids,<br />

a stage of development that has not been previously reported for any species of Oochoristica, were obtained<br />

from both hosts. Evidence against the assumption of geographic isolation stems from the fact that lizard species<br />

known to harbor Oochoristica spp. have been introduced beyond their native ranges, and in some cases, these<br />

introductions predate the species descriptions. Lack of support for either assumption indicates a need for more<br />

rigorous analyses and experimentation to determine species of Oochoristica.<br />

KEY WORDS: Oochoristica javaensis, Cestoda, Hemidactylus turcicus, Hemidactylus garnotii, Sceloporus undulatus<br />

undulatus, Mediterranean geckos, Indo-Pacific geckos, fence lizards, development, host specificity, biogeography,<br />

taxonomy.<br />

Approximately 80 species have been described<br />

in the cosmopolitan genus Oochoristica<br />

Liihe, 1898 (Bursey and Goldberg, 1996a, b;<br />

Bursey et al., 1996, 1997; Brooks et al., 1999).<br />

These anoplocephalid cestodes predominantly<br />

parasitize lizards, but also snakes, turtles, and a<br />

few marsupials (Schmidt, 1986; Beveridge,<br />

1994). Development has been examined for<br />

Oochoristica vacuolata Hickman, 1954, Oochoristica<br />

osheroffi Meggitt, 1934, and Oochoristica<br />

anolis Hardwood, 1932 (Hickman, 1963;<br />

Widmer and Olsen, 1967; Conn, 1985). Although<br />

larval and adult development has been<br />

examined for 3 species of Oochoristica, only<br />

Conn (1985) tried to determine host specificity<br />

experimentally. In his experiments, however, he<br />

was unable to infect wall lizards, Podarcis muralis<br />

(Laurenti, 17<strong>68</strong>) and mice, Mm musculus<br />

Linnaeus, 1758. Curiously, no other attempts<br />

have been made to determine the specificity of<br />

a species of Oochoristica. This is unfortunate in<br />

that, as Brooks et al. (1999) pointed out, one of<br />

the major criteria used in resolving the taxonomy<br />

of Oochoristica has been the assumption of<br />

a high degree of host specificity exhibited by<br />

species in this genus. They also mentioned re-<br />

1 Corresponding author. Current address: Department<br />

of Zoology, 3029 Cordley Hall, Oregon <strong>State</strong><br />

University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, U.S.A. (e-mail:<br />

crischar@bcc.orst.edu).<br />

149<br />

striction to particular geographic regions as a<br />

criterion that has ostensibly been used in the past<br />

to identify species of Oochoristica.<br />

In a survey of helminths of the Mediterranean<br />

gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus (Linnaeus, 1758),<br />

from Louisiana, U.S.A., a species of Oochoristica<br />

was recovered (C. D. Criscione, unpublished<br />

data); however, there were difficulties in<br />

identifying this species. These problems were<br />

associated in part with the assumptions of strict<br />

host specificity and geographic isolation. It became<br />

apparent that in addition to the lack of<br />

specificity experiments, introduced and native<br />

host distributions were often ignored when identifying<br />

species of Oochoristica. Neither assumption<br />

has been properly addressed, and in order<br />

to validate the identification of any species of<br />

Oochoristica, these assumptions should be tested.<br />

In light of these problems with the taxonomy<br />

of Oochoristica, the primary objective of this<br />

study was to examine the development of Oochoristica<br />

javaensis Kennedy, Killick, and Beverley-Burton,<br />

1982, and to test the assumption<br />

of specificity via experimental infections. In addition,<br />

we comment on the assumption of geographic<br />

isolation.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

To minimize variation among hosts, gravid proglottids<br />

of O. javaensis were obtained from 15 worms recovered<br />

from the small intestine of a single female<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


150 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

tfl<br />

C<br />

a<br />

o<br />

ft.<br />

"S<br />

V><br />

_.<br />

(8<br />

O W<br />

a<br />

:c<br />

1<br />

Si<br />

as<br />

2<br />

H HM's"-^<br />

a<br />

O<br />

'S a<br />

s<br />

u<br />

13<br />

1 S<br />

a<br />

1<br />

|fi<br />

"ft<br />

G<br />

1 .10<br />

5<br />

1g<br />

•<br />

Q<br />

Oochoristic<br />

•S<br />

•S2c0)<br />

QJ<br />

leasur<br />

J<br />

E<br />

u<br />

"o<br />

Q<br />

n t^r-<br />

1<br />

r7<br />

in<br />

CJ<br />

CD<br />

s<br />

^^<br />

2<br />

d<br />

+ 1<br />

o<br />

cs<br />

rn<br />

S d<br />

Z<br />

'§<br />

J<br />

T)<br />

CL><br />

3<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

O<br />

O<br />

CS<br />

a)<br />

IfcH<br />

0<br />

u<br />

N<br />

'Z<br />

CU<br />

"a,<br />

a<br />

o<br />

O<br />


CRISCIONE AND FONT—DEVELOPMENT OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 151<br />

Table 2. Measurements of Oochoristica javaensis obtained from experimentally infected Hemidactylus<br />

garnotii (HEGA), and Sceloporus u. undulatus (SCUN) for day 105 postexposure; measurements in (xm<br />

unless noted otherwise.<br />

Variable<br />

Total<br />

Proglottid number<br />

Neck<br />

Scolex<br />

Sucker<br />

Immature proglottid<br />

Genital pore position||<br />

Mature proglottid<br />

Cirrus sac<br />

Ovary<br />

Vitellaria<br />

Testis<br />

Testes number<br />

Gravid proglottid<br />

Oncosphere<br />

Hook<br />

L± (mm)<br />

W<br />

L (mm)<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L (mm)<br />

W<br />

L<br />

L<br />

Sample<br />

size*<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

HEGA<br />

n = 5f<br />

SCUN<br />

Sample<br />

size n = 1<br />

61.6-86.9 (67.7 ± 48.3)§ 1 54.5<br />

109-144 (128 ± 5.7)<br />

1 140<br />

166-229 (191 ± 10.7) 1 221<br />

1.16-1.79 (1.52 ± 0.12) 1 1.12<br />

90-191 (152 ± 17.7) 1 218<br />

78-277 (140 ± 36.3) 1 164<br />

35-90 (61.8 ± 9.5) 1 82<br />

47-82 (66.4 ± 6.4) 1 105<br />

482-561 (520 ± 6.6)<br />

3 379-403 (390 ± 7.1)<br />

300-387 (348 ± 7)<br />

3 427-466 (443 ± 11.9)<br />

0.24-0.28 (0.27 ± 0.004) 3 0.24-0.28 (0.26 ± 0.01)<br />

593-695 (643 ± 9.1) 3 403-411 (406 ± 2.7)<br />

616-790 (712 ± 12.4) 3 648-695 (679 ± 15.7)<br />

43-51 (46.7 ± 0.47) 3 47-51 (49.7 ± 1.3)<br />

137-164 (146 ± 1.99) 3 109-121 (117 ± 4.0)<br />

265-351 (314 ± 6.0)<br />

3 1<strong>68</strong>-211 (91 ± 12.6)<br />

195-265 (230 ± 5.1)<br />

3 133-187 (159 ± 15.7)<br />

137-191 (169 ± 4.5) 3 86-105 (96.3 ± 5.6)<br />

82-144 (118 ± 4.3) 3 82-101 (89.7 ±5.8)<br />

39_47 (43.5 ± 0.77) 3 35-39 (36.3 ± 1.3)<br />

35-55 (46.2 ± 1.3) 3 39-43(41.7 ± 1.3)<br />

23-35 (30.8 ± 0.78) 3 21-30 (26.3 ± 2.7)<br />

571-749 (629 ± 12.6) 3 433-473 (453 ± 11.6)<br />

1.50-2.28 (1.92 ± 0.05) 3 1.48-1.52 (1.49 ± 0.01)<br />

20-34 (25.9 ± 1.04) 3 22 (22 ± 0.0)<br />

16-28 (21.5 ± 0.79) 3 18-20(19.3 ± 0.67)<br />

10-12 (11.6 ± 0.21) 3 12 (12 ± 0.0)<br />

* Sample size refers to the total number of each character that was measured.<br />

t Number of tapeworms measured.<br />

± L = length, W = width.<br />

§ Range followed by mean ± 1 SE in parentheses.<br />

|| Genital pore position was calculated as a ratio of the position along the length of the mature proglottid from the anterior end<br />

(length to the center of the genital pore -^ length of proglottid).<br />

mediate host for the genus Oochoristica. Oochoristica<br />

javaensis became established in 7 individuals<br />

of the experimental definitive hosts.<br />

Successful infection occurred in only 1 of 16 H.<br />

turciciis; this Mediterranean gecko was examined<br />

on day 1 PE and had an intensity of 4.<br />

Oochoristica javaensis was recovered from 3 of<br />

10 H. garnotii on days 7, 28, and 105 PE and<br />

had intensities of 1, 7, and 6, respectively. Three<br />

of 5 S. u. undulatus were infected with 2, 3, and<br />

1 tapeworms on days 10, 30, and 105 PE, respectively.<br />

The 10 A. carolinensis and 5 R.<br />

sphenocephala were negative for infections.<br />

Measurements for specimens from experimental<br />

infections are in Tables 1 and 2.<br />

Proglottid formation did not occur prior to<br />

day 28 PE (Figs. 1 and 2). Terminal proglottids<br />

of tapeworms recovered on day 28 PE from H.<br />

garnotii had developing ovaries, testes, vitellaria,<br />

and cirrus sacs (Fig. 3). A median terminal<br />

excretory pore was present in each terminal proglottid,<br />

and in 1 worm there was a developed<br />

genital atrium. Terminal proglottid length ranged<br />

from 514 to 822 (mean = 659, SE = 38.7, n =<br />

7) and width from 174 to 277 (mean = 216, SE<br />

= 12.4, n — 7). Two of the worms from S. u.<br />

undulatus examined on day 30 PE also had developing<br />

reproductive organs (Fig. 4). One measured<br />

442 X 158 (L X W); the other had been<br />

torn. The third tapeworm recovered from day 30<br />

PE had been damaged in the mounting process;<br />

however, prior examination had shown that no<br />

more than 15 proglottids had formed, sexual primoridia<br />

had just begun to develop, and total<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


152 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


length did not exceed 1.2 mm. By day 105 PE,<br />

development of O. javaensis progressed to strobilas<br />

with gravid proglottids in both H. garnotii<br />

(Fig. 5) and 5. u. undulatus (Fig. 6). Although<br />

it was possible that tapeworms from day 105 PE<br />

were natural infections because experimental definitive<br />

hosts were not laboratory-raised, prior<br />

fecal examinations were negative for all hosts<br />

used in experiments.<br />

Discussion<br />

Development of Oochoristica javaensis<br />

Prior to the present study, the most developed<br />

stage experimentally obtained for a species of<br />

Oochoristica was a terminal mature proglottid<br />

(Conn, 1985). Our experimental infections with<br />

O. javaensis were successful in obtaining gravid<br />

specimens. Susceptible definitive hosts for O. javaensis<br />

included H. turcicus, H. garnotii, and 5.<br />

u. undulatus; however, the fact that only 1 of 16<br />

control hosts, H. turcicus, became infected suggests<br />

that exposure techniques may have been<br />

flawed. Possible problems may have been the<br />

temperature at which experimental hosts were<br />

housed or the inoculation method. When dealing<br />

with small hosts, the stomach tube may not be<br />

the best method, and another, such as placing<br />

metacestodes in gel capsules, may prove to be<br />

more efficient. Despite the scarcity of infections,<br />

however, the developing worms obtained from<br />

H. garnotii and S. u. undulatus indicated a lack<br />

of specificity for O. javaensis.<br />

On day 105 PE, Conn (1985) recovered a single<br />

specimen of O. anolis from A. carolinensis<br />

that had mature proglottids with fully formed<br />

male and female reproductive systems. The terminal<br />

proglottid, however, still had a median excretory<br />

pore, suggesting that this specimen had<br />

not yet shed any proglottids. Specimens of O.<br />

javaensis from H. garnotii on day 28 PE also<br />

had median excretory pores in the terminal proglottids.<br />

Although most of the specimens that we<br />

recovered from day 28 PE did not have fully<br />

developed reproductive organs, their stage of development<br />

had greatly surpassed the develop-<br />

CRISCIONE AND FONT—DEVELOPMENT OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 153<br />

mental stage of O. anolis from day 28 PE (Conn,<br />

1985). Oochoristica anolis from green anoles on<br />

day 28 PE had just begun to form proglottids<br />

with genital anlages and had a maximum total<br />

length of 3.25 mm (Conn, 1985). Widmer and<br />

Olsen (1967) reported immature O. osheroffi<br />

with a maximum total length of 4.14 mm on day<br />

28 PE in the prairie rattlesnake, Crotalus viridis<br />

Rafinesque, 1818, but the mean total worm<br />

length from our study for day 28 PE was 8.32<br />

mm (Table 1). These comparisons suggest a<br />

more rapid development in the definitive host<br />

for O. javaensis than for O. anolis or O. osheroffi.<br />

However, small sample sizes in our study<br />

and infection techniques differing from previous<br />

life cycle studies of Oochoristica spp. prevented<br />

definitive comparison of developmental patterns<br />

among species. Likewise, the low number of infections<br />

precluded examination of host-induced<br />

variation for O. javaensis. Although development<br />

in S. u. undulatus appeared slightly slower<br />

than in H. garnotii up to day 30 PE (Table 1),<br />

measurements of gravid specimens from H. garnotii<br />

and S. u. undulatus on day 105 PE (Table<br />

2) may suggest plasticity for some characters.<br />

Host specificity and geographic isolation<br />

Results from our study experimentally demonstrated<br />

for the first time that a single species<br />

of Oochoristica can infect more than 1 species<br />

of host. Oochoristica javaensis infected hosts<br />

representing 2 unrelated lizard families, Phrynosomatidae<br />

for S. u. undulatus and Gekkonidae<br />

for H. garnotii (Estes et al., 1988; Pough et al.,<br />

1998). It is not known if the ecology of either<br />

S. it. undulatus or H. garnotii would predispose<br />

natural populations of these hosts to the establishment<br />

of O. javaensis. Development in different<br />

hosts demonstrated via our laboratory experiments,<br />

however, raises questions with regard<br />

to the use of host specificity as a taxonomic criterion<br />

for species of Oochoristica. Specificity in<br />

the laboratory and in the field should be examined<br />

for other species of Oochoristica in light of<br />

these results for 2 reasons. First, lack of speci-<br />

Figures 1-6. Development of Oochoristica javaensis from Hemidactylus garnotii (HEGA) and Sceloporus<br />

u. undulatus (SCUN) at different days postexposure. Photomicrographs were taken with differential<br />

interference contrast. Bars = 200 jjim. 1. Day 7 in HEGA. 2. Day 10 in SCUN. 3, 4. Terminal proglottids<br />

from day 28 in HEGA and day 30 in SCUN, respectively. 5, 6. Mature proglottids from day 105 in HEGA<br />

and SCUN, respectively. CS = cirrus sac, GA = genital atrium, O = ovary, T = testis, and V = vitellaria.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


154 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

ficity means that tapeworms of the same species<br />

will be exposed to different environments in different<br />

species of hosts, thus presenting opportunities<br />

for host-induced variation. If variation is<br />

induced, then this may affect the current morphometrically<br />

based taxonomy of species of<br />

Oochoristica. Second, a better understanding of<br />

the degree to which species of Oochoristica can<br />

switch hosts is imperative in light of the conservation<br />

implications associated with introduced<br />

organisms and their parasites (see Barton,<br />

1997).<br />

Introduced lizards will have consequences not<br />

only for conservation, but also for parasite taxonomy.<br />

If in the past, species of Oochoristica<br />

have been transmitted with their exotic lizard<br />

hosts, then current assumptions of biogeographic<br />

isolation may be incorrect. This is not to say that<br />

there was never a biogeographic pattern that paralleled<br />

Oochoristica speciation, but especially<br />

because of anthropogenic effects, species of<br />

Oochoristica may have colonized new areas before<br />

many of them were ever described (see Bursey<br />

et al. [1996] for a list of authority dates).<br />

This possibility exists because records of some<br />

introduced geckos, i.e., H. turcicus in Florida<br />

(Stejneger, 1922) and Hemidactylus mabouia<br />

(Moreau de Jonnes, 1818) in South America and<br />

the Caribbean (Kluge, 1969), predate many<br />

Oochoristica species descriptions.<br />

It is interesting to note that several authors<br />

(Bursey and Goldberg, 1996b; Bursey et al.,<br />

1996; Brooks et al., 1999) listed O. vanzolinii as<br />

a Neotropical species of Oochoristica from Brazil<br />

without regard to the fact that it was described<br />

from the introduced house gecko, H. mabouia<br />

(Rego and Oliveira Rodrigues, 1965). It<br />

has been hypothesized that H. mabouia naturally<br />

colonized the New World via rafting or was<br />

transported during the slave trades over 400 yr<br />

ago (Kluge, 1969). In either case, H. mabouia<br />

colonized the New World from Africa, thus presenting<br />

the opportunity for parasite transport. It<br />

is also interesting to note that in describing O.<br />

javaensis, Kennedy et al. (1982) listed O. vanzolinii<br />

as the species that most resembled their<br />

specimens.<br />

Brooks et al. (1999) stated that both assumptions,<br />

specificity and geographic isolation, were<br />

not evidence for new species, and suggested that<br />

in describing new species many morphological<br />

characters should be provided. We strongly support<br />

their contention; however, the full extent to<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

which certain features are plastic is still unknown<br />

for this genus. As indicated by Criscione<br />

and Font (<strong>2001</strong>), proglottid morphology of O.<br />

javaensis exhibited a high degree of plasticity<br />

that may have resulted from a crowding effect<br />

(Read, 1951). Providing more characters may alleviate<br />

some problems, but it will not solve the<br />

underlying difficulties associated with the taxonomy<br />

of Oochoristica. The morphologically<br />

based taxonomy of Oochoristica will only be<br />

validated upon experimentation establishing the<br />

variation of characters within the genus and/or<br />

the use of molecular data.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We express our gratitude to Dr. Richard Seigel,<br />

Caroline Kennedy, and Tom Lorenz for collecting<br />

the fence lizards and leopard frogs, and<br />

to Amanda Vincent and Jonathan Willis for their<br />

help with experiments and care of lizards.<br />

Thanks are also extended to Dr. Murray Kennedy<br />

and Dr. Bruce Conn for loaning us specimens<br />

of Oochoristica from their private collections,<br />

and to Judith Price at the Canadian Museum<br />

of Nature (CMNPA) and Pat Pilitt, Dr. Eric<br />

Hoberg, and Dr. J. Ralph Lichtenfels at the<br />

USNPC for their assistance and loan of specimens.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Barton, D. P. 1997. Introduced animals and their parasites:<br />

the cane toad, Bufo marinus, in Australia.<br />

Australian Journal of Ecology 22:316-324.<br />

Beveridge, I. 1994. Family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkovsky,<br />

1902. Pages 315-366 in L. F. Khalil, A.<br />

Jones, and R. A. Bray, eds. Keys to the Cestode<br />

Parasites of Vertebrates. Commonwealth Agricultural<br />

Bureau, Wallingford, U.K.<br />

Brooks, D. R., G. Perez-Ponce de Leon, and L.<br />

Garcia-Prieto. 1999. Two new species of Oochoristica<br />

Liihe, 1898 (Eucestoda: Cyclophyllidea:<br />

Anoplocephalidae: Linstowiinae) parasitic in<br />

Ctenosaura spp. (Iguanidae) from Costa Rica and<br />

Mexico. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 85:893-897.<br />

Bursey, C. R., and S. R. Goldberg. 1996a. Oochoristica<br />

macallisteri sp. n. (Cyclophyllidea: Linstowiidae)<br />

from the side-blotched lizard, Ufa stansburiana<br />

(Sauria: Phrynosomatidae), from California,<br />

USA. Folia Parasitologica 43:293-296.<br />

, and . 1996b. Oochoristica maccoyi n.<br />

sp. (Cestoda: Linstowiidae) from Anolis gingivinus<br />

(Sauria: Polychortidae) collected in Anguilla,<br />

Lesser Antilles. Caribbean Journal of Science 32:<br />

390-394.<br />

-, and D. N. Woolery. 1996. Oochoristica<br />

piankai sp. n. (Cestoda: Linstowiidae) and<br />

other helminths of Moloch horridus (Sauria:


Agamidae) from Australia. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 63:215-221.<br />

-, C. T. McAllister, and P. S. Freed. 1997.<br />

Oochoristica jonnesi sp. n. (Cyclophyllidea: Linstowiidae)<br />

from the house gecko, Hemidactylus<br />

mabouia (Sauria: Gekkonidae), from Cameroon.<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

64:55-58.<br />

Conn, D. B. 1985. Life cycle and postembryonic development<br />

of Oochoristica anolis (Cyclophyllidea:<br />

Linstowiidae). Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 71:10—<br />

16.<br />

Criscione, C. D., and W. F. Font. <strong>2001</strong>. Artifactual<br />

and natural variation of Oochoristica javaensis'.<br />

statistical evaluation of in situ fixation. <strong>Comparative</strong><br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:156-163.<br />

Estes, R., K. De Queiroz, and J. A. Gauthier. 1988.<br />

Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. Pages<br />

119-281 in R. Estes and G. Pregill, eds. Phylogenetic<br />

Relationships of the Lizard Families, Essays<br />

Commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford<br />

University Press, Stanford, California, U.S.A.<br />

Hicknian, J. L. 1963. The biology of Oochoristica<br />

vacuolata Hickman (Cestoda). Papers and Proceedings<br />

of the Royal Society of Tasmania 97:81-<br />

104.<br />

Kennedy, M. J., L. M. Killick, and M. Beverley-<br />

Burton. 1982. Oochoristica javaensis n. sp. (Eu-<br />

CRISCIONE AND FONT—DEVELOPMENT OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 155<br />

Editors' Acknowledgments<br />

cestoda: Linstowiidae) from Gehyra mutilata and<br />

other gekkonid lizards (Lacertilia: Gekkonidae)<br />

from Java, Indonesia. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

60:2459-2463.<br />

Kluge, A. G. 1969. The evolution and geographical<br />

origin of the New World Hemidactylus mabouiabrookii<br />

complex (Gekkonidae, Sauria). Miscellaneous<br />

Publications, Museum of Zoology, University<br />

of Michigan 138:1-78.<br />

Pough, F. H., R. M. Andrews, J. E. Cadle, M. L.<br />

Crump, A. H. Savitzky, and K. D. Wells. 1998.<br />

Herpetology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River,<br />

New Jersey, U.S.A. 577 pp.<br />

Read, C. P. 1951. The "crowding effect" in tapeworm<br />

infections. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 37:174-178.<br />

Rego, A. A., and H. Oliveira Rodrigues. 1965. Sobre<br />

duas Oochoristica parasitas de lacertilios (Cestoda,<br />

Cyclophillidea). Revista Brasileira de Biologia<br />

25:59-65.<br />

Schmidt, G. D. 1986. Handbook of Tapeworm Identification.<br />

CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A.<br />

675 pp.<br />

Stejneger, L. 1922. Two new geckos to the fauna of<br />

the United <strong>State</strong>s. Copeia 1922:56.<br />

Widmer, E. A., and O. W. Olsen. 1967. The life<br />

history of Oochoristica osheroffi Meggitt, 1934<br />

(Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae). Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 53:343-349.<br />

We acknowledge, with thanks, the following persons for providing valuable help and insights in reviewing<br />

manuscripts for <strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong>: Roy Anderson, Prema Arasu, Carter Atkinson, Scott<br />

Baird, James Baldwin, Diane Barton, Ian Beveridge, Reginald Blaylock, Walter Boeger, Rodney Bray,<br />

Daniel Brooks, Michael Burt, Goran Bylund, Charles Bursey, Ronald Campbell, Melanie Chapman,<br />

Anindo Choudhury, James Coggins, William Coil, David Cone, Bruce Conn, Thomas Cribb, John Cross,<br />

Lawrence Curtis, Murray Dailey, William Davidson, Emmet Dennis, Marie-Claude Durette-Desset, Ralph<br />

Eckerlin, Burton Endo, Alan Fedynich, Stephen Feist, Jacqueline Fernandez, David Fitch, Donald Forrester,<br />

Scott Gardner, Lynda Gibbons, David Gibson, Tim Goater, Stephen Goldberg, Robert Goldstein, Hideo<br />

Hasegawa, Richard Heard, Sherman Hendrix, John Hnida, Eric Hoberg, John Holmes, Patrick Hudson,<br />

David Huffman, Jean-Pierre Hugot, Kym Jacobson, Francisco Jimenez-Ruiz, James Joy, Michael Kent,<br />

Mike Kinsella, Greg Klassen, Ronald Ko, Delane Kritsky, Kevin Lafferty, Murray Lankester, Ralph Lichtenfels,<br />

Eugene Lyons, John Mackiewicz, David Marcogliese, Jean Mariaux, Chris McAllister, Donald<br />

McAlpine, Frantisek Moravec, Janice Moore, Patrick Muzzall, Fuad Nahhas, Robin Overstreet, Raphael<br />

Payne, Thomas Platt, Robert Poulin, Annie Prestwood, Robert Rausch, Amilcar Rego, Mark Rigby, John<br />

Riley, Klaus Rohde, Benjamin Sacks, William Samuel, Gerhard Schad, Thomas Scholz, Maria Sepiilveda,<br />

Scott Seville, Takeshi Shimazu, John Sullivan, Stephen Taft, Dennis Thoney, Tellervo Valtonen, William<br />

Wardle, Patricia Wilber, and Darwin Wittrock.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 156-163<br />

Artifactual and Natural Variation of Oochoristica javaensis:<br />

Statistical Evaluation of In Situ Fixation<br />

CHARLES D. CRISCIONE' AND WILLIAM F. FONT2<br />

Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana 70402, U.S.A.<br />

(e-mail: 2wffont@selu.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: Lack of knowledge of the extent of natural morphological variation can undermine proper taxonomic<br />

decisions. Confounding this problem is artifactual variation that arises from improper fixation techniques. For<br />

the morphologically based taxonomy of the cestode genus Oochoristica, little information exists on the plasticity<br />

of important taxonomic characters. In addition, paratypes of several species of Oochoristica are highly contracted<br />

and contorted. These paratypes were recovered from preserved hosts; thus, the tapeworms were killed and fixed<br />

inside the host (in situ fixation). Experiments demonstrated that in situ fixation of Oochoristica javaensis results<br />

in highly contracted specimens, and statistical comparisons between relaxed and in situ-fixed tapeworms revealed<br />

significant differences for proglottid measurements. Natural variation for the paratypes recovered from preserved<br />

hosts is likely misrepresented by the artificial variation induced by in situ fixation. Lastly, data from natural<br />

infections suggested that proglottid characters of O. javaensis are plastic and may be subject to crowding effects.<br />

KEY WORDS: Oochoristica javaensis, Cestoda, Hemidactylus turcicus, Mediterranean gecko, fixation techniques,<br />

crowding effects, morphological variation, taxonomy.<br />

The taxonomy of the cestode genus Oochoristica<br />

Liihe, 1898, has been based solely on morphology<br />

without knowledge of the extent of natural<br />

intraspecific morphological variation. Parasite<br />

morphological variation may be the result of<br />

genetic determinants, host-induced effects, parasite<br />

intensity effects, or external habitat influences.<br />

Stunkard (1957) and Haley (1962) discussed<br />

the importance of environmental and<br />

host-induced variation for the systematics of helminth<br />

parasites, citing such factors as different<br />

host species, host age, host diet, or infection intensity<br />

as causes of variation. They also emphasized<br />

the need to assess experimentally the stability<br />

of taxonomic characters when identifying<br />

a species.<br />

In addition to the lack of knowledge on intraspecific<br />

variation, natural variation of some species<br />

of Oochoristica may be masked by artificial<br />

morphological variation induced by fixation<br />

techniques. Several paratype specimens of<br />

Oochoristica examined from the U.S. National<br />

Parasite Collection (USNPC), Beltsville, Maryland,<br />

U.S.A. were highly contracted and contorted.<br />

Examination of the respective species descriptions<br />

revealed that these paratypes (listed<br />

below) were obtained from formalin-fixed hosts.<br />

1 Corresponding author. Current address: Department<br />

of Zoology, 3029 Cordley Hall, Oregon <strong>State</strong><br />

University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, U.S.A. (e-mail:<br />

crischar@bcc.orst.edu).<br />

156<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

That is, they were removed from host specimens<br />

deposited in museum collections without regard<br />

to the effects of host fixation on internal parasites.<br />

Bakke (1988) and others have qualitatively<br />

illustrated the distorting effects of improper fixation<br />

techniques on the morphology of soft-bodied<br />

helminths, but comparisons of fixation techniques<br />

have not been tested statistically to examine<br />

for quantitative differences in the measurements<br />

of important taxonomic characters.<br />

The purpose of our report was to provide a<br />

quantitative assessment of the artifactual morphological<br />

variation induced by killing and fixing<br />

tapeworms within a host, i.e., in situ fixation.<br />

In order to address the effects that improper fixation<br />

methods may have on the morphologically<br />

based taxonomy of Oochoristica, statistical<br />

comparisons of in situ-fixed tapeworms to ones<br />

that were collected alive and killed in a relaxed<br />

state were conducted with specimens of Oochoristica<br />

javaensis Kennedy, Killick, and Beverley-Burton,<br />

1982. In addition, we provide data<br />

regarding the effects of intensity on O. javaensis<br />

morphology.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Fixation experiments<br />

To mimic lizard fixation techniques used for museum<br />

collections, 15 Mediterranean geckos, Hemidactylus<br />

turcicus (Linnaeus, 1758), were collected from the<br />

campus of Louisiana <strong>State</strong> University (LSU), Baton<br />

Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. (30°24.92'N; 91010.81'W),<br />

where they were known to have a high prevalence of


infection with O. javaensis (C. D. Criscione, unpublished<br />

data). Geckos were killed using an overdose of<br />

ether and immediately fixed via subcutaneous, oral<br />

cavity, and body cavity injections of unheated 10%<br />

formalin. Oral cavity injections insured that the tapeworms<br />

were killed immediately. After 6 days in 10%<br />

formalin, geckos were soaked in water for 24 hr to<br />

remove the formalin. Geckos were then transferred to<br />

70% ethanol for storage until dissection 4 days later.<br />

In situ-fixed tapeworms recovered upon necropsy were<br />

stored in 70% ethanol, stained in Semichon's acetocarmine,<br />

dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene, and<br />

mounted in Canada balsam. Comparisons were made<br />

with relaxed tapeworms that were killed with hot water<br />

(90°C) and fixed and stored in alcohol-formalin-acetic<br />

acid solution (AFA). Relaxed worms were obtained in<br />

a helminth survey of//, turcicus from LSU in the summer<br />

of 1998 (C. D. Criscione, unpublished data); staining<br />

and mounting techniques were the same as for the<br />

in situ-fixed specimens.<br />

Quantitative analyses included measurements of mature<br />

proglottids from 5 relaxed and 5 in situ-fixed specimens<br />

of O. javaensis. Three mature proglottids, located<br />

just anterior to the first proglottid displaying evidence<br />

of egg production, were selected from each individual.<br />

Length and width were measured for each<br />

mature proglottid and for the ovary, vitellaria, and 1<br />

testis within each proglottid. One testis was randomly<br />

selected from each proglottid, ovary length was measured<br />

for the ovary lobe opposite the genital atrium,<br />

and ovary width was measured across both lobes. Although<br />

multiple testes are present within a single proglottid,<br />

only 1 was chosen in order to facilitate the use<br />

of appropriate statistical tests. In order to test for in<br />

situ-fixation effects, a nested ANOVA design was used<br />

to control the pseudoreplication of measuring 3 proglottids<br />

from 1 tapeworm. Tapeworms nested within<br />

type of fixation constituted the experimental units, i.e.,<br />

true replicates, with the error term being the proglottids,<br />

i.e., pseudoreplicates, nested within individual<br />

tapeworms. Principal components analysis (PCA) with<br />

Varimax rotation was used as a data reduction technique<br />

and to examine latent relationships among the<br />

variables. A variable was considered to load on a factor<br />

if its correlation to the factor was >|0.5| (Hair et<br />

al., 1999). The resulting factors with their standardized<br />

factor scores were then tested for differences between<br />

relaxed and in situ-fixed tapeworms in the nested design.<br />

Statistical significance was determined at P <<br />

0.05.<br />

Analysis of natural morphological variation<br />

The analysis of intensity effects on the morphology<br />

of O. javaensis included 5 tapeworms from each of 3<br />

Mediterranean geckos that were naturally infected with<br />

15, 28, and 64 tapeworms. Criteria and morphological<br />

characters used for measurements were the same as<br />

those used in the fixation experiments. Experimental<br />

design using factor scores from a PCA with Varimax<br />

rotation was also the same, in that a nested ANOVA<br />

was used to test for intensity effects. A priori contrasts<br />

of 15 versus 28 and 28 versus 64 were computed. In<br />

order to conduct this analysis, the 5 tapeworms from<br />

CRISCIONE AND FONT—VARIATION OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 157<br />

each intensity level were treated as true replicates,<br />

when in fact they were pseudoreplicates.<br />

In addition, 10 relaxed tapeworms that were killed<br />

with hot water (90°C) were selected to provide measurements<br />

representative of O. javaensis recovered in<br />

a helminth survey of H. turcicus (C. D. Criscione, unpublished<br />

data). This representative data set included<br />

specimens from geckos with intensities ranging from<br />

1 to 64, and had at least 1 tapeworm from each of 5<br />

collection locations in southeastern Louisiana, U.S.A.<br />

[Bayou Segnette <strong>State</strong> Park in Westwego (29°53.18'N;<br />

90°09.80'W); Fairview-Riverside <strong>State</strong> Park in Madisonville<br />

(30°24.55'N; 90°08.41'W); a residential<br />

neighborhood in Metairie (30°00.76'N; 90°08.90'W);<br />

Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond<br />

(30°30.67'N; 90°27.98'W); and LSU]. PCA with Varimax<br />

rotation was applied to this data set to examine<br />

for latent relationships among the same variables used<br />

in the fixation and intensity analyses.<br />

Specimens examined<br />

Museum specimens examined from the USNPC and<br />

the Canadian Museum of Nature (CMNPA), Ottawa,<br />

Ontario, Canada included the following: O. javaensis,<br />

2 paratypes (CMNPA nos. 1982-0693, 1982-0695);<br />

Oochoristica anolis Hardwood, 1932, 1 voucher<br />

(USNPC no. 75748) and the holotype (USNPC no.<br />

30898); Oochoristica bezyi Bursey and Goldberg,<br />

1992, 2 paratypes (USNPC no. 81874); Oochoristica<br />

bresslaui Fuhrmann, 1927, 1 voucher (USNPC no.<br />

89087); Oochoristica chinensis Jensen, Schmidt, and<br />

Kuntz, 1983, 2 paratypes (USNPC no. 0771<strong>68</strong>); Oochoristica<br />

islandensis Bursey and Goldberg, 1992, 1<br />

paratype (USNPC no. 82225); Oochoristica macallisteri<br />

Bursey and Goldberg, 1996, 1 voucher (USNPC<br />

no. 89267) and 2 paratypes (USNPC no. 86196); Oochoristica<br />

mccoyi Bursey and Goldberg, 1996, 2<br />

vouchers (USNPC nos. 85403, 85408) and 1 paratype<br />

(USNPC no. 86343); Oochoristica novaezealandae<br />

Schmidt and Allison, 1985, 5 paratypes (USNPC no.<br />

78407); Oochoristica osheroffi Meggitt, 1934, 1<br />

voucher (USNPC no. 80433); Oochoristica parvula<br />

(Stunkard, 1938), 3 vouchers (USNPC no. 84397);<br />

Oochoristica piankai Bursey, Goldberg, and Woolery,<br />

1996, 1 voucher (USNPC no. 88189) and 1 paratype<br />

(USNPC no. 84589); Oochoristica scelopori Voge and<br />

Fox, 1950, 2 vouchers (USNPC nos. 84234, 87529).<br />

We deposited voucher specimens of O. javaensis from<br />

H. turcicus in the USNPC (nos. 90344-90348).<br />

Results<br />

For the fixation analysis, PCA revealed 3 latent<br />

variables from the 8 measured (Table 1).<br />

Examination of the variable factor loadings revealed<br />

that factor 1 consisted of all the vertical<br />

measurements, while factors 2 and 3 were characterized<br />

by horizontal measures. Factors 1, 2,<br />

and 3 were renamed vertical, horizontal-1, and<br />

horizontal-2, respectively. All 3 factors showed<br />

significant worm-to-worm variation within each<br />

type of fixation (Fvcrtical = 9.20, FhorizontaM =<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


158 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 1. Oochoristica javaensis: variable factor loadings, factor eigenvalues, and percent total variance<br />

accounted for by each factor from the Varimax rotated correlation matrix of the fixation data set.<br />

Testis length<br />

Ovary length<br />

Vitellaria length<br />

Proglottid length<br />

Ovary width<br />

Proglottid width<br />

Testis width<br />

Vitellaria width<br />

Eigenvalues<br />

Percent of total variance explained by the factor<br />

* Bold print shows loadings where variable loaded onto factor.<br />

42.20, Fhorizontal_2 = 5.31, df = 8, 20, P < 0.001);<br />

thus, the fixation main effect was tested with the<br />

mean-square values of the subgroups, tapeworms<br />

nested within fixation method. The vertical<br />

factor showed a significant effect between in<br />

situ-fixed and relaxed tapeworms (Fig. 1) (F]>8 =<br />

11.927, P = 0.009); however, neither horizontal<br />

factor was significant. Table 2 provides the raw<br />

measurements of the variables used in the analysis.<br />

PCA revealed that the 8 variables used in the<br />

intensity data set constituted only 1 factor (Table<br />

•3 0<br />

CJ<br />

1 -1<br />

-2<br />

In situ Relaxed<br />

Form of Fixation<br />

Figure 1. Plot of the mean factor scores and<br />

95% confidence intervals for the vertical factor of<br />

relaxed and in situ-fixed specimens of Oochoristica<br />

javaensis.<br />

Factor 1<br />

(vertical)<br />

0.917*<br />

0.875<br />

0.863<br />

0.805<br />

-0.203<br />

-0.236<br />

-0.092<br />

0.463<br />

3.320<br />

41.495<br />

Varimax rotated loading matrix<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Factor 2<br />

(horizontal- 1)<br />

-0.112<br />

-0.176<br />

-0.237<br />

-0.497<br />

0.912<br />

0.869<br />

0.469<br />

0.177<br />

2.184<br />

27.296<br />

Factor 3<br />

(horiz.ontal-2)<br />

0.209<br />

0.209<br />

0.262<br />

0.023<br />

-0.082<br />

-0.096<br />

-0.835<br />

0.793<br />

1.498<br />

18.723<br />

3), thus showing that all 8 characters from relaxed<br />

specimens varied together. Even though<br />

there was significant worm-to-worm variation<br />

for this factor (F12 30 = 12.62, P < 0.001), there<br />

was still a significant intensity effect (F2 12 =<br />

13.42, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). The a priori contrast<br />

between 15 and 28 was significant (F, 12 =<br />

10.58, P = 0.007), but 28 versus 64 was not.<br />

Figure 3A-C displays mature proglottid variation<br />

for tapeworms recovered from intensities of<br />

15, 28, and 64, and Table 4 gives the raw measurements<br />

of the variables. Measurements of 10<br />

O. javaensis tapeworms from Louisiana are given<br />

in Table 5. Based on results from the fixation<br />

experiments, only tapeworms exhibiting little to<br />

no wrinkling (i.e., contraction) were used to provide<br />

the representative measurements of O. javaensis<br />

collected in our survey. The fact that the<br />

8 variables in the representative data emerged as<br />

only 1 factor from the PCA (Table 3) again demonstrated<br />

that all 8 characters from relaxed specimens<br />

varied together.<br />

Discussion<br />

Variation resulting from different fixation<br />

techniques or conditions only confounds taxonomic<br />

problems in which the range of natural<br />

morphological variation is not known. Experimental<br />

data revealed 2 quantitative problems<br />

with using in situ-fixed tapeworms. The first was<br />

that a significant reduction in the vertical factor<br />

without a significant change in horizontal factors<br />

produced an accordion effect. High vertical factor<br />

scores were determined by large length measurements<br />

of the proglottid and its ovary, vitel-


CRISCIONE AND FONT—VARIATION OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 159<br />

Table 2. Measurements of mature proglottids from specimens of Oochoristica javaensis fixed in a relaxed<br />

state and specimens fixed in situ; all measurements are in jxm.<br />

Proglottid width<br />

Proglottid length<br />

Ovary width<br />

Ovary length<br />

Vitellaria width<br />

Vitellaria length<br />

Testis width<br />

Testis length<br />

Sample size*<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

Relaxed<br />

n = 5t<br />

482-648 (589 ± 15.8)±<br />

356-640 (493 ± 25.8)<br />

246-35 1 (288 ± 8.06)<br />

152-238 (201 ± 6.63)<br />

125-195 (161 ± 5.11)<br />

90-137 (104 ± 3.83)<br />

31-43 (38.7 ± 0.83)<br />

27-47 (39.5 ± 1.23)<br />

* Sample size refers to the total number of each character that was measured.<br />

t Number of tapeworms used in measurements.<br />

:j: Range followed by mean ± 1 SE in parentheses.<br />

laria, and testes (Table 2); thus, relaxed tapeworms<br />

had a higher mean factor score (Fig. 1).<br />

Contraction from in situ fixation resulted in mature<br />

proglottids wider than long (Fig. 3D-F), but<br />

completely relaxed tapeworms from hot-fixed<br />

specimens yielded mature proglottids longer<br />

than wide (Fig. 3A-C).<br />

The second quantitative effect pertained to the<br />

correlative relationships among the mature proglottid<br />

characters and was revealed by the PCA<br />

itself. If only relaxed specimens are incorporated<br />

into the PCA, i.e., the intensity and representative<br />

data sets, all 8 characters vary together as<br />

Table 3. Oochoristica javaensis: variable factor<br />

loadings, factor eigenvalues, and percent total variance<br />

accounted for by each factor from the correlation<br />

matrix of the intensity data set and representative<br />

data set.<br />

Ovary width<br />

Vitellaria width<br />

Ovary length<br />

Proglottid width<br />

Vitellaria length<br />

Testis width<br />

Testis length<br />

Proglottid length<br />

Eigenvalues<br />

Percentage of total variance<br />

explained by the factor<br />

Loading matrices ;_<br />

for the O<br />

Intensity<br />

data set<br />

Factor 1<br />

0.924*<br />

0.921<br />

0.916<br />

0.893<br />

0.866<br />

0.841<br />

0.753<br />

0.751<br />

5.929<br />

74.116<br />

Representative<br />

Q<br />

data set "g<br />

Factor 1 W<br />

r~<br />

0.909 a<br />

0.854 ^<br />

0.814 ^<br />

0.851 ^<br />

0.784<br />

0.825<br />

0.749<br />

0.443<br />

4.996<br />

62.445<br />

Bold print shows loadings where variable loaded onto factor.<br />

In situ-fixed<br />

n = 5<br />

403-845 (635<br />

213-490 (312<br />

261-355 (310<br />

109-183 (144<br />

113-148 (130<br />

43-94 (70.5<br />

35-47 (43.5<br />

20-35 (27.1<br />

± 34.1)<br />

± 23.0)<br />

± 7.01)<br />

± 5.69)<br />

± 2.86)<br />

± 4.11)<br />

± 0.95)<br />

± 1.07)<br />

1 factor (Table 3); but when in situ-fixed tapeworms<br />

are incorporated into the PCA, i.e., the<br />

fixation data set, vertical measurements become<br />

independent of horizontal measurements (Table<br />

1). Contraction of the in situ-fixed tapeworms<br />

altered the correlative nature of the 8 variables<br />

and divided 1 factor into 3 factors.<br />

Contraction of helminth parasites resulting<br />

from improper fixation has been documented<br />

many times in the parasite literature (Bakke,<br />

1988); however, our study may be the first to<br />

quantify the effects of different forms of fixation<br />

and to analyze the data statistically. The empirical<br />

evidence provided in the current study not<br />

only supported the conclusions of Bakke (1988)<br />

1.5<br />

0.5<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.5<br />

15 28 64<br />

Intensity of Infection<br />

Figure 2. Plot of the mean factor scores and<br />

95% confidence intervals for tapeworms collected<br />

at intensities of 15, 28, and 64.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


160 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figure 3. Mature proglottid variation of Oochoristica javaensis from Hemidactylus turcicus. Photomicrographs<br />

were taken with differential interference contrast. A-C. Natural variation of specimens from<br />

intensities of 15, 28, and 64, respectively; all were fixed in a relaxed state. D-F. Artificial variation showing<br />

contraction that resulted from in situ fixation. Bars = 200 u.m. CS = cirrus sac, GA = genital atrium, O<br />

= ovary, T = testis, and V = vitellaria.<br />

Table 4. Mature proglottid measurements of Oochoristica javaensis from Hemidactylus turcicus with intensities<br />

of 15, 28, and 64; all measurements are in |xm.<br />

Level of<br />

intensity<br />

Proglottid width<br />

Proglottid length<br />

Ovary width<br />

Ovary length<br />

Vitellaria width<br />

Vitellaria length<br />

Testis width<br />

Testis length<br />

Sample<br />

size*<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

15<br />

n<br />

15<br />

= 5t<br />

506-616 (560 ± 7.06):j:<br />

545-75 1 (624 ± 14.5)<br />

238-293 (2<strong>68</strong> ± 3.89)<br />

156-226 (189 ± 4.48)<br />

129-203 (161 ± 5.78)<br />

74-137 (105 ± 4.95)<br />

39-47 (42.7 ± 0.61)<br />

39-51 (43 d:<br />

0.87)<br />

28<br />

n = 5<br />

387-450 (409<br />

395-553 (470<br />

195-254 (225<br />

125-179 (160<br />

86-133 (117<br />

70-113 (90.3<br />

* Sample size refers to the total number of each character that was measured.<br />

t Number of tapeworms used in measurements.<br />

± Range followed by mean ± 1 SE in parentheses.<br />

± 5)<br />

± 14.7)<br />

± 4.85)<br />

± 3.83)<br />

± 3.37)<br />

± 3.3)<br />

35-43 (39 ± 0.78)<br />

31-47 (39 ± 1.03)<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

n<br />

269-545<br />

419-545<br />

121-281<br />

78-183<br />

59-117<br />

43-101<br />

27-43<br />

27-47<br />

64<br />

= 5<br />

(387<br />

(463<br />

(198<br />

(126<br />

± 31.7)<br />

± 8.7)<br />

± 14.2)<br />

± 7.9)<br />

(90.4 ± 5.19)<br />

(73.5 ± 4.91)<br />

(35 ± 1.29)<br />

(36.6 ± 1.4)


CRISCIONE AND FONT—VARIATION OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 161<br />

Table 5. Measurements of Oochoristica javaensis from naturally infected Hemidactylus turcicus in southeastern<br />

Louisiana; measurements in jxin unless noted otherwise.<br />

Variable<br />

Total<br />

Proglottid number<br />

Neck<br />

Scolex<br />

Sucker<br />

Immature proglottid<br />

Genital pore position*<br />

Mature proglottid<br />

Cirrus sac<br />

Ovary<br />

Vitellaria<br />

Testis<br />

Testes number<br />

Gravid proglottid<br />

Oncosphere<br />

Hook<br />

Li (mm)<br />

W<br />

L (mm)<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L<br />

W<br />

L (mm)<br />

W<br />

L<br />

L<br />

Sample size*<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

30<br />

n = 10t<br />

22.2-105 (53.4 ± 7.4)§,||<br />

86-164 (131 ± 7.8)||<br />

158-237 (205 ± 8.1)||<br />

1.12-1.58 (1.38 ± 0.05)||<br />

148-246 (195 ± 9.1)||<br />

98-183 (140 ± 8.9)<br />

51-90 (74.1 ± 3.9)||<br />

62-117 (89 ± 5.3)||<br />

261-506 (408 ± 14.5)<br />

237-371 (297 ± 7.6)<br />

0.24-0.33 (0.28 ± 0.004)||<br />

277-648 (490 ± 19.5)||<br />

395-751 (509 ± 17.8)||<br />

43-55 (47.7 ± 0.58)<br />

86-144 (116 ± 2.8)||<br />

133-390 (2<strong>68</strong> ± 11.8)||<br />

78-316 (184 ± 0.6)||<br />

62-269 (144 ± 8.9)||<br />

43-221 (106 ± 6.6)||<br />

27-51 (40.2 ± 0.98)||<br />

31-47 (40.9 ± 0.9)<br />

17-46 (26.6 ± 1.4)||<br />

158-650 (492 ± 29.4)||<br />

0.85-1.99 (1.26 ± 0.05)||<br />

20-34 (25.3 ± 0.69)||<br />

18-28 (23.2 ± 0.52)||<br />

8-12 (11.5 ± 0.18)||<br />

* Sample size refers to the total number of each character that was measured.<br />

t Number of tapeworms measured.<br />

± L = length, W = width.<br />

§ Range followed by mean ± 1 SE in parentheses.<br />

|| Indicates that the range of the character extends values reported in the original description (Kennedy et al., 1982).<br />

# Genital pore position was calculated as a ratio of the position along the length of the mature proglottid from the anterior<br />

end (length to the center of the genital pore + length of proglottid).<br />

but also quantitatively demonstrated the misleading<br />

representation of morphological characters<br />

used in the taxonomy of Oochoristica resulting<br />

from in situ fixation. We believe that our<br />

more rigorous analysis is important because, despite<br />

the elegant studies of Bakke (1988) and<br />

previous workers, the practice of describing improperly<br />

fixed specimens is still widespread<br />

among parasite taxonomists.<br />

In addition to the quantitative changes resulting<br />

from in situ fixation, 2 qualitative effects further<br />

demonstrated the inappropriateness of using<br />

in situ-fixed specimens in species descriptions.<br />

Distortion of the scolex (Fig. 4A, B) and proglottids<br />

(Fig. 4C, D) prevented accurate measurements<br />

of these characters. This is not to say<br />

that every scolex and mature proglottid fixed in<br />

situ will be rendered useless for species identi-<br />

fication, but the number of appropriate characters<br />

available for analysis will be greatly reduced.<br />

As seen in Figure 4A-D, one would have<br />

difficulty in finding a true scolex width, and contortion<br />

in the strobila would limit the number of<br />

proglottids suitable for examination.<br />

Species descriptions based on contracted or<br />

disfigured specimens will misrepresent the true<br />

natural variation by decreasing the means of vertical<br />

characters and artificially inflating the dispersion<br />

of measurements if used in conjunction<br />

with relaxed specimens. Such may be the case<br />

with several paratype (O. bezyi, O. islandensis,<br />

O. macallisteri, O. mccoyi, O. piankai} and<br />

voucher (O. mccoyi, O. par~vula, O. piankai, O.<br />

scelopori) specimens examined in our study.<br />

These specimens may represent true species, but<br />

their reported natural variation is more than like-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


162 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figure 4. Comparisons of relaxed and in situ-fixed specimens of Oochoristicajavaensis. A-D. Distorting<br />

effects of in situ fixation on scolices and proglottids. E-H. Relaxed specimens. Bars = 200 (xm for A, B,<br />

E, and F (differential interference contrast). Bars = 500 (Jim for C, D, G, and H (brightfield).<br />

ly masked within the artificial variation induced<br />

by in situ fixation. Characters that do not reflect<br />

their natural variation should not be used to describe<br />

species. Oochoristica spp. recovered from<br />

fixed museum hosts may provide historical<br />

abundance data, but identification of these specimens<br />

should be made with extreme caution, and<br />

ideally, in conjunction with specimens fixed appropriately.<br />

Intensity effects were examined because a<br />

crowding effect has been documented as a cause<br />

of variation in the size of tapeworms (Read,<br />

1951), and because of the occurrence of different<br />

intensities in naturally infected H. turcicus.<br />

PCA for the intensity data set produced 1 factor<br />

in which all 8 variables loaded high (Table 3);<br />

therefore, individual proglottids with large measurement<br />

values received high factor scores. Although<br />

not quantified, there was no apparent<br />

crowding effect observed for natural infections<br />

with intensities between 1 and 15. Tapeworms<br />

from an intensity of 15 had significantly greater<br />

factor scores than specimens from 28 and 64<br />

(Fig. 2), thus indicating that crowding reduces<br />

the size of the respective morphological characters<br />

(Table 4) in O. javaensis. Brooks and<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Mayes (1976) reported similar crowding effects<br />

for O. bivitellobata recovered from the prairie<br />

racerunner, Cnemidophorus sexlineatus Lowe,<br />

1966. Their results and ours, however, should be<br />

considered only preliminary for 2 reasons. First,<br />

data were obtained from natural infections; thus<br />

other factors that induce variation were not controlled.<br />

Second, the intensity levels were not<br />

replicated. Ideally, one would wish to sample<br />

tapeworms from multiple hosts harboring all<br />

possible intensity levels. Both reports, however,<br />

suggest that morphological characters for species<br />

of Oochoristica can be variable and may be<br />

subject to intensity levels.<br />

Measurements of the 10 0. javaensis specimens<br />

given in Table 5 extend the ranges of several<br />

characters provided in the original description<br />

of O. javaensis (Kennedy et al., 1982).<br />

These measurements were based on specimens<br />

with little or no contraction and are provided to<br />

give a representation of O. javaensis collected<br />

from H. turcicus in southeastern Louisiana.<br />

Means of several characters (Table 5) do not<br />

match those provided by Kennedy et al. (1982);<br />

however, based on the lack of host specificity<br />

displayed in laboratory experiments (Criscione


and Font, <strong>2001</strong>), the indication of plasticity in<br />

morphological characters (Table 4), and the examination<br />

of O. javaensis paratypes, it was determined<br />

that the specimens from H. turcicus in<br />

southeastern Louisiana were O. javaensis.<br />

In summary, statistical analyses demonstrated<br />

that measurements of in situ-fixed tapeworms,<br />

i.e., specimens recovered from preserved hosts,<br />

distorted the true natural variation of O. javaensis.<br />

The intraspecific variation of several species<br />

of Oochoristica may be misrepresented because<br />

they were described from highly contracted, in<br />

situ-fixed specimens. Additionally, morphological<br />

characters used in the taxonomy of Oochoristica<br />

have not been examined for their stability<br />

when exposed to different environmental<br />

or host-induced conditions. Our analyses indicated<br />

that proglottid morphology was highly<br />

variable and that this plasticity may have resulted<br />

from crowding.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We extend our thanks to Dr. Murray Kennedy<br />

and Dr. Bruce Conn for loaning us specimens of<br />

Oochoristica from their private collections, and to<br />

Judith Price at the CMNPA and Pat Pilitt, Dr. Eric<br />

Hoberg, and Dr. Ralph Lichtenfels at the USNPC<br />

for their assistance and loan of specimens.<br />

CRISCIONE AND FONT—VARIATION OF OOCHORISTICA JAVAENSIS 163<br />

Notice of Dues Increase<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bakke, T. A. 1988. Morphology of adult Phyllodistomum<br />

umblae (Fabricius) (Platyhelminthes, Gorgoderidae):<br />

the effect of preparation, killing and<br />

fixation procedures. Zoologica Scripta 17:1-13.<br />

Brooks, D. R., and M. A. Mayes. 1976. Morphological<br />

variation in natural infections of Oochoristica<br />

bivitellobata Loewen, 1940 (Cestoidea: Anoplocephalidae).<br />

Transactions of the Nebraska Academy<br />

of Sciences 3:20-21.<br />

Criscione, C. D., and W. F. Font. <strong>2001</strong>. Development<br />

and specificity of Oochoristica javaensis (Eucestoda:<br />

Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae: Linstowiinae).<br />

<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:149-155.<br />

Hair, J. F., Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and<br />

W. C. Black. 1999. Multivariate Data Analysis,<br />

5th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New<br />

Jersey, U.S.A. 730 pp.<br />

Haley, A. J. 1962. Role of host relationships in the<br />

systematics of helminth parasites. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

48:671-678.<br />

Kennedy, M. J., L. M. Killick, and M. Beverley-<br />

Burton. 1982. Oochoristica javaensis n. sp. (Eucestoda:<br />

Linstowiidae) from Gehyra mutilata and<br />

other gekkonid lizards (Lacertilia: Gekkonidae)<br />

from Java, Indonesia. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

60:2459-2463.<br />

Read, C. P. 1951. The "crowding effect" in tapeworm<br />

infections. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 37:174-178.<br />

Stunkard, H. W. 1957. Intraspecific variation in parasitic<br />

flatworms. Systematic Zoology 6:7-18.<br />

At the January <strong>2001</strong> meeting of the Helminthological Society of Washington, the Society voted to<br />

increase the membership dues to US$30.00 for individual U.S. members and to US$33.00 for individual<br />

foreign members. Institution subscription rates will increase as follows: US$55.00 (U.S.A.), US$57.00<br />

(Canada and Mexico), US$60.00 (all other countries). This is the first dues increase in six years and is<br />

necessitated by increased management costs to the Society. The increases will take effect in January, 2002.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 164-172<br />

Seasonal Occurrence and Community Structure of Helminth<br />

Parasites in Green Frogs, Rana clamitans melanota, from<br />

Southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A.<br />

MATTHEW G. BOLEK' AND JAMES R. COGGINS<br />

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: coggins@csd.uwm.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: From April to October 1996, 75 green frogs, Rana clamitans melanota, were collected from Waukesha<br />

County, Wisconsin, U.S.A. and examined for helminth parasites. Seventy-one (94%) of 75 green frogs<br />

were infected with 1 or more helminth species. The component community consisted of 12 species: 5 trematodes,<br />

2 cestodes, and 5 nematodes. Approximately 2,790 (72%) trematodes, 447 (11.5%) cestodes, and 636 (16.5%)<br />

nematodes were found. A significant correlation existed between wet weight and helminth species richness.<br />

Helminth populations and communities were seasonally variable and/or did not show significant differences<br />

during the year. Haematoloechus varioplexus showed seasonal variation in size during the year that was related<br />

to recruitment period. The helminth fauna of green frogs was depauperate and dominated by indirect-life-cycle<br />

parasites. Host diet and aquatic habitat were important in the transmission dynamics of these species. Host size,<br />

sex, and time of collection were also important factors in structuring helminth communities of green frogs and<br />

may mask any simple explanations.<br />

KEY WORDS: Rana clamitans, Haematoloechus varioplexus, Halipegus eccentricus, Glyptheltnins quieta, Cosmocercoides<br />

sp., Oswaldocruzia pipiens, Waltonella sp., Mesocestoides sp., metacercariae, Trematoda, Nematoda,<br />

Cestoda, Amphibia, seasonal study, Wisconsin, U.S.A.<br />

Studies by Kennedy et al. (1986) on freshwater<br />

fish, birds, and a mammal have developed<br />

predictions in determining helminth community<br />

structure, particularly that ectotherm and endotherm<br />

helminth communities are fundamentally<br />

different: the former are species poor and noninteractive,<br />

while the latter are diverse and interactive.<br />

A review by Aho (1990) indicated that<br />

helminth communities of amphibians are highly<br />

variable, depauperate, and noninteractive in<br />

structure, but there is a need to examine and<br />

reexamine more species from different locations.<br />

To date there are few studies that utilized helminth<br />

community measures in amphibian hosts<br />

(Goater et al., 1987; Aho, 1990; Muzzall, 1991a,<br />

b; Goldberg et al., 1995; Barton, 1996; Yoder<br />

and Coggins, 1996; McAlpine, 1997; Bolek and<br />

Coggins, 2000). A number of helminth surveys<br />

of green frogs, Rana clamitans melanota Rafinesque,<br />

1820, have been published (Campbell,<br />

19<strong>68</strong>; Williams and Taft, 1980; Coggins and Sajdak,<br />

1982; McAlpine and Burt, 1998), but there<br />

are few studies on the helminth infracommunity<br />

and component community structure of this spe-<br />

1 Corresponding author. Current address: School of<br />

Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln,<br />

Lincoln, Nebraska <strong>68</strong>588, U.S.A. (e-mail: mbolek@<br />

unlserve.unl.edu).<br />

164<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

cies (Muzzall, 199la; McAlpine, 1997), and<br />

none that incorporated a seasonal component.<br />

Green frogs are large, semiaquatic frogs inhabiting<br />

freshwater ponds, lakes, swamps, and<br />

slow-moving streams in North America. They<br />

spend most of their time around the water's<br />

edge. They occur from Newfoundland to western<br />

Ontario, and south to eastern Oklahoma,<br />

southern Illinois, northern Georgia, and eastern<br />

North Carolina. In Wisconsin, these frogs overwinter<br />

buried in the mud and are active from<br />

early April through October (Vogt, 1981). Green<br />

frogs are largely sit-and-wait gape-limited predators,<br />

feeding on any accessible prey of appropriate<br />

size, including aerial, aquatic, and terrestrial<br />

invertebrates, primarily insects (Scale,<br />

1987; Werner et al., 1995). Here we report on<br />

the seasonal helminth community structure of<br />

green frogs from southeastern Wisconsin. Specifically,<br />

we were interested in how host habitat,<br />

age and/or size, diet, sex, and seasonality were<br />

important in determining helminth populations<br />

and communities of green frogs.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 75 green frogs, R. clamitans melanota,<br />

was collected from April to October 1996 at a small<br />

spring-fed permanent pond located at the Carroll <strong>College</strong><br />

field station in Waukesha County, Wisconsin,


U.S.A. (42°59'N; 88°21'W). Ten to 15 frogs were collected<br />

monthly around the periphery of the pond by a<br />

dip-net. Animals were placed in plastic containers,<br />

transported to the laboratory, stored at 4°C, and euthanized<br />

in MS 222 (ethyl m-aminoben/.oate methane sulfonic<br />

acid) within 72 hr of capture. Snout-vent length<br />

(SVL) and wet weight (WW) were recorded for each<br />

individual. Frogs were individually toe-clipped and<br />

frozen. At necropsy, the digestive tracts, limbs and<br />

body wall musculature, and internal organs were examined<br />

for helminth parasites. Each organ was placed<br />

individually in a petri dish and examined under a stereomicroscope.<br />

The body cavities were rinsed with distilled<br />

water into a petri dish and the contents examined.<br />

All individuals were sexed by gonad inspection during<br />

necropsy. Worms were removed and fixed in alcohol—<br />

formaldehyde-acetic acid or formalin. Trematodes and<br />

cestodes were stained with acetocarmine, dehydrated<br />

in a graded ethanol series, cleared in xylene, and<br />

mounted in Canada balsam. Nematodes were dehydrated<br />

to 70% ethanol, cleared in glycerol, and identified<br />

as temporary mounts. Prevalence, mean intensity,<br />

and abundance are according to Bush et al. (1997).<br />

Mean intensity was not calculated for the unidentified<br />

kidney metacercariae because they could not be counted<br />

accurately, and overall abundance was reported as<br />

an estimate of encysted metacercariae counted on the<br />

surface of the kidneys. Mean helminth species richness<br />

is the sum of helminth species per individual frog, including<br />

noninfected individuals, divided by the total<br />

sample size. All values are reported as the mean ± 1<br />

standard deviation. Undigested stomach contents were<br />

identified to class or order following Borror et al.<br />

(1989). Stomach contents are reported as a percent =<br />

the number of prey items in a given class or order,<br />

divided by the total number of prey items recovered<br />

X 100. Voucher specimens have been deposited in the<br />

H. W. Manter Helminth Collection, University of Nebraska,<br />

Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A. (accession numbers<br />

HWML 15354, Haematoloechus varioplexus Stafford,<br />

1902; 15355, Glypthelmins quieta Stafford, 1900;<br />

15356, kidney metacercariae; 15357, Mesocestoides<br />

sp.; 15358, diplostomid metacercariae; 15359, Halipegus<br />

eccentricus Thomas, 1939; 15360, unidentified<br />

adult tapeworm; 15361, Cosmocercoides sp.; 15362,<br />

unidentified larval nematode; 15363, unidentified species<br />

of Waltonella Schacher, 1974; 15364, Oswaldocruzia<br />

pipiens Walton, 1929).<br />

The chi-square test for independence was calculated<br />

to compare differences in prevalence among host sex.<br />

Yates' adjustment for continuity was used when sample<br />

sizes were low. A single-factor, independent-measures<br />

ANOVA and Scheffe's posthoc test were used to<br />

compare among seasonal differences in mean intensity<br />

and mean helminth species richness. When variances<br />

were heteroscedastic, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the<br />

Kolmogorov—Smirnov two-sample test were used. Student's<br />

?-test was used to compare differences in mean<br />

intensity and mean helminth species richness between<br />

sex of hosts. Approximate Mests were calculated when<br />

variances were heteroscedastic (Sokal and Rohlf,<br />

1981). Pearson's correlation was used to determine relationships<br />

among host SVL and WW and abundance<br />

of helminth parasites, excluding larval platyhelminths.<br />

BOLEK AND COGGINS—HELMINTH COMMUNITIES IN GREEN FROGS 165<br />

Pearson's correlation was calculated for host SVL and<br />

WW and helminth species richness per individual frog.<br />

Because WW gave a stronger correlation than SVL in<br />

each case, it is the only parameter reported. Because<br />

of low sample size during certain collection periods,<br />

data were pooled on a bimonthly basis to form samples<br />

of 15—20 frogs per season. Larval helminths were not<br />

included in the seasonal analysis, because they can<br />

also accumulate throughout the amphibian's life and<br />

thus mask monthly recruitment dynamics in adult<br />

frogs.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 75 adult green frogs, 43 males and<br />

32 females, was collected during April through<br />

October 1996. No significant difference existed<br />

in the number of male and female frogs collected<br />

throughout the year (x2 = 7.01, P > 0.05).<br />

The overall means of SVL and WW of green<br />

frogs were <strong>68</strong>.8 ± 10.8 mm (range 39.8-89.4<br />

mm) and 35.8 ± 15.5 g (5.4-75.6 g), respectively.<br />

There was no significant difference in<br />

mean SVL (t = 0.10, P > 0.05) or mean WW<br />

(t = 0.24, P > 0.05) in male and female frogs.<br />

Stomach content analyses of green frogs revealed<br />

a broad range of aerial, terrestrial, and<br />

aquatic invertebrates. Sixteen different groups of<br />

invertebrates were recovered from stomach contents<br />

of green frogs, with coleopterans, gastropods,<br />

and diplopodans making up the largest<br />

percentage.<br />

Seventy-one (94%) of 75 R. clamitans melanota<br />

were infected with helminth parasites. The<br />

component community consisted of 12 species<br />

(5 trematodes, 2 cestodes, and 5 nematodes). Of<br />

these, 8 have indirect life cycles, 1 has a direct<br />

life cycle, and the life cycles of 3 are unknown.<br />

Overall mean helminth abundance, excluding<br />

larval platyhelminths, was 16.5 ± 38 with most<br />

frog infracommunities having 10 or fewer<br />

worms. In terms of abundance, digeneans dominated<br />

adult helminth communities (61.5% of total<br />

adult helminths). Prevalence ranged from<br />

80% for kidney metacercariae to 1.3% for an<br />

unidentified adult cestode, a filarid nematode of<br />

the genus Waltonella, and an unidentified encysted<br />

nematode. Values for overall prevalence,<br />

mean intensity, mean abundance, and total number<br />

of helminths recovered are summarized in<br />

Table 1.<br />

Statistically significant differences in prevalence<br />

or mean intensity existed between male<br />

and female frogs for H. varioplexus, H. eccentricus,<br />

kidney metacercariae, and unidentified<br />

species of Mesocestoides Valunt, 1863 and Cos-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


166 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 1. Prevalence, mean intensity (MI), mean abundance (MA), and total helminths found in 75 specimens<br />

of Rana clamitans melanota in Wisconsin.<br />

Trematoda<br />

Species<br />

Haematoloechus varioplexus<br />

Halipegus eccentricus<br />

Glypthelmins quieta<br />

Unidentified metacercariae:i:<br />

Diplostomid metacercariae*<br />

Cestoda<br />

Unidentified adult cestode<br />

Mesocestoides sp.*<br />

Nematoda<br />

Oswaldocruzia pipiens<br />

Cosmoccrcoides sp.<br />

Waltonclla sp.t<br />

Larval nematode<br />

Encysted nematode<br />

* Underestimate.<br />

t New host record.<br />

± Not counted.<br />

Prevalence: MI ± 1 SD<br />

Number of<br />

worms<br />

number (%) (range) MA ± 1 SD recovered<br />

33 (44)<br />

17 (22.6)<br />

11 (14.6)<br />

60 (80)<br />

12 (16.0)<br />

1 (1.3)<br />

14 (18.6)<br />

21 (28)<br />

19 (25)<br />

1 (1.3)<br />

9 (12)<br />

1 (1.3)<br />

5.3 ± 7<br />

d-30)<br />

1.9 ± 1.7<br />

(1-8)<br />

35.5 ± 34.7<br />

(1-110)<br />

NC:i:<br />

35 ± 41<br />

(1-100)<br />

1<br />

31.9 ± 22<br />

(12-86)<br />

14.7 ± 23<br />

(1-90)<br />

3.3 ± 4.3<br />

(1-19)<br />

4<br />

25.9 ± 61<br />

(1-200)<br />

1<br />

mocercoides Harwood, 1930 (Table 2). Both H.<br />

varioplexus, a lung trematode, and H. eccentricus,<br />

a trematode of the eustachian tubes, had significantly<br />

higher mean intensities in male frogs,<br />

while the kidney metacercariae occurred at a<br />

higher prevalence in males. Female frogs had<br />

significantly higher mean intensities of Mesocestoides<br />

sp. and Cosmocercoides sp.<br />

Mean helminth species richness was 2.<strong>68</strong> ±<br />

1.29 species per frog. Infections with multiple<br />

species were common, with 0, 1,2, 3, 4, and 5<br />

species occurring in 4, 8, 23, 20, 13, and 7 frogs,<br />

respectively. No statistically significant differences<br />

in mean helminth species richness were<br />

found between male (2.76 ± 1.01) and female<br />

frogs (2.56 ± 1.52, t = 0.66, P > 0.05). A nonsignificant<br />

positive correlation was found between<br />

overall helminth abundance, excluding<br />

larval platyhelminths, and WW (/• = 0.04, P ><br />

0.05). Nonsignificant relationships were also observed<br />

for most helminth species: unidentified<br />

adult cestode (r = -0.01, P > 0.05), H. vario-<br />

2.3 ± 5.4<br />

0.4 ± 1.1<br />

5.2 ± 18<br />

NC<br />

5.7 ± 20.7<br />

0.01 ± 0.1<br />

5.9 ± 15.3<br />

4.1 ± 13.7<br />

0.8 ± 2.6<br />

0.05 ± 0.5<br />

3.5 ± 23<br />

0.01<br />

± 0.1<br />

176<br />

33<br />

391<br />

> 1,770<br />

420<br />

1<br />

446<br />

310<br />

62<br />

4<br />

259<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

1<br />

Lungs<br />

Location<br />

Eustachian tubes<br />

Small intestine<br />

Kidneys, body cavity<br />

Leg muscles<br />

Small intestine<br />

Leg muscles, lungs<br />

Small intestine, stomach<br />

Large intestine, small intestine<br />

Body cavity<br />

Large intestine<br />

Small intestine<br />

plexus (r = 0.10, P > 0.05), H. eccentricus (r<br />

= 0.19, P > 0.05), G. quieta (r = -0.02, P ><br />

0.05), O. pipiens (r = -0.12, P > 0.05), unidentified<br />

larval nematode (r = -0.04, P ><br />

0.05), Waltonella sp. (r = 0.20, P > 0.05), and<br />

encysted nematodes (r = -0.19, P > 0.05). The<br />

nematode Cosmocercoides sp. had a significant<br />

positive correlation with WW (/• = 0.31, P <<br />

0.01). A significant positive Pearson's correlation<br />

also existed between species richness and<br />

WW (r = 0.31, P < 0.01). However, correlations<br />

between frog WW and species richness<br />

were not significant in May—June (/• = 0.31, P<br />

> 0.05), July-August (r = 0.01, P > 0.05), and<br />

September-October (/- = 0.29, P > 0.05) but<br />

were significant for the April collection (r =<br />

0.60, P < 0.02).<br />

The trematodes H. varioplexus and H. eccentricus<br />

occurred throughout the year, with highest<br />

prevalences observed during the fall (September-October)<br />

collection, 65% and 30%, respectively.<br />

The intestinal trematode, G. quieta, was


Table 2. Prevalence (Pr) and<br />

Rana clamitans melanota.<br />

Trematoda<br />

Species<br />

Haematoloechus varioplexus<br />

Halipegns eccentricus<br />

Glypthelmins quieta<br />

Unidentified metacercariae*<br />

Diplostomid metacercariae*<br />

Cestoda<br />

Unidentified adult cestode<br />

Mesocestoides sp.*<br />

Nematoda<br />

Oswaldocruzia pipiens<br />

Cosmocercoides sp.<br />

Waltonella sp.<br />

Larval nematode<br />

Encysted nematode<br />

* Underestimate.<br />

± Not counted.<br />

BOLEK AND COGGINS—HELMINTH COMMUNITIES IN GREEN FROGS 167<br />

mean intensity (MI) of helminth parasites in male and female green frogs,<br />

Measure of<br />

parasitism<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

PI-<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

Pr<br />

MI ±<br />

PI-<br />

MI ±<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

1 SD<br />

first observed during midspring (May-June)<br />

with a prevalence of 5%. Prevalence for this<br />

species reached its maximum (30%) during summer<br />

(July-August) and decreased during the fall<br />

collection (20%). Seasonal mean intensity of<br />

adult platyhelminths followed similar patterns as<br />

prevalence, but no significant differences existed<br />

for any of the adult platyhelminths recovered, H.<br />

eccentricus (adjusted H = 2.02, P > 0.05), H.<br />

varioplexus (F = 0.34, P > 0.05), or G. quieta<br />

(t = 0.43, P > 0.05).<br />

Although prevalence and intensity of H. varioplexus<br />

did not vary significantly throughout<br />

the collection period, mean length of worms did<br />

(Fig. 1). Greatest mean length of worms (4.1<br />

mm) was recorded in early spring (April), when<br />

all individuals were gravid adults, and reached<br />

a minimum during midspring (1.84 mm), when<br />

immature individuals were common. Statistically<br />

significant differences in mean length were<br />

observed for April and May—June collections,<br />

Males<br />

N = 43<br />

46.5 (20/43)<br />

7 ± 8.6<br />

23.3 (10/43)<br />

2.3 ± 2.1<br />

1 1 .6 (5/43)<br />

21.8 ± 27.9<br />

90.7 (39/43)<br />

NC:!:<br />

18.6 (8/43)<br />

45.3 ± 46.1<br />

2.3 (1/43)<br />

1<br />

23.3 (10/43)<br />

24.9 ± 16.2<br />

27.9 (12/43)<br />

16.6 ± 25.8<br />

20.9 (9/43)<br />

2+1.7<br />

0 (0/43)<br />

0<br />

9.3 (4/43)<br />

11.5 ± 11.2<br />

0 (0/43)<br />

0<br />

Females<br />

N = 32<br />

40.6 ( 1 3/32)<br />

2.8 ± 2.2<br />

21.9 (7/32)<br />

1.4 ± 0.5<br />

18.8 (6/32)<br />

47 ± 38.1<br />

65.6 (21/32)<br />

NC<br />

12.5 (4/32)<br />

14.5 ± 23.7<br />

0 (0/32)<br />

0<br />

12.5 (4/32)<br />

49.3 ± 24.8<br />

28.1 (9/32)<br />

12.2 ± 19.6<br />

31.3 (10/32)<br />

4.4 ± 5.6<br />

3.1 (1/32)<br />

4<br />

18.8 (6/32)<br />

35.5 ± 80.6<br />

3.1 (1/32)<br />

1<br />

Statistic<br />

X2 = 0.24<br />

f',= 3.07<br />

X2 = 0.02<br />

f',= 2.71<br />

X2 = 0.46<br />

t = 1 .35<br />

X2 = 5.72<br />

X2odj = 0.16<br />

t = 1.23<br />

X2ailJ = 0.02<br />

X2adj = 0.78<br />

t = 6.69<br />

x2 = o.oo<br />

/ = 0.44<br />

X2 = LOO<br />

r',= 3.81<br />

X2ailj = 0.02<br />

X2:,Ji = 1-67<br />

f',= 1.67<br />

X2a(lj = 0.02<br />

P<br />

>0.05<br />

0.05<br />

0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

>().05<br />

>0.05<br />

0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

April and July-August collections, May-June<br />

and September—October collections, and July-<br />

August and September-October collections (F =<br />

11.8, P < 0.05, single-factor, independent-measure<br />

ANOVA; P < 0.05 for all pair-wise comparisons,<br />

Scheffe's test).<br />

The nematodes Waltonella sp. and an unidentified<br />

encysted larva were recovered infrequently<br />

as single infections during midspring and fall<br />

collections, respectively. Prevalence and intensity<br />

values for O. pipiens, Cosmocercoides sp.,<br />

and unidentified larval nematodes were low and/<br />

or erratic over the 7-mo period. The nematodes<br />

O. pipiens, Cosmocercoides sp., and unidentified<br />

larval nematodes were first observed during<br />

midspring and persisted until fall, with prevalence<br />

being highest in summer for O. pipiens<br />

(62%) and midspring and summer for Cosmocercoides<br />

sp. (40%) and larval nematodes<br />

(20%). However, only O. pipiens exhibited statistically<br />

significant differences (adjusted H =<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


1<strong>68</strong> COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

7 -r<br />

N = 20 N = 27 N = 28 N = 79<br />

Apr May-Jun Jul- Aug Sep-Oct<br />

Date<br />

Figure 1. Mean lengths of Haematoloechus varioplexus<br />

from Rana clamitans melanota. N = number<br />

of worms measured from all frogs recovered in<br />

each sampling period.<br />

9.45, P < 0.05) in mean intensity. The two-sample<br />

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test revealed significant<br />

differences in mean intensities during the<br />

May-June (27 ± 30) and July-August (9.8 ±<br />

17) collections.<br />

Mean helminth species richness fluctuated<br />

seasonally (Fig. 2) and was lowest (1.53) during<br />

early spring and highest (3.1) during the summer<br />

collections. Statistically significant differences<br />

in mean helminth species richness were observed<br />

for April and May—June collections,<br />

April and July—August collections, and April<br />

and September-October collections (F = 6.01,<br />

P < 0.05, single-factor, independent-measure<br />

ANOVA; P < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons,<br />

Scheffe's test). No statistically significant differences<br />

in frog WW were observed during the<br />

year (F = 0.37, P > 0.05).<br />

Discussion<br />

Wisconsin green frogs had high overall helminth<br />

prevalence, with parasite infracommunities<br />

being dominated by indirect life-cycle parasites.<br />

Of the identified parasites, only 1 direct<br />

life-cycle nematode, O. pipiens, was present,<br />

with most helminth species displaying a prevalence<br />

below 50% and/or low mean intensities<br />

below 30.<br />

Most green frogs contained identifiable stom-<br />

5-r<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

= 15 N = 20 N = 20 N = 20<br />

May-Jim Jul-Aug Sep-Oct<br />

Date<br />

Figure 2. Mean helminth species richness of<br />

Rana clamitans melanota during April, May-June,<br />

July-August, and September-October 1996. N =<br />

number of frogs collected on each date.<br />

ach contents containing predominantly beetles,<br />

gastropods, and diplopods. In total, 16 different<br />

groups of terrestrial, aerial, and aquatic invertebrates<br />

comprised their stomach contents.<br />

These results appear similar to those of other<br />

investigators (Hamilton, 1948; Stewart and Sandison,<br />

1972; McAlpine and Dilworth, 1989;<br />

Werner et al., 1995). Hamilton (1948) found that<br />

the principal foods of green frogs collected in<br />

New York, U.S.A. consisted of beetles, flies, and<br />

grasshoppers, with a total of 15 different items<br />

recovered from adult frogs and 20 different prey<br />

items recovered from various sized individuals.<br />

The most common helminth recovered was an<br />

unidentified kidney metacercaria. This larval<br />

trematode had an overall prevalence of 80% and<br />

mean intensity of over 30 worms per frog. Four<br />

other digeneans were recovered from green<br />

frogs: a diplostomid metacercaria encysted in<br />

the musculature, and 3 adult trematodes: H. varioplexus,<br />

H. eccentricus, and G. quieta. Frogs<br />

become infected with H. varioplexus, a lung<br />

trematode, and H. eccentricus, a eustachian tube<br />

trematode, by eating infected odonates (Krull,<br />

1931; Dronen, 1975, 1978; Wetzel and Esch,<br />

1996). Glypthelmins quieta, a trematode of the<br />

small intestine, is acquired when frogs ingest<br />

prey such as tadpoles, frogs, and/or shed skin<br />

infected with metacercariae (Prudhoe and Bray,<br />

1982). Therefore, diet was important in the


transmission dynamics of these 3 trematode species<br />

in this study.<br />

Haematoloechus varioplexus and H. eccentricus<br />

were recovered from frogs throughout the<br />

year, increasing, although not significantly, in<br />

both prevalence and mean intensity during the<br />

fall collection. Recently, Wetzel and Esch (1997)<br />

have shown that the life span of H. eccentricus<br />

may be variable, with trematodes capable of maturing<br />

in as little as 1 wk and being lost the<br />

following week. Because of the small number of<br />

these flukes recovered in our study, little can be<br />

said about their recruitment throughout the year.<br />

Krull (1931) estimated that the life-span of Haematoloechus<br />

medioplexus Stafford, 1902, averaged<br />

1 yr, while studies by Kennedy (1980) on<br />

species of Haematoloechus have shown that<br />

trematodes can reach full length in only 60 days.<br />

The size differences observed for H. varioplexus<br />

during the year (Fig. 1) may be significant in<br />

understanding recruitment of this species. The<br />

seasonal variation in length of H. varioplexus<br />

suggests that adult worms are lost during early<br />

spring and that new infections begin during<br />

midspring and continue throughout the year.<br />

These results are similar to those of Ward<br />

(1909), who observed lung flukes of Rana pipiens<br />

Schreber, 1782, being lost during breeding,<br />

and recruitment occurring throughout the year.<br />

Two cestode species were recovered from<br />

green frogs during this study, the larval tetrathyridium<br />

of Mesocestoides sp. and a single<br />

specimen of an adult cestode that could not be<br />

identified because the scolex was lost. The complete<br />

life cycles of Mesocestoides spp. are currently<br />

unknown; however, a number of mammals,<br />

amphibians, and reptiles are known to<br />

serve as second intermediate hosts, while carnivorous<br />

mammals serve as definitive hosts. The<br />

tetrathyridian stage has been reported from a variety<br />

of mammals and reptiles but is rare in amphibians<br />

(McAllister and Conn, 1990). The life<br />

cycles of these 2 species of cestode are unknown,<br />

although frog diet may be important in<br />

their transmission dynamics.<br />

Nematodes in the genus Waltonella typically<br />

are found in the body cavity of species of Rana.<br />

Adult worms release microfilaria into the bloodstream,<br />

and mosquitoes serve as vectors, infecting<br />

frogs while feeding (Witenberg and Gerichter,<br />

1944). The only report of filarial worms in<br />

R. clamitans is of microfilaria recovered from 1<br />

frog in Ontario, Canada (Barta and Desser,<br />

BOLEK AND COGGINS—HELMINTH COMMUNITIES IN GREEN FROGS 169<br />

1984). Therefore, R. clamitans melanota is apparently<br />

a new host record for Waltonella sp.<br />

(Esslinger, 1986; Baker, 1987). Waltonella<br />

americana was previously reported and described<br />

in Wisconsin leopard frogs by Walton<br />

(1929).<br />

The nematode Cosmocercoides sp. was recovered<br />

from the large intestine of green frogs.<br />

Confusion exists in the literature on the identification<br />

of species of Cosmocercoides in amphibians<br />

and reptiles (Baker, 1987; Vanderburgh<br />

and Anderson, 1987). The major difference in<br />

species identification is the number of rosette<br />

papillae per subventral row in males, with male<br />

Cosmocercoides dukae Holl, 1928 (gastropod<br />

parasite) having 9—21 rosette papillae, averaging<br />

13-14, and C. variabilis (amphibian parasite)<br />

having 15-25, averaging 20 or 21. Because of<br />

this overlap and the presence of only 5 damaged<br />

males out of 62 nematodes recovered, species<br />

identification was not possible. Interestingly, no<br />

worms were found in the lungs or body cavity<br />

of any green frogs, and Cosmocercoides sp. occurred<br />

in frogs in months when gastropods were<br />

commonly found in the stomach contents. We<br />

suspect that specimens of Cosmocercoides sp.<br />

recovered are C. dukae, although this cannot be<br />

confirmed.<br />

Differential infection between host sex and<br />

prevalence or mean intensity was observed for<br />

a number of helminth species. Male frogs had a<br />

significantly higher prevalence of kidney metacercariae<br />

and significantly higher mean intensities<br />

of H. varioplexus and H. eccentricus than<br />

female frogs. Male green frogs are territorial<br />

during the breeding season and defend their<br />

aquatic breeding site from potential competitors<br />

(Martof, 1953; Oldham, 1967). Thus, unlike the<br />

females, they remain in the water for longer periods<br />

of time and may be exposed to cercariae<br />

of the kidney trematode for longer periods. Because<br />

males remain in a relatively small area of<br />

the pond during the breeding season, they may<br />

occur in a microhabitat conducive to becoming<br />

infected with digeneans. Recently, Wetzel and<br />

Esch (1997), in a seasonal study of Halipegus<br />

occidualis Stafford, 1905 and H. eccentricus in<br />

green frogs, suggested that certain areas of a<br />

pond may be "hot spots" for infection with digenetic<br />

trematodes. Therefore, male frogs in<br />

these "hot spots" may feed more often on<br />

emerging odonates containing metacercariae of<br />

species of Haematoloechus and Halipegus, ex-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


170 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

plaining the higher mean intensities of these<br />

trematodes observed in male frogs (Wetzel and<br />

Esch, 1996).<br />

Female frogs had significantly greater mean<br />

intensities of Cosrnocercoides sp. and Mesocestoides<br />

sp. than males. Although Cosmocercoides<br />

sp. could not be identified to species,<br />

both C. variabilis and C. dukae occur in terrestrial<br />

habitats. Female frogs spend more time<br />

on the ground and have a higher probability<br />

of encountering these nematodes in a terrestrial<br />

habitat, either by skin-penetrating C. variabilis<br />

or by feeding on terrestrial mollusks,<br />

hosts for C. dukae. Unfortunately, nothing can<br />

be stated about the transmission dynamics of<br />

Mesocestoides sp., and no conclusions can be<br />

drawn from this difference. The observed differences<br />

in host sex are probably due to ecological<br />

differences in their habitat preference<br />

throughout the year.<br />

Significant positive relationships between<br />

WW and species richness were observed in<br />

green frogs. In this study, frogs in the later<br />

collections had greater species richness than in<br />

early collections (Fig. 2); therefore, time of<br />

exposure was more important in developing<br />

richer helminth communities than was frog<br />

weight during the May-June, July-August,<br />

and September—October collections. This is<br />

supported by the results showing significant<br />

differences in species richness over time and<br />

nonsignificant correlations between WW and<br />

species richness. Observations linking higher<br />

species richness with larger host size have<br />

been reported in green frogs and other species<br />

of Rana by Muzzall (199 la) and Me Alpine<br />

(1997). These investigators suggested that older<br />

individuals may have a longer exposure<br />

time and possess more surface area for colonization<br />

by skin-penetrating nematodes and<br />

digenean metacercariae. Also, larger frogs<br />

possess a greater gape size and may feed on<br />

larger, and a wider number, of intermediate<br />

hosts than smaller individuals. As in their<br />

studies, our data also support the island size<br />

hypothesis, which predicts that larger host individuals<br />

should support higher species richness<br />

than smaller individuals (Holmes and<br />

Price, 1986). McAlpine (1997) also stated that<br />

aspects of host ecology, such as diet and habitat,<br />

and parasite transmission may confound<br />

any simple relationship between the diversity<br />

of helminth communities and size of hosts.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Data from the present study suggest that time<br />

of transmission may also have a similar confounding<br />

effect.<br />

The depauperate helminth community structure<br />

of Carroll <strong>College</strong> green frogs was similar<br />

to the community structure of green frogs examined<br />

from Michigan, U.S.A. and New<br />

Brunswick, Canada by Muzzall (199la) and<br />

McAlpine (1997), respectively. Of the 120<br />

frogs examined from Michigan, 108 (90%)<br />

were infected with a total of 13 species of helminths<br />

(8 trematodes, 1 cestode, and 4 nematodes)<br />

while 164 of 234 (70.1%) green frogs<br />

examined from Canada were infected with 18<br />

species of helminths (10 trematodes, 3 cestodes,<br />

and 5 nematodes). As in our study, in<br />

terms of abundance, digeneans dominated the<br />

adult helminth communities of frogs in Michigan<br />

(96.5%) and New Brunswick (60.8%), indicating<br />

that diet and a semiaquatic habitat<br />

were also important in structuring helminth<br />

communities dominated by indirect-life-cycle<br />

parasites at those locations. Similarly, in both<br />

of those studies, adult frogs had higher species<br />

richness than young-of-the-year individuals,<br />

indicating that size and/or age were also important<br />

in acquiring new species of helminths<br />

into the infracommunity of these hosts. Data<br />

from our study and the Michigan and New<br />

Brunswick frogs suggest that although helminth<br />

species composition, richness, and prevalence<br />

may be variable depending on collection<br />

site and the ecological factors influencing<br />

variation in life history traits in local populations<br />

at those locations, green frog helminth<br />

communities are dominated by digenetic trematodes<br />

acquired in a semiaquatic habitat and/<br />

or through the frogs' diet.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank Dr. Susan Lewis, Department of Biology,<br />

Can-oll <strong>College</strong> for allowing access to the<br />

field station and permission to collect frogs, and<br />

Melissa Ewert and Luke Bolek for help in collecting<br />

frogs. We also thank 2 anonymous reviewers<br />

and the editors Drs. Willis A. Reid, Jr.<br />

and Janet W Reid for improvements on an earlier<br />

draft of the manuscript.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Aho, J. M. 1990. Helminth communities of amphibians<br />

and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding<br />

patterns and processes. Pages 157-


196 in G. W. Esch, A. O. Bush, and J. W. Aho,<br />

eds. Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes.<br />

Chapman and Hall, New York, New York,<br />

U.S.A. 335 pp.<br />

Baker, M. R. 1987. Synopsis of the Nematoda parasitic<br />

in amphibians and reptiles. Memorial University<br />

of Newfoundland Occasional Papers in Biology<br />

11:1-325.<br />

Barta, J. R., and S. S. Desser. 1984. Blood parasites<br />

of amphibians from Algonquin Park, Ontario.<br />

Journal of Wildlife Diseases 20:180-189.<br />

Barton, D. P. 1996. Helminth infracommunities in Litoria<br />

genimaculata (Amphibia: Anura) from<br />

Birthday Creek, an upland rainforest stream in<br />

northern Queensland, Australia. International<br />

Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 26:381-385.<br />

Bolek, M. G., and J. R. Coggins. 2000. Seasonal occurrence<br />

and community structure of helminth<br />

parasites from the eastern American toad, Bufo<br />

americanus americanus, from southeastern Wisconsin,<br />

U.S.A. <strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> 67:202-<br />

209.<br />

Borror, D. J., C. A. Triplehorn, and N. F. Johnson.<br />

1989. An Introduction to the Study of Insects, 6th<br />

ed. Harcourt Brace <strong>College</strong> Publishers, Philadelphia,<br />

Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 875 pp.<br />

Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />

Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />

own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />

Campbell, R. A. 19<strong>68</strong>. A comparative study of the<br />

parasites of certain Salientia from Pocahontas<br />

<strong>State</strong> Park, Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science<br />

19:13-29.<br />

Coggins, J. R., and R. A. Sajdak. 1982. A survey of<br />

helminth parasites in the salamanders and certain<br />

anurans from Wisconsin. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 49:99-102.<br />

Dronen, N. O. 1975. Studies on the life cycle of Haematoloechus<br />

coloradensis Cort, 1915 (Digenea:<br />

Plagiorchiidae), with emphasis on host susceptibility<br />

to infection. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 61:657-<br />

660.<br />

. 1978. Host-parasite population dynamics of<br />

Haematoloechus coloradensis Cort, 1915 (Digenea:<br />

Plagiorchiidae). American Midland Naturalist<br />

99:330-349.<br />

Esslinger, J. H. 1986. Redescription of Foleyellid.es<br />

striatus (Ochoterena and Caballero, 1932) (Nematoda:<br />

Filarioidea) from a Mexican frog, Rana<br />

montezumae, with reinstatement of the genus Foleyellides<br />

Caballero, 1935. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 53:218-223.<br />

Goater, T. M., G. W. Esch, and A. O. Bush. 1987.<br />

Helminth parasites of sympatric salamanders: ecological<br />

concepts at the infracommunity, component,<br />

and compound community levels. American<br />

Midland Naturalist 118:289-299.<br />

Goldberg, S. R., C. R. Bursey, and I. Ramos. 1995.<br />

The component parasite community of three sympatric<br />

toad species, Bufo cognatus, Bufo debilis<br />

(Bufonidae), and Spea multiplicata (Pelobatidae)<br />

from New Mexico. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 62:57—61.<br />

BOLEK AND COGGINS—HELMINTH COMMUNITIES IN GREEN FROGS 171<br />

Hamilton, W. J., Jr. 1948. The food and feeding behavior<br />

of the green frog, Rana clamitans Latreille,<br />

in New York <strong>State</strong>. Copeia 1948:203-207.<br />

Holmes, J. C., and P. W. Price. 1986. Communities<br />

of parasites. Pages 187-213 in J. Kikkawa and D.<br />

J. Anderson, eds. Community Ecology: Pattern<br />

and Process. Blackwell Scientific Publications,<br />

Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 432 pp.<br />

Kennedy, M. J. 1980. Host-induced variations in Haematoloechus<br />

buttensis (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae).<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:427-<br />

442.<br />

Kennedy, R. C., A. O. Bush, and J. M. Aho. 1986.<br />

Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds<br />

and fish different? <strong>Parasitology</strong> 93:205-215.<br />

Krull, W. H. 1931. Life history studies on two frog<br />

lung flukes, Pneumonoeces mediopiexus and<br />

Pneumobites parviplexus. Transactions of the<br />

American Microscopical Society 50:215—277.<br />

Martof, B. S. 1953. Territoriality in the green frog,<br />

Rana clamitans. Ecology 34:165-167.<br />

McAllister, C. T., and D. B. Conn. 1990. Occurrence<br />

of tetrathyridia of Mesocestoides sp. (Cestoidea:<br />

Cyclophyllidea) in North American anurans (Amphibia).<br />

Journal of Wildlife Diseases 26:540-543.<br />

McAlpine, D. F. 1997. Helminth communities in bullfrogs<br />

(Rana catesbeiand), green frogs (Rana<br />

clamitans), and leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) from<br />

New Brunswick, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

75:1883-1890.<br />

, and M. B. Burt. 1998. Helminths of bullfrogs,<br />

Rana catesbeiana, green frogs, R. clamitans,<br />

and leopard frogs, R. pipiens in New Brunswick.<br />

Canadian Field-Naturalist 112:50-<strong>68</strong>.<br />

-, and T. G. Dilworth. 1989. Microhabitat and<br />

prey size among three species of Rana (Anura:<br />

Ranidae) sympatric in eastern Canada. Canadian<br />

Journal of Zoology 67:2244-2252.<br />

Muzzall, P. M. 1991 a. Helminth infracommunities of<br />

the frogs Rana catesbeiana and Rana clamitans<br />

from Turkey Marsh, Michigan. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

77:366-371.<br />

. 1991b. Helminth communities of the newt,<br />

Notophthalrnus viridescens, from Turkey Marsh,<br />

Michigan. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 77:87-91.<br />

Oldham, R. S. 1967. Orienting mechanisms of the<br />

green frog, Rana clamitans. Ecology 48:477-491.<br />

Prudhoe, O. B. E., and R. A. Bray. 1982. Platyhelminth<br />

parasites of the Amphibia. British Museum<br />

(Natural History)/Oxford University Press, London,<br />

U.K. 217 pp.<br />

Scale, D. B. 1987. Amphibia. Pages 467-552 in T. J.<br />

Pandian and F. J. Vanberg, eds. Animal Energetics.<br />

Vol. 2. Academic Press, San Diego, California,<br />

U.S.A. 631 pp.<br />

Sokal, R. R., and J. F. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd<br />

ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, New<br />

York, U.S.A. 859 pp.<br />

Stewart, M. M., and P. Sandison. 1972. <strong>Comparative</strong><br />

food habits of sympatric mink frogs, bullfrogs and<br />

green frogs. Journal of Herpetology 6:241-244.<br />

Vanderburgh, D. J., and R. C. Anderson. 1987. The<br />

relationship between nematodes of the genus Cosmocercoides<br />

Wilkie, 1930 (Nematoda: Cosmocer-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


172 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

coidea) in toads (Bufo americanus) and slugs<br />

(Deroceras laeve). Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

65:1650-1661.<br />

Vogt, R. C. 1981. Natural History of Amphibians and<br />

Reptiles of Wisconsin. The Milwaukee Public<br />

Museum and Friends of the Museum, Inc., Milwaukee,<br />

Wisconsin, U.S.A. 205 pp.<br />

Walton, A. C. 1929. Studies on some nematodes of<br />

North American frogs. I. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

15:227-249.<br />

Ward, H. B. 1909. The influence of hibernation and<br />

migration on animal parasites. Proceedings of the<br />

7th International Zoological Congress (Boston).<br />

12pp.<br />

Werner, E. E., G. A. Wellborn, and M. A. McPeek.<br />

1995. Diet composition in postmetamorphic bullfrogs<br />

and green frogs: implications for interspecific<br />

predation and competition. Journal of Herpetology<br />

29:600-607.<br />

Wetzel, E. J., and G. W. Esch. 1996. Influence of<br />

odonate intermediate host ecology on the infection<br />

dynamics of Halipegus spp., Haematoloechus longiplexus,<br />

and Haematoloechus complexus (Trematoda:<br />

Digenea). Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 63:1-7.<br />

-, and . 1997. Infrapopulation dynamics<br />

of Halipegus occidualls and Halipegus eccentricus<br />

(Digenea: Hemiuridae): temporal changes<br />

within individual hosts. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

83:1019-1024.<br />

Williams, D. D., and S. J. Taft. 1980. Helminths of<br />

anurans from NW Wisconsin. Proceedings of the<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington 47:278.<br />

Witenberg, G., and C. Gerichter. 1944. The mor<br />

phology and life history of Foleyella duboisis<br />

with remarks on allied filarids of amphibians.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 30:245-256.<br />

Yoder, H. R., and J. R. Coggins. 1996. Helminth<br />

communities in the northern spring peeper, Pseudacris<br />

c. crucifer Wied, and the wood frog, Rana<br />

sylvatica Le Conte, from southeastern Wisconsin.<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

63:211-214.<br />

Announcement of the<br />

FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF NEMATOLOGY<br />

at the<br />

Tenbel Resort, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain<br />

June 8-13, 2002<br />

Sponsor: The International Federation of Nematology Societies (IFNS).<br />

Scientific Program: 4 full days of scientific sessions with an opening plenary session, symposia, colloquia,<br />

discussion sessions and offered papers arranged in 4 poster sessions. The themes will include the systematics,<br />

molecular biology, genomics, genetics, management, ecology, and physiology of parasitic, entomophagous,<br />

and free-living nematodes. Abstracts of offered papers will be accepted between December<br />

1, <strong>2001</strong> and March 1, 2002.<br />

Accommodations: The Tenbel resort is a large hotel complex in an extensive tropical garden setting. A<br />

range of accommodations will be available to Congress participants. Special interest and scenic tours will<br />

be arranged during and after the FICN. Details of available accommodations and tourism opportunities<br />

will be posted on the IFNS web site at http:\\www.ifns.org.<br />

Registration: Registrations for the FICN will be accepted after December 1, <strong>2001</strong>. Registration forms<br />

and details regarding regular, student, spouse, and accompanying person registrations are available from<br />

the IFNS web site at www.ifns.org, or from Dr. Maria Arias, FICN Local Arrangements Chair, CSIC<br />

Centre de Ciencias Medioambiantales, Serrano 115 DPDO, Madrid 28006, Spain.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 173-176<br />

Blood Parasites of the Ring-Necked Duck (Ay thy a collaris} on Its<br />

Wintering Range in Florida, U.S.A.<br />

DONALD J. FORRESTER, 1


174 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Voucher specimens have been deposited in the International<br />

Reference Centre for Avian Haematozoa at<br />

the Queensland Museum, Brisbane, Australia (accession<br />

nos. G462509-G462640) and the U.S. National<br />

Parasite Collection in Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A. (accession<br />

nos. 88248-88254). Prevalence data for each<br />

parasite were evaluated by using PROC FREQ for 2tailed<br />

Fisher's exact tests with regard to locality, gender,<br />

and age (SAS Institute, 1989). Significance was<br />

taken at P < 0.05. Terminology used was according to<br />

Bush et al. (1997).<br />

Results<br />

Five species of blood parasites were identified,<br />

2 protozoans (Haemoproteus nettionis<br />

(Johnson and Cleland, 1909) and Leucocytozoon<br />

simondi Mathis and Leger, 1910) and microfilariae<br />

of 3 nematodes (Splendidofilaria fallisensis<br />

(Anderson, 1954) and 2 unidentified species).<br />

The microfilariae of 5. fallisensis (n = 1,096)<br />

were 75.1 (41-130) in length and 4.9 (4.1-6.0)<br />

in width, with a rounded anterior, and a tapering<br />

tail that ended bluntly. Sheaths were lacking.<br />

Microfilariae of 2 unidentified filaroid species<br />

were observed in 36 ring-necked ducks. Microfilariae<br />

of Species I were long and slender with<br />

a bluntly rounded anterior and an overall uniform<br />

body width that tapered slightly to a rounded<br />

posterior. These microfilariae (n = 94) were<br />

150 (110-190) in length and 5.8 (5.0-6.0) in<br />

width. They had a well-defined sheath that could<br />

be seen at 1 or both ends of the body. The cephalic<br />

space was 4.8 (3-7, n = 10). Fixed points<br />

(n — 10), expressed as percentages of body<br />

length, were as follows: excretory cell 36.4 (35—<br />

38), inner body 64.9 (62-67), anal pore 86.6<br />

(83-90). Microfilariae of Species II (n = 287)<br />

were similar in appearance to Species I, except<br />

they were 150 (120-210) in length and 5.8 (5.0-<br />

6.0) in width and lacked a sheath. The cephalic<br />

space was 5.2 (3-6, n = 10). Fixed points (n =<br />

10) were as follows: excretory cell 36.5 (35-39),<br />

inner body 64.7 (63-67), anal pore 86.6 (85-<br />

90).<br />

The overall prevalences were H. nettionis<br />

(5.3%), L. simondi (9.2%), S. fallisensis<br />

(39.2%), filaroid Species I (6.0%), and filaroid<br />

Species II (13.8%). Of the sample, 97 ducks<br />

were infected with 1 species of parasite, 43 with<br />

2, and 8 with 3. The most common multiple infection<br />

was a combination of L. simondi and S.<br />

fallisensis (n = 15), followed by combinations<br />

of the 2 unidentified filaroids (n = 10).<br />

There were no significant differences in prevalences<br />

of the 5 species of parasites among the<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

collection periods, and therefore data for all<br />

years were combined. Prevalences of H. nettionis<br />

in Regions 1 (7%) and 2 (7%) were significantly<br />

higher (P = 0.03) than in Region 3 (0%).<br />

The prevalence of L. simondi was significantly<br />

higher (P = 0.0005) in Region 1 (19%) than in<br />

Regions 2 (8%) and 3 (1%). Microfilariae of<br />

Species II were more prevalent (P = 0.016) in<br />

Regions 2 (14%) and 3 (22%) than in Region 1<br />

(6%). There were no regional differences in the<br />

prevalences of the microfilariae of S. fallisensis<br />

and Species I.<br />

Microfilariae of S. fallisensis, Species I, and<br />

Species II were more prevalent in female ducks<br />

(46%, 9%, and 23%) than in males (33%, 3%,<br />

and 5%) (P = 0.028, 0.042, and 0.00002). The<br />

prevalences of H. nettionis and L. simondi were<br />

similar.<br />

Leucocytozoon simondi was more prevalent<br />

(P = 0.021) in juveniles (16%) than in adults<br />

(6%). On the other hand, filaroid Species I and<br />

II were both more prevalent (P = 0.029 and<br />

0.001) in adults (8% and 18%) than in juveniles<br />

(1% and 4%). There were no age differences in<br />

the prevalences of H. nettionis and S. fallisensis.<br />

Discussion<br />

Although this is the first report of H. nettionis<br />

and L. simondi from ring-necked ducks in Florida,<br />

both have been identified in ring-necked<br />

ducks overwintering in Texas, U.S.A. (Loven et<br />

al., 1980). Prevalences in the 20 ducks examined<br />

in Texas were similar to those of our Florida<br />

birds, i.e., 5% for H. nettionis and 10% for L.<br />

simondi. No microfilariae were reported in the<br />

Texas study. Unidentified microfilariae were<br />

seen in 1 of 6 ring-necked ducks examined in<br />

Maine, U.S.A.; the authors stated that their microfilariae<br />

were 45—65 long and 4-6 wide with<br />

a short, narrow, and slightly twisted tail (Nelson<br />

and Gashwiler, 1941). In a study of the blood<br />

parasites of 178 ring-necked ducks in the Maritime<br />

Provinces of Canada (New Brunswick,<br />

Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island), the<br />

prevalence of H. nettionis was higher (10%), and<br />

of L. simondi was lower (5%), than those in our<br />

birds from Florida (Bennett et al., 1975). No microfilariae<br />

were reported in the Maritime study.<br />

In another study, Bennett and Inder (1972)<br />

found microfilariae in 1 of 10 ring-necked ducks<br />

from Newfoundland, Canada, but provided no<br />

descriptions or measurements.<br />

Anderson's (1956) description of the micro-


filariae of S. fallisensis was similar to our specimens,<br />

with the exception of ranges of the<br />

lengths and the lack of sheaths; however, he noted<br />

that the sheaths of S. fallisensis were extremely<br />

delicate, and he was unable to see them<br />

in most specimens stained with Giemsa. Anderson<br />

(1956) also described a microfilaria from a<br />

European teal (Anas crecca Linnaeus, 1758) that<br />

he called Type D. His Type D microfilariae were<br />

similar to those of 5. fallisensis except for the<br />

length (range = 110-138) and the lack of a<br />

sheath. The microfilariae in our ring-necked<br />

ducks that we are calling 5. fallisensis could actually<br />

represent 2 species. However, it is possible<br />

that because we measured twice as many microfilariae<br />

as did Anderson (1956), that we have<br />

determined that the range of lengths for the microfilariae<br />

of this species is more extensive than<br />

previously recognized. Therefore, we are calling<br />

those microfilariae that fell in the range of 41-<br />

130 in length, but otherwise conformed to Anderson's<br />

(1956) description, S. fallisensis. The<br />

high number of combined infections of S. fallisensis<br />

and L. simondi in the same bird (n = 15)<br />

was probably due to the fact that both parasites<br />

utilize the same species of simuliid blackflies as<br />

vectors (Fallis et al., 1951; Anderson, 19<strong>68</strong>).<br />

Of the 36 ducks that had unidentified microfilariae,<br />

2 had Species I only, while 17 had Species<br />

II only. Seventeen of 36 ducks had both<br />

Species I and II microfilariae. The fact that Species<br />

I usually occurred with Species II and only<br />

twice by itself and that the range of lengths and<br />

several fixed points were almost equal may support<br />

the idea that these are variations of a single<br />

species. In many ways (morphologic and metric)<br />

our microfilariae resemble those of Chandlerella<br />

bus hi, described by Bartlett and Anderson<br />

(1987) from American coots (Fulica americana<br />

Gmelin, 1789) in Manitoba, Canada. They were<br />

not able to see the sheaths on microfilariae of C.<br />

bushi in blood films made from fresh heart blood<br />

and stained with Giemsa. However, they were<br />

able to see the sheaths on Giemsa-stained blood<br />

films of heart blood taken from thawed carcasses<br />

or specimens teased from lung tissue. The lack<br />

of visible sheaths of microfilariae in our ringnecked<br />

duck blood films might be because they<br />

were made from fresh heart blood. The identification<br />

of the microfilariae from ring-necked<br />

ducks will have to await the discovery of adult<br />

worms and further study and comparison of their<br />

FORRESTER ET AL.—BLOOD PARASITES OF RING-NECKED DUCKS 175<br />

intrauterine microfilariae with those from the<br />

blood.<br />

The regional differences in the prevalences of<br />

H. nettionis and L. simondi may have been a<br />

reflection of the location of the breeding grounds<br />

and flyways used by different subpopulations of<br />

ring-necked ducks. Because transmission of the<br />

blood parasites of waterfowl does not occur in<br />

Florida (Thul et al., 1980; Thul and O'Brien,<br />

1990; Forrester et al., 1994), the ducks must become<br />

infected either on the breeding grounds or<br />

during migration. The types and numbers of arthropod<br />

vectors found on various breeding<br />

grounds might differ and thereby influence the<br />

acquisition of these blood parasites in various<br />

segments of the North American population.<br />

Ring-necked ducks that overwinter in Florida<br />

are known to breed during the summer months<br />

in various prairie provinces of Canada across to<br />

Ontario and the eastern U.S.A. (Bellrose, 1976).<br />

Some ducks that breed in the more western regions<br />

of Canada migrate eastward and then<br />

move southward. Others migrate southward and<br />

pass through Wisconsin, Indiana, Tennessee, and<br />

Georgia. Most of the ring-necked ducks in Florida<br />

originate from Ontario, Manitoba, and the<br />

District of Mackenzie (Bellrose, 1976). The lower<br />

prevalence of infections of L. simondi in<br />

adults may be due to age-related immunity. Reasons<br />

for the gender differences in prevalences<br />

are unknown.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank H. F. Percival, T C. Hines, C. W.<br />

Jeske, and A. R. Woodward for assistance in collecting<br />

ducks, R. C. Littell for helping with statistical<br />

analyses, and R. C. Anderson, E. C. Greiner,<br />

and M. G. Spalding for reviewing the manuscript<br />

and offering useful suggestions. This research<br />

was supported in part by the Florida Fish<br />

and Wildlife Conservation Commission and is a<br />

contribution of Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration,<br />

Florida Pitman—Robertson Project W-41.<br />

This is Florida Agricultural Experiment Station<br />

Journal Series No. R-07749.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Anderson, R. C. 1956. Ornithofilaria fallisensis n. sp.<br />

(Nematoda: Filarioidea) from the domestic duck<br />

with descriptions of microfilariae in waterfowl.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 32:125-137.<br />

. 19<strong>68</strong>. The simuliid vectors of Splendidofilaria<br />

fallisensis of ducks. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

46:610-611.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


176 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Bartlett, C. M., and R. C. Anderson. 1987. Chandlerella<br />

bushi n. sp. and Splendidofilaria caperata<br />

Hibler, 1964 (Nematoda: Filarioidea) from Fulica<br />

americana (Gruiformes: Rallidae) in Manitoba,<br />

Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65:2799-<br />

2802.<br />

Bellrose, F. C. 1976. Ducks, Geese & Swans of North<br />

America. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,<br />

U.S.A. 543 pp.<br />

Bennett, G. F., and J. G. Inder. 1972. Blood parasites<br />

of game birds from insular Newfoundland. Canadian<br />

Journal of Zoology 50:705-706.<br />

, A. D. Smith, W. Whitman, and M. Cameron.<br />

1975. Hematozoa of the Anatidae of the Atlantic<br />

Flyway. II. The Maritime Provinces of Canada.<br />

Journal of Wildlife Diseases 11:280-289.<br />

-, M. Whiteway, and C. B. Woodworth-Lynas.<br />

1982. Host-parasite catalogue of the avian<br />

Haematozoa. Memorial University of Newfoundland<br />

Occasional Papers in Biology 5:1-243.<br />

Bishop, M. A., and G. F. Bennett. 1992. Host-parasite<br />

catalogue of the avian Haematozoa, Supplement<br />

1, and Bibliography of the avian blood-inhabiting<br />

Haematozoa, Supplement 2. Memorial<br />

University of Newfoundland Occasional Papers in<br />

Biology 15:1-244.<br />

Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />

Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />

own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />

Fallis, A. M., D. M. Davies, and M. A. Vickers.<br />

1951. Life history of Leucocytozoon simondi<br />

Mathis and Leger in natural and experimental infections<br />

and blood changes produced in the avian<br />

host. Canadian Journal of Zoology 29:305-328.<br />

New Book Available<br />

Forrester, D. J., J. M. Kinsella, J. W. Mertins, R.<br />

D. Price, and R. E. Turnbull. 1994. Parasitic helminths<br />

and arthropods of fulvous whistling-ducks<br />

(Dendrocygna bicolor) in southern Florida. Journal<br />

of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

61:84-88.<br />

Loven, J. S., E. G. Bolen, and B. W. Cain. 1980.<br />

Blood parasitemia in a South Texas wintering waterfowl<br />

population. Journal of Wildlife Diseases<br />

16:25-28.<br />

Martin, E. M. 1996. Tables of 1981-1990 average<br />

U.S. waterfowl harvest by species and county.<br />

Unpublished data from the Division of Migratory<br />

Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,<br />

Laurel, Maryland, U.S.A.<br />

Nelson, E. C., and J. S. Gashwiler. 1941. Blood parasites<br />

of some Maine waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife<br />

Management 5:199-205.<br />

Robertson, W. B., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1992.<br />

Florida Bird Species: An Annotated List. Florida<br />

Ornithological Society Special Publication Number<br />

6, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A. 260 pp.<br />

SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide,<br />

Version 6, 4th ed., Vol. 1. SAS Institute, Inc.,<br />

Gary, North Carolina, U.S.A. 943 pp.<br />

Thul, J. E., D. J. Forrester, and E. C. Greiner. 1980.<br />

Hematozoa of Wood Ducks (Aix sponsd) in the<br />

Atlantic Flyway. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 16:<br />

383-389.<br />

, and T. O'Brien. 1990. Wood duck hematozoan<br />

parasites as biological tags: Development of<br />

a population assessment model. Pages 323-334 in<br />

Proceedings of the 1988 North American Wood<br />

Duck Symposium, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.<br />

Metazoan Parasites in the Neotropics: A Systematic and Ecological Perspective. Editors Guillermo<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, Alfonso N. Garcia-Aldrete, and Victor M. Vidal-Martinez. 2000. Published by the<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) to celebrate the 70th Anniversary of the Institute<br />

de Biologia. 310 pp. ISBN 9<strong>68</strong>-36-8827-6. 6%" X 8Vi" soft cover. Cost: US$20.00 or MXP$200.00 per<br />

copy plus shipping and handling. Available from Institute de Biologia, UNAM, Secretaria Tecnica, Apartado<br />

Postal 70-153, CP 04510 Mexico D.F., Mexico or on-line at the internet web-page http://<br />

www.ibiologia.unam.mx. Payment by check only, made payable to "Institute de Biologia, UNAM". This<br />

volume is a compilation of 11 original contributions by an internationally diverse group of 18 researchers<br />

addressing a broad range of parasite systematics and biogeographical issues in South and Central American<br />

vertebrates.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 177-184<br />

Parelaphostrongylus tennis (Nematoda: Protostrongylidae) and Other<br />

Parasites of White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus} in Costa Rica<br />

RAMON A. CARRENO,1'5 LANCE A. DuRDEN,2 DANIEL R. BROOKS,3 ARTHUR ABRAMS,4 AND<br />

ERIC P. HOBERG4<br />

1 Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1 (e-mail:<br />

rcarreno@uoguelph.ca), .<br />

2 Institute of Arthropodology and <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Georgia Southern University, <strong>State</strong>sboro, Georgia 30460,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: Idurden@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu),<br />

3 Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G5 (e-mail: dbrooks@<br />

zoo.utoronto.ca), and<br />

4 Biosystematics and National Parasite Collection Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, BARC East<br />

1180, Beltsville, Maryland 20715, U.S.A.<br />

ABSTRACT: Parasites were collected from 2 female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Area de<br />

Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica, in early June 1999. Both deer were parasitized by the ticks Amblyomma<br />

parvum and Haemaphysalis juxtakochi as well as the hippoboscid fly, Lipoptena mazamae. One deer also hosted<br />

the ticks Boophilus microplus, Ixodes qffinis, and Anocentor nitens. Both deer were infected by larvae of the<br />

nasopharyngeal botfly Cephenemyia jellisoni, and the helminths Eucyathostomum webbi, Gongylonema pulchrum,<br />

Parelaphostrongylus tennis, and Paramphistomum liorchis, whereas Setaria yehi, an undescribed species<br />

of Ashworthius, and Onchocerca cervipedis occurred in single hosts. A cysticercus of Taenia oinissa was found<br />

encapsulated in the lung parenchyma of 1 host. This is the first report of these endoparasites from Central<br />

America.<br />

KEY WORDS: Ashworthius sp., biodiversity, ticks, Boophilus microplus, Gongylonema pulchrum, Haemaphysalis<br />

juxtakochi, Ixodes affinis, Odocoileus virginianus, white-tailed deer, helminth parasites, Parelaphostrongylus<br />

tenuis, cysticercus, Costa Rica.<br />

The white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus<br />

(Zimmermann, 1780) has a widespread Nearctic<br />

and Neotropical range, extending from southern<br />

Canada and the United <strong>State</strong>s through Mexico<br />

and Central America to Bolivia, the Guianas,<br />

and northern Brazil (Reid, 1997). The subspecies<br />

described from Costa Rica, Odocoileus virginianus<br />

truei Merriam, 1898, ranges from the<br />

southeastern edge of Mexico to northeastern<br />

Panama (Whitehead, 1972; Mendez, 1984). The<br />

parasite fauna of O. virginianus and other cervids<br />

is well documented in North America<br />

(Walker and Becklund, 1970; Davidson et al.,<br />

1981). However, very little information is available<br />

on parasites of cervids in the southern parts<br />

of their range, including Central America. This<br />

is significant because white-tailed deer are hosts<br />

to several serious pathogens and parasites of cervids<br />

and other animals, including the tick Ixodes<br />

scapularis Say, 1821, which is the main North<br />

American vector of the agent of Lyme borreli-<br />

5 Corresponding author. Present address: Department<br />

of Nematology, University of California, Davis, California<br />

95616, U.S.A. (e-mail: racarreno@<br />

ucdavis.edu).<br />

177<br />

osis. Additionally, one of the most important<br />

parasites in O. virginianus is Parelaphostrongylus<br />

tenuis (Dougherty, 1945), the meningeal<br />

worm. This species is not pathogenic in O. virginianus,<br />

but when snails infected with its larvae<br />

are ingested by other ruminants such as moose<br />

(Alces alces (Linnaeus, 1758)), fallow deer<br />

(Dama dama (Linnaeus, 1758)), reindeer (Rangifer<br />

tarandus (Linnaeus, 1758)), and llamas<br />

(Lama spp.), severe neurologic disease can result<br />

from adult worms in the brain and central<br />

nervous system (Anderson, 1964, 1970; Nettles<br />

et al., 1977; Krogdahl et al., 1987; Rickard et<br />

al., 1994).<br />

The following report is part of a biodiversity<br />

inventory of eukaryotic parasites of vertebrates<br />

in the Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG)<br />

in northwestern Costa Rica.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

We collected 2 adult female O. virginianus within<br />

the ACG, Guanacaste, Costa Rica (10°57'N; 85°48'W)<br />

in early June 1999. Ectoparasites were collected within<br />

1 hr postmortem. Internal organs were then removed,<br />

following procedures suggested by Nettles (1981), and<br />

examined for endoparasites. In addition to onsite ex-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


178 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

amination, several aliquots of abomasal and intestinal<br />

contents were fixed and later searched for parasites.<br />

Contents from the abomasum and small intestine were<br />

suspended in 2 liter of water. Duplicate aliquots of 200<br />

ml were removed, fixed in 5% formalin, and subsequently<br />

examined using a stereomicroscope. Digeneans<br />

were fixed in hot 10% formalin and stored in 70%<br />

ethanol. Ectoparasites and nematodes were stored in<br />

70% ethanol without fixation in formalin. Prior to examination,<br />

nematodes were cleared in either glycerine<br />

or phenol-alcohol. Tissues examined for sarcocysts<br />

were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with<br />

both hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff<br />

stains for diagnosis. Amphistome digeneans were prepared<br />

using the same methods and identified using descriptions<br />

by Kennedy et al. (1985) and Sey (1991).<br />

Voucher tick specimens are deposited in the U.S. National<br />

Tick Collection (USNTC), Institute of Arthropodology<br />

and <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Georgia Southern University,<br />

<strong>State</strong>sboro, Georgia, U.S.A. Voucher specimens<br />

of other parasites are deposited in the U.S. National<br />

Parasite Collection (USNPC), United <strong>State</strong>s Department<br />

of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A. Accession<br />

numbers are listed in Table 1.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 18 parasite species was found in<br />

the 2 deer (Table 1). Both deer hosted the hippoboscid<br />

louse fly Lipoptena mazamae and the<br />

ixodid ticks Amblyomma parvum and Haemaphysalis<br />

juxtakochi. We also found second- and<br />

third-stage larvae of Cephenemyia jellisoni<br />

(identified using keys in Bennett and Sabrosky<br />

[1962]) in the nasal sinuses of both deer. One<br />

deer also hosted the ticks Anocentor nitens, Boophilus<br />

microplus, and Ixodes affinis.<br />

Both deer hosted the digenean trematode Paramphistomum<br />

liorchis in their rumens. They also<br />

were infected by 3 species of nematodes: Gongylonema<br />

pulchrum in the submucosa of the<br />

esophagus, Eucyathostomum webbi in the large<br />

intestine, and Parelaphostrongylus tennis in the<br />

inner surface of the dura and from cranial sinuses<br />

and nerves. Meristic data for the latter<br />

species (Table 2) did not differ from those reported<br />

for P. tennis in O. virginianus from North<br />

America (Anderson, 1963; Carreno and Lankester,<br />

1993), although the esophageal lengths of<br />

the 2 males were greater than those reported in<br />

North American specimens.<br />

A cysticercus of Taenia omissa was found encapsulated<br />

in fibrous connective tissue in the<br />

lung parenchyma. Identification of the cysticercus<br />

was based on structure and measurements of<br />

rostellar hooks and the occurrence in deer; morphology<br />

of the intact cysticercus was consistent<br />

with observations by Rausch (1981).<br />

Two specimens of Setaria yehi were collected<br />

from 1 deer, 1 in the rectum, and the other in<br />

the posterior region of the body cavity. From the<br />

abomasal intestinal aliquots, few nematodes in<br />

the abomasa and none in the small intestines<br />

were found. A female specimen of Mazamastrongylus<br />

sp. occurred in the abomasum of 1<br />

deer. It could not be identified to species based<br />

on the diagnostic features within the genus.<br />

Hoberg (1996) demonstrated polymorphism in<br />

vulvar anatomy, and no males were found. In<br />

the abomasum of the second deer, specimens of<br />

an undescribed species of Ashworthius were<br />

found.<br />

Protozoan infections were not obvious in<br />

these animals (blood smears and fecal examinations<br />

were negative), except for the presence<br />

of unidentified sarcocysts in the hind leg muscles<br />

of 1 host.<br />

Discussion<br />

Parasites in white-tailed deer<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

This report constitutes the first data on parasites<br />

of O. virginianus in Costa Rica. The ranges<br />

of C. jellisoni, P. liorchis, E. webbi, O. cervipedis,<br />

and, most importantly, P. tennis are now<br />

extended south of North America. These range<br />

extensions suggest that the parasites may also be<br />

present in Mexico, other parts of Central America,<br />

and perhaps South America, coinciding with<br />

the distribution of this cervid.<br />

There is little information on the parasites of<br />

cervids south of the United <strong>State</strong>s. Captive O.<br />

virginianus from the Yucatan Peninsula have<br />

been reported as hosts of nematodes (Haemonchus<br />

sp., Cooperia spp., Isospora spp., Eimeria<br />

spp., Trichuris spp., Strongyloides spp.) and cestodes<br />

(Moniezia spp.), based on examination of<br />

fecal samples and fecal culture of nematode L3<br />

larvae (Montes-Perez et al., 1998). Several parasites<br />

have been listed from O. virginianus from<br />

Mexico and Central America, including arthropods,<br />

Cephenemyia sp., L. mazamae, A. nitens,<br />

H. juxtakochi, I. affinis, and nematodes, Haemonchus<br />

conforms (Rudolphi, 1802) Cobb,<br />

1898, and Gongylonema pulchrum, as well as<br />

several other species not found in the present<br />

study (Mendez, 1984). In South America, O. virginianus<br />

has been reported as a host for the<br />

nematodes H. contortus, Setaria sp., Oesophagostomum<br />

asperum Railliet and Henry, 1913,<br />

and Mecistocirrus sp., as well as the arthropods


CARRENO ET AL.—DEER PARASITES IN COSTA RICA 179<br />

Table 1. Parasites recovered from Odocoileus virginianus in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.<br />

Protozoa<br />

Sarcocystis sp.<br />

Parasite Deer Deer 2 Accession number<br />

Arthropoda: Acari<br />

Arnblyomma parvum Aragao, 1908<br />

Anocentor nitens (Neumann, 1897)<br />

Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887)<br />

Haemaphysalis juxtakochi (Cooley, 1946)<br />

Ixodes qffinis Neumann, 1899<br />

Amblyomma sp. (immature stages)<br />

Arthropoda: Diptera<br />

Lipoptena mazamae Rondani, 1878<br />

Cephenemyia jellisoni Townsend, 1941<br />

Trematoda<br />

Paramphistomum liorchis Fischoeder,<br />

1901<br />

Cestoda<br />

Taenia omissa Liihe, 1910<br />

Nematoda<br />

Setaria yehi (Desset, 1966)<br />

Ashworthius sp.<br />

Gongylonenm pulchmm Molin, 1857<br />

Eucyathostomum webbi Pursglove, 1976<br />

Parelaphostrongylus tennis (Dougherty,<br />

1945)<br />

Mazamastrongylus sp.<br />

Onchocerca cervipedis Wehr and Dikmans,<br />

1935<br />

+ USNPC 90056<br />

+ + RML 122837, RML 122838<br />

+ RML 122838<br />

+ - RML 122838<br />

+ + RML 122837, RML 122838<br />

+ - RML 122838<br />

+ + RML 122837, RML 122838<br />

+ USNPC 90062, USNPC 90063<br />

10 USNPC 90053, USNPC 90054<br />

+ (> 1,000) + (


180 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 2. Morphometric measurements for P. tennis<br />

recovered from O. virginianus in Guanacaste, Costa<br />

Rica; measurements are given in microns (u.m) unless<br />

otherwise noted.<br />

Males<br />

Length (mm)<br />

Width (posterior to esophagus)<br />

Esophagus length<br />

Nerve ring from anterior<br />

Excretory pore from anterior<br />

Gubernaculum length<br />

Crura length<br />

Spicules<br />

Spicule branch<br />

Females<br />

Length (mm)<br />

Width (posterior to esophagus)<br />

Nerve ring from anterior<br />

Excretory pore from anterior<br />

Vulva from posterior<br />

Anus from posterior<br />

N Mean Range<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

3<br />

3<br />

6<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

8<br />

8<br />

47.00<br />

170.00<br />

807.50<br />

120.00<br />

110.00<br />

117.00<br />

36.17<br />

225.00<br />

7 1 .50<br />

105.50<br />

210.00<br />

105.50<br />

108.50<br />

185.50<br />

56.96<br />

—<br />

140-200<br />

795-820<br />

107-133<br />

—<br />

110-131<br />

25.7-44.0<br />

211-236<br />

70-73<br />

—<br />

190-230<br />

102-109<br />

106-111<br />

165-214<br />

45.5-79.0<br />

gated geographically and seasonally. For example,<br />

in Alabama, Durden et al. (1991) recovered<br />

4 species of ticks from 537 O. virginianus examined<br />

during winter (November-January), but<br />

only 2 of these species (/. scapularis and Dermacentor<br />

albipictus (Packard, 1869)) were common.<br />

In Alberta, Samuel et al. (1980) recorded<br />

just 1 species of tick (D. albipictus) from 148<br />

O. virginianus examined in all months, whereas<br />

Smith (1977) recorded 7 tick species from this<br />

host from 12 southeastern states, again with just<br />

2 species (/. scapularis and Amblyomma americanum<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)) being common. In<br />

southern Texas, Samuel and Trainer (1970) recovered<br />

6 species of ticks from 404 O. virginianus<br />

examined, with 3 of these species (A.<br />

americanum, Amblyomma inornatum Banks,<br />

1909, and Amblyomma maculatum Koch, 1844)<br />

being prevalent.<br />

The known geographical range of A. parvutn<br />

extends from Mexico to Argentina. Throughout<br />

this range it parasitizes a wide variety of mammals<br />

(Fairchild et al., 1966; Jones et al., 1972).<br />

In Panama, Fairchild et al. (1966) recorded A.<br />

parvum from white-tailed deer, cattle, domestic<br />

cats, sloth, human, anteater (Tamandua sp.), and<br />

cotton rats (Sigmodon spp.). There is an unpublished<br />

USNTC record of this tick from a horse<br />

in Costa Rica.<br />

The tropical horse tick, A. nitens, is a pest of<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

equines in the neotropics and is the main vector<br />

of Babesia equi (Laveran, 1901), the protozoan<br />

that causes equine piroplasmosis (Strickland et<br />

al., 1976). In adjoining Panama, Fairchild et al.<br />

(1966) reported this tick from horses, cattle, and<br />

deer. The USNTC contains 8 collections of A.<br />

nitens from Costa Rica: 6 from horses, 1 from<br />

a domestic cat, and 1 from a rabbit (Sylvilagus<br />

sp.).<br />

The southern cattle tick, B. microplus, was<br />

formerly widespread throughout the New World<br />

as a major pest of domestic cattle, where it<br />

caused tremendous economic damage through<br />

its role as a vector of Babesia bigemina (Smith<br />

and Kilborne, 1893), an agent of bovine piroplasmosis<br />

(=Texas cattle fever) (Strickland et<br />

al., 1976; Bram and George, 2000). This tick<br />

also is a vector of Anaplasma marginale Theiler,<br />

1910 and Babesia bovis (Babes, 1888) Starcovici,<br />

1893. In Costa Rica, Hermans et al. (1994)<br />

reported high infection rates for these 3 hemoparasites<br />

in B. microplus and high seroprevalences<br />

to them in cattle. In Panama, Fairchild et<br />

al. (1966) reported this tick from cattle, horses,<br />

pigs, and dogs, with single collections from a<br />

goat and a deer. The USNTC contains 23 collections<br />

of B. microplus from Costa Rica: 15<br />

from cattle, 2 from horses, 2 from vegetation,<br />

and 1 each from a human, a tapir (Tapirus sp.),<br />

a gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus (Schreber,<br />

1775)), and a fringe-lipped bat (Trachops<br />

cirrhosus (Spix, 1823)).<br />

Deer are the preferred hosts of H. juxtakochi,<br />

which is widely distributed from Mexico to Argentina<br />

(Jones et al., 1972). However, this tick<br />

has occasionally also been collected from rodents,<br />

humans, tapirs, coatimundis (Nasua sp.),<br />

peccaries (Tayassu spp.), porcupines (Coendou<br />

spp.), and lagomorphs (Fairchild et al., 1966;<br />

Jones et al., 1972). The USNTC contains 1 other<br />

Costa Rican collection of H. juxtakochi, also<br />

from a white-tailed deer.<br />

Ixodes affinis has a disjunct geographical distribution,<br />

with 1 focus in the southeastern<br />

U.S.A. (coastal Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina),<br />

and the other focus extending from Mexico<br />

to Brazil (Fairchild et al., 1966; Durden and<br />

Keirans, 1996). Because it is a member of the<br />

Ixodes ricinus complex, several members of<br />

which are vectors of the Lyme disease spirochete,<br />

Borrelia burgdorferi Johnson, Schmid,<br />

Hyde et al., 1984, this tick could be an enzootic<br />

vector of this zoonotic pathogen. It parasitizes a


ange of host species, but most collections, especially<br />

of adults, are from deer and larger carnivores<br />

(Fairchild et al., 1966; Durden and Keirans,<br />

1996). The USNTC includes 5 additional<br />

Costa Rican collections of /. qffinis: 2 from ocelots<br />

(Leopardus pardalis (Linnaeus, 1758)), and<br />

1 each from a human, a horse, and a long-tailed<br />

weasel (Mustela frenata Lichtenstein, 1831).<br />

Digeneans<br />

Brokx (1984) and Mendez (1984) reported<br />

amphistome digeneans, Cotylophoron sp. and<br />

Paramphistomum cervi (Zeder, 1790), respectively,<br />

in the stomach of O. virginianus. Unfortunately<br />

no voucher specimens exist from those<br />

accounts, so we cannot confirm their identifications.<br />

The only amphistomes we found were P.<br />

liorchis, the species most commonly reported<br />

from O. virginianus in North America (Kennedy<br />

et al., 1985).<br />

Cestodes<br />

Taenia omissa has a broad geographic distribution<br />

in the Western Hemisphere, coinciding<br />

with the range of the cougar, Puma concolor<br />

(Linnaeus, 1771), and deer intermediate hosts<br />

including Odocoileus and Mazama in North and<br />

South America (Rausch, 1981; Rausch et al.,<br />

1983). Consistent with the current study, cysticerci<br />

generally are found in the thoracic cavity,<br />

including the lungs and pericardium (Forrester<br />

and Rausch, 1990). Although cysticerci have<br />

been reported in brocket deer (Mazama cf. gouazoubira<br />

(Fischer, 1814)) from eastern Colombia<br />

(Rausch, 1981), there are apparently no prior records<br />

from Central America. Prevalence and intensity<br />

of infection in deer may be influenced by<br />

differences in population density of cougars<br />

across the range of this parasite—host assemblage<br />

(Forrester and Rausch, 1990).<br />

Nematodes<br />

This is the first record of P. tennis south of<br />

the United <strong>State</strong>s. The presence of elaphostrongyline<br />

nematodes in cervids is a major concern<br />

in the translocation of these animals in wildlife<br />

projects and the game ranching industry (Lankester<br />

and Fong, 1989; Samuel et al., 1992;<br />

Miller and Thorne, 1993; Davidson et al., 1996).<br />

Parelaphostrongylus tennis is of great concern<br />

in future wildlife management and conservation<br />

practices in Central America. An overall decline<br />

of O. virginianus populations in Mexico and<br />

CARRENO ET AL.—DEER PARASITES IN COSTA RICA 181<br />

Central America due to overhunting and habitat<br />

loss (Mendez, 1984) raises the possibility of reintroducing<br />

deer to areas where they have been<br />

extirpated. The effects of P. tennis on the only<br />

other Central American cervid, the brocket deer<br />

(Mazama americana (Erxleben, 1777)), are unknown.<br />

As P. tennis is highly pathogenic in<br />

most cervids other than O. virginianus, it may<br />

also be pathogenic in Mazama spp. Until the<br />

pathogenic significance (if any) of P. tennis to<br />

M. americana has been determined, the translocation<br />

of both it and Central American O. virginianus<br />

may be problematic in areas inhabited<br />

by other cervids that may be susceptible to parelaphostrongylosis.<br />

The translocation of infected O. virginianus<br />

to areas in which P. tennis is absent may result<br />

in the establishment of the parasite in other areas.<br />

The importation of deer from Pennsylvania<br />

to an island off the Georgia coast may have resulted<br />

in the establishment of P. tennis in an area<br />

outside its normal range (Davidson et al., 1996).<br />

Similarly, the translocation of reindeer (Rangifer<br />

tarandus) from Norway to Newfoundland has<br />

led to the establishment of Elaphostrongylus<br />

rangiferi Mitskevitch, 1960, another pathogenic<br />

species, in this region of North America (Lankester<br />

and Fong, 1989). Other cervids such as<br />

red deer (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758) and<br />

moose (Alces alces (Linnaeus, 1758)) may also<br />

harbor Elaphostrongylus species, and North<br />

American elk have been shown to have potential<br />

for surviving infection with and passing larvae<br />

of P. tennis (Samuel et al., 1992). These studies<br />

indicate a need for reliable diagnosis of P. tennis<br />

in ungulates and the need to determine the full<br />

distribution of this parasite. This information can<br />

help to prevent the spread of the parasite to uninfected<br />

host populations. Cervids of western<br />

North America are of particular concern, as P.<br />

tennis has not been recorded in western states<br />

and provinces (Miller and Thorne, 1993).<br />

The presence of P. tennis in Central American<br />

deer is also of evolutionary significance. As yet,<br />

we do not know if M. americana or any of the<br />

South American cervids such as Pudu spp. and<br />

Ozotoceros spp. are hosts for protostrongylids.<br />

Phylogenetic analysis of the family Protostrongylidae<br />

and comparison with host distribution,<br />

however, indicates that cervids are the basal<br />

hosts of these parasites (Carreno and Hoberg,<br />

1999). Discovery of new or already described<br />

protostrongyles in these hosts will contribute<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


182 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

further to an understanding of the evolution of<br />

the Protostrongylidae.<br />

The presence of an undescribed species of<br />

Ashworthius is also of interest. Species of this<br />

genus of the Haemonchiinae have never been<br />

reported from hosts in the Western Hemisphere,<br />

although both Haernonchus and Mecistocirrus<br />

are known in Central and South America. In Africa<br />

and Eurasia, species of Ashworthius have<br />

been reported from cervids and members of 2<br />

subfamilies of the Bovidae, but not species of<br />

Bos (Pike, 1969; Drozdz et al., 1998). The presence<br />

of Ashworthius sp. in a wild cervid in the<br />

Western Hemisphere may have been the result<br />

of introduction and colonization from bovine<br />

hosts following European settlement since the<br />

1500s (Hoberg, 1997). The host distribution for<br />

this genus and its apparent absence in domestic<br />

bovids, however, suggest otherwise. Alternatively,<br />

the distribution of Ashworthius spp. in Central<br />

America may be relatively archaic, reflecting<br />

an extended history with endemic cervids. Historical<br />

reconstruction of the biogeography of<br />

Ashworthius in the New World is currently hampered<br />

by the paucity of survey data regarding<br />

parasitism in wild ruminants in Central and<br />

South America. Additionally, it is important to<br />

note that superficially some species of Ashworthius<br />

may resemble and be confused with Haemonchus<br />

spp.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The purpose of parasite inventories is 2-fold.<br />

First, the information obtained from parasite<br />

faunas can contribute valuable integrative information<br />

on our knowledge of the biosphere that<br />

serves as an indicator of biodiversity (Brooks<br />

and Hoberg, 2000). Secondly, in the case of the<br />

white-tailed deer, it is important to develop an<br />

understanding of the distribution of potential<br />

pathogens of wildlife. Many wildlife pathogens<br />

pose a serious threat to global biodiversity and<br />

also include several zoonoses (Daszak et al.,<br />

2000), and it is thus necessary to assess carefully<br />

the global distribution of potentially pathogenic<br />

parasites (Hoberg, 1997). The results of this<br />

study are an important contribution to biodiversity<br />

initiatives in Costa Rica. They have important<br />

implications in conservation projects in the<br />

region, as some parasites of white-tailed deer,<br />

such as P. tennis, may be pathogenic in other,<br />

less common endemic hosts such as M. arneri-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

The uncertainty of species identifications in<br />

other reports, such as the amphistome digeneans<br />

(Brokx, 1984; Mendez, 1984), demonstrates the<br />

need for deposition of suitable voucher specimens<br />

in documenting parasite fauna. Are we<br />

dealing with a widespread and relatively uniform<br />

parasite fauna of white-tailed deer throughout<br />

their range, or one that is highly localized<br />

depending on habitat? A lack of voucher specimens<br />

to confirm identifications, and a lack of<br />

sufficient expert taxonomists available to provide<br />

those identifications (the taxonomic impediment:<br />

Brooks and Hoberg, 2000), prevents us<br />

from making such assessments. And such assessments,<br />

in turn, are critical for management<br />

policy, including game farming, sport hunting,<br />

and the interface between wildlands and agroscape.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank the scientific and technical staff of<br />

the ACG for support of this study, in particular<br />

Sigifredo Marin, Roger Blanco, Alejandro Masis,<br />

Maria Marta Chavarria, Felipe Chavarria,<br />

Guillermo Jimenez, Carolina Cano, Elda Araya,<br />

Fredy Quesada, Dunia Garcia, Roberto Espinoza,<br />

Elba Lopez, and Petrona Rios. Special thanks<br />

to Dr. Dan Janzen, technical adviser to the ACG,<br />

and to Calixto Moraga for their timely and accurate<br />

assistance. We are also grateful to Dr.<br />

Murray Lankester, Lakehead University, Thunder<br />

Bay, Canada, for advice on necropsy and<br />

collection procedures. Funds for this study were<br />

provided in part by an operating grant from the<br />

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research<br />

Council (NSERC) of Canada to D.R.B. Study of<br />

tick specimens was funded in part by National<br />

Institutes of Health grant Al 40729 to L.A.D.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Anderson, R. C. 1963. The incidence, development,<br />

and experimental transmission of Pneiunostrongylus<br />

tenuis Dougherty (Metastrongyloidea: Protostrongylidae)<br />

of the meninges of the white-tailed<br />

deer (Odocoileus virginianus borealis) in Ontario.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 41:775-792.<br />

. 1964. Neurologic disease in moose infected<br />

experimentally with Pneiimostrongyliis tennis<br />

from white-tailed deer. Pathologia Veterinaria 1:<br />

289-322.<br />

-. 1970. Neurologic disease in reindeer (Rangifer<br />

tarandus tarandus) introduced into Ontario.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 49:159-166.<br />

Bennett, G. F., and C. W. Sabrosky. 1962. The Ne<br />

arctic species of the genus Cephenemyla (Diptera,


Oestridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 40:431-<br />

448.<br />

Bram, R. A., and J. E. George. 2000. Introduction<br />

of nonindigenous arthropod pests of animals.<br />

Journal of Medical Entomology 37:1-8.<br />

Brokx, P. A. 1984. South America. Pages 525-546 in<br />

L. K. Halls, ed. White-Tailed Deer: Ecology and<br />

Management. Wildlife Management Institute.<br />

Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,<br />

U.S.A. 870 pp.<br />

Brooks, D. R., and E. P. Hoberg. 2000. Triage for<br />

the biosphere: the need and rationale for taxonomic<br />

inventories and phylogenetic studies of parasites.<br />

<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> 67:1—25.<br />

Capelle, K. J. 1971. Myiasis. Pages 279-305 in J. W.<br />

Davis and R. C. Anderson, eds. Parasitic Diseases<br />

of Wild Mammals. Iowa <strong>State</strong> University Press,<br />

Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.<br />

Carreno, R. A., and E. P. Hoberg. 1999. Evolutionary<br />

relationships among the Protostrongylidae<br />

(Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) as inferred from<br />

morphological characters, with consideration of<br />

parasite—host coevolution. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

85:638-648.<br />

, and M. W. Lankester. 1993. Additional information<br />

on the morphology of the Elaphostrongylinae<br />

(Nematoda: Protostrongylidae) of North<br />

American Cervidae. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

71:592-600.<br />

Daszak, P., A. A. Cunningham, and A. D. Hyatt.<br />

2000. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—<br />

threats to biodiversity and human health. Science<br />

287:443-449.<br />

Davidson, W. R., G. L. Doster, and R. C. Freeman.<br />

1996. Parelaphostrongylus tennis on Wassaw Island,<br />

Georgia: a result of translocating whitetailed<br />

deer. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 32:701-<br />

703.<br />

, F. A. Hayes, V. F. Nettles, and F. E. Kellogg<br />

(eds.). 1981. Diseases and Parasites of White-<br />

Tailed Deer. Miscellaneous Publication No. 7, Tall<br />

Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida,<br />

U.S.A. 458 pp.<br />

Drozdz, J., A. W. Demiaszkiewicz, and J. Lachowicz.<br />

1998. Ashworthius sidemi (Nematoda, Trichostrongylidae)<br />

a new parasite of the European bison<br />

Bison bonasus (L.) and the question of independence<br />

of A. gagarini. Acta Parasitologica 43:75-<br />

80.<br />

Durden, L. A., and J. E. Keirans. 1996. Nymphs of<br />

the genus Ixodes (Acari: Ixodidae) of the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s: taxonomy, identification key, distribution,<br />

hosts, and medical/veterinary importance. Thomas<br />

Say Publications in Entomology: Monographs,<br />

Entomological Society of America, Lanham,<br />

Maryland, U.S.A. 95 pp.<br />

, S. Luckhart, G. R. Mullen, and S. Smith.<br />

1991. Tick infestations of white-tailed deer in Alabama.<br />

Journal of Wildlife Diseases 27:606-614.<br />

Fairchild, G. B., G. M. Kohls, and V. J. Tipton.<br />

1966. The ticks of Panama (Acarina: Ixodoidea).<br />

Pages 167-219 in R. L. Wenzel and V. J. Tipton,<br />

eds. Ectoparasites of Panama. Field Museum of<br />

Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.<br />

CARRENO ET AL.—DEER PARASITES IN COSTA RICA 183<br />

Forrester, D. J., and R. L. Rausch. 1990. Cysticerci<br />

(Cestoda: Taeniidae) from white-tailed deer, Odocoileus<br />

virginianus, in southern Florida. Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 76:583-585.<br />

Hermans, P., R. H. Dwinger, G. M. Buening, and<br />

M. V. Herrero. 1994. Seasonal incidence and hemoparasite<br />

infection rates of ixodid ticks (Acari,<br />

Ixodidae) detached from cattle in Costa Rica. Revista<br />

de Biologia Tropical 42:623-632.<br />

Hoberg, E. P. 1996. Emended description of Mazamastrongylus<br />

peruvianus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae),<br />

with comments on the relationships of<br />

the genera Mazamastrongylus and Spiculopteragia.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 82:470-477.<br />

. 1997. Parasite biodiversity and emerging<br />

pathogens: a role for systematics in limiting impacts<br />

on genetic resources. Pages 71-83 in K. E.<br />

Hoagland and A. Y. Rossman, eds. Global Genetic<br />

Resources: Access, Ownership and Intellectual<br />

Property Rights. Association of Systematics Collections,<br />

Washington, D.C., U.S.A.<br />

Jones, E. K., C. M. Clifford, J. E. Keirans, and G.<br />

M. Kohls. 1972. The ticks of Venezuela (Acarina:<br />

Ixodoidea) with a key to the species of Amblyornma<br />

in the western hemisphere. Brigham Young<br />

University Science Bulletin, Biological Series<br />

17(4): 1-40.<br />

Kennedy, M. J., M. W. Lankester, and J. B. Snider.<br />

1985. Paramphistomum cervi and Paramphistomum<br />

liorchis (Digenea: Paramphistomatidae) in<br />

moose, Alces alces, from Ontario, Canada. Canadian<br />

Journal of Zoology 63:1207-1210.<br />

Krogdahl, D. W., J. P. Thilstead, and S. K. Olsen.<br />

1987. Ataxia and hypermetria caused by Parelaphostrongylus<br />

tennis infection in llamas. Journal<br />

of the American Veterinary Medical Association<br />

190:191-193.<br />

Lankester, M. W., and D. Fong. 1989. Distribution<br />

of elaphostrongyline nematodes (Metastrongyloidea:<br />

Protostrongylidae) in Cervidae and possible<br />

effects of moving Rangifer spp. into and within<br />

North America. Alces 25:133-145.<br />

Maa, T. C. 1963. Genera and species of Hippoboscidae<br />

(Diptera): types, synonymy, habitats and natural<br />

groupings. Pacific Insects Monograph 6:1-<br />

186.<br />

Mendez, E. 1984. Mexico and Central America. Pages<br />

513-524 in L. K. Halls, ed. White-Tailed Deer:<br />

Ecology and Management. Wildlife Management<br />

Institute. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,<br />

U.S.A. 870 pp.<br />

Miller, M. W., and E. T. Thorne. 1993. Captive cervids<br />

as potential sources of disease for North<br />

America's wild cervid populations: avenues, implications,<br />

and preventive management. Transactions<br />

of the North American Wildlife and Natural<br />

Resources Conference 58:460-467.<br />

Montes-Perez, R. C., R. I. Rodriguez-Vivas, J. F. de<br />

J. Torres-Acosta, and L. G. Ek-Pech. 1998. Seguimiento<br />

anual de la parasitosis gastrointestinal<br />

de venados cola blanca Odocoileus virginianus<br />

(Artiodactyla: Cervidae) en cautiverio en Yucatan,<br />

Mexico. Revista de Biologia Tropical 46:821-827.<br />

Nettles, V. F. 1981. Necropsy procedures. Pages 6-16<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


184 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

in W. R. Davidson, F. A. Hayes, V. F. Nettles, and<br />

F. E. Kellogg, eds. Diseases and Parasites of<br />

White-Tailed Deer. Miscellaneous Publication no.<br />

7, Tall Timbers Research Station. Southeastern<br />

Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, Athens,<br />

Georgia, U.S.A. 458 pp.<br />

, A. K. Prestwood, and R. D. Smith. 1977.<br />

Cerebrospinal parelaphostrongylosis in fallow<br />

deer. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 13:440-444.<br />

Pike, A. 1969. A revision of the genus Ashworthius<br />

Le Roux, 1930 (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae).<br />

Journal of Helminthology 43:135-144.<br />

Rausch, R. L. 1981. Morphological and biological<br />

characteristics of Taenia rileyi Loewen, 1929<br />

(Cestoda: Taeniidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

59:653-666.<br />

, C. Maser, and E. P. Hoberg. 1983. Gastrointestinal<br />

helminths of the cougar, Felis concolor<br />

L., in northeastern Oregon. Journal of Wildlife<br />

Diseases 19:14-19.<br />

Reid, F. A. 1997. A Field Guide to the Mammals of<br />

Central America and Southeast Mexico. Oxford<br />

University Press, Oxford, U.K. 334 pp.<br />

Rickard, L. G., B. B. Smith, E. J. Gentz, A. A.<br />

Frank, E. G. Pearson, L. L. Walker, and M. J.<br />

Pybus. 1994. Experimentally induced meningeal<br />

worm (Parelaphostrongylus tennis) infection in<br />

the llama (Lama glama): clinical evaluation and<br />

implications for parasite translocation. Journal of<br />

Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 25:390-402.<br />

Samuel, W. M., E. R. Grinnell, and A. J. Kennedy.<br />

1980. Ectoparasites (Mallophaga, Anoplura, Acari)<br />

on mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus, and whitetailed<br />

deer, Odocoileus virginianus, of Alberta,<br />

Canada. Journal of Medical Entomology 17:15-<br />

17.<br />

, M. J. Pybus, D. A. Welch, and C. J. Wilke.<br />

1992. Elk as a potential host for meningeal worm:<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

implications for translocation. Journal of Wildlife<br />

Management 56:629-639.<br />

-, and D. O. Trainer. 1970. Amblyomma (Ac-<br />

arina: Ixodidae) on white-tailed deer, Odocoileus<br />

virginianus (Zimmermann), from South Texas<br />

with implications for theileriasis. Journal of Medical<br />

Entomology 7:567-574.<br />

Sey, O. 1991. CRC Handbook of the Zoology of Amphistomes.<br />

CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida,<br />

U.S.A. 480 pp.<br />

Smith, J. S. 1977. A survey of ticks infesting whitetailed<br />

deer in 12 southeastern states. M.S. Thesis,<br />

University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, U.S.A. 61<br />

pp.<br />

Strickland, R. K., R. R. Gerrish, J. L. Hourrigan,<br />

and G. O. Schubert. 1976. Ticks of Veterinary<br />

Importance. USD A, APHIS Handbook No. 485.<br />

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.<br />

D.C., U.S.A. 122 pp.<br />

, , and J. S. Smith. 1981. Arthropods.<br />

Pages 363-389 in W. R. Davidson, F. A. Hayes,<br />

V. F. Nettles, and F. E. Kellogg, eds. Diseases and<br />

Parasites of White-Tailed deer. Miscellaneous<br />

Publication no. 7, Tall Timbers Research Station.<br />

Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study,<br />

Athens, Georgia, U.S.A. 458 pp.<br />

Tonn, R. J., G. M. Kohls, and K. Arnold. 1963.<br />

Ectoparasites of birds and mammals of Costa<br />

Rica. 2. Ticks. Revista de Biologia Tropical 11:<br />

217-220.<br />

Walker, M. L., and W. W. Becklund. 1970. Checklist<br />

of the internal and external parasites of deer,<br />

Odocoileus hemionus and O. virginianus, in the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s and Canada. Special Publication No.<br />

1, Index Catalogue of Medical and Veterinary Zoology,<br />

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,<br />

D.C., U.S.A. 45 pp.<br />

Whitehead, G. K. 1972. Deer of the World. Constable<br />

and Company, London, U.K. 194 pp.


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 185-189<br />

Cepedietta michiganensis (Protozoa) and Batracholandros<br />

magnavulvaris (Nematoda) from Plethodontid Salamanders in West<br />

Virginia, U.S.A.<br />

JAMES E. JOY' AND ROBERT B. TUCKER<br />

Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: joy@marshall.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: The gastrointestinal tracts of 38 plethodontid salamanders (25 Plethodon punctatus and 13 Plethodon<br />

wehrlei), collected at high elevation sites in Pendleton and Randolph counties, West Virginia, U.S.A., were<br />

examined for parasites in 1996. Sixty percent of P. punctatus and 23% of P. wehrlei were infected by the ciliate<br />

Cepedietta michiganensis, while prevalences of the nematode Batracholandros magnavulvaris were 52% and<br />

30% for P. punctatus and P. wehrlei, respectively. Mean intensities were 3.4 nematodes per infected host for<br />

P. punctatus and 4.0 for P. wehrlei. Only 2 of 61 B. magnavulvaris collected were males. This is the first report<br />

of parasites from these plethodontid species and the first record of C. michiganensis from West Virginia.<br />

KEY WORDS: Batracholandros magnavulvaris, Cepedietta michiganensis, Plethodon punctatus, Plethodon<br />

wehrlei, Ciliata, Nematoda, West Virginia, U.S.A.<br />

The Cow Knob salamander, Plethodon punctatus<br />

Highton, 1972, is a large plethodontid salamander<br />

known only from higher elevations<br />

(>730 m) of the Shenandoah and Great North<br />

mountains in Augusta, Rockingham, and Shenandoah<br />

counties of Virginia (Buhlmann et al.,<br />

1988; Conant and Collins, 1991). The range of<br />

this rare species in West Virginia is restricted to<br />

higher elevations (>730 m) of Hardy and Pendleton<br />

counties in the eastern panhandle. All 25<br />

P. punctatus examined for this study were collected<br />

on Shenandoah Mountain in Pendleton<br />

County, West Virginia, from June through August<br />

1996, under a permit granted by the West<br />

Virginia Division of Natural Resources<br />

(WVDNR) and written permission from the U.S.<br />

Fish and Wildlife Service.<br />

Wehrle's salamander, Plethodon wehrlei<br />

Fowler and Dunn, 1917, is considered a near<br />

sibling of P. punctatus, and has been recorded<br />

from a wide range of elevations in 28 of West<br />

Virginia's 55 counties (Green and Pauley, 1987).<br />

The geographic range of P. wehrlei extends<br />

from southwestern New York to northwestern<br />

North Carolina (Conant and Collins, 1991). All<br />

13 P. wehrlei individuals used in this study were<br />

collected from Shaver's Mountain in Randolph<br />

County, West Virginia, from May through August<br />

1996, under a permit from the WVDNR.<br />

The original purpose of collecting these plethodontid<br />

species was to obtain reproductive and<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

185<br />

ecological data for use in forest and wildlife<br />

management plans. Because there are no published<br />

reports of parasites from either species,<br />

these collections also offered the opportunity to<br />

examine them for parasites.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

All salamanders were anesthetized in Chloretone®<br />

within 48 hr of collection. Snout-to-vent lengths (SVL)<br />

were measured with vernier calipers to the nearest 0.1<br />

mm. Salamanders were killed by decapitation, sexed,<br />

and the small and large intestines were removed for<br />

examination. The SVL for P. punctatus (ft/mean in mm<br />

± 1 SD) was 18/63.8 ± 6.9 for males and 7/65.3 ±<br />

7.9 for females. Because the difference in mean SVL<br />

for males versus females was not significant (£0.05,23 =<br />

0.469), individuals of both host sexes were combined<br />

to calculate prevalence of ciliate infection and prevalence<br />

and mean intensity of nematode infection. The<br />

SVL for P. wehrlei (/z/mean in mm ± 1 SD) was 6/<br />

59.8 ± 9.3 for males and 7/59.9 ± 11.7 for females.<br />

Again the difference in mean SVL for males versus<br />

females was not significant (?oo5,ii = 0.017), and the<br />

data for both host sexes were combined for calculations<br />

of prevalence and mean intensity.<br />

During necropsy it was evident that both salamander<br />

species harbored astomatous ciliates and nematodes.<br />

Whole mounts of these ciliates and nematodes were<br />

prepared by staining in Semichon's acetic carmine, dehydrating<br />

in an ethanol series, clearing in xylene, and<br />

mounting in Permount®. Voucher specimens have been<br />

deposited in the U.S. National Parasite Collection,<br />

Beltsville, Maryland 20705, U.S.A., under accession<br />

numbers USNPC 89838 (Cepedietta michiganensis)<br />

and USNPC 89839 (Batracholandros magnavulvaris).<br />

Results<br />

The astomatous ciliate, C. michiganensis<br />

(Woodhead, 1928) Corliss, de Puytorac, and<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


186 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 1. Published reports of amphibian hosts harboring Cepedietta michiganensis, with prevalences (P)<br />

by locality; host scientific names, taxonomic authorities, and dates after Frost (1985).<br />

Host common name and species<br />

Arnbystoma jeffersonianum (Green, 1 827) (Jefferson salamander)<br />

Ambystoma opacum (Gravenhorst, 1807) (marbled salamander)<br />

Desmognathus fitscus (Green, 1818) (northern dusky<br />

salamander)<br />

Desmognathus phoca (Matthes, 1855) (seal salamander)<br />

Eurycea bislineata (Green, 1818) (northern two-lined<br />

salamander)<br />

Eurycea cirrigera (Green, 1830) (southern two-lined<br />

salamander)<br />

Eurycea guttolineata (three-lined salamander):!:<br />

Hemidactylium scutatum (Temminck and Schlegel,<br />

1838) (four-toed salamander)<br />

Plethodon albagula Grobman, 1944 (western slimy salamander)<br />

Plethodon cinereus (Green, 1818) (red-backed salamander)<br />

Plethodon fourchensis Duncan and Highton, 1979<br />

(Fourche Mountain salamander)<br />

Plethodon glutinosus (Green, 1818) (northern slimy salamander)<br />

Plethodon jordani Blatchley, 1901 (Jordan's salamander)<br />

Plethodon ouachitae Dunn and Heinze, 1933 (Rich<br />

Mountain salamander)<br />

Plethodon punctatus Highton, 1972 (Cow Knob salamander)<br />

Plethodon wehrlei Fowler and Dunn, 1917 (Wehrle's<br />

salamander)<br />

Pseudotriton moiitanus Baird, 1849 (midland mud salamander)<br />

Rana clamitans Latreille, 1801 (southern green frog)<br />

Rana sylvatica LeConte, 1825 (wood frog)<br />

P(%)<br />

1/NI*<br />

7<br />

0/12|<br />

6<br />

9<br />

6<br />

18<br />

16<br />

0/2 It<br />

70<br />

1/NI*<br />

9<br />

18<br />

33<br />

5<br />

1 l/7t<br />

41-72§<br />

20<br />

14<br />

0-49<br />

48<br />

60<br />

23<br />

33<br />

—<br />

20<br />

Michigan<br />

North Carolina<br />

North Carolina<br />

Locality<br />

North Carolina<br />

North Carolina<br />

New Hampshire<br />

North Carolina<br />

North Carolina<br />

North Carolina<br />

Michigan<br />

Reference<br />

Woodhead, 1928<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Muzzall et al., 1997<br />

Mann, 1932<br />

Mann, 1932<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Woodhead, 1928<br />

Arkansas McAllister et al., 1993<br />

Ohio<br />

New Hampshire<br />

Michigan<br />

Arkansas<br />

North Carolina<br />

North Carolina<br />

Tennessee<br />

Arkansas<br />

Great Smoky Mts. of Tennessee-<br />

North Carolina<br />

Tennessee<br />

Arkansas<br />

West Virginia<br />

West Virginia<br />

North Carolina<br />

Ohio<br />

Ohio<br />

Hazard, 1937<br />

Muzzall et al., 1997<br />

Muzzall, 1990<br />

Winter et al., 1986<br />

Mann, 1932<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Powders, 1970<br />

Winter et al., 1986<br />

Powders, 1967<br />

Powders, 1970<br />

Winter et al., 1986<br />

Present study<br />

Present study<br />

Rankin, 1937a<br />

Odlaug, 1954<br />

Hazard, 1937<br />

* Single individual infected/sample size not included.<br />

t Prevalence in Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. area of the central Piedmont/prevalence in the mountains.<br />

:!: Eurycea guttolineata, the three-lined salamander, is considered a subspecies of the long-tailed salamander, E. longicauda<br />

(Green, 1818).<br />

§ Prevalences inversely related to altitude and higher in fall months.<br />

Lorn, 1965, was found in 60% (15/25) and 23%<br />

(3/13) of P. punctatus and P. wehrlei, respectively<br />

(Table 1). This ciliate species was primarily<br />

aggregated in the duodenum of both host<br />

species, either free in the lumen or attached to<br />

the intestinal epithelium. Cepedietta michiganensis<br />

individuals were often so numerous that<br />

they appeared to occlude the duodenum; however,<br />

because there was no gross distention of<br />

this organ it was unlikely that any blockage of<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

food materials actually occurred. No damage to<br />

cells of the host's intestinal epithelium was evident.<br />

There were a few instances where small<br />

numbers of ciliates were found in the middle and<br />

posterior small intestine, large intestine, or gall<br />

bladder of P. punctatus, as well.<br />

The oxyurid nematode, Batracholandros<br />

magnavulvaris (Schad, 1960) Fetter and Quentin,<br />

1976, was found in the large intestine of<br />

52% (13/25) P. punctatus and 31% (4/13) P.


JOY AND TUCKER—SALAMANDER PARASITES 187<br />

Table 2. Published reports of hosts harboring Batracholandros magnavulvaris, with prevalences (P) and<br />

mean intensities (x) by locality; host scientific names, taxonomic authorities, and dates after Frost (1985).<br />

Host common name and species<br />

Aneides flavipunctatus (Strauch, 1870) (black salamander)<br />

Aneides aeneus Cope and Packard, 1881 (green salamander)<br />

Desmognathus brimleyorum Stejneger, 1895 (Ouachita<br />

dusky salamander)<br />

Desmognathus fuscus (Green, 1818) (northern dusky salamander)<br />

Desmognathus monticola Dunn, 1916 (seal salamander)<br />

Desmognathus ochrophaeus Cope, 1959 (Allegheny<br />

Mountain dusky salamander)<br />

Desmognathus phoca (Matthes, 1855) (seal salamander)<br />

Desmognathus quadrimaculatus Holbrook, 1840 (blackbellied<br />

salamander)<br />

Eurycea bislineata (Green, 1818) (northern two-lined<br />

salamander)<br />

Eurycea guttolineata (three-lined salamander)<br />

Eurycea lucifuga Rafinesque, 1822 (cave salamander)<br />

Leiirognathus marmoratus Moore, 1 899 (shovel-nosed<br />

salamander)<br />

Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque, 1820) (red-spotted<br />

newt, red eft)<br />

Notophthalmus viridescens (red-spotted newt, adult)<br />

Plethodon caddoensis Pope and Pope, 1951 (Caddo<br />

Mountain salamander)<br />

Plethodon cinereus (Green, 1818) (red-backed salamander)<br />

Plethodon fourchensis Duncan and Highton, 1 979<br />

(Fourche Mountain salamander)<br />

Plethodon glutinosus (Green, 1818) (northern slimy salamander)<br />

Plethodon ouachitae Dunn and Heinze, 1933 (Rich<br />

Mountain salamander)<br />

Plethodon punctatus Highton, 1 972 (Cow Knob salamander)<br />

Plethodon serratus Grobman, 1944 (southern red-backed<br />

salamander)<br />

Plethodon wehrlei Fowler and Dunn, 1917 (Wehrle's salamander)<br />

Plethodon yonahlossee Dunn, 1917 ( Yonahlossee salamander)<br />

P (%)<br />

50<br />

24<br />

77<br />

30<br />

48<br />

—<br />

10<br />

6<br />

27<br />

—<br />

48<br />

60<br />

50<br />

23<br />

14<br />

40<br />

14<br />

25<br />

15<br />

7<br />

31<br />

27<br />

11<br />

2<br />

0/64±<br />

100<br />

6<br />

100<br />

8<br />

12<br />

0/2*<br />

50<br />

28<br />

—<br />

9<br />

33<br />

0/3$<br />

14<br />

52<br />

22<br />

31<br />

33<br />

A'<br />

3<br />

5<br />

3<br />


188 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

wehrlei individuals (Table 2). Mean intensities<br />

(±1 SD) were 3.4 (±1.9) and 4.0 (±4.0) for P.<br />

punctatus and P. wehrlei, respectively. Of the 61<br />

B. magnavulvaris individuals collected, only 2<br />

(both in P. wehrlei) were males.<br />

Discussion<br />

Prevalences of 60% and 23% for C. michiganensis<br />

in P. punctatus and P. wehrlei from<br />

West Virginia fall within ranges cited by previous<br />

investigators for this species (Table 1). Finding<br />

C. michiganensis species throughout the intestinal<br />

tract, with heavy aggregations in the duodenum,<br />

is consistent with the observations of<br />

Winter et al. (1986), who noted that C. michiganensis<br />

could be found throughout the intestine<br />

of Plethodon ouachitae Dunn and Heinze, 1933,<br />

but was concentrated in the anterior third of this<br />

organ. There was a single case of C. michiganensis<br />

infection in the gallbladder of P. punctatus,<br />

but ciliates were not attached to the epithelium<br />

of the gall bladder. Winter et al. (1986)<br />

also reported C. michiganensis from the gall<br />

bladder of P. ouachitae, adding that the ciliates<br />

were not attached to the epithelium. Three other<br />

reports mentioned occurrence of this ciliate in<br />

the host's gall bladder: Muzzall (1990) for Plethodon<br />

cinereus (Green, 1818); McAllister et al.<br />

(1993) for Plethodon albagula Grobman, 1944;<br />

and Muzzall et al. (1997) for Eurycea bislineata<br />

(Green, 1818) and P. cinereus. Previous reports<br />

of amphibian hosts harboring species of C. michiganensis<br />

are summarized in Table 1.<br />

Prevalences of 52% and 31% recorded in the<br />

present study for B. magnavulvaris in P. punctatus<br />

and P. wehrlei, respectively, are not unusual.<br />

This nematode species exhibits little host<br />

specificity and is found in widely varying prevalences<br />

(McAllister et al., 1995), an observation<br />

supported by the findings of other investigators<br />

summarized in Table 2. McAllister et al. (1995)<br />

also reported that prevalence for B. magnavulvaris<br />

in Desmognathus brimleyorum Stejneger,<br />

1895 varies seasonally, being highest (34%) in<br />

mid-March versus only 17% for late May. While<br />

we had relatively few salamanders in our sample,<br />

all B. magnavulvaris individuals were collected<br />

from 13 of 21 P. punctatus in June and<br />

July. Similarly, 4 of the 9 P. wehrlei examined<br />

in May through July were infected. None of the<br />

8 plethodontids (4 P. punctatus and 4 P. wehrlei)<br />

sampled in August were infected, suggesting<br />

that the variations in prevalence by season noted<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

by McAllister et al. (1995) may be a normal<br />

pattern. Mean intensities of infection at 3.4 and<br />

4.0 for P. punctatus and P. wehrlei, respectively,<br />

were relatively high compared with previous reports<br />

(Table 2). Only 2 B. magnavulvaris individuals<br />

collected in the present study were<br />

males. This heavily female-biased sex ratio for<br />

B. magnavulvaris is similar to the observations<br />

of previous investigators (Dyer et al., 1980;<br />

Muzzall, 1990; Joy et al., 1993; McAllister et<br />

al., 1995).<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We are grateful to William Tolin, U.S. Fish<br />

and Wildlife Service, for granting the requisite<br />

collection permit for P. punctatus, and to Thomas<br />

Pauley for reviewing this manuscript.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Buhlmann, K. A., C. A. Pague, J. C. Mitchell, and<br />

R. B. Glascow. 1988. Forestry operations and terrestrial<br />

salamanders: techniques in a study of the<br />

Cow Knob salamander, Plethodon punctatus. Pages<br />

38-44 in R. C. Szaro, K. E. Severson, and D.<br />

R. Patton, eds. Management of Amphibians, Reptiles<br />

and Mammals in North America. USDA Forest<br />

Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range<br />

Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado,<br />

U.S.A. Technical Report RM-166.<br />

Bursey, C. R., and D. R. Schibli. 1995. A comparison<br />

of the helminth fauna of two Plethodon cinereus<br />

populations. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 62:232-236.<br />

Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1991. A Field Guide<br />

to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central<br />

North America. Houghton Mifflin Company,<br />

Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 450 pp.<br />

Dunbar, J. R., and J. D. Moore. 1979. Correlations<br />

of host specificity with host habitat in helminths<br />

parasitizing the plethodontids of Washington<br />

County, Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee<br />

Academy of Science 54:106-109.<br />

Dyer, W. G. 1991. Helminth parasites of amphibians<br />

from Illinois and adjacent midwestern states.<br />

Transactions of the Illinois <strong>State</strong> Academy of Science<br />

84:1-19.<br />

, R. A. Brandon, and R. L. Price. 1980. Gas<br />

trointestinal helminths in relation to sex and age<br />

of Desmognathus fuxcus (Green, 1818) from Illinois.<br />

Proceedings of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 47:95-99.<br />

-, and S. B. Peck. 1975. Gastrointestinal parasites<br />

of the cave salamander, Eurycea lucifuga Rafinesque,<br />

from the southeastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Canadian<br />

Journal of Zoology 53:52-54.<br />

Ernst, E. M. 1974. The parasites of the red-backed<br />

salamander, Plethodon cinereus. Bulletin of the<br />

Maryland Herpetological Society 10:108-1 14.<br />

Fischthal, J. H. 1955. Ecology of worm parasites in


south-central New York salamanders. American<br />

Midland Naturalist 53:176-183.<br />

Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian Species of the World:<br />

A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Allen<br />

Press, Inc. and The Association of Systematics<br />

Collections, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. 732 pp.<br />

Goater, T. M., G. W. Esch, and A. O. Bush. 1987.<br />

Helminth parasites of sympatric salamanders: ecological<br />

concepts at infracommunity, component<br />

and compound community levels. American Midland<br />

Naturalist 118:289-300.<br />

Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians<br />

and Reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh<br />

Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 241<br />

pp.<br />

Hazard, F. O. 1937. Two new host records for the<br />

protozoan Haptophyra michiganensis Woodhead.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 23:315-316.<br />

Joy, J. E., T. K. Pauley, and M. L. Little. 1993.<br />

Prevalence and intensity of Thelandros magncivulvaris<br />

and Omeia papillocaucia (Nematoda) in<br />

two species of desmognathine salamanders from<br />

West Virginia. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 60:93-95.<br />

Lehmann, D. L. 1954. Some helminths of West Coast<br />

urodeles. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 40:231.<br />

Mann, D. R. 1932. The ecology of some North Carolina<br />

salamanders with special reference to their<br />

parasites. M.A. Thesis, Duke University, Durham,<br />

North Carolina, U.S.A. 52 pp.<br />

McAllister, C. T., C. R. Bursey, S. J. Upton, S. E.<br />

Trauth, and D. B. Conn. 1995. Parasites of' Desmognathus<br />

briinleyorum (Caudata: Plethodontidae)<br />

from the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas<br />

and Oklahoma. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 62:150-156.<br />

, S. J. Upton, and S. E. Trauth. 1993. Endoparasites<br />

of western slimy salamanders, Plethodon<br />

albagula (Caudata: Plethodontidae), from<br />

JOY AND TUCKER—SALAMANDER PARASITES 189<br />

Arkansas. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 60:124-126.<br />

Muzzall, P. M. 1990. Endoparasites of the red-backed<br />

salamander, Plethodon c. cinereus, from southwestern<br />

Michigan. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 57:165-167.<br />

, C. R. Peebles, and T. M. Burton. 1997. Endoparasites<br />

of plethodontid salamanders from Paradise<br />

Brook, New Hampshire. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

83:1193-1195.<br />

Odlaug, T. O. 1954. Parasites of some Ohio Amphibia.<br />

Ohio Journal of Science 54:126-128.<br />

Powders, V. N. 1967. Altitudinal distribution of the<br />

astomatous ciliate Cepedietta michiganensis<br />

(Woodhead) in a new host, Plethodon jordani<br />

Blatchley. Transactions of the American Microscopical<br />

Society 86:336—338.<br />

. 1970. Altitudinal distribution of the protozoan<br />

Cepedietta michiganensis in the salamanders<br />

Plethodon glutinosus and Plethodon jordani in<br />

eastern Tennessee. American Midland Naturalist<br />

83:393-403.<br />

Rankin, J. S., Jr. 1937a. An ecological study of parasites<br />

of some North Carolina salamanders. Ecological<br />

Monographs 7:169-270.<br />

. 1937b. New helminths from North Carolina<br />

salamanders. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 23:29-42.<br />

Schad, G. A. 1963. Thelandros magnavidvaris (Rankin,<br />

1937) Schad, 1960 (Nematoda: Oxyuroidea)<br />

from the green salamander, Aneides aeneus. Canadian<br />

Journal of Zoology 41:943-946.<br />

Walton, A. C. 1940. Some nematodes from Tennessee<br />

Amphibia. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of<br />

Science 15:402-405.<br />

Winter, E. A., W. M. Zawada, and A. A. Johnson.<br />

1986. Comparison of the symbiotic fauna of the<br />

family Plethodontidae in the Ouachita Mountains<br />

of western Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas<br />

Academy of Sciences 40:82-85.<br />

Woodhead, A. F. 1928. Haptophyra michiganensis sp.<br />

nov., a protozoan parasite of the four-toed salamander.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 14:177-182.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 190-195<br />

Some Adult Endohelminths Parasitizing Freshwater Fishes from the<br />

Atlantic Drainages of Nicaragua<br />

M. LEOPOLDINA AGUIRRE-MACEDO, M TOMAS ScHOLZ,1-2 DAVID GONZALEZ-SOUS,'<br />

VICTOR M. VIDAL-MARTINEZ,' PETR PosEL,3 GREGORY ARJONA-TORRES,'<br />

SVETLANA DUMAILO,3 AND EDUARDO SlU-ESTRADA3<br />

1 Laboratorio de Parasitologfa, Centre de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados del Institute Politecnico<br />

Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Unidad Merida, Carretera Antigua a Progreso Km 6, A.P. 73 Cordemex, C.P.<br />

97310, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico (e-mail: leo@mda.cinvestav.mx),<br />

2 Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske<br />

Budejovice, Czech Republic (e-mail: tscholz@paru.cas.cz), and<br />

3 Bluefields Indian and Caribbean University, P.O. Box 88, Bluefields, Nicaragua (e-mail: bicu@ibw.com.ni)<br />

ABSTRACT: Adults of 12 endoparasitic helminths were recorded from 8 freshwater fish species from the South<br />

Atlantic Autonomous Region, Nicaragua: 8 digeneans Crassicutis cichlasomae, Magnivitellinum simplex, Oligogonotylus<br />

manteri, Prosthenhystera obesa, Saccocoelioides sogandaresi, Saccocoelioides sp. 1, Saccocoelioides<br />

sp. 2, and Allocreadiidae gen. sp. ("Crepidostomum" sp.); 3 nematodes Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus)<br />

rebecae, Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) neocaballeroi, and Rhabdochona kidderi kidderi; and 1 acanthocephalan<br />

Neoechinorhynchus golvani. <strong>Comparative</strong> measurements among 5. sogandaresi from Poecilia velifera,<br />

Saccocoelioides sp. 1 from Cichlasoma maculicaiida, and Saccocoelioides sp. 2 from Astyanax fasciatus, as well<br />

as drawings of the 2 latter species are given for future reference. All but C. cichlasomae and O. manteri are<br />

reported from Nicaragua for the first time, and most taxa also represent new geographical records for Central<br />

America. The majority of species have previously been found in freshwater fishes from southeastern Mexico,<br />

which indicates a close similarity of the helminth faunas of both regions, in accordance with previous data on<br />

the larval stages of endohelminths and gill monogeneans.<br />

KEY WORDS: Helminths, parasites, Digenea, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, freshwater fishes, Nicaragua.<br />

During a short visit by 4 of the authors<br />

(M.L.A.M., T.S., V.M.V.M., and G.A.T.) to Nicaragua<br />

in March 1999, brackish and freshwater<br />

fishes from the Autonomous Region of the<br />

South Atlantic were examined for helminth parasites.<br />

Because information on helminths parasitizing<br />

freshwater fishes in Nicaragua is limited<br />

to the report by Watson (1976), in which several<br />

species of trematodes from Lake Nicaragua were<br />

reported, a list of adult endohelminths is provided,<br />

with morphological data on some taxa. The<br />

results of a survey of larval stages of endohelminths<br />

found in the same fish hosts and ancyrocephaline<br />

monogeneans from the gills of cichlids,<br />

have already been published (Aguirre-Macedo<br />

et al., <strong>2001</strong>; Vidal-Martinez, Scholz, and<br />

Aguirre-Macedo, <strong>2001</strong>).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 56 fish of the following 8 species was<br />

examined: tetra Astyanax fasciatus (Cuvier, 1819) (8<br />

specimens examined) (family Characidae); pastel cichlid<br />

Amphilophus alfari (Meek, 1907) (3); convict cichlid<br />

4 Corresponding author.<br />

190<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Archocentrus nigrofasciatus (Giinther, 1869) (3); blackbelt<br />

cichlid Cichlasoma maculicaiida (Regan, 1805)<br />

(12); jaguar cichlid Cichlasoma managuense (Giinther,<br />

1867) (13); butterfly cichlid Herotilapia multispinosa<br />

(Giinther, 1867) (8) (Cichlidae); molly Poecilia velifera<br />

(Regan, 1814) (5) (Poeciliidae); and long-whiskered catfish<br />

Rhamdia nicaraguensis (Giinther, 1864) (4) (Pimelodidae).<br />

Fish were collected by hook and line and<br />

throw nets from 7 localities of the Atlantic drainages of<br />

Nicaragua in the Autonomous Region of the South Atlantic<br />

(Region Autonoma del Atlantico Sur—RAAS):<br />

Torsuani River (11°47'06"N; 83°52'38"W); Mahogany<br />

River (12°03'22"N; 83°59'07"W); Cano Negro Stream<br />

(12°00'55"N; 84°01'10"W), in Bluefields City; Walpatara<br />

Bridge (12°00'14"N; 83°45'58"W); Loonku Creek<br />

(11°59'05"N; 83°46'48"W); Cano Marandn Stream<br />

(12°00'10"N; 83°46'39"W); and Puente Chino<br />

(12°00'30"N; 83°46'13"W). The number offish sampled<br />

in individual localities and map locations are given in<br />

Aguirre-Macedo et al. (<strong>2001</strong>).<br />

Fish were transported alive to the laboratory of the<br />

Bluefields Indian and Caribbean University (BICU),<br />

where they were examined by routine helminthological<br />

procedures outlined by Vidal-Martinez, Aguirre-Macedo<br />

et al. (<strong>2001</strong>). All helminths were studied in fresh<br />

preparations and counted in situ. Adult helminths were<br />

considered those with fully developed reproductive organs<br />

regardless of the presence of eggs. Eventually,<br />

some digeneans were fixed with a glycerin-ammonium<br />

picrate (GAP) mixture following the methodology out-


AGUIRRE-MACEDO ET AL.—ENDOHELMINTHS FROM NICARAGUAN FISHES 191<br />

Table 1. Some endoparasitic helminths collected from Nicaraguan freshwater fishes.<br />

Digcnea<br />

Helminth species<br />

Crassicutis cichlasomae Manter, 1936<br />

Magnivitellinum simplex Kloss, 1966<br />

Oligogonotylus manteri Watson, 1976<br />

IProsthenhystera obesa (Diesing, 1850)<br />

Saccocoelioides sogandaresi Lumsden,<br />

1964<br />

Saccocoelioides sp. 1<br />

Saccocoelioides sp. 2<br />

Allocreadiidae gen. sp.<br />

Nematoda<br />

Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) rebecae<br />

Andrade-Salas, Pineda-Lopez, and<br />

Osorio-Sarabia, 1994<br />

Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) neocaballeroi<br />

(Caballero-Deloya, 1977)<br />

Rhabdochona kidderi kidderi Pearsc,<br />

1936<br />

Acanthocephala<br />

Neoechinorhynchus golvani Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

1978<br />

Hosts<br />

(no. infected/examined)<br />

Cichlasoma maculicauda (5/7)<br />

Astyanax fasciatus ( 1 /4)<br />

(1/2)<br />

C. maculicauda (2/7)<br />

Cichlasoma managuense (1/2)<br />

A. fasciatus (1/2)<br />

Poet-ilia velifera (1/1)<br />

C. maculicauda (1/3)<br />

(6/7)<br />

A. fasciatus (2-4)<br />

A. fasciatus ( 1 /4)<br />

(1/2)<br />

Intensity<br />

range<br />

1-8<br />

1<br />

6<br />

3-6<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

17<br />

4-42<br />

1-3<br />

1<br />

4<br />

Amphilophus alfari (1/3) 29<br />

C. maculicauda (21 \) 1—2<br />

Herotilapia rnultispinosa (3/8) 1—3<br />

A. fasciatus (1/9) 3<br />

C. maculicauda (1/11) 1<br />

C. maculicauda (1/11) 1<br />

A. alfari (1/1)<br />

C. managuense (1/2)<br />

C. managuense (2/4)<br />

H. rnultispinosa (1/4)<br />

H. rnultispinosa (1/3)<br />

lined by Ergens (1969). Measurements are given in<br />

micrometers. Drawings were made with the aid of a<br />

drawing tube. Reference specimens were deposited in<br />

the Coleccion Nacional de Helmintos (CNHE), Mexico<br />

City, Mexico, and the Laboratory of <strong>Parasitology</strong>,<br />

CINVESTAV-IPN (CHCM), Merida, Mexico.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 12 helminth species was found.<br />

Data on the hosts, localities, and infection range<br />

are provided in Table 1. All but 1 species<br />

(IProsthenhystera obesa) were located in the intestine;<br />

IP. obesa inhabited the gall blader.<br />

Among the species found, 3 trematodes were<br />

not identified to species level: 2 species of Saccocoelioides<br />

and a trematode of the subfamily<br />

Allocreadiinae (Allocreadiidae). Measurements<br />

of the first 2 species (Figs. 1-4), together with<br />

those of a congeneric species {Saccocoelioides<br />

sogandaresi) from Poecilia velifera are presented<br />

in Table 2.<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1-8<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Locality<br />

Cano Maranon<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Loonku Creek<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Puente Chino<br />

Loonku Creek<br />

Cano Maranon<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Cano Maranon<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Loonku Creek<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Loonku Creek<br />

Deposit<br />

accession nos.<br />

CNHE/CHCM<br />

4193/<br />

4 1 95/<br />

4196/<br />

4194/<br />

/383<br />

/384<br />

/380<br />

4142/<br />

/393, 393-1<br />

Mahogany River 4143/<br />

Torsuani River /396<br />

Torsuani River<br />

Loonku Creek<br />

Puente Chino<br />

Cano Negro<br />

Loonku Creek<br />

Puente Chino<br />

41911<br />

Discussion<br />

The number of species of adult endohelminths<br />

recorded was lower than that of larval stages, in<br />

particular metacercariae of digeneans, found in<br />

the same fish hosts (Aguirre-Macedo et al.,<br />

<strong>2001</strong>). Adult trematodes represented the dominant<br />

group (8 species) in this study, whereas<br />

nematodes were fewer (only 3 species). Only 1<br />

acanthocephalan occurred in fishes examined.<br />

No adult cestodes were found, even in the pimelodid<br />

catfish Rhamdia nicaraguensis, but<br />

only 4 fish of this species were examined. Thus,<br />

it is probable that more fish and localities need<br />

to be sampled to find adult cestodes, especially<br />

considering the low prevalence (


192 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


AGUIRRE-MACEDO ET AL.—ENDOHELMINTHS FROM NICARAGUAN FISHES 193<br />

Table 2. Measurements of species of Saccocoelioides from Nicaraguan freshwater fishes (n = number of<br />

specimens measured).<br />

Host<br />

Body shape<br />

Body length<br />

Maximum width<br />

Oral sucker<br />

Ventral sucker<br />

Sucker ratio<br />

Position of acctabulum<br />

Prepharynx<br />

Pharynx<br />

Oral sucker/pharynx ratio<br />

Extent of ceca<br />

Tcstis<br />

Hermaphroditic sac<br />

Ovary<br />

Extent of vitellarium<br />

Eggs<br />

Saccocoelioides<br />

sogandaresi<br />

(n = 1)<br />

Poecilia velifera*<br />

Widely oval<br />

995<br />

310<br />

100 X 122<br />

123 X 130<br />

1.14:1<br />

48% of body length<br />

38<br />

90 X 98<br />

1.18:1<br />

Anterior line of testis<br />

102 X 82<br />

150 X 76<br />

—<br />

—<br />

—<br />

Specimens fixed with GAP under pressure.<br />

Ponce de Leon, 1996) from fish of the genus<br />

Rhamdia in the Yucatan Peninsula (see Scholz<br />

et al., 1996).<br />

In South America, cestodes appear to be the<br />

dominant component of the fauna of endohelminths<br />

in freshwater fishes, in terms of the number<br />

of species and genera (Thatcher, 1991; Rego<br />

et al., 1999). These cestodes belong almost exclusively<br />

to the order Proteocephalidea, and they<br />

occur most frequently in siluriform fishes, including<br />

pimelodids (de Chambrier and Vaucher,<br />

1999; Rego, 2000).<br />

The endohelminth fauna of fishes from the<br />

Atlantic coastal drainages of Nicaragua closely<br />

resembles that of southeastern Mexico. Similar<br />

to the larval stages of endohelminths (Aguirre-<br />

Macedo et al., <strong>2001</strong>), a majority of species<br />

found occur in congeneric fish hosts from the<br />

Yucatan Peninsula (Moravec et al., 1995; Scholz<br />

et al., 1995, 1996; Salgado-Maldonado et al.,<br />

1997; Scholz and Vargas-Vazquez, 1998; Vidal-<br />

Martinez, Aguirre-Macedo et al., <strong>2001</strong>). This<br />

similarity indicates close relationships between<br />

Saccocoelioides sp. 1<br />

(n = 3)<br />

Astyanax fasciatus<br />

Elongate, with tapering ends<br />

1,070-1,210<br />

290-320<br />

90-112 X 100-120<br />

105-115 X 113-125<br />

0.83-1.01:1<br />

33-35%<br />

45-50<br />

70-78 X 63-69<br />

1.35-1.61:1<br />

About midline of testis<br />

274-290 X 140-173<br />

245-280 X 143-160<br />

98-105 X 80-104<br />

Far postacetabular<br />

73-75 X 46-50<br />

Saccocoelioides sp. 2<br />

(« = 15)<br />

Cichlasoma maculicauda<br />

Oval to elongate<br />

470-<strong>68</strong>0<br />

150-335<br />

67-105 X 75-125<br />

56-120 X 50-125<br />

0.63-1.30:1<br />

31-39%<br />

36-72<br />

50-82 X 47-75<br />

1.01-1.46:1<br />

About midline to % of testis<br />

72-175 X 58-145<br />

77-162 X 62-135<br />

37-87 X 35-87<br />

About midline of acetabulum<br />

67-81 X 36-47<br />

the helminth faunas of freshwater fishes in Central<br />

America and southeastern Mexico, in accordance<br />

with the analysis of Vidal-Martinez and<br />

Kennedy (2000) and the general biogeography<br />

of the neotropics (Briggs, 1984). Vidal-Martinez,<br />

Scholz and Aguirre-Macedo (<strong>2001</strong>) also<br />

found a marked resemblance between gill monogeneans<br />

of cichlids from Nicaragua and those<br />

from Yucatan.<br />

Three species of trematodes, Magnivitellinum<br />

simplex, IP. obesa, and S. sogandaresi, all nematodes,<br />

and the acanthocephalan Neoechinorhynchus<br />

golvani, previously found in North and<br />

South America (Travassos et al., 1969; Thatcher,<br />

1991; Perez-Ponce de Leon et al., 1996; Salgado-Maldonado<br />

et al., 1997; Moravec, 1998), are<br />

reported from Central America for the first time.<br />

With the exception of the trematodes Oligogonotylus<br />

manteri and Crassicutis cichlasomae reported<br />

from Lake Nicaragua by Watson (1976),<br />

all species also represent new geographical records<br />

from Nicaragua. This reflects the shortage<br />

Figures 1—4. 1, 2. Saccocoelioides sp. 1 from Cichlasoma maculicauda. 1. Total view from the ventral<br />

aspect. 2. Tegumental spines at pharyngeal level. 3, 4. Saccocoelioides sp. 2 from Astyanax fasciatus. 3.<br />

Total view ventral from the ventral aspect. 4. Tegumental spines at pharyngeal level. Scale bars in millimeters.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


194 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

of data on helminths of freshwater fishes in this<br />

country and in Central America in general.<br />

Three species of the genus Saccocoelioid.es<br />

Szidat, 1954, were found in this study, differing<br />

from each other in the size and shape of the<br />

body, their spination, relative size of the pharynx<br />

and hermaphroditic sac, extent of the vitellaria,<br />

egg size, etc. However, 2 of them (Figs.<br />

1-4) remain unidentified to species level because<br />

they differ from all hitherto described taxa<br />

(see Szidat, 1954; Lunaschi, 1984). They are not<br />

described as new species because of the unsatisfactorily<br />

resolved taxonomy of the genus, with<br />

numerous taxa having been inadequately described.<br />

To provide data for subsequent species<br />

identification, measurements of all 3 species are<br />

provided in Table 2.<br />

The allocreadiid trematode found in Astyanax<br />

fasciatus most resembles in its morphology the<br />

species Crepidostomum platense Szidat, 1954,<br />

and Crepidostomum stenopteri Mane-Garzon<br />

and Gascon, 1973, described from the intestine<br />

of several pimelodid catfishes from Argentina<br />

and from the characid fish "dentudo transparente"<br />

Charax (=Asiphonichthys) stenopterus<br />

(Cope, 1894) from Uruguay, respectively (see<br />

Szidat, 1954; Mane-Garzon and Gascon, 1973).<br />

However, there are marked differences among<br />

the present specimens and both species of Crepidostomum<br />

in the extent of the vitelline follicles,<br />

position of the ventral sucker, and in the<br />

shape and relative positions of the testes. It is,<br />

therefore, probable that the trematode from Nicaragua<br />

represents at least a new species. Nevertheless,<br />

it is not described formally in this paper<br />

because it differs, as do both species from<br />

South America, in its morphology from members<br />

of Holarctic species of the genus Crepidostomum<br />

Braun, 1900, and may even represent a<br />

different genus.<br />

The present report is the second on adults of<br />

helminth parasites from Nicaragua, following<br />

that of Watson (1976). It is evident that much<br />

more data on the fish parasites from larger samples<br />

of fish hosts must be obtained for better<br />

understanding of their species composition and<br />

relationships to those from other areas of the<br />

Neotropical region.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors are indebted to Dr. Anindo<br />

Choudhury, National Wildlife Health Center,<br />

Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A., for valuable advice<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

and helpful suggestions. Thanks are also due to<br />

the students of the School of Marine Biology of<br />

BICU for help in collecting fish, and to the authorities<br />

of this university for enabling us to use<br />

its facilities. A short visit by M.L.A.M. and<br />

V.M.V.M. to the Czech Republic in August 1999<br />

was supported by the Institute Mexicano de<br />

Cooperacion Internacional de la Secretaria de<br />

Relaciones Exteriores, Mexico.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Aguirre-Macedo, M. L., T. Scholz, D. Gonzalez-Solis,<br />

V. M. Vidal-Martinez, P. Posel, G. Arjona-<br />

Torres, E. Siu-Estrada, and S. Dumailo. <strong>2001</strong>.<br />

Larval helminths parasitizing freshwater fishes<br />

from the Atlantic coast of Nicaragua. <strong>Comparative</strong><br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:42-51.<br />

Briggs, J. C. 1984. Freshwater fishes and biogeography<br />

of Central America and the Antilles. Systematic<br />

Zoology 33:428-435.<br />

de Chambrier, A., and C. Vaucher. 1999. Proteocephalidae<br />

et Monticelliidae (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidea)<br />

parasites des poissons d'eau douce au<br />

Paraguay, avec descriptions d'un genre nouveau<br />

et de dix especes nouvelles. Revue Suisse de<br />

Zoologie 106:165-240.<br />

Ergens, R. 1969. The suitability of ammonium-picrate<br />

in preparing slides of lower Monogenoidea. Folia<br />

Parasitologica 16:320.<br />

Lunaschi, L. I. 1984. Helmintos parasitos de peces de<br />

agua dulce de la Argentina I. Tres nuevas especies<br />

del genero Saccocoelioides Szidat, 1954 (Trematoda<br />

Haploporidae). Neotropica 30(83):31-42.<br />

Mane-Garzon, F., and A. Gascon. 1973. Digenea de<br />

peces de agua dulce del Uruguay, I. Una nueva<br />

especie del genero Crepidostomum Braum, 1900<br />

del intestine de Asiphonichthys stenopterus. Revista<br />

de Biologia del Uruguay 1:11-14.<br />

Moravec, F. 1998. Nematodes of Freshwater Fishes<br />

of the Neotropical Region. Academia, Prague,<br />

Czech Republic. 464 pp.<br />

, C. Vivas-Rodriguez, T. Scholz, J. Vargas-<br />

Vazquez, E. Mendoza-Franco, and D. Gonzalez-SoIis.<br />

1995. Nematodes parasitic in fishes of<br />

cenotes (=sinkholes) of the Peninsula of Yucatan,<br />

Mexico. Part 1. Adults. Folia Parasitologica 42:<br />

115-129.<br />

Perez-Ponce de Leon, G., L. Garcia-Prieto, D. Osorio-Sarabia,<br />

and V. Leon-Regagnon. 1996. Listados<br />

Faunisticos de Mexico. VI. Helmintos Parasitos<br />

de Peces de Aguas Continentales de Mexico.<br />

Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, D.F., Mexico. 100<br />

pp.<br />

Rego, A. A. 2000. Cestode parasites of neotropical<br />

teleost freshwater fishes. Pages 135-154 in A. N.<br />

Garcfa-Aldrete, G. Salgado-Maldonado, and V. M.<br />

Vidal-Martmez, eds. Metazoan Parasites in the<br />

Neotropics: Ecological, Taxonomic and Evolutionary<br />

Perspectives. Commemorative Volume of<br />

the 70th Anniversary of the Institute de Biologia,


AGUIRRE-MACEDO ET AL.—ENDOHELMINTHS FROM NICARAGUAN FISHES 195<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.<br />

Mexico, D.F., Mexico.<br />

J. C. Chubb, and G. C. Pavanelli. 1999.<br />

Cestodes in South American freshwater teleost<br />

fishes: keys to the genera and brief descriptions.<br />

Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 16:299-367.<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, G., R. Pineda-Lopez, V. M.<br />

Vidal-Martinez, and C. R. Kennedy. 1997. A<br />

checklist of metazoan parasites of cichlid fish<br />

from Mexico. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 64:195-207.<br />

Scholz, T., and J. Vargas-Vazquez. 1998. Trematodes<br />

parasitizing fishes of the Rio Hondo River<br />

and freshwater lakes of Quintana Roo, Mexico.<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

65:91-95.<br />

, , F. Moravec, C. Vivas-Rodriguez,<br />

and E. F. Mendoza-Franco. 1995. Cenotes (sinkholes)<br />

of the Yucatan Peninsula of Yucatan, Mexico,<br />

as habitat of adult trematodes of fish. Folia<br />

Parasitologica 42:37-47.<br />

, , , , and . 1996.<br />

Cestoda and Acanthocephala of fishes from cenotes<br />

( = sinkholes) of Yucatan, Mexico. Folia Parasitologica<br />

43:141-152.<br />

Szidat, L. 1954. Trematodos nuevos de peces de agua<br />

dulce de la Republica Argentina y un intento para<br />

alcarar su caracter marino. Revista del Institute de<br />

Investigacion de las Ciencias Naturales y Museo<br />

Argentine de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"<br />

3(1): 1-85.<br />

Thatcher, V. E. 1991. Amazon fish parasites. Amazoniana<br />

11:263-572.<br />

Travassos, L., J. F. Teixeira de Freitas, and A.<br />

Kohn. 1969. Trematodeos do Brasil. Memorias do<br />

Institute Oswaldo Cruz 67:1-886.<br />

Vidal-Martinez, V. M., M. L. Aguirre-Macedo, T.<br />

Scholz, D. Gonzalez-Solis, and E. F. Mendoza-<br />

Franco. <strong>2001</strong>. Atlas of the Helminth Parasites of<br />

Cichlid Fish of Mexico. Academia, Prague, Czech<br />

Republic. 165 pp.<br />

, and C. R. Kennedy. 2000. Zoogeographical<br />

determinants of the helminth fauna composition<br />

of neotropical cichlid fish. Pages 227-290 in A.<br />

N. Garcfa-Aldrete, G. Salgado-Maldonado, and V.<br />

M. Vidal-Martinez, eds. Metazoan Parasites in the<br />

Neotropics: Ecological, Taxonomic and Evolutionary<br />

Perspectives. Commemorative Volume of<br />

the 70th Anniversary of the Institute de Biologia,<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.<br />

Mexico, D.F., Mexico.<br />

T. Scholz, and M. L. Aguirre-Macedo.<br />

<strong>2001</strong>. Dactylogyridae of cichlid fishes from Nicaragua,<br />

Central America, with descriptions of<br />

Gussevia herotilapiac and three new species of<br />

Sciadicleithrum (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae).<br />

<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:76-86.<br />

Watson, D. E. 1976. Digenea of fishes from Lake Nicaragua.<br />

Pages 251-260 in T. B. Thorson, ed. Investigations<br />

of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan<br />

Lakes. School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska,<br />

Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.<br />

Relocation of the Onderstepoort Helminthological Collection<br />

We have been notified that the Onderstepoort Helminthological Collection has moved and been renamed,<br />

and is now under the curatorship of Professor J. Boomker, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases,<br />

and Dr. E. van den Berg, Plant Protection Unit, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort,<br />

0110 South Africa. The collection is now known as the National Collection of Animal Helminths and is<br />

fully accessible. Prospective lenders, or those seeking further information, can notify Professor Boomker<br />

at the above address, phone: +27-12-529-8166, fax: +27-12-529-8312, or e-mail: jboomker@op.up.ac.za.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 196-203<br />

Helminth Parasites of Freshwater Fishes of the Balsas River<br />

Drainage Basin of Southwestern Mexico<br />

GUILLERMO SALGADO-MALDONADO,1'4 GUILLERMINA CABANAS-CARRANZA,1<br />

JUAN M. CASPETA-MANDUJANO,2 EDUARDO SoTO-GALERA,3 ELIZABETH MAYEN-PENA,'<br />

DAVID BRAILOVSKY,' AND RAFAEL BAEZ-VALE'<br />

1 Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-153, CP 04510,<br />

Mexico (e-mail: gsalgado@mail.ibiologia.unam.mx),<br />

2 Centre de Investigaciones Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001,<br />

CP 62210, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, and<br />

3 Laboratorio de Ictiologfa y Limnologia, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, Institute Politecnico<br />

Nacional, Carpio y Plan de Ayala, Santo Tomas, Mexico, D.F., Mexico<br />

ABSTRACT: This study presents the results of the first survey of the helminth parasites in fishes in the Balsas<br />

River drainage, southwestern Mexico. A total of 25 species of helminth parasites in 13 freshwater fish species<br />

(n = 1,045) was collected between December 1995 and September 1998. The most prevalent and widespread<br />

helminth species was the Asian tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi. Two features characterize the helminth<br />

fauna of the Balsas River basin fishes: (1) a predominance of nematode and trematode species coupled with a<br />

scarcity of monogeneans and acanthocephalans; and (2) all helminths found had previously been reported from<br />

other regions of Mexico; therefore the composition of the helminth fauna of the fishes of the Balsas River<br />

drainage is not very distinct from that of fishes from other previously studied freshwater basins in Mexico.<br />

KEY WORDS: Monogenea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, freshwater fish, Balsas River, southwestern<br />

Mexico, survey.<br />

The Balsas River basin is the largest river<br />

drainage in southwestern Mexico. The Balsas<br />

River has its source at about 3,660 m altitude in<br />

the Sierra Madre del Sur. It flows generally eastwest<br />

through the states of Tlaxcala, Puebla,<br />

Guerrero, and Michoacan and receives several<br />

major inflows from the states of Oaxaca, Mexico,<br />

Morelos, and Jalisco before emptying into<br />

the Pacific Ocean. This river has a fish fauna<br />

composed of 37 species of 26 genera in 10 families.<br />

In addition to native fishes, exotic species<br />

such as Asian cyprinids (carps) and African<br />

cichlids (tilapias) have been introduced into<br />

many areas.<br />

Little information exists about the occurrence<br />

of helminth parasites of fishes from the Balsas<br />

River (Osorio-Sarabia, 1982, 1984; Salgado-<br />

Maldonado et al., 1998; Caspeta-Mandujano and<br />

Moravec, 2000; Caspeta-Mandujano et al., 2000;<br />

Moravec, 2000; Moravec et al., 2000), and the<br />

present report is the first survey of the helminth<br />

parasites of fishes of this drainage system. The<br />

aim of this work is to report the survey results,<br />

and the distribution and intensity data for these<br />

helminth parasites.<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

196<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 1,045 fish was collected from 28 sites,<br />

mostly rivers, in the Balsas River basin between December<br />

1995 and September 1998 (Table 1, Fig. 1).<br />

Fish at each site were captured by electrofishing or<br />

by gill nets. Live fish were brought to the laboratory<br />

and examined within 48 hr after capture using standard<br />

procedures. The following fishes were examined (* indicates<br />

species endemic to the Balsas River basin): Cyprinidae—*Hybopis<br />

boucardi (Giinther, 18<strong>68</strong>) (Balsas<br />

shiner, n= 111); Characidae—Astyanax fasciatus (Cuvier,<br />

1819) (Mexican tetra, n = 166); Ictaluridae—*Ictalurus<br />

balsanus (Jordan and Snyder, 1899) (Balsas<br />

catfish, n = 1); Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818)<br />

(channel catfish, n = 2); Goodeidae—Goodca atripinnis<br />

Jordan, 1880 (blackfin goodea, n = 6); *Ilyodon<br />

whitei (Meek, 1904) (Balsas splitfin, n = 59); Poeciliidae—Heterandria<br />

bimaculatiis (Heckel, 1848) (spottail<br />

killifish, n = 88), Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1860<br />

(guppy, n — 20), Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes in<br />

Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1846 (Mexican molly, n =<br />

261), Poeciliopsis gracilis (Heckel, 1848) (porthole<br />

livebearer, n = 156), Poeciliopsis infans (Woolman,<br />

1894) (Lerma livebearer, n = 20); Cichlidae—*Cichlasoma<br />

istlanum (Jordan and Snyder, 1899) (redside<br />

cichlid, n = 32), Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Giinther,<br />

1867) (convict cichlid, n = 123). Fish sample sizes per<br />

site are given in Table 1.<br />

All helminths recovered from each fish were counted.<br />

Digeneans (adults and metacercariae), cestodes,<br />

and nematodes were fixed in hot 10% neutral formalin.<br />

Acanthocephalans were placed in distilled water and<br />

refrigerated overnight (6-12 hr) to evert the proboscis,


Table 1. Helminths found in freshwater fishes from the Balsas River basin, Mexico.<br />

^Locality (no<br />

total no. of helm<br />

Species Site Hosts<br />

Monogenea<br />

Gyrodactylus sp. Gills<br />

P. gracilis PL (2/18; 7; 0.4 ± 1.1 [3-4])<br />

P. infans VJ (1/20; 1)<br />

A.fasciatus PL (3/13; 12; 0.9 ± 1.8 [3-5]),<br />

[1-2]), PT (5/10; 30; 3.0 ± 3<br />

Urocleidoides cf. costaricensis (Price Gills<br />

and Bussing, 1967) Kritsky and<br />

Leiby, 1972<br />

/. whitei CH (1/22; 3)<br />

P. sphenops AR (1/7; 1), CH (2/43; 2; 0.05<br />

P. gracilis AR (9/11; 17; 1.5 ± 1.1 [1-4])<br />

A. fasciatus CU (1/11; 1)<br />

P. reticulata AC (3/20; 3; 0.2 ± 0.4 [1-1])<br />

P. sphenops HA (2/15; 16; 1.1 ± 3.9 [1-15]<br />

H. boucardi JU (1/8; 1), IX (5/10; 18; 1.8 ±<br />

Trematoda<br />

Saccocoelioides sogandaresi Lums- Intestine<br />

den, 1961<br />

Magnivitellinum simplex Kloss, 1966 Intestine<br />

Diplostomum cf. compaction (Lutz, Eyes, brain, body cavity<br />

1928)<br />

Posthodiplostomum minimum Muscle, liver, eyes,<br />

(MacCallum, 1921) mesentery, body cavity<br />

G. atripinnis JU (6/6; 801; 134.0 ± 37.5 [83<br />

H. bimacidata HJ (1/25; 1)<br />

P. sphenops HA (5/15; 39; 2.6 ± 6.0 [1-22]<br />

1), AM (1/16; 1); OT (1/2; 1<br />

P. infans VJ (19/20; 307; 15.4 ± 14.3 [3<br />

C. istlanum AM (1/4; 2)<br />

C. nigrofasciatum CO (5/44; 5; 0.1 ± 0.3 [1-1]),<br />

AM (8/20; 25; 1.2 ± 2.3 [1-9])<br />

H. boucardi CU (5/14; 10; 0.7 ± 1.3 [1-4])<br />

A.fasciatus PL (1/13; 1), HJ (1/5; 1)<br />

P. sphenops CO (1/10; 1), HJ (10/40; 14; 0.<br />

P. gracilis PL (1/18; 2), HJ (2/3; 3; 1.0 ±<br />

C. istlanum AM (3/4; 157; 39.2 ± 53.3 [16<br />

C. nigrofasciatum CH (17/22; 125; 5.7 ± 5.7 [1-2<br />

16.6 ± 13.1 [1-55]), AM (18<br />

A. fasciatus AM (4/26; 5; 0.2 ± 0.5 [1-2])<br />

Uvulifer sp. Skin, fins<br />

A. fasciatus AM (2/26; 5; 0.2 ± 0.7 [2-3])<br />

/. whitei CH (18/22; 1926; 87.5 ± 97.4<br />

P. sphenops CH (6/43; 28; 0.6 ± 2.3 [1-13]<br />

P. gracilis CH (3/15; 4: 0.3 ± 0.6 [1-2]),<br />

C. nigrofasciatum CH (2/22; 2; 0.1 ± 0.3 [1-1]),<br />

Clinostomum complanatum (Rudol- Fins, opercula, body<br />

phi, 1814) cavity<br />

Centrocestus formosanus (Nishigori, Gills<br />

1924)<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 1. Continued.<br />

'•'Locality (no.<br />

total no. of helmi<br />

Species Site Hosts<br />

H. boucardi CU (15/19; 103; 5.4 ± 10.8 [1-4<br />

[1-6]), IX (1/10; 1), PT (7/7;<br />

(5/15; 8; 0.5 ± 1.0 [1-4]), AM<br />

A. fasciatus CU (1/11; 1)<br />

H. bimacuiata CO ((1/13; 1), HJ (5/25; 7; 0.3 ±<br />

P. reticulata AC (1/20; 1)<br />

P. sphenops PT (1/5; 1), MI (1/15; 2), XO (3<br />

0.4 ± 0.9 [1-3]), PL (2/13; 2;<br />

5; 1)<br />

P. gracilis CO (2/19; 2; 0.1 ± 0.3 [1-1]), T<br />

C. istlamim TE (1/11; 2)<br />

C. nigrofasciatum HJ (3/21; 5; 0.2 ± 0.7 [1-3])<br />

P. sphenops HA ((2/15; 2; 0.1 ± 0.4 [1-1]), T<br />

XO (3/16; 6; 0.4 ± 0.8 [2-2])<br />

P. gracilis TE (9/16; 15; 0.9 ± 1.1 [1-3])<br />

A. fasciatus CU (1/11; 1)<br />

P. gracilis TE (1/16; 1)<br />

C. istlamim TE (3/11; 11; 1.0 ± 2.6 [1-9])<br />

Intestine<br />

Cestoda<br />

Bothriocephalus archeilognathi Yamaguti,<br />

1934<br />

Body cavity, mesentery,<br />

liver<br />

Glossocercus auritus (Rudolphi,<br />

1819) Bona, 1994<br />

P. sphenops TE (2/6; 18; 3.0 ± 6.0 [3-15])<br />

P. gracilis TE (4/16; 19; 1.2 ± 2.4 [2-8])<br />

Parvitaenia cochlearii Coil, 1955 Liver<br />

Parvitaenia macropeos (Wedl, 1855) Liver<br />

Baer and Bona, 1960<br />

Valipora minuta (Coil, 1950) Baer Liver, gall bladder<br />

and Bona, 1960<br />

A. fasciatus PL (1/13; 5)<br />

P. sphenops CH (7/43; 42; 1.0 ± 2.7 [1-10]),<br />

± 4.5 [1-13]), HJ (5/40; 116;<br />

C. nigrofasciatum CH (1/22; 1)<br />

H. boucardi JU (5/8; 15; 1.9 ± 2.1 ([1-6]), C<br />

1.7 [2-4]), RP (6/7; 80; 11.4 ±<br />

0.3 ± 0.5 [1-1]), MI (7/10; 34<br />

C. istlamim CO (1/1; 4), AM (4/4; 143; 35.8<br />

C. nigrofasciatum AR (8/16; 35; 2.2 ± 3.6 [1-14]),<br />

1.0 [1-6]), HJ (17/21; 99; 4.7<br />

C. atripinnis JU (5/6; 33; 5.5 ± 4.9 [1-13])<br />

Nematoda<br />

Capillaria cyprinodonticola Huffman Intestine,<br />

and Bullock, 1973 liver<br />

Rhabdochona canademis Moravec Intestine<br />

and Arai, 1971<br />

Rhabdochona kidderi Pearse, 1936 Intestine<br />

A. fasciatus CO (2/13; 2; 0.1 ± 0.4 [0-1]), P<br />

0.2 ± 0.4 [1-1]), PT (1/10; 1)<br />

Rhabdochona lichtenfelsi Sanchez- Intestine<br />

Alvarez et al., 1998<br />

Rhabdochona mexicana Caspeta- Intestine<br />

Mandujano et al., 2000<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


•o<br />

d<br />

c<br />

o<br />

U<br />

rH<br />

CB<br />

3 C8<br />

H<br />

°Q<br />

0 W<br />

T1<br />

infectei<br />

indance<br />

-2 ,0<br />

tf &<br />

o ,.<br />

4- -5<br />

0 g<br />

6 '6<br />

5-3<br />

>. *^"<br />

^3 O<br />

I §<br />

0<br />

o<br />

bo<br />

.-"^r)(T\'O ^ l> ON ^ g^ ID ro (— ;<br />

•SvS-Scj^G^tSi '1 3 S. 1 3 1 1<br />

^ > -s § > -s > ><br />

« t 1 oih0o?"3'^l>i>o<br />

r5 '8 5 § z x ^ c 1<br />

i lc?i^^52?x<br />

S .2? S •§ -2? S -£P -2?<br />

Si.S.S.&e^ss<br />

-<br />

-2<br />

8&ONK^^»ArC&:<br />

«^,--^u^^?^b<br />

o;u^a;u^uu u °??a;^~^:o3-0<br />

" ""> CN 2} oo \ K5 2<br />

C3"~ 'V'nCrfNin'i.t)<br />

'o_1.»Jf:


200 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

MEXICO ,-•* ! \TLAXCAl_A<br />

Figure 1. The Balsas River drainage basin of southwestern Mexico, showing the fish collection sites.<br />

Double circles indicate sites where no infected fish were collected.<br />

then fixed in hot 10% formalin. Digeneans, cestodes,<br />

and acanthocephalans were stained with Mayer's paracarmine<br />

or Ehrlich's hematoxylin, dehydrated through<br />

a graded alcohol series, cleared in methyl salicylate,<br />

and whole-mounted. Nematodes were cleared with<br />

glycerine for light microscopy and stored in 70% ethanol.<br />

Voucher specimens of all taxa have been deposited<br />

in the Coleccion Nacional de Helmintos, Institute<br />

de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.<br />

Infection parameters utilized are those proposed<br />

by Margolis et al. (1982), that is, prevalence (% infected)<br />

and abundance of infection (number of parasites<br />

per examined fish), expressed as mean ± standard<br />

deviation, followed by the range of intensity.<br />

Results<br />

The parasites encountered, their hosts, collection<br />

locations, infection sites, and prevalence,<br />

abundance, and range of intensity of helminth<br />

species are summarized in Table 1.<br />

Only 18 of the 1,045 host fish examined harbored<br />

monogeneans. Eight Gyrodactylus sp.<br />

were collected from 2 P. gracilis and 1 P. infans.<br />

Fifteen A. fasciatus were found to harbor<br />

66 Urocleidoides cf. costaricensis.<br />

Only 36 (3.4%) of the necropsied fish (3 species)<br />

were parasite-free. These fish included both<br />

ictalurid species, and 33 /. whitei from CR. Fish<br />

at 8 of the 28 collection sites sampled were not<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

infected at all: HU, PE, CI, PA, XA, TL, AH,<br />

and CR (Fig. 1).<br />

The most prevalent and widespread helminth<br />

parasite was the cestode Bothriocephalus acheilognathi<br />

that was recorded in 8 of the 13 Balsas<br />

River fish species, at infection intensities<br />

from 1 to 46.<br />

Discussion<br />

Data from this survey provide further evidence<br />

to support Moravec's (1998) contention<br />

that nematodes represent a significant component<br />

of helminth faunas in tropical freshwater<br />

fishes. They also corroborate the statement of<br />

Salgado-Maldonado and Kennedy (1997) that<br />

richness in digenean species is a characteristic<br />

of these helminth communities. In contrast,<br />

acanthocephalans were found to be very rare in<br />

the Balsas River survey, supporting the claim of<br />

Salgado-Maldonado et al. (1992) that adult<br />

acanthocephalans are generally very rare parasites<br />

in Mexican freshwater fishes. Adult cestodes<br />

are not common parasites in Mexican<br />

freshwater fishes; however, this survey found 4<br />

metacestode species. Previous surveys from<br />

most other geographical areas in Mexico (Pine-


da-Lopez et al., 1985; Leon, 1992; Jimenez-<br />

Garcia, 1994; Salgado-Maldonado et al., 1997)<br />

did not reveal a rich fauna of cestodes (but see<br />

Scholz et al., 1996). Monogeneans have only exceptionally<br />

been reported from freshwater fishes<br />

in Mexico (Lamothe-Argumedo, 1981), but a<br />

number of species have been found recently, in<br />

particular in southeastern Mexico (Kritsky et al.,<br />

1994, 2000; Mendoza-Franco et al., 1997,<br />

1999).<br />

Most of the parasites recorded in this survey<br />

are shared with freshwater fishes inhabiting other<br />

Mexican drainage basins (see Pineda-Lopez<br />

et al., 1985; Jimenez-Garcia, 1994; Moravec,<br />

Vivas-Rodriguez, Scholz, Vargas-Vazquez,<br />

Mendoza-Franco, and Gonzalez-Soli's, 1995;<br />

Moravec, Vivas-Rodriguez, Scholz, Vargas-Vazquez,<br />

Mendoza-Franco, Schmitter-Soto, and<br />

Gonzalez-Soli's, 1995; Scholz et al., 1995, 1996;<br />

Salgado-Maldonado et al., 1997; Moravec,<br />

1998; Moravec et al., 2000; Scholz and Vargas-<br />

Vazquez, 1998; Scholz and Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

2000). Six adult species are of neotropical origin:<br />

Urocleidoid.es cf. costaricensis, M. simplex,<br />

R. kidderi, R. lichtenfelsi, R. mexicana, and N.<br />

golvani. Saccocoelioides sogandaresi, Rhabdochona<br />

canadensis, and C. cyprinodonticola have<br />

been recorded in various freshwater fishes in<br />

Canada and southern North America (Lumsden,<br />

1963; Moravec and Aral, 1971; Moravec, 1998).<br />

Twelve of 25 helminth species recorded during<br />

this survey were larval forms that utilized<br />

small freshwater fishes as intermediate hosts. All<br />

these allogenic species are widespread taxa, with<br />

wide distributions within Mexico and broad host<br />

specificity. Thus, they can be regarded as an<br />

ecological component of the fish parasite communities<br />

in the Balsas River basin. The metacercariae<br />

of C. complanatum, P. minimum, and<br />

Diplostomum cf. compactum, as well as the larvae<br />

of nematodes Eustrongylides sp., Contracaecum<br />

sp., and Acuariidae gen. sp. have been<br />

commonly recorded in cichlids, poeciliids, characiids,<br />

pimelodids, and other fish families from<br />

southern Mexico (Pineda-Lopez, 1985; Pineda-<br />

Lopez et al., 1985; Osorio-Sarabia et al., 1987;<br />

Jimenez-Garcia, 1994; Moravec, Vivas-Rodriguez,<br />

Scholz, Vargas-Vazquez, Mendoza-Franco,<br />

Schmitter-Soto, and Gonzalez-Solis, 1995;<br />

Scholz et al., 1995; Salgado-Maldonado et al.,<br />

1997). They have also been reported in atherinids,<br />

goodeids, and other fish families from the<br />

Lerma Santiago River basin in the highland pla-<br />

SALGADO-MALDONADO ET AL.—HELMINTHS OF MEXICAN FISHES 201<br />

teau of central Mexico (Osorio-Sarabia et al.,<br />

1986; Salgado-Maldonado and Osorio-Sarabia,<br />

1987; Leon, 1992; Peresbarbosa et al., 1994).<br />

All these helminth species are widely distributed<br />

in North America, and some are worldwide<br />

(Hoffman, 1967; Yamaguti, 1971; Gibson,<br />

1996).<br />

Some of the helminths found have been introduced<br />

to Mexico with exotic fish or other animals.<br />

The Asian fish tapeworm (B. acheilognathi)<br />

has been disseminated globally in association<br />

with Asian cyprinids (grass and common<br />

carp) introduced to several countries for use in<br />

aquaculture (Salgado-Maldonado et al., 1986).<br />

This tapeworm has broad host specificity and<br />

now occurs in more than 15 freshwater fish species<br />

in Mexico (Garcia and Osorio-Sarabia,<br />

1991). We found B. acheilognathi widely distributed<br />

within the Balsas River basin, parasitizing<br />

8 fish species, mainly poeciliids.<br />

Another example is the heterophyid trematode<br />

C. formosanus that was introduced into Mexico<br />

most probably with the imported thiarid snail<br />

Melanoides tuberculata (Miiller, 1774) serving<br />

as the first intermediate host. This trematode has<br />

rapidly spread to an extensive area, including<br />

central Mexico and both the Atlantic and Pacific<br />

coasts, apparently aided by the previous expansion<br />

of M. tuberculata within Mexico. The<br />

metacercariae of C. formosanus are encysted in<br />

the gills of a wide spectrum of native fishes including<br />

members of Atherinidae, Cichlidae, Cyprinidae,<br />

Eleotridae, Goodeidae, Ictaluridae, and<br />

Poeciliidae (see Scholz and Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

2000). The adults are parasites in piscivorous<br />

birds and mammals. An increasing number of<br />

recent records of C. formosanus in numerous<br />

new hosts and regions, including the Balsas River<br />

drainage, suggests that this helminth is continuing<br />

to expand its distribution (Scholz and<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, 2000).<br />

Too few studies have been undertaken to draw<br />

conclusions about the zoogeographic characteristics<br />

of the helminth communities in the freshwater<br />

fish species of the Balsas River basin.<br />

However, two general statements can be made<br />

about these faunas. The first is that nematode<br />

and trematode species predominate, with only a<br />

few monogeneans and acanthocephalans being<br />

present. Second, all helminths found had previously<br />

been reported from other regions of Mexico;<br />

therefore the taxonomic composition of the<br />

helminth fauna of the fishes of the Balsas River<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


202 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

drainage is not very distinct from that seen in<br />

other previously studied freshwater basins in<br />

Mexico.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

This study was supported by project no.<br />

400355-5-276<strong>68</strong>N from the Consejo Nacional<br />

para la Ciencia y la Tecnologia (CONACyT),<br />

Mexico and by the Comision Nacional para el<br />

Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CON-<br />

ABIO), Mexico, project nos. H007 and L051.<br />

We are indebted to Drs. Frantisek Moravec and<br />

Tomas Scholz for identification of nematodes<br />

and cestodes. Thanks are also due Aitzane Delgado-Yoshino,<br />

Erick Alcantara, Alejandra Hernandez-Rodriguez,<br />

Nancy Minerva Lopez-Flores,<br />

Isabel Cristina Caneda-Guzman, Norman<br />

Mercado-Silva, and Felipe Villegas-Marquez for<br />

their assistance in the field and laboratory.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Caspeta-Mandujano, J. M., and F. Moravec. 2000.<br />

Two new intestinal nematodes of Profundulus labialis<br />

(Pisces, Cyprinodontidae) from fresh waters<br />

in Mexico. Acta Parasitologica 45:332-339.<br />

, , M. A. Delgado-Yoshino, and G.<br />

Salgado-Maldonado. 2000. Seasonal variations<br />

in the occurrence and maturation of the nematode<br />

Rhabdochona kidderi in Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum<br />

of the Amacuzac River, Mexico. Helminthologia<br />

37:29-33.<br />

Garcia, P. L., and D. Osorio-Sarabia. 1991. Distribucion<br />

actual de Bothriocephalus acheilognathi<br />

en Mexico. Anales del Institute de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 62:523-526.<br />

Gibson, D. I. 1996. Trematoda. In L. Margolis and Z.<br />

Kabata, eds. Guide to the Parasites of Fishes of<br />

Canada. Part IV. Canadian Special Publications of<br />

Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 124. 373 pp.<br />

Hoffman, G. L. 1967. Parasites of North American<br />

Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press,<br />

Berkeley, California, U.S.A. 486 pp.<br />

Jimenez-Garcia, M. I. 1994. Fauna helmintologica de<br />

Cichlasoma fenestratum (Pisces: Cichlidae) del<br />

lago de Catemaco, Veracruz, Mexico. Anales del<br />

Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />

de Mexico, Serie Zoologia 64:75-78.<br />

Kritsky, D. C., E. F. Mendoza-Franco, and T.<br />

Scholz. 2000. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 36.<br />

Dactylogyrids from the Gills of Rhamdia guatemalensis<br />

(Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from Cenotes<br />

of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, with Proposal<br />

of Ameloblastella gen. n. and Aphanoblastella<br />

gen. n. (Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae).<br />

<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> 67:76-84.<br />

, V. M. Vidal-Martinez, and R. Rodriguez-<br />

Canul. 1994. Neotropical Monogenoidea 19. Dactylogyridae<br />

of cichlids (Perciformes) from the Yucatan<br />

Peninsula, with descriptions of three new<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

species of Sciadicleithriim Kritsky, Thatcher and<br />

Boeger, 1989. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 61:26-33.<br />

Lamothe-Argumedo, R. 1981. Monogeneos parasitos<br />

de peces. VIII. Descripcion de una nueva especie<br />

del genero Octomacrum Mueller, 1934 (Monogenea:<br />

Discocotylidae). Anales del Instituto de Biologia,<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico,<br />

Serie Zoologia 51:51—60.<br />

Leon, R. V. 1992. Fauna helmintologica de algunos<br />

vertebrados acuaticos de la cienega de Lerma, Estado<br />

de Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologia,<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 63:151-153.<br />

Lumsden, R. D. 1963. Saccocoelioides sogandaresi<br />

sp. n., a new haploporid trematode from the sailfin<br />

molly Mollienisia latipinna Le Sueur in Texas.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 49:281-284.<br />

Margolis, L., G. W. Esch, J. C. Holmes, A. M. Kuris,<br />

and G. A. Schad. 1982. The use of ecological<br />

terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee<br />

of the American Society of Parasitologists).<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:131-133.<br />

Mendoza-Franco, E. F., T. Scholz, and V. M. Vidal-<br />

Martinez. 1997. Sciadicleithriim meekii sp. n.<br />

(Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) from the gills of<br />

Cichlasoma meeki (Pisces: Cichlidae) from cenotes<br />

(=sinkholes) of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.<br />

Folia Parasitologica 44:205-208.<br />

, , C. Vivas-Rodriguez, and J. Vargas-<br />

Vazquez. 1999. Monogeneans of freshwater fishes<br />

from cenotes (sinkholes) of the Yucatan Peninsula,<br />

Mexico. Folia Parasitologica 46:267-273.<br />

Moravec, F. 1998. Nematodes of Freshwater Fishes<br />

of the Neotropical Region. Academia, Prague,<br />

Czech Republic. 464 pp.<br />

—. 2000. Systematic status of Laurotravassoxyuris<br />

bravoae Osorio-Sarabia, 1984 (Nematoda:<br />

Pharyngodonidae) [=Atractis bravoae (Osorio-<br />

Sarabia, 1984) n. comb.: Cosmocercidae]. Systematic<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 46:117-122.<br />

, and H. P. Arai. 1971. The North and Central<br />

American species of Rhabdochona Railliet, 1916<br />

(Nematoda: Rhabdochonidae) of fishes, including<br />

Rhabdochona canadensis sp. nov. Journal of the<br />

Fisheries Research Board of Canada 28:1645-<br />

1662.<br />

, G. Salgado-Maldonado, and J. M. Caspeta-<br />

Mandujano. 2000. Rhabdochona mexicana sp. n.<br />

(Nematoda: Rhabdochonidae) from the intestine<br />

of characid fishes in Mexico. Folia Parasitologica<br />

47:211-215.<br />

, C. Vivas-Rodriguez, T. Scholz, J. Vargas-<br />

Vazquez, E. Mendoza-Franco, and D. Gonzalez-Solis.<br />

1995. Nematodes parasitic in fishes of<br />

cenotes (=sinkholes) of the Peninsula of Yucatan,<br />

Mexico. Part 1. Adults. Folia Parasitologica 42:<br />

115-129.<br />

, , , , , J- J-<br />

Schmitter-Soto, and D. Gonzalez-Solis. 1995.<br />

Nematodes parasitic in fishes of cenotes ( = sinkholes)<br />

of the Peninsula of Yucatan, Mexico. Part<br />

2. Larvae. Folia Parasitologica 42:199-210.<br />

Osorio-Sarabia, D. 1982. Descripcion de una nueva


especie del genero Goezici Zeder, 1800 (Nematoda:<br />

Goeziidae) en peces de agua dulce de Mexico.<br />

Anales del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologia 52:<br />

71-87.<br />

. 1984. Descripcion de una especie nueva del<br />

genero Laurotravassoxyuris Vigueras, 1938<br />

(Nematoda: Syphaciidae) en peces de agua dulce<br />

de Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 54:23-33.<br />

, G. Perez, and G. Salgado-Maldoiiado.<br />

1986. Helmintos de peces del lago de Patzcuaro,<br />

Michoacan I: Helmintos de Chirostoma estor el<br />

"pescado bianco." Taxonomfa. Anales del Instituto<br />

de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />

de Mexico, Serie Zoologfa 57:61-92.<br />

-, R. Pineda-Lopez, and G. Salgado-Maldonado.<br />

1987. Fauna helmintologica de peces dulceacufcolas<br />

de Tabasco. Estudio preliminar. Universidad<br />

y Ciencia 4:5-31.<br />

Peresbarbosa, R. E., G. Perez, and L. Garcia-Prieto.<br />

1994. Helmintos parasites de tres especies de<br />

peces (Goodeidae) del lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan.<br />

Anales del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologfa 65:201-204.<br />

Pineda-Lopez, R. 1985. Infeccion por metacercarias<br />

(Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) en peces de agua<br />

dulce de Tabasco. Universidad y Ciencia 2:47-60.<br />

, V. M. Carballo-Cruz, M. G. Fucugauchi,<br />

and L. Garcia-Magana. 1985. Metazoarios parasitos<br />

de peces de importancia comercial en la region<br />

de Los Rfos, Tabasco, Mexico. Pages 197-<br />

270 in Usumacinta: Investigacion Cientffica en la<br />

Cuenca del Usumacinta. Gobierno del Estado de<br />

Tabasco, Mexico.<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, G., G. Cabanas-Carranza,<br />

and J. M. Caspeta-Mandujano. 1998. Crcptotrema<br />

agonostomi n. sp. (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae)<br />

from the intestine of freshwater fish of Mexico.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 84:431-434.<br />

, S. Guillen-Hernandez, and D. Osorio-Sarabia.<br />

1986. Presencia de Bothriocephalus acheilognathi<br />

Yamaguti, 1934 (Ccstoda: Bothriocephal-<br />

SALGADO-MALDONADO ET AL.—HELMINTHS OF MEXICAN FISHES 203<br />

idae) en peces de Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico.<br />

Anales del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologfa 57:<br />

213-218.<br />

, M. I. Jimenez-Garcia, and V. Leon-Regagnon.<br />

1992. Presence of Octospiniferoides chandleri<br />

Bullock, 1957 in Heterandria bimaculata<br />

from Catemaco Veracruz, and considerations<br />

about the acanthocephalans of freshwater fishes of<br />

Mexico. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz<br />

87(supplement 1):239-240.<br />

, and C. R. Kennedy. 1997. Richness and similarity<br />

of helminth communities in the tropical<br />

cichlid fish Cichlasoma umphthalmus from the<br />

Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. <strong>Parasitology</strong> 114:<br />

581-590.<br />

, and D. Osorio-Sarabia. 1987. Helmintos de<br />

algunos peces del lago de Patzcuaro. Ciencia y<br />

Desarrollo 13:41-57.<br />

, R. Pineda-Lopez, V. M. Vidal-Martinez,<br />

and C. R. Kennedy. 1997. A checklist of metazoan<br />

parasites of cichlid fish from Mexico. Journal<br />

of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

64:195-207.<br />

Scholz, T., and G. Salgado-Maldonado. 2000. The<br />

introduction and dispersal of Centrocestus formosanus<br />

(Nishigori, 1924) (Digenea: Heterophyidae)<br />

in Mexico: a review. American Midland Naturalist<br />

143:185-200.<br />

, and J. Vargas-Vazquez. 1998. Trematodes<br />

from fishes of the Rio Hondo River and freshwater<br />

lakes of Quintana Roo, Mexico. Journal of the<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington 65:91-<br />

95.<br />

, , F. Moravec, C. Vivas-Rodriguez,<br />

and E. Mendoza-Franco. 1995. Metacercariae of<br />

trematodes of fishes from cenotes ( = sinkholes) of<br />

the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Folia Parasitologica<br />

42:173-192.<br />

, , , , and . 1996.<br />

Cestoda and Acanthocephala of fishes from cenotes<br />

( = sinkholes) of Yucatan, Mexico. Folia Parasitologica<br />

43:141-152.<br />

Yamaguti, S. 1971. Synopsis of Digenetic Vertebrates<br />

of Vertebrates. Vol. I. Keigaku Publishing Company,<br />

Tokyo, Japan. 1,074 pp.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 204-218<br />

A Checklist of Helminth Parasites of Freshwater Fishes from the<br />

Lerma-Santiago River Basin, Mexico<br />

GUILLERMO SALGADO-MALDONADO,1-4 GUILLERMINA CABANAS-CARRANZA,1 EOUARDO SOTO-<br />

GALERA,2 JUAN M. CASPETA-MANDUJANO,3 R. GRISELDA MORENO-NAVARRETE,1<br />

PETRA SANCHEZ-NAVA,' AND ROGELIO AGUILAR-AGUILAR'<br />

1 Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-153, CP 04510,<br />

Mexico, D.F., Mexico (e-mail: gsalgado@mail.ibiologia.unam.mx),<br />

2 Laboratorio de Ictiologfa y Limnologfa, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, Institute Politecnico<br />

Nacional, Carpio y Plan de Ayala, Santo Totnas, CP 11340, Mexico D.F., Mexico, and<br />

3 Centre de Investigaciones Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos, Avenida Universidad<br />

1001, CP 62210, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico<br />

ABSTRACT: A checklist based on previously published records and original data is presented for the helminth<br />

parasites reported from 33 freshwater fish species from the Lerma-Santiago river basin, west-central Mexico.<br />

The checklist contains 43 helminth species, 6 (14%) of which are endemic to the basin. Fourteen of the 43 are<br />

allogenic species, mostly Nearctic in origin. Three species are anthropogenically introduced colonizers, of which<br />

the Asian fish tapeworm Bothriocephalus acheilognathi is the most widely distributed species in the basin. The<br />

checklist includes 75 new host records, and records of 12 localities where no previous surveys had been conducted.<br />

KEY WORDS: Digenea, Monogenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, freshwater fishes, Lerma-Santiago<br />

river basin, west-central Mexico, survey.<br />

At least 375 freshwater fish species, of which<br />

approximately 60% are endemic, occur in Mexico,<br />

and over 500 species occur if those living<br />

in estuaries and coastal lagoons are included<br />

(Miller, 1982; Espinosa-Perez, 1993). The Lerma-Santiago<br />

river basin in west-central Mexico<br />

has the highest percentage of endemism of any<br />

major river basin in Mexico, with 30 of its 42<br />

(72%) fish species found nowhere else (Espinosa-Perez,<br />

1993; Soto-Galera et al., 1998).<br />

This river basin (Fig. 1) drains much of westcentral<br />

Mexico and consists of 2 major rivers, the<br />

Lerma and the Santiago. The Lerma River basin<br />

is the most important hydrologic system of the<br />

Mexican Central Highland Plateau. It originates in<br />

the <strong>State</strong> of Mexico at an elevation of 3,000 m and<br />

flows for 700 km through the states of Queretaro,<br />

Guanajuato, Michoacan, and Jalisco before emptying<br />

into Chapala Lake at 1,500 m elevation. The<br />

Santiago River drains from Chapala Lake, flowing<br />

through the state of Jalisco to the Pacific Ocean.<br />

The fish fauna of the Lerma-Santiago river basin<br />

has long been studied by ichthyologists (Diaz-<br />

Pardo et al., 1993; Soto-Galera et al., 1998). No<br />

regional survey of the parasite fauna of these fish<br />

has been published, and the literature is scattered<br />

4 Corresponding author.<br />

204<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

in taxonomic papers (Flores-Barroeta, 1953; Lamothe-Argumedo,<br />

1970, 1981, 1988; Lamothe-Argumedo<br />

and Cruz-Reyes, 1972; Osorio-Sarabia et<br />

al., 1986; Salgado-Maldonado et al., 1986; Salgado-Maldonado<br />

and Osorio-Sarabia, 1987; Alarcon,<br />

1988; Alarcon and Castro-Aguirre, 1988; Garcfa-<br />

Prieto et al., 1988; Garcfa-Prieto and Osorio-Sarabia,<br />

1991; Leon-Regagnon, 1992; Peresbarbosa-<br />

Rojas et al., 1994; Perez-Ponce de Leon et al.,<br />

1994; Espinosa-Huerta et al., 1996; Mendoza-<br />

Garfias et al., 1996; Astudillo-Ramos and Soto-<br />

Galera, 1997; Pineda-Lopez and Gonzalez, 1997;<br />

Sanchez-Alvarez et al., 1998; Guzman-Cornejo<br />

and Garcfa-Prieto, 1999; Caspeta-Mandujano et<br />

al., 1999; Moravec et al., 2000, <strong>2001</strong>; Scholz and<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, 2000, <strong>2001</strong>). This paper<br />

compiles the extant information on the helminth<br />

parasites of freshwater fishes in the Lerma-Santiago<br />

river basin and includes original data derived<br />

from our own research. The species referred to in<br />

theses and scientific meetings do not constitute formal<br />

publications and are consequently not considered<br />

herein. This checklist should facilitate future<br />

research on the ecology, zoogeography, and biodiversity<br />

of this important river basin.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

As part of an ongoing parasitological investigation into<br />

the helminth fauna of the freshwater fishes of Mexico, a


JALISCO<br />

SALGADO-MALDONADO ET AL.—HELMINTHS OF MEXICAN FISHES 205<br />

Chap '<br />

LAKE'CHAPALA<br />

Figure 1. The Lerma-Santiago River drainage basin of west-central Mexico, showing the fish collection<br />

sites. Locality codes as in Table 1.<br />

review of the literature dealing with freshwater fish helminth<br />

parasites in the entire Lerma-Santiago river basin<br />

was made. In addition, a total of 1,177 fish of 18 species<br />

(Table 1), from 11 localities in the Lerma-Santiago river<br />

basin (Table 2, Fig. 1) was examined for the presence of<br />

helminths from January to October 1997 and from January<br />

to March 1998.<br />

At each site, fish were captured using electrofishing or<br />

gill nets. The numbers of fish examined at each locality<br />

and collection data are given in the parasite-host list (Table<br />

3). After capture, the fish were taken live to the laboratory<br />

and examined within 48 hr using standard procedures.<br />

Briefly, all the external surfaces, viscera, and<br />

musculature of each fish host were examined under a<br />

stereomicroscope, and all the helminths encountered in<br />

each fish were counted. Digeneans (adults and larvae),<br />

cestodes, and nematodes were fixed in hot 4% neutral<br />

formalin. Acanthocephalans were placed in distilled water,<br />

refrigerated overnight (6—12 hr) to evert the proboscis,<br />

and then fixed in hot 10% formalin. Digeneans, cestodes,<br />

and acanthocephalans were stained with Mayer's paracarmine<br />

or Ehrlich's hematoxylin, dehydrated using a<br />

graded alcohol series, cleared in methyl salicylate, and<br />

whole mounted. Nematodes were cleared with glycerine<br />

for light microscopy and stored in 70% ethanol. Voucher<br />

specimens of all taxa have been deposited in the National<br />

Helminth Collection (Coleccion Nacional de Helmintos<br />

[CNHE]), Institute of Biology, National Autonomous<br />

University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City. Infection<br />

parameters utilized are those proposed by Margolis et al.<br />

(1982), that is, prevalence (% infected) and mean intensity<br />

of infection (number of parasites per examined fish).<br />

Voucher specimens of the following species, found in<br />

fish from the Lerma-Santiago river basin and deposited<br />

in the CNHE, were examined: Posthodiplostomum minimum<br />

(MacCallum, 1921) (nos. 001253, 001476,<br />

001748); Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934<br />

(no. 000434); Proteocephalus pusillus Ward, 1910 (nos.<br />

000383-000386); Proteocephalus sp. (no. 000425); Ligula<br />

intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1758) [nos. 448(F) and<br />

449(F)], and Contracaeciim sp. [nos. 002508(F) and<br />

002253(F)].<br />

Results<br />

A host-parasite checklist is presented herein<br />

as Table 3. In this study, 43 helminth species are<br />

reported from 33 species of freshwater fishes of<br />

the Lerma-Santiago river basin, west-central<br />

Mexico. Six (14%) of the 43 species are endemic<br />

to the basin: A. mexicanum, M. bravoae, O.<br />

mexicanum, R. lichtenfelsi, Spinitectus sp., and<br />

B. nayaritensis. Fourteen are allogenic species<br />

that mature in, and are transported by, birds: C.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


206 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOOY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 1. Fish species from the Lerma-Santiago river basin of west-central Mexico that were examined<br />

for helminths in 1997 and 1998.<br />

Fish species Common name<br />

Sample<br />

size (n)<br />

Cyprinidae<br />

*Algansea tincella (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1844) Spottail chub 17<br />

jCyprinux carpio Linnaeus, 1758 Common carp 45<br />

'•'"Notropis sallei (Giinther, 18<strong>68</strong>) Azteca chub 37<br />

*Yuriria alta (Jordan, 1880) Lerma chub 49<br />

Goodeidae<br />

''Girardinichthys multiradiatiis (Meek, 1904) Darkedged splitfin 503<br />

'•'•Goodea atripinnis Jordan, 1880 Blackfin goodea 143<br />

*Xcnotoca variants (Bean, 1887) Jeweled splitfin 56<br />

Poeciliidae<br />

Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes //; Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1846 Mexican molly 23<br />

*Poeciliopxis infans (Woolman, 1894) Lerma livebearer 16<br />

Poeciliopsis sp. 13<br />

Atherinidae<br />

*Atherinella crystallina (Jordan and Culver ;'/; Jordan, 1895) Blackfin silverside 48<br />

*Chirostoma humboldtianitm (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes,<br />

1835) Shortfin silverside 46<br />

*Chirostoma jordani: Woolman, 1894 Mesa silverside 64<br />

*Chirostoma labarcae Meek, 1902 Sharpnose silverside 3<br />

*Chirostoma riojai Solorzano and Lopez, 1966 Toluca silverside 78<br />

Cichlidae<br />

Cichlasoma beani (Jordan, 1889) Sinaloan cichlid 32<br />

Centrarchidae<br />

t Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819 Bluegill 2<br />

Gobiidac<br />

Awaous tajasica (Lichtenstein, 1822) River goby 2<br />

* Species endemic to the Lerma-Santiago river basin.<br />

t Species introduced to the Lerma-Santiago river basin.<br />

complanatum, Diplostomum sp., P. minimum, C.<br />

formosanus, L. intestinalis, C. cf. ralli, P. caballeroi,<br />

P. cf. urseus, P. cochlearii, V. campylane<br />

ristrota, V. mutabills, Eustrongylides sp.,<br />

Contracaecum sp., and P. brevis. Three species<br />

are recent, anthropogenically introduced colonizers:<br />

C. formosanus, P. tornentosa, and B. acheilognathi,<br />

which is the most widely distributed<br />

species in the basin. Twelve of the 33 fish species<br />

examined have not previously been surveyed<br />

for parasites, and present data expand the<br />

spectrum of fish hosts, to the effect that the list<br />

provides 75 new records for hosts and locations.<br />

Discussion<br />

Only 8 fish species have been examined in<br />

sufficient numbers to enable evaluation of helminth<br />

community composition and structure: Algansea<br />

lacustris, Chirostoma estor, C. attenu-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

atutn, Goodea atripinnis, Alloophorus robustus,<br />

Allotoca diazi, Micropterus salmoides, and Cyprinus<br />

carpio. Patzcuaro Lake has been systematically<br />

sampled, while other localities have only<br />

been sampled occasionally and with few fish examined.<br />

From large areas of the basin no data<br />

on fish parasites exist at all. There is also limited<br />

information on the parasites of fish in rivers and<br />

other water bodies. Parasitological knowledge<br />

for the Lerma-Santiago river basin is fragmentary,<br />

as many studies did not record all the helminth<br />

species because they were prepared for<br />

taxonomic ends, such as the description of a single<br />

species. As a result, most of the research in<br />

the basin merely indicates where data are most<br />

needed.<br />

A notable aspect of the present data is a highly<br />

characteristic endemic helminth component in<br />

the Lerma-Santiago river basin. Of the 43 re-


SALGADO-MALDONADO ET AL.—HELMINTHS OF MEXICAN FISHES 207<br />

Table 2. Codes and features of the localities sampled or reported in the literature from which hosts were<br />

collected.<br />

Code<br />

Bata<br />

Bizn<br />

Chap<br />

Chic<br />

Coin<br />

Cons<br />

Cuit<br />

Igna<br />

Lagu<br />

Lerm<br />

Patz<br />

Rami<br />

Rsan<br />

Sala<br />

Taza<br />

Tila<br />

Trin<br />

Viet<br />

Zira<br />

Locality name<br />

Presa El Batan<br />

Presa La Biznaga<br />

Lago de Chapala<br />

Lago de Chicnahuapan<br />

("Almoloya del Rio")<br />

Presa Cointzio<br />

Presa Constitucion de 1917<br />

Lago de Cuitzeo<br />

Presa Ignacio Allende<br />

La Lagunilla<br />

Cienega de Lerma<br />

Lago de Patzcuaro<br />

Presa Ignacio Ramirez<br />

Rio Santiago (Aguamilpa)<br />

Lago de Salazar<br />

Las Tazas<br />

Santiago Tilapa, Laguna de<br />

Guadalupe Victoria<br />

Trinidad Fabela<br />

Villa Victoria<br />

Lago de Zirahuen<br />

Habitat<br />

type<br />

AR*<br />

AR<br />

NL<br />

NL<br />

AR<br />

AR<br />

NL<br />

AR<br />

WL<br />

WL<br />

NL<br />

AR<br />

RI<br />

NL<br />

AR<br />

NL<br />

AR<br />

AR<br />

NL<br />

<strong>State</strong> (coordinates)<br />

Queretaro (20°13'13"N; 100°24'39"W)<br />

Guanajuato (21°25'30"N; 100°52'52.7"W)<br />

Jalisco (20°08'-20°22'N; 102°42'-103°25'W)<br />

=|: AR = Artificial reservoir; NL = natural lake; WL = wetland; RI = river.<br />

corded helminth species, 6 (14%) are endemic<br />

to the basin: the digeneans A. mexicanum and<br />

M. bravoae, from atherinids and the goodeid G.<br />

multiradiatus, respectively; the monogenean O.<br />

mexicanum, a parasite of the cyprinid A. lacustris',<br />

and the nematodes R. lichtenfelsi, from the<br />

goodeids A. robustus, A. diazi, and G. atripinnis,<br />

and a species of Spinitectus, previously referred<br />

to as S. carolini, from the atherinids C. attenuatum<br />

and C. estor. Additionally, the nematode<br />

species B. nayaritensis, a parasite of C. beani in<br />

the Santiago River, may be endemic to this basin,<br />

because there is no other record of this species<br />

in Mexico (Moravec, 1998), and cichlids<br />

are the best studied fish family from a parasitological<br />

point of view (Salgado-Maldonado et<br />

al., 1997; Vidal-Martfnez and Kennedy, 2000).<br />

It is thought that the present hydrological configuration<br />

of the Lerma-Santiago river basin was<br />

created during the Pliocene Age by orogenic activity<br />

that isolated it from the ocean (Barbour,<br />

1973; Echelle and Echelle, 1984). The fish fauna<br />

of the basin consists of the descendants of marine<br />

ancestors that invaded the freshwater bodies,<br />

as well as Nearctic components such as cyprinids.<br />

It is assumed that by at least 5 million yr<br />

ago the fish species in the basin had established<br />

themselves, evolving and diversifying from their<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°11'N; 99°30'W)<br />

Michoacan (19°36'46"N; 101°17'58"W)<br />

Queretaro (20°25'00"N; 100°05'00"W)<br />

Guanajuato-Michoacan (20°04'34"- 1 9°53'25"N; 101° 1 9'34"-l 00°50'20"W)<br />

Guanajuato (20°55'N; 100°50'W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°08'30"N; 99°30'12"W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°22'41"N; 99°59'39"W)<br />

Michoacan (19°41'-19°32'N; 101°27'-101°53'W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°26'54"N; 99°59'32"W)<br />

Nayarit (21°46'42"N; 104°55'36"W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°21'5"N; 99°21'55"W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (not located)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°1 1'15"N; 99°23'56"W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°48'N; 99°46'W)<br />

Estado de Mexico (19°26'28"N; 100°4'33"W)<br />

Michoacan (19°21'14"-19°29'32"N; 101°30'33"-101°46'15"W)<br />

original marine ancestors. The parasite fauna<br />

must also have evolved and diversified during<br />

this period of isolation, the current assemblage<br />

of endemic helminth species being the product<br />

of these evolutionary processes. To the extent to<br />

which the fish species adapted to these environments<br />

and speciated within them, so did their<br />

helminth communities, with some being lost and<br />

others developing in the new hosts. In other<br />

words, both the fish of the Lerma-Santiago river<br />

basin, and their parasites developed in isolation.<br />

The fish parasite fauna of this basin is also<br />

enriched through colonization by allogenic species<br />

transported by birds. As a result, the fish<br />

helminth communities in the basin have an<br />

abundant (14 of the total 43 species) component<br />

of allogenic species that mature in, and are<br />

transported by, birds: C. complanatum, Diplostomum<br />

sp., P. minimum, C. formosanus, L. intestinalis,<br />

C. cf. ralli, P. caballeroi, P. cf. urseus,<br />

P. cochlearii, V. campylancristrota, V. mutabilis,<br />

Eustrongylid.es sp., Contracaecum sp.,<br />

and P. brevis, most of which occur throughout<br />

the American continent or are cosmopolitan.<br />

Many factors may have favored this colonization.<br />

They include the small size of the fish in<br />

this basin, their gregarious habits, their shallow<br />

water habitat, their status in the food web, and<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 3. Parasite-host list of helminths collected from fish of the Lerma-Santiago river basin of west-c<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

exam- Preva<br />

ined mean in<br />

Locality<br />

Host/infection site(s)*<br />

Parasite<br />

Adult Trematoda<br />

Family Allocreadiidae Stossich, 1903<br />

AUocreadium mexicanurn Osorio-Sarabia, Perez and Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

1986<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

23%<br />

13%<br />

24%<br />

"Low<br />

40%<br />

216<br />

195<br />

48<br />

8<br />

209<br />

64<br />

5<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Rsan<br />

Tila<br />

Patz<br />

Lagu<br />

Viet<br />

C. estorll<br />

C. attenuatum/l<br />

A. crystallina/I<br />

C. riojaill<br />

M. salmoides/Pc, I<br />

G. midtiradiatusl\I<br />

Crepidostomum cooperi Hopkins, 1931<br />

Margotrema bravoae Lamothe-Argumedo, 1970<br />

9<br />

Chap<br />

/. dugesill<br />

Family Gorgoderidae (Looss, 1901)<br />

Phyllodistomum lacustris (Loewen, 1929)<br />

6%<br />

17<br />

Igna<br />

A. tincella/l<br />

Larval Trematoda<br />

Family Cryptogonimidae Ciurea, 1933<br />

Cryptogonimidae gen. sp.<br />

Family Proterodiplostomidae Dubois, 1936<br />

Proterodiplostomurn sp.<br />

6%<br />

67%<br />

45%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

33%<br />

3%<br />

20%<br />

61%<br />

30%<br />

3%<br />

28%<br />

36%<br />

17<br />

15<br />

94<br />

50<br />

75<br />

3<br />

31<br />

5<br />

18<br />

20<br />

29<br />

46<br />

14<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Chic<br />

Lagu<br />

Rami<br />

Sala<br />

Trin<br />

Viet<br />

Bizn<br />

Igna<br />

Trin<br />

Viet<br />

Rami<br />

A. tincella/Bc<br />

N. sallei/Bc<br />

G. multiradiatus/Bc<br />

/Be<br />

/Be<br />

/Be<br />

/Be<br />

/Be<br />

G. atripinnis/Bc<br />

/Be<br />

/Be<br />

C. humboIdtianum/L,<br />

C. riojai/Bc<br />

90%<br />

9<br />

9<br />

Family Clinostomidae Liihe, 1901<br />

Clinostomum complanatum (Rudolphi, 1814)<br />

30<br />

41<br />

31<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

A. robustusll<br />

/L, M<br />

A. diazi/L, M<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 3. Continued.<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

exam- Preva<br />

ined mean i<br />

Locality<br />

Host/infection site(s)*<br />

Parasite<br />

13%<br />

0.6%<br />

5%<br />

27%<br />

30<br />

178<br />

22<br />

41<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Igna<br />

Cuit<br />

G. atripinnisll<br />

/L<br />

/L<br />

X. variatusH<br />

Family Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886<br />

Diplostomum sp.<br />

10%<br />

79%<br />

9%<br />

11%<br />

7%<br />

14%<br />

30%<br />

5%<br />

216<br />

38<br />

22<br />

9<br />

30<br />

42<br />

30<br />

390<br />

6<br />

30<br />

41<br />

31<br />

9<br />

30<br />

178<br />

35<br />

41<br />

30<br />

195<br />

42<br />

216<br />

30<br />

30<br />

17<br />

15<br />

1<br />

8<br />

10<br />

118<br />

13<br />

Patz<br />

Bizn<br />

Rsan<br />

Igna<br />

Cuit<br />

Zira<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Lerm<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Lerm<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Zira<br />

Patz<br />

Cuit<br />

Cuit<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Lagu<br />

Chic<br />

Igna<br />

Chic<br />

Rami<br />

C. estor/B<br />

C. jor'danifM.<br />

P. sphenops/Bc<br />

Y. alta/M<br />

G. atripinnisll<br />

C. attenuatum/1<br />

C. jordanill<br />

A. lacustris/M<br />

N. sallei/1<br />

A. robustusll<br />

/L, M, Mu, E<br />

A. diazi/L, M, Mu, E<br />

G. multiradiatusH<br />

G. atripinnisll<br />

/L, Mu<br />

/L, M, Mu, E<br />

X. variants!!<br />

C. attenuatum/1^, M, Mu<br />

/L, M, Mu, E, B<br />

/L, M, Mu<br />

C. estor/L, Mu, E, B<br />

C. jordani/1<br />

O. aureusll<br />

A. tincella/M<br />

N. sallei/M<br />

/M<br />

/M<br />

Y. altall, L, M<br />

G. multiradiatus/M<br />

/M<br />

Diplostomum (Tylodelphys) sp.<br />

Posthodiplostomum minimum (MacCallum, 1921) Dubois,<br />

1936<br />

93%<br />

87%<br />

62%<br />

80%<br />

100%<br />

98%<br />

81%<br />

95%<br />

67%<br />

7%<br />

82%<br />

7%<br />

100%<br />

22%<br />

80%<br />

22%<br />

8%<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 3. Continued.<br />

Preval<br />

mean in<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

examined<br />

Locality<br />

Host/infection site(s)*<br />

Parasite<br />

60%<br />

55%<br />

25%<br />

57%<br />

5%<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

48%<br />

52%<br />

100%<br />

26%<br />

8%<br />

25<br />

22<br />

4<br />

35<br />

22<br />

9<br />

2<br />

46<br />

23<br />

2<br />

23<br />

13<br />

Bizn<br />

Igna<br />

Trin<br />

Igna<br />

Rsan<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Viet<br />

Igna<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Tila<br />

G. atripinnis/M<br />

/L, M<br />

/M<br />

X. variatusfL, M<br />

P. sphenops/M<br />

P. infans/L, M<br />

/M<br />

C. humboldtianumfL<br />

C. jordani/L, M<br />

C. labarcaefL, M<br />

C. riojaifL, M<br />

/L, M<br />

?<br />

31<br />

Patz<br />

A. diazill<br />

Family Plagiorchiidae Liihe, 1901<br />

Ochetosorna sp.<br />

Family Heterophyidae Odhner, 1914<br />

Centrocestus formosanus (Nishigori, 1924)<br />

18%<br />

50%<br />

27%<br />

100%<br />

20%<br />

62%<br />

38%<br />

50%<br />

17<br />

14<br />

11<br />

1<br />

5<br />

13<br />

48<br />

2<br />

Igna<br />

Igna<br />

Igna<br />

Rsan<br />

Igna<br />

Rsan<br />

Rsan<br />

Rsan<br />

A. tincella/G<br />

Y. alta/G<br />

G. atripinnis/G<br />

P. sphenops/G<br />

P. infans/G<br />

Poeciliopsis sp./G<br />

A. crystallina/G<br />

L. macrochirus/G<br />

L2%<br />

25<br />

Rsan<br />

C. beani/G<br />

Monogenea<br />

Family Dactylogyridae Bychowsky, 1933<br />

Sciadicleithrum sp.<br />

28%<br />

23%<br />

46<br />

22<br />

Chic<br />

Rsan<br />

G. multiradiatuslG<br />

P. sphenopslG<br />

Family Gyrodactylidae Cobbold, 1864<br />

Gyrodactylus elegans Nordmann, 1832<br />

Gyrodactyhis sp.<br />

62%<br />

390<br />

Patz<br />

A. lacustrislG<br />

Family Discocotylidae Price, 1936<br />

Octomacrum mexicanum Lamothe-Argumedo, 1981<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 3. Continued.<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

exam- Preva<br />

ined mean i<br />

Locality<br />

Host/infection site(s)*<br />

Parasite<br />

0.3%<br />

390<br />

Patz<br />

A. lacustns/l<br />

Adult Cestoda<br />

Order Caryophyllidea van Beneden in Carus, 1863<br />

Caryophyllidea gen. sp.<br />

9<br />

Family Bothriocephalidae Blanchard, 1849<br />

Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934<br />

5%<br />

13%<br />

390<br />

6<br />

178<br />

5<br />

41<br />

31<br />

9<br />

41<br />

9<br />

36<br />

30<br />

195<br />

42<br />

216<br />

234<br />

9<br />

9<br />

25<br />

43<br />

209<br />

40<br />

17<br />

15<br />

17<br />

3<br />

43<br />

2<br />

63<br />

50<br />

75<br />

Chap<br />

Patz<br />

Lerm<br />

Patz<br />

Lerm<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Lerm<br />

Bata<br />

Chap<br />

Cons<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Zira<br />

Patz<br />

Coin<br />

Chap<br />

Patz<br />

Bata<br />

Cons<br />

Patz<br />

Cons<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Rami<br />

Trin<br />

Chic<br />

Lagu<br />

Rami<br />

A. mbescensll<br />

A. lacustrisll<br />

N. sallei/I<br />

C. carpioll<br />

l\ robustus/l<br />

12%<br />

8%<br />

13%<br />

7%<br />

24%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

24%<br />

40%<br />

l%<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

13%<br />

24%<br />

33%<br />

2%<br />

100%<br />

3%<br />

26%<br />

3%<br />

A. diazifl<br />

G. multiradiatusll<br />

G. atripinnisll<br />

/I<br />

X. variatusll<br />

C. attenuatum/l<br />

/I<br />

/I<br />

C. estor/l<br />

C. humboldtianumll<br />

C. ocotlanell<br />

C. grandocule/l<br />

Cliirostoma sp./I<br />

/I<br />

M. salmoidesll<br />

O. niloticiis/l<br />

A. tincella/l<br />

N. sallei/l<br />

Y. alta/l<br />

/I<br />

C. carpioll<br />

11<br />

G. miiltiracliatus/l<br />

l\<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


212 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

_| H * < -l<br />

O O O O O O<br />

=: £ £ 5: =: 5<br />

a! a


Table 3. Continued.<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

exam- Prev<br />

ined mean<br />

Locality<br />

Host/infection site(s)*<br />

Parasite<br />

8<br />

3%<br />

22%<br />

3<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

33%<br />

10<br />

4%<br />

9%<br />

3%<br />

4%<br />

24<br />

38<br />

23<br />

38<br />

48<br />

46<br />

3<br />

20<br />

50<br />

75<br />

31<br />

25<br />

Igan<br />

Bizn<br />

Igna<br />

Bizn<br />

Rsan<br />

Viet<br />

Rami<br />

Rami<br />

Lagu<br />

Rami<br />

Trin<br />

Rsan<br />

X. variatus/M<br />

C. jordani/M, L<br />

C. jordani/L<br />

C. jordanifL<br />

A. crystallinafL<br />

C. humboldtianum/Gb<br />

C. jordani/Gb<br />

C. riojai/Gb<br />

G. miiltiradiatus/Gb<br />

Paradilepis caballeroi Rysavy and Macko, 1973<br />

Paradilepis cf. urceus (Wedl, 1855)<br />

Paradilepis sp.<br />

Parvitaenia cochlearii Coil, 1955<br />

Valipora campy lancristrota (Wedl, 1855)<br />

C. beani/L, Gb<br />

Valipora mutabilis Linton, 1927<br />

0.5%<br />

195<br />

Patz<br />

C. attenuatum/l<br />

Order Cyclophyllidea<br />

Cyclophyllidea gen. sp.<br />

Adult Nematoda<br />

Family Capillariidae Neveau-Lemaire, 1936<br />

Pseudocapillaria tomentosa (Dujardin, 1843)<br />

5%<br />

10<br />

0.5%<br />

2%<br />

1<br />

7%<br />

8%<br />

5%<br />

33%<br />

20<br />

178<br />

195<br />

216<br />

110<br />

43<br />

75<br />

184<br />

3<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Rami<br />

A. robustiis/l<br />

G. atripinnis/I<br />

C. attenuatum/I<br />

C. estorfl<br />

/I<br />

C. carpio/l<br />

N. sallei/l<br />

(1986) but Moravec et al<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

20<br />

25<br />

Igna<br />

Bizn<br />

Remarks: This species was originally described as Capillaria patzcuarensis by Osorio-Sarabia et al.<br />

from Europe with cyprinids.<br />

Capillariidae gen. sp.<br />

G. atripinnis/I<br />

/I<br />

14%<br />

7<br />

Rsan<br />

C. beani/I<br />

Family Cucullanidae Cobbold, 1864<br />

Dichelyne mexicanus Caspeta-Mandujano, Moravec and<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, 1999<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 3. Continued.<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

exam- Preva<br />

ined mean in<br />

* Locality<br />

Parasite Host/infection site(s)<br />

0.5%<br />

390<br />

Patz<br />

Family Philometridae Baylis and Daubney, 1926<br />

Philometridae gen. sp. A. lacustrisfBc<br />

7<br />

7<br />

7<br />

40%<br />

8%<br />

7<br />

44%<br />

360<br />

41<br />

31<br />

20<br />

178<br />

35<br />

25<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Cuit<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Rsan<br />

Family Rhabdochonidae Travassos, Artigas, and Pereira, 1928<br />

Rhabdochona lichtenfelsi Sanchez-Alvarez, Garcia, and A. robustusfl<br />

Perez, 1998 /I<br />

A. diazi/i<br />

G. atripinnis/l<br />

n<br />

n<br />

Beaninema nayaritense Caspeta-Mandujano, Moravec, and C. beani/l<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, 2000<br />

10%<br />

14%<br />

43%<br />

12%<br />

30<br />

195<br />

42<br />

216<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Zira<br />

Patz<br />

Family Cystidicolidae Skrjabin, 1846<br />

Spinitectus sp. C. attenuatum/l<br />

11<br />

l\ estor/I<br />

Remarks: The nematodes were originally reported as Spinitectus carolini Holl, 1928, but they in fact belong to a separate spec<br />

of the Czech Republic, personal communication).<br />

Larval Nematodes<br />

Family Dioctophymatidae Railliet, 1915<br />

?<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

13%<br />

1%<br />

10%<br />

41<br />

178<br />

195<br />

30<br />

209<br />

10<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Bizn<br />

A. robustus/M, Be<br />

G. atripinnis/Mu<br />

C. attenuatum/M<br />

n<br />

M. salmoidesfMu<br />

G. atripinnis/Mu<br />

Eustrongylides sp.<br />

Family Anisakidae Railliet and Henry, 1912<br />

Contracaeciim sp.<br />

0.3%<br />

6%<br />

13%<br />

1 1 %<br />

5%<br />

31%<br />

390<br />

17<br />

15<br />

9<br />

22<br />

35<br />

Patz<br />

Igna<br />

Rami<br />

Igna<br />

Igna<br />

Igna<br />

A. lacustris/l<br />

A. tincella/M<br />

N. sallei/M<br />

Y. alta /M<br />

G. atripinnis/M, Be<br />

X. variatus/M<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

COMPARA1


Table 3. Continued.<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hosts<br />

exam- Prev<br />

ined mean<br />

Locality<br />

Host/infection site(s)*<br />

Parasite<br />

119<br />

3<br />

17<br />

12<br />

50%<br />

9<br />

38<br />

23<br />

25<br />

2<br />

Igna<br />

Bizn<br />

Igna<br />

Rsan<br />

Rsan<br />

P. infansIM<br />

C. joi'dani/M<br />

/M<br />

C. beani/L,, M<br />

A. tajasica/M<br />

5%<br />

0.8%<br />

2%<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Rami<br />

Rami<br />

Bizn<br />

Trin<br />

Igna<br />

A. robustiisfL<br />

A. laciistris/l<br />

C. carpioll<br />

A. ?-obnstns/M, I<br />

A. diazi/M, I<br />

G. atripinnis/M, I<br />

/I<br />

M. salmoidesfl<br />

N. salleifl<br />

G. miiltiradiatiis/I<br />

G. atripinnisfl<br />

fl<br />

X. variatus/l<br />

Family Gnathostomatidae Railliet, 1895<br />

Gnathostoma sp.<br />

Spiroxys sp.<br />

1<br />

l%<br />

33<br />

15<br />

6<br />

3<br />

5<br />

20<br />

390<br />

184<br />

41<br />

31<br />

35<br />

178<br />

209<br />

3<br />

13<br />

18<br />

29<br />

21<br />

20%<br />

25<br />

Rsan<br />

C. beanifl<br />

Acanthocephala Adult<br />

Family Neoechinorhynchidae Ward, 1953<br />

Neoechinorhynchus golvani Salgado-Maldonado, 1978<br />

Acanthocephala Larvae<br />

Family Polymorphidae Meyer, 1931<br />

Polymorphic brevis Van Cleave, 1916<br />

0.3%<br />

2%<br />

3%<br />

4%<br />

8%<br />

3%<br />

6%<br />

390<br />

184<br />

41<br />

31<br />

178<br />

195<br />

216<br />

209<br />

35<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Patz<br />

Igna<br />

A. lacustris/M<br />

C. carpio/L., M<br />

A. robustus/M, Mu<br />

A. diazi/M, Mu<br />

G. atripinnis/L,, M<br />

C. attenuatum/L., M<br />

C. estor/L, M<br />

M. salmoides/L,, M<br />

X. variatus/L,<br />

* B = brain; Be = body cavity; E = eyes; G = gills; Gb = gall bladder; I = intestine; L = liver; M = mesentery; Mu =<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


216 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

their situation along the annual migratory routes<br />

of Nearctic birds. Additionally, the low number<br />

of helminth species in the basin may have readily<br />

allowed invasion of these communities by<br />

allogenic species.<br />

Three helminth species on the list are recent,<br />

anthropogenically introduced colonizers. The<br />

first is the cestode B. acheilognathi, which is the<br />

most widely distributed species in the basin and<br />

is found in 22 host species. The second is the<br />

heterophyid trematode C. formosanus. The actual<br />

distribution of this helminth within the basin<br />

has not been evaluated, because the intermediate<br />

host, the thiarid snail Melanoides tuberculata<br />

Miiller, 1774, has established along riverbanks<br />

and in riverbeds, where few fish have been sampled.<br />

Both these species were introduced recently<br />

into Mexico; the cestode together with<br />

Asian carp (Salgado-Maldonado et al., 1986),<br />

and the trematode most probably with the intermediate<br />

snail host (Scholz and Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

2000). The third species is the capillariid<br />

nematode P. tomentosa, reported from atherinids<br />

and goodeids, as well as from cultured carp, C.<br />

carpio, from Mexico, where it was probably introduced<br />

along with its fish host from Europe<br />

(Moravec, 1998; Moravec et al., <strong>2001</strong>).<br />

The proportions among the helminth groups<br />

that constitute the communities in the fish of the<br />

Lerma-Santiago river basin are also distinctive.<br />

The dominance in species numbers of nematodes<br />

and trematodes (principally metacercariae)<br />

is a pattern characteristic of the fish helminth<br />

communities of southeastern Mexico (Scholz et<br />

al., 1995; Salgado-Maldonado and Kennedy,<br />

1997; Scholz and Vargas-Vazquez, 1998) and<br />

the Balsas River basin in central Mexico (Salgado-Maldonado<br />

et al., <strong>2001</strong>). However, data in<br />

the present study show that cestodes, both adults<br />

and metacestodes, are almost as important in the<br />

Lerma-Santiago river basin in terms of numbers<br />

as the nematodes and trematodes. Most cestodes<br />

found, such as V. campylancristrota, occur<br />

throughout the American continent or are cosmopolitan<br />

(see Scholz and Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

<strong>2001</strong>). The presence of 5 monogenean species<br />

in the basin is also notable, as it is a higher<br />

number than recorded in other drainages in central<br />

Mexico. However, the monogenean fauna of<br />

freshwater fishes in southeastern Mexico is even<br />

richer (Kritsky et al., 1994, 2000; Mendoza-<br />

Franco et al., 1997, 1999, 2000).<br />

It is still not possible to form conclusions<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

about the zoogeographic characteristics of the<br />

fish helminth parasite communities in the Lerma-Santiago<br />

river basin, as very few studies<br />

have been done. However, the data that do exist<br />

suggest that the proportion of endemic parasites<br />

is high, and thus very distinctive, as compared<br />

for example to the lack of endemic species<br />

among the helminth parasites of fishes from the<br />

Balsas River drainage (Salgado-Maldonado et<br />

al., <strong>2001</strong>). The helminth communities were<br />

probably initially poor, and have been invaded<br />

by allogenic, Nearctic species transported by<br />

birds that have enriched these multispecific assemblages.<br />

Research into fish helminth parasites in the<br />

Lerma-Santiago river basin has been restricted to<br />

descriptions of some species, and more detailed<br />

studies have been carried out only in Patzcuaro<br />

Lake. Obviously, more complete inventories of<br />

the fish parasites in this basin are urgently required.<br />

Almost 7% of the fish species that originally<br />

inhabited the basin are extinct, and an additional<br />

23% are classified as endangered or vulnerable<br />

because of population decline associated<br />

with continuous habitat degradation and introduction<br />

of competing and predatory species that are<br />

added to the natural predation pressures in these<br />

ecosystems (Soto-Galera et al., 1998).<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

This study was supported by project no.<br />

276<strong>68</strong>N from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia<br />

y Tecnologia (CONACyT), Mexico, and by project<br />

no. H007 from the Comision Nacional para<br />

el Estudio y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONA-<br />

BIO), Mexico. We are indebted to Dr. Frantisek<br />

Moravec for confirmation of identification of<br />

nematodes and Dr. Tomas Scholz for identification<br />

of cestodes. We also thank Nancy Minerva<br />

Lopez-Flores, Isabel Jimenez-Garcia, Cris Caneda-Guzman,<br />

Rafael Baez-Vale, Norman Mercado-Silva,<br />

and Felipe Villegas-Marquez for<br />

their assistance in the field and laboratory.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Alarcon, G. C. 1988. Diagnostico e identificacion de<br />

una parasitosis helmmtica en Carassius carassius<br />

en un centre piscicola. Revista Latinoamericana<br />

de Microbiologia 30:297.<br />

, and J. L. Castro-Aguirre. 1988. Tratamiento<br />

experimental con Mebendazol para bothriocefalosis<br />

en Carassius carassius. Revista Latinoamericana<br />

de Microbiologfa 30:298.<br />

Astudillo-Ramos, L., and E. Soto-Galera. 1997. Es-


tudio helmintologico de Chirostoma humboldtianum<br />

y Girardinichthys multiradiatus capturados en<br />

el Lerma. Zoologia Informa 35:53-59.<br />

Barbour, C. D. 1973. A biogeographical history of<br />

Chirostoma (Pisces: Atherinidae): a species flock<br />

from the Mexican Plateau. Copeia 1973:533-556.<br />

Caspeta-Mandujano, J. M., F. Moravec, and G. Salgado-Maldonado.<br />

1999. Observations on cucullanid<br />

nematodes from freshwater fishes in Mexico,<br />

including Dichelyne mexicanus sp. n. Folia Parasitologica<br />

46:289-295.<br />

, , and . <strong>2001</strong>. Two new species<br />

of rhabdochonids (Nematoda: Rhabdochonidae)<br />

from freshwater fishes in Mexico, with a description<br />

of a new genus. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 87:<br />

139-143.<br />

Diaz-Pardo, E., M. A. Godinez-Rodriguez, E. Lopez-Lopez,<br />

and E. Soto-Galera. 1993. Ecologia<br />

de los peces de la cuenca del rio Lerma, Mexico.<br />

Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas<br />

39:103-127.<br />

Echelle, A. A., and A. F. Echelle. 1984. Evolutionary<br />

genetics of a "species flock": atherinid fishes on<br />

the Mesa Central of Mexico. Pages 93-110 in A.<br />

A. Echelle and I. Kornfield, eds. Evolution of Fish<br />

Species Flocks. University of Maine at Orono<br />

Press, Orono, Maine, U.S.A.<br />

Espinosa-Huerta, E., L. Garcia-Prieto, and G.<br />

Perez. 1996. Helminth community structure of<br />

Chirostoma attemiatiim (Osteichthyes: Atherinidae)<br />

in two Mexican lakes. Southwestern Naturalist<br />

41:288-292.<br />

Espinosa-Perez, H. 1993. Riqueza y diversidad de peces.<br />

Ciencias, Mexico 7:77-84.<br />

Flores-Barroeta, L. 1953. Cestodos de vertebrados I.<br />

Ciencia 13:31-36.<br />

Garcia-Prieto, L., H. Mejia, and G. Perez. 1988.<br />

Hallazgo del plerocercoide de Ligula intestinalis<br />

(Cestoda) en algunos peces dulceacuicolas de<br />

Mexico. Anales del Institute de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 58:887-888.<br />

, and D. Osorio-Sarabia. 1991. Distribucion<br />

actual de Bothriocephalus acheilognathi en Mexico.<br />

Anales del Institute de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologia<br />

62:523-526.<br />

Guzman-Cornejo, M. C., and L. Garcia-Prieto.<br />

1999. Trematodiasis en algunos peces del lago de<br />

Cuitzeo, Michoacan, Mexico. Revista de Biologia<br />

Tropical 47:593=596.<br />

Kritsky, D. C., E. F. Mendoza-Franco, and T.<br />

Scholz. 2000. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 36.<br />

Dactylogyrids from the gills of Rhamdia guatemalcnsis<br />

(Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from cenotes<br />

of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, with proposal<br />

of Ameloblastella gen. n. and Aphanoblastella<br />

gen. n. (Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae).<br />

<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> 67:76-84.<br />

, V. M. Vidal-Martinez, and R. Rodriguez-<br />

Canul. 1994. Neotropical Monogenoidea 19. Dactylogyridae<br />

of cichlids (Perciformes) from the Yucatan<br />

Peninsula, with descriptions of three new<br />

species of Sciadicleithrum Kritsky, Thatcher, and<br />

SALGADO-MALDONADO ET AL.—HELMINTHS OF MEXICAN FISHES 217<br />

Boeger, 1989. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 61:26-33.<br />

Lamothe-Argumedo, R. 1970. Trematodos de peces<br />

VI. Margotrema bravoae gen. nov. sp. nov.<br />

(Trematoda: Allocreadiidae) parasito de Lermichthys<br />

multiradiatus Meek. Anales del Institute de<br />

Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de<br />

Mexico, Serie Zoologia 41:87-92.<br />

. 1981. Monogeneos parasitos de peces VIII.<br />

Descripcion de una nueva especie del genero Octomacrum<br />

Miiller, 1934 (Monogenea: Discocotylidae).<br />

Anales del Institute de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologia<br />

51:56-60.<br />

. 1988. Trematodos de peces VIII. Primer registro<br />

de Phyllodistomum lacustri (Loewen, 1924)<br />

parasito de Ictalurus dugesi en Mexico. Anales<br />

del Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologia 58:487-<br />

496.<br />

-, and A. Cruz-Reyes. 1972. Hallazgo de Ligula<br />

intestinalis (Goeze, 1782) Gmelin, 1790 en<br />

Lermichthys multiradiatus (Meek) (Pisces: Goodeidae).<br />

Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia<br />

Natural 33:99-100.<br />

Leon-Regagnon, V. 1992. Fauna helmintologica de<br />

algunos vertebrados acuaticos de la Cienega de<br />

Lerma, Mexico. Anales del Institute de Biologia,<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 63:151-153.<br />

Margolis, L., G. W. Esch, J. C. Holmes, A. M. Kuris,<br />

and G. A. Schad. 1982. The use of ecological<br />

terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee<br />

of the American Society of Parasitologists).<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:131-133.<br />

Mendoza-Franco, E. F., T. Scholz, and V. M. Vidal-<br />

Martinez. 1997. Sciadicleithrum meekii sp. n.<br />

(Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) from the gills of<br />

Cichlasoma meeki (Pisces: Cichlidae) from cenotes<br />

( = sinkholes) of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.<br />

Folia Parasitologica 44:205-208.<br />

, , C. Vivas-Rodriguez, and J. Vargas-<br />

Vazquez. 1999. Monogeneans of freshwater fishes<br />

from cenotes (sinkholes) of the Yucatan Peninsula,<br />

Mexico. Folia Parasitologica 46:267-273.<br />

-, V. M. Vidal-Martinez, M. L. Aguirre-Macedo,<br />

R. Rodriguez-Canul, and T. Scholz. 2000.<br />

Species of Sciadicleithrum (Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae)<br />

of cichlid fishes from southeastern<br />

Mexico and Guatemala: new morphological<br />

data and host and geographical records. <strong>Comparative</strong><br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 67:85-91.<br />

Mendoza-Garfias, B., L. Garcia-Prieto, and G.<br />

Perez. 1996. Helmintos de la "acumara" Algansea<br />

lacustris en el lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan,<br />

Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 67:77=88.<br />

Miller, R. R. 1982. Pisces. Pages 486-581 in S. H.<br />

Hurlbert and A. Villalobos, eds. Aquatic Biota of<br />

Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. San<br />

Diego <strong>State</strong> University, San Diego, California,<br />

U.S.A.<br />

Moravec, F. 1998. Nematodes of Freshwater Fishes<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


218 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

of the Neotropical Region. Academy of Sciences<br />

of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.<br />

464 pp.<br />

, R. Aguilar-Aguilar, and G. Salgado-Maldonado.<br />

<strong>2001</strong>. Systematic status of Capillaria<br />

patzcuarensis Osorio-Sarabia, Perez-Ponce de<br />

Leon et Salgado-Maldonado, 1986 (Nematoda:<br />

Capillariidae) from freshwater fishes in Mexico.<br />

Acta Parasitologica 46:8-11.<br />

-, G. Salgado-Maldonado, and D. Osorio-Sarabia.<br />

2000. Records of the bird capillariid, Ornithocapillaria<br />

appendiculata (Freitas, 1933)<br />

comb, n., from freshwater fishes in Mexico, with<br />

remarks on Capillaria patzcuarensis Osorio-Sarabia,<br />

Perez-Ponce de Leon and Salgado-Maldonado,<br />

1986. Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong> 45:53-59.<br />

Osorio-Sarabia, D., G. Perez, and G. Salgado-Maldonado.<br />

1986. Helmintos de peces del lago de<br />

Patzcuaro, Michoacan, I. Helmintos de Chirostoma<br />

estorel "pescado bianco." Taxonomfa. Anales<br />

del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologfa 57:61-92.<br />

Peresbarbosa-Rojas, R. E., G. Perez, and L. Garcia.<br />

1994. Helmintos parasites de tres especies de peces<br />

(Goodeidae) del lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan.<br />

Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologfa<br />

65:201-204.<br />

Perez-Ponce de Leon, G., B. Mendoza G., and G.<br />

Pulido F. 1994. Helminths of the charal prieto<br />

Chirostoma atteniiatum (Osteichthes: Atherinidae),<br />

from Patzcuaro Lake, Michoacan, Mexico.<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

61:139-141.<br />

Pineda-Lopez, R., and C. Gonzalez. 1997. Bothriocephalus<br />

acheilognathr. presencia e importancia<br />

de un invasor asiatico infectando peces de Queretaro.<br />

Zoologfa Informa 35:5-12.<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, G., G. Cabanas-Carranza, J.<br />

M. Caspeta-Mandujano, E. Soto-Galera, E.<br />

Mayen-Pena, D. Brailovsky, and R. Baez-Vale.<br />

<strong>2001</strong>. Helminth parasites of freshwater fishes of<br />

the Balsas River drainage, southwestern Mexico.<br />

<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> <strong>68</strong>:196-203.<br />

, S. Guillen-Hernandez, and D. Osorio-Sarabia.<br />

1986. Presencia de Bothriocephalus acheilognathi<br />

Yamaguti, 1934 (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidae)<br />

en peces de Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico.<br />

Anales del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologfa 57:<br />

213-218.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

, and C. R. Kennedy. 1997. Richness and similarity<br />

of helminth communities in the tropical<br />

cichlid fish Cichlasoma iirophthalmus from the<br />

Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. <strong>Parasitology</strong> 1 14:<br />

581-590.<br />

, and D. Osorio-Sarabia. 1987. Helmintos de<br />

algunos peces del lago de Patzcuaro. Ciencia y<br />

Desarrollo 113:41-57.<br />

-, R. Pineda-Lopez, V. M. Vidal-Martinez,<br />

and C. R. Kennedy. 1997. A checklist of mctazoan<br />

parasites of cichlid fish from Mexico. Journal<br />

of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

64:195-207.<br />

Sanchez-Alvarez, A., L. Garcia-Prieto, and G.<br />

Perez. 1998. A new species of Rhahdochona Railliet,<br />

1916 (Nematoda: Rhabdochonidae) from endemic<br />

goodeids (Cyprinodontiformes) from two<br />

Mexican lakes. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 84:840-<br />

845.<br />

Scholz, T., and G. Salgado-Maldonado. 2000. The<br />

introduction and dispersal of Centrocestus forinosanus<br />

(Nishigori, 1924) (Digenea: Heterophyidae)<br />

in Mexico: a review. American Midland Naturalist<br />

143:185-200.<br />

, and . <strong>2001</strong>. Metacestodes of the family<br />

Dilepididae (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) parasitizing<br />

fishes in Mexico. Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

49:23-39.<br />

, and J. Vargas-Vazquez. 1998. Trematodes<br />

from fishes of the Rio Hondo River and freshwater<br />

lakes of Quintana Roo, Mexico. Journal of the<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington 65:91-<br />

95.<br />

-, F. Moravec, C. Vivas-Rodriguez,<br />

and E. Mendoza-Franco. 1995. Metacercariae of<br />

trematodes of fishes from cenotes ( = sinkholes) of<br />

the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Folia Parasitologica<br />

42:173-192.<br />

Soto-Galera, E., E. Diaz-Pardo, E. Lopez-Lopez,<br />

and J. Lyons. 1998. Fish as indicators of environmental<br />

quality in the Rio Lerma Basin, Mexico.<br />

Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management<br />

1:267-216.<br />

Vidal-Martinez, V. M., and C. R. Kennedy. 2000.<br />

Zoogeographical determinants of the helminth<br />

fauna composition of Neotropical cichlid fish.<br />

Pages 250-278 in G. Salgado-Maldonado, A. N.<br />

Garcfa-Aldrete, and V. M. Vidal-Martfnez, eds.<br />

Metazoan Parasites in the Neotropics: A Systematic<br />

and Ecological Perspective. Instituto de Biologfa,<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico,<br />

Mexico City, Mexico.


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 219-227<br />

Singhiatrema vietnamensis sp. n. (Digenea: Ommatobrephidae) and<br />

Szidatia taiwanensis (Fischthal and Kimtz, 1975) comb. n. (Digenea:<br />

Cyathocotylidae) from Colubrid Snakes in Vietnam<br />

STEPHEN S. CURRAN,' ROBIN M. OVERSTREET,U DANG TAT THE,2 AND NGUYEN THI LE2<br />

1 The University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 7000, Ocean Springs,<br />

Mississippi 39566, U.S.A. (e-mail: robin.overstreet@usm.edu and stephen.curran@usm.edu) and<br />

2 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Nghia do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam (ntminh@ncst.ac.vn)<br />

ABSTRACT: A new digenean is described and a second species is redescribed from the colubrid rear-fanged<br />

water snakes Enhydris chinensls (Gray) and Enhydris phunbea (Boie) captured from several regions in Vietnam<br />

during 1996-1998. Singhiatrema vietnamensis sp. n. (Ommatobrephidae) from the small intestine of both snakes<br />

is characterized by the extent of the ceca, the position of the vitellaria, the size of the eggs, and the host. Szidatia<br />

taiwanensis (Fischthal and Kuntz, 1975) comb. n. (Cyathocotylidae) is redescribed from the holotype and specimens<br />

from the gallbladder of both snakes. The species is transferred from the genus Mesostephanoides primarily<br />

because it does not have a large cirrus that is spined; it is characterized by the shape of the seminal vesicle,<br />

length of the ceca, body size relative to the forebody, number of testes in hindbody, egg size, size of tribocytic<br />

organ, and the infection site in the host. Concerning the classification of Singhiatrema Simha within Echinostomatiformes,<br />

we consider Singhiatrematinae Simha a junior synonym of Ommatobrephinae Poche. We discuss<br />

the classification of Gogatea Lutz and Szidatia Dubois and consider Gogatinae Mehra a junior synonym of<br />

Szidatiinae Dubois. The use of different fixation methods can produce artifacts characteristic at the generic level.<br />

KEY WORDS: Singhiatrema vietnamensis sp. n., Ommatobrephidae, Szidatia taiwanensis comb, n., Cyathocotylidae,<br />

fixation artifacts, Enhydris chinensis, Enhydris plumbea, Colubridae, snakes, Vietnam.<br />

Two unrelated digeneans, a new intestinal ommatobrephid<br />

and a gallbladder cyathocotylid,<br />

each infecting 2 species of rear-fanged colubrid<br />

water snakes (Enhydris chinensis (Gray, 1842)<br />

and Enhydris plumbea (Boie, 1827)) from Vietnam,<br />

are herein described. The life history of<br />

neither parasite is known. The new ommatobrephid<br />

is most similar to species of Singhiatrema<br />

Simha, 1954, which are usually found in the intestines<br />

of water snakes. Exceptions include<br />

Singhiatrema najai Chattopadhyaya, 1967, from<br />

the intestine of the Indian cobra Naja naja (Linnaeus,<br />

1758), and Singhiatrema lali Chakrabarti,<br />

1967, from the intestine of a freshwater emydid<br />

turtle (Hardella thurgii (Gray, 1831)) (Chattopadhyaya,<br />

1967). All prior known species are<br />

reported from the Indian subcontinent only.<br />

The gallbladder cyathocotylid that we found<br />

in Vietnam also occurs in one of the same hosts<br />

in Taiwan. It exhibits a relationship with Szidatia<br />

joyeuxi (Hughes, 1929), which infects the intestine<br />

of the colubrid water snake Matrix maura<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758) (as Tropidonotus viperinus<br />

(Sonnini and Latreille, 1802)) in an oasis in Tunis,<br />

Morocco, and has a cercaria that is shed<br />

from the freshwater snail Melanopsis sp. and de-<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

219<br />

velops in the leg muscles of the frog Rana rudibunda<br />

Pallas, 1771 (as Rana esculenta rudibunda;<br />

see Langeron, 1924; Hughes, 1929; Dubois,<br />

1938).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The second and third authors captured a total of 43<br />

specimens of E. chinensis and 51 specimens of E.<br />

plumbea in Ha Noi, Nam Ha, Thai Binh, Na Nam,<br />

Nam Dinh, Hai Duong, and Hai Phong provinces (Red<br />

River Delta) in Vietnam. They collected digeneans live<br />

from the intestines and gallbladders of both snakes<br />

from all the provinces. For the first collections, they<br />

relaxed the specimens in distilled water, then placed<br />

them in physiological saline, and finally fixed them in<br />

a cold 5% formalin solution. However, specimens collected<br />

later were used for the descriptions. These were<br />

placed directly into saline, then fixed with near boiling<br />

water without coverslip pressure, and finally pipetted<br />

into 5% formalin. Additional unmeasured specimens<br />

were fixed under pressure for examination of specific<br />

features. Whole mounts of worms were prepared by<br />

staining specimens with either carmine or Van<br />

Cleave's hematoxylin with additional Ehrlich's hematoxylin.<br />

These were dehydrated, cleared with clove oil,<br />

and mounted on slides with Canada balsam. Measurements<br />

are given for the holotype, followed in parentheses<br />

by the range of measurements of each feature<br />

derived from specimens heat-fixed without pressure.<br />

Measurements are given in micrometers unless otherwise<br />

stated. Specimens were deposited in the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection (USNPC), Belts-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


220 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

ville, Maryland, U.S.A., and the Harold W. Manter<br />

Laboratory (HWML) of the University of Nebraska<br />

<strong>State</strong> Museum, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.<br />

Description<br />

Results<br />

Ommatobrephidae Poche, 1926<br />

Singhiatrema vietnamensis sp. n.<br />

(Figs. 1 and 2)<br />

Based on 5 specimens: Ommatobrephinae<br />

Poche, 1926. Body pyriform, elongate, 2.56 mm<br />

(2.41-2.61 mm) long, 0.76 mm (0.76-0.91 mm)<br />

wide at maximum width near posterior end of<br />

body, lacking tegumental spines but possessing<br />

minute interrupted longitudinal striae. Oral sucker<br />

with subterminal mouth, 170 (170—207) long,<br />

189 (189-217) wide. Head crown having single<br />

row of 22—23 spines 31—56 long, arranged 11—<br />

12 per side; row interrupted dorsally and ventrally.<br />

Prepharynx short, less than % length of<br />

pharynx; pharynx oval, 95 (95-106) long, 78<br />

(78-106) wide. Esophagus 640 (547-640) long,<br />

89 (80—105) wide. Ceca extending beyond posterior<br />

extent of testes. Acetabulum 290 (285-<br />

329) long, 379 (363-407) wide, lying between<br />

anterior % and anterior J/2 of body. Ratio of<br />

widths of oral sucker to acetabulum 1:1.8-2.0.<br />

Testes 2, weakly (incompletely) lobed, lying<br />

opposite, located near terminal end of body, with<br />

anterior margins diverging from each other; left<br />

testis 292 (285-340) long, 217 (200=234) wide;<br />

right testis 279 (251-335) long, 234 (195-234)<br />

wide. Cirrus sac oval, 179 (179-227) long, 102<br />

(102—110) wide, medial, lying between cecal bifurcation<br />

and acetabulum, containing large bipartite<br />

seminal vesicle, short pars prostatica, and<br />

short muscular ejaculatory duct; pars prostatica<br />

a short duct surrounded by prostatic cells at anterior<br />

of sac; external seminal vesicle lacking.<br />

Ovary pretesticular, spherical, 73 (73-95) in<br />

diameter, slightly dextral in 4 of 5 specimens,<br />

slightly sinistral in 1 specimen. Oviduct communicating<br />

with Laurer's canal, then forming<br />

ootype; Laurer's canal straight, directed dorsally<br />

from region of ootype, opening on dorsal surface<br />

at level of ovary; ootype surrounded by<br />

Mehlis' gland; Mehlis' gland compact, usually<br />

larger than ovary, consisting of relatively small<br />

cells; ootype receiving relatively long common<br />

vitelline duct from vitelline reservoir, communicating<br />

with uterus; uterus intercecal, postacetabular,<br />

with proximal portion a uterine seminal<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

receptacle and with distal portion a metraterm;<br />

metraterm thick walled, approximately length of<br />

cirrus sac, sinistral to cirrus sac, entering genital<br />

atrium anteriorly; genital atrium relatively small,<br />

ventral to anterior portion of cirrus sac in heatkilled<br />

specimens (directed anteriorly in coldkilled<br />

specimens when fixed under pressure with<br />

cirrus sac displaced anteriorly); genital pore<br />

opening medially or submedially near anterior<br />

region of cirrus sac in heat-killed specimens<br />

(near anterior acetabular margin in contracted<br />

specimens). Vitellarium consisting of 2 lateral<br />

bands of irregularly shaped follicles; bands lying<br />

ventral to ceca between posterior level of acetabulum<br />

and middle of testes, communicating to<br />

vitelline reservoir by left and right transverse<br />

main collecting channel; left channel about 195<br />

long, right channel about 223-280 long; vitelline<br />

reservoir approximately 45—56 long, 111-195<br />

wide. Eggs 95-117 long, 61-75 wide, with<br />

thickened knob at posterior end, with eyespots<br />

visible in miracidia of some specimens; eyespots<br />

2, lightly pigmented in developing miracidia,<br />

darkly pigmented and fused in developed miracidia.<br />

Excretory vesicle Y-shaped, with triangular<br />

posterior bladder; main stem slender, medial,<br />

concealed by overlapping lobes of testes, extending<br />

anteriorly from bladder and bifurcating<br />

at anterior margins of testes; arms reaching anteriorly<br />

to approximate level just posterior to<br />

pharynx; excretory pore subterminal, opening<br />

on dorsal surface.<br />

Taxonomic summary<br />

TYPE HOST: Enhydris chinensis (Gray,<br />

1842), rear-fanged water snake or Chinese water<br />

snake (Colubridae). Other host: Enhydris plumbea<br />

(Boie, 1827), rear-fanged water snake, rice<br />

paddy snake, or plumbeous water snake (Colubridae).<br />

TYPE LOCALITY: Ha Noi Province, Vietnam.<br />

Other localities: throughout Red River Delta, Vietnam,<br />

in Nam Ha, Thai Binh, Nam Ha, Nam<br />

Dinh, Hai Duong, and Hai Phong provinces.<br />

INFECTION SITE: Small intestine.<br />

PREVALENCE AND INTENSITY OF INFECTION: Ten<br />

of 43 specimens of E. chinensis (23%) each<br />

hosted 1-5 individual worms; 9 of 51 specimens<br />

of E. plumbea (18%) each hosted 1—3 worms.<br />

SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Holotype USNPC No.<br />

90037; paratypes USNPC No. 90038, HWML<br />

Nos. 15388 (E. chinensis), 15389 (E. plumbea).


CURRAN ET AL.—TWO VIETNAMESE SNAKE DIGENEANS 221<br />

Figures 1-6. 1. Ventral view of holotype of Singhiatrema vietnamensis sp. n.; scale bar = 300 u.m. 2.<br />

Ventral view of specimen of 5. vietnamensis exposed to fresh water and slight pressure prior to and during<br />

cold fixation; scale bar = 300 (mm. 3. Ventral view of Szidatia taiwanensis; scale bar = 200 \nm. 4. Ventral<br />

view of S. taiwanensis showing detail of tribocytic organ; scale bar = 200 (Jim. 5. Lateral view of 5.<br />

taiwanensis; scale bar = 200 (Jim. 6. Ventral view of 5. taiwanensis exposed to fresh water prior to cold<br />

fixation; scale bar = 275 (xm.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


222 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

ETYMOLOGY: This species is named for its<br />

type locality, Vietnam.<br />

Remarks<br />

Singhiatrema vietnamensis is consistent with<br />

members of Ommatobrephidae because it has a<br />

preacetabular cirrus sac with an internal seminal<br />

vesicle; large embryonated eggs, with some containing<br />

an oculate miracidium; and opposite incompletely<br />

lobed testes located in the posterior<br />

region of the body, often with axes diverging<br />

anteriorly. The species belongs in Ommatobrephinae<br />

rather than Parorchiinae Lai, 1936, because<br />

the collar of spines is interrupted dorsally<br />

and ventrally as opposed to being arranged in a<br />

continuous row. In addition, the tegument is<br />

smooth rather than spinous, an external seminal<br />

vesicle is absent, spines do not occur on the intromittent<br />

organ, and the specimens are parasites<br />

in reptiles rather than birds. The 2 genera within<br />

Ommatobrephinae, Singhiatrema and Ommatobrephus<br />

Nicoll, 1914, are distinguished by the<br />

presence of a dorsally interrupted row of collar<br />

spines in the former and the absence of the collar<br />

spines in the latter. The presence of a dorsally<br />

and ventrally interrupted row of 22-23 collar<br />

spines in 5. vietnamensis enables us to assign<br />

the worms to the genus Singhiatrema. Singhiatrema<br />

was originally unveiled to science in an<br />

oral presentation and abstract at the Forty-first<br />

Session of the Indian Science Congress (Simha,<br />

1954). The genus was described in more detail<br />

by Simha (1958) and placed in Echinostomatidae<br />

Poche, 1926, by the author without a subfamily<br />

designation. Singhiatrema singhia Simha,<br />

1954, from a colubrid ratsnake (Ptyas mucosus<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)) from Hyderabad in southern<br />

India, was designated the type species (Simha,<br />

1954). Two other species, Singhiatrema longifurca<br />

Simha, 1958, and Singhiatrema hyderabadensis<br />

Simha, 1958, parasitize another colubrid<br />

water snake, the checkered keelback Xenochrophis<br />

piscator (Schneider, 1799) (as Tropidonotus<br />

piscator}, from the same locality<br />

(Simha, 1958). Three other Indian species have<br />

since been added to the genus. Singhiatrema najai<br />

parasitizes the Indian cobra (N. najd) in Hyderabad,<br />

S. lali parasitizes the turtle H. thurgii<br />

in Lucknow, and Singhiatrema piscatora Dwivedi,<br />

19<strong>68</strong>, parasitizes the water snake X. piscator<br />

in Chhindwara (Chakrabarti, 1967; Chattopadhyaya,<br />

1967; Dwivedi, 19<strong>68</strong>).<br />

Singhiatrema vietnamensis differs from its<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

congeners, with the exception of S. lali, by having<br />

ceca that extend to the posterior region of<br />

the body and vitelline follicles that lie ventral<br />

and lateral to the ceca in bands stretching from<br />

the posterior margin of the acetabulum to the<br />

midlevel of the testes. Singhiatrema vietnamensis<br />

differs from S. lali by having larger eggs<br />

(103-119 |xm long by 45-56 jxm wide vs. 65-<br />

87 |xm long by 34-39 |xm wide), ceca that reach<br />

beyond the posterior level of the testes rather<br />

than to their midlevel, longer collar spines (31-<br />

56 (Jim rather than 7-9 jxm), and a snake rather<br />

than a turtle definitive host. Yamaguti (1971) reported<br />

24 collar spines for S. lali; however,<br />

Chakrabarti (1967) did not report the number of<br />

collar spines in the description of S. lali, and the<br />

illustration of the species did not permit the collar<br />

spines to be counted. Specimens of S. lali<br />

were apparently never deposited in a lending<br />

museum. We report 22-23 collar spines in our<br />

specimens of 5. vietnamensis. Three of 5 of our<br />

specimens had 22 collar spines and the remaining<br />

2 had 23 collar spines. It is possible that<br />

some specimens could lose spines in life or handling,<br />

but biological variation probably exists.<br />

Initially, we obtained 4 specimens of S. vietnamensis<br />

that had been placed in fresh water<br />

prior to their fixation with slight pressure in unheated<br />

formalin (see Fig. 2). The overall shape<br />

of these specimens, as well as their measurements,<br />

varied dramatically from those specimens<br />

fixed with heat and used in the above description.<br />

Specimens subjected to fresh water and<br />

pressure had an oval rather than pyriform body<br />

shape, and their width was greater (1.0-1.6 mm<br />

vs. 0.75-0.91 mm). The pharynx was swollen<br />

(131-158 |xm long by 127-140 jxm wide vs. 95-<br />

106 (Jim long by 78-106 |xm wide), and the<br />

esophagus was contracted in length but swollen<br />

in width (285-415 (xm long by 77-203 |xm wide<br />

vs. 547-640 (xm long by 80-105 |xm wide). In<br />

addition, the ceca were contracted slightly,<br />

reaching to the posterior level of the testes rather<br />

than beyond the posterior level of the testes, and<br />

the eggs were swollen or collapsed and therefore<br />

larger in whole mounts (109—117 |xm long by<br />

81-95 urn wide vs. 103-119 |xm long by 45-56<br />

(xm wide). The long side of the oval cirrus sac<br />

was oriented laterally rather than vertically, with<br />

the pore on the sinistral end rather than at the<br />

anterior end, and the testes were larger (411-560<br />

|xm long by 258-339 |xm wide compared with<br />

250-340 |xm long by 195-234 |xm wide). If the


methods of fixation had not been known, these<br />

differences would be great enough to suspect<br />

different species.<br />

Cyathocotylidae Poche, 1926<br />

Szidatia taiwanensis<br />

(Fischthal and Kuntz, 1975) comb. n.<br />

(Figs. 3-6)<br />

Redescription<br />

Based on holotype and 9 specimens from Vietnam:<br />

Szidatiinae Dubois, 1938. Body bipartite;<br />

forebody pyriform, 0.85 mm (0.81-1.15 mm)<br />

long, not accounting for slight curl; hindbody<br />

conical; entire body 1.20 mm (1.03-1.57 mm)<br />

long, 0.57 mm (0.47-0.93 mm) wide at maximum<br />

width just posterior to midforebody. Ratio<br />

of forebody to total body length 1:1.39 (1:1.27-<br />

1.36). Tegument with spines over entire forebody,<br />

with few or no spines on hindbody, with<br />

numerous minute papillae near posterior end.<br />

Oral sucker with subterminal mouth, (90-119)<br />

long, 119 (99-144) wide. Prepharynx very<br />

short. Pharynx oval, (60-75) long, (60-80)<br />

wide. Esophagus 94 (67-149) long, 31 (23-40)<br />

wide. Ceca bifurcating at about anterior Vs of<br />

forebody, extending to level of posterior margin<br />

of ovary. Acetabulum 82 (62-95) long, 98 (85-<br />

1 12) wide, situated between anterior % and anterior<br />

l/2 of forebody, always smaller than oral<br />

sucker. Tribocytic organ oval, protruding slightly<br />

from ventral surface, 327 (283-447) long, -250<br />

(246-423) wide, with medial-longitudinal slit<br />

with basal layer of dark-staining cells.<br />

Testes 2, oblique; anterior testis spanning both<br />

forebody and hindbody, -80 (149-213) long,<br />

124 (114-169) wide; posterior testis in hindbody<br />

91 (144-199) long, 142 (129-229) wide. Cirrus<br />

sac in posterior end of body, club-shaped, 410<br />

(332-362) long, 65 (60-73) wide, extending anteriorly<br />

to middle of anterior testis, containing<br />

internal seminal vesicle, pars prostatica with<br />

small prostatic cells, and short unspined ejaculatory<br />

duct (not true cirrus); internal seminal<br />

vesicle 241 (206-339) long, 45 (57-110) wide<br />

at thickest portion; pars prostatica 1 1 1 (43-198)<br />

long, —30 (23-25) wide, sinuous in some specimens,<br />

surrounded externally by free gland cells;<br />

ejaculatory duct 45 (24-74) long, 20 (8-14)<br />

wide, thin walled, eversible, surrounded by<br />

gland cells.<br />

Ovary nearly spherical, 85 (65-129) long, 75<br />

(70—99) wide. Vitellarium comprised of 2 pairs<br />

CURRAN ET AL.—TWO VIETNAMESE SNAKE DIGENEANS 223<br />

of lateral fields of follicles underlying tribocytic<br />

organ, with the 2 on each side overlying each<br />

other, ventral to ovary and testes; fields not confluent<br />

anteriorly; right field totaling —12-14<br />

(16-20) follicles; left field totaling -14 (16-23)<br />

follicles; follicles spherical to ovate, ranging 37—<br />

43 (50-99) long, >50 (55-124) wide. Vitelline<br />

reservoir lying posterior to ovary and between<br />

testes, 145 (119-149) long, 80 (78-144) wide,<br />

(159-167) thick (thickness measured from 2 laterally<br />

mounted specimens). Uterus reaching anteriorly<br />

to near level of anterior extent of vitellarium;<br />

distal portion an indistinct metraterm;<br />

metraterm slightly longer than cirrus sac (coiled<br />

in holotype and some other specimens), demarcated<br />

by transverse muscular band, surrounded<br />

by lining of free gland cells, emptying into genital<br />

atrium separate from ejaculatory duct; genital<br />

atrium an open funnel in distal portion of<br />

body, surrounded by gland cells. Eggs 5 (4-12)<br />

in number, 150 (140-169) long, 77 (80-99)<br />

wide, with indistinct operculum.<br />

Excretory vesicle V-shaped; arms united both<br />

anteriorly and medially; anterior junction at level<br />

of and dorsal to midesophagus; medial junction<br />

at level of anterior extent of tribocytic organ,<br />

ventral to ceca, leading to small bladder<br />

associated with base of acetabulum; excretory<br />

pore subterminal, opening ventral to and separate<br />

from constricted genital atrium.<br />

Taxonomic summary<br />

HOSTS: Enhydris chinensis (Gray, 1842),<br />

rear-fanged water snake or Chinese water snake<br />

(Colubridae), and Enhydris plumbea (Boie,<br />

1827), rear-fanged water snake, rice paddy<br />

snake, or plumbeous water snake (Colubridae).<br />

LOCALITIES: Ha Noi, Nam Ha, Thai Binh,<br />

Ha Nam, Nam Dinh, Hai Duong, and Hai Phong<br />

provinces in Vietnam.<br />

INFECTION SITE: Gallbladder (holotype USNPC<br />

No. 73148 from Taiwan in E. chinensis from<br />

intestine).<br />

PREVALENCE AND INTENSITY OF INFECTION: Sixteen<br />

of 43 specimens from intestine of E. chinensis<br />

(37%) each hosted 1-9 individual worms;<br />

24 of 51 specimens of E. plumbea (47%) each<br />

hosted 1-9 worms.<br />

SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Voucher specimens<br />

USNPC Nos. 90039 and 90040 (E. chinensis),<br />

HWML No. 15390 (2 slides, E. chinensis).<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


224 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Remarks<br />

Fischthal and Kuntz (1975) described Mesostephanoid.es<br />

taiwanensis from the small intestine<br />

of E. chinensis from Taipei Prefecture in<br />

Taiwan on the basis of a single specimen. We<br />

examined that specimen, USNPC No. 73148,<br />

and, even though it was not from the gallbladder,<br />

we considered our specimens from Vietnam<br />

conspecific with it. Data for the holotype fit<br />

those for our specimens. We, however, interpret<br />

differently the terminal genitalia described and<br />

illustrated by Fischthal and Kuntz (1975) in their<br />

Figure 15. Perhaps they misinterpreted the nonillustrated<br />

muscular looping of the metraterm as<br />

spines. In any event, the cirrus sac of the holotype<br />

contained a club-shaped seminal vesicle<br />

measuring about 260 u,m long, a straight pars<br />

prostatica 113 u,m long, and a short ejaculatory<br />

duct 45 fjim long. The metraterm coiled once<br />

prior to descending to the genital atrium. We observed<br />

spines in none of these features. Because<br />

of the lack of a spined cirrus and lack of anterior<br />

confluence of the bands of vitelline follicles, we<br />

consider that the species belongs to Szidatia Dubois,<br />

1938, as Szidatia taiwanensis (Fischthal and<br />

Kuntz, 1975) comb. n.<br />

Dubois (1951) differentiated the monotypic<br />

genus Mesostephanoides Dubois, 1951, from<br />

other cyathocotylid genera on the basis of Mesostephanoides<br />

burmanicus (Chatterji, 1940),<br />

having a forebody to total body length ratio that<br />

we estimate as 1:1.14-1.18, a spined cirrus 300<br />

(Jim long, and vitelline follicles confluent anteriorly.<br />

We consider the first 2 features of questionable<br />

generic significance, and an examination<br />

of M. burmanicus and related species may<br />

show that Mesostephanoides is a synonym of<br />

Gogatea Lutz, 1935, a genus with species having<br />

anteriorly confluent vitelline follicles.<br />

Szidatia taiwanensis resembles its 2 congeners<br />

in that the vitelline follicles are in separate<br />

lateral fields, as opposed to being in a single<br />

confluent field underlying the tribocytic organ as<br />

reported for species of Gogatea, the only other<br />

genus in Szidatiinae. Szidatia taiwanensis most<br />

closely resembles Szidatia nemethi Dollfus,<br />

1953, from the water snake TV. maura (as N. viperina)<br />

from Charrat, Morocco, but differs from<br />

this species by having a much smaller tribocytic<br />

organ (283—447 jjim long by 246-423 |xm wide<br />

vs. 885 (Jim long by 765 u,m wide), larger eggs<br />

(140-169 jxm long by 80-99 (Jim wide vs. 105<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

(xm long by 55 (Jim wide), and a club-shaped<br />

rather than a coiled seminal vesicle. Szidatia taiwanensis<br />

differs from S. joyeuxi, the type and<br />

remaining species in the genus, by having a<br />

longer esophagus (67-149 |JLm compared with<br />

40 |xm), ceca that reach only to the level of the<br />

anterior testis rather than beyond the posterior<br />

testis, an acetabulum that lies between the middle<br />

and anterior % of the forebody rather than<br />

exactly in the middle, and oblique rather than<br />

tandem testes; the anterior testis is almost entirely<br />

within the forebody rather than in the<br />

hindbody, the seminal vesicle is club-shaped<br />

rather than coiled, and the eggs are larger (140-<br />

169 (xm long by 80-99 (Jim wide vs. 100 (Jim<br />

long by 70 (xm wide). The minute papillae on<br />

the tegument at the posterior end, too small to<br />

illustrate to scale, probably serve a sensory<br />

function during mating or egg deposition. The<br />

intestine, the infection site of the specimen reported<br />

by Fischthal and Kuntz (1975), may have<br />

resulted from postmortem migration from the<br />

gallbladder. A few specimens of other species<br />

normally found in the gallbladder occasionally<br />

occur in the intestine normally. We do not think<br />

the difference in sites based on 1 specimen is<br />

significant.<br />

As with the echinostomate specimens of S.<br />

vietnamensis, the initial specimens of S. taiwanensis<br />

had been placed in fresh water prior to<br />

fixation in unheated formalin (see Fig. 6). Unlike<br />

those of S. vietnamensis, these specimens<br />

were not fixed under any pressure; nevertheless,<br />

their measurements and features varied dramatically<br />

from those obtained from specimens fixed<br />

with heat and used for the above description.<br />

Hindbody length was generally shorter (146-<br />

506 (Jim vs. 326—762 (Jim), and both the anterior<br />

and posterior testes occurred entirely in the forebody<br />

of specimens exposed to water, whereas<br />

the posterior testis was always in the hindbody<br />

of heat-killed specimens. The cirrus sac was<br />

generally straighter in osmotically stressed specimens<br />

and more bent or curled in the region of<br />

the pars prostatica in heat-killed specimens. In<br />

addition, the tribocytic organ was greatly enlarged<br />

(492-650 (Jim long by 520-<strong>68</strong>5 |xm wide<br />

vs. 283-447 fxm long by 245-423 ujn wide) in<br />

the stressed specimens. The most important difference<br />

due to fixation techniques pertained to<br />

the configuration of the vitellarium. In the<br />

stressed specimens, vitelline follicles appeared<br />

confluent anteriorly (horseshoe-shaped distribu-


tion) but were in independent lateral bands in<br />

heat-killed specimens. Because the presence or<br />

absence of an anterior vitelline confluence differentiates<br />

Gotatea from Szidatia, and the appearance<br />

of confluence can be influenced in<br />

cold-killed or freshwater-soaked specimens, the<br />

methods of fixation clearly have a bearing on<br />

taxonomic interpretations.<br />

Discussion<br />

Classification of Singhiatrema<br />

The position of Singhiatrema within Echinostomatiformes<br />

La Rue, 1957, continues to be debated<br />

by taxonomists. Ommatobrephinae Poche,<br />

1926, was created for Ommatobrephus and<br />

Singhiatrema, and Parorchiinae Lai, 1936, was<br />

included in Ommatobrephidae on the basis of<br />

the generic level character of the collar spines<br />

(see Simha and Chattopadhyaya, 1967). Singhiatrematinae<br />

Simha, 1962, was later created to<br />

house Singhiatrema, presumably because the author<br />

considered the presence of collar spines to<br />

be of taxonomic importance at the subfamiliar<br />

rather than generic level. These changes resulted<br />

in Ommatobrephidae containing Ommatobrephinae,<br />

Parorchiinae, and Singhiatrematinae, each<br />

containing a single genus. Members of Ommatobrephinae<br />

and Singhiatrematinae differ only in<br />

the presence or absence of a single row of collar<br />

spines. We consider the presence or absence of<br />

collar spines to represent a generic feature only<br />

and, therefore, consider Singhiatrematinae a junior<br />

subjective synonym of Ommatobrephinae.<br />

Yamaguti (1971) considered Parorchiinae a subfamily<br />

in Philophthalmidae Travassos, 1918. We<br />

agree with Yamaguti in returning Parorchiinae<br />

to Philophthalmidae because members of that<br />

subfamily do not possess characters consistent<br />

with Ommatobrephidae. Most notably, parorchiines<br />

have tegumental spines, a conspicuous prepharynx,<br />

an external seminal vesicle, a spined<br />

cirrus, opposite testes that do not diverge anteriorly,<br />

and life cycles that involve birds and estuarine<br />

molluscs. Although no knowledge of the<br />

larval stages of species in Singhiatrema or Ommatobrephus<br />

is available, all known adults of<br />

species in these genera infect freshwater or terrestrial<br />

reptilian hosts, indicating a freshwater<br />

rather than an estuarine life cycle.<br />

Classification of Szidatia<br />

Contrary opinions regarding the status of key<br />

generic features of Gogatea and Szidatia have<br />

CURRAN ET AL.—TWO VIETNAMESE SNAKE DIGENEANS 225<br />

formed the basis for debates over whether the 2<br />

cyathocotylid subfamilies Szidatiinae and Gogatinae<br />

Mehra, 1947, should be synonymized<br />

(see Dubois, 1938, 1951, 1953; Mehra, 1947;<br />

Sudarikov, 1962; Yamaguti, 1971). Both subfamilies<br />

contain only a single genus, but the<br />

above discussion of Mesostephanoides should<br />

be noted.<br />

Lutz (1935) erected Gogatea and created the<br />

combination Gogatea serpentum (Gogate, 1932)<br />

for Prohemistomum serpentum Gogate, 1932, a<br />

parasite in the intestine of the colubrid snake X.<br />

piscator (as Natrix piscator) from the Union of<br />

Myanmar (as Burma). Lutz (1935) included Gogatea<br />

in his new subfamily Prohemistominae<br />

Lutz, 1935. Szidat (1936) added the new combination<br />

Gogatea joyeuxi (Hughes, 1929) for the<br />

cyathocotylid previously considered Prohemistomum<br />

joyeuxi (Hughes, 1929) from the colubrid<br />

water snake Natrix natrix scutata Pallas,<br />

1771 (as Tropidontus natrix persa), by Joyeux<br />

and Baer (1934). That species developed in the<br />

snake when fed diplostomula consistent with diplostomula<br />

described by Hughes (1929) from<br />

Tunis, Morocco (Joyeux and Baer, 1934). Gogatea<br />

indicum Mehra, 1947, was subsequently<br />

described from X. piscator in India. Dubois<br />

(1938) observed that the vitellarium of G. joyeuxi<br />

consisted of 2 distinct rows of vitelline follicles,<br />

1 on either side of the tribocytic organ.<br />

The vitellarium of other species in Gogatea consists<br />

of a confluent arch of follicles, lying dorsal<br />

to the tribocytic organ. Dubois (1938) erected<br />

Szidatia Dubois, 1938, on the basis of the differing<br />

configuration of the vitellaria and created<br />

the new combination S. joyeuxi for G. joyeuxi.<br />

Dubois (1938) also created the subfamily Szidatinae,<br />

emended as Szidatiinae by Yamaguti<br />

(1958), to house both Szidatia and Gogatea.<br />

Mehra (1947) did not consider that the difference<br />

in vitelline configuration warranted generic<br />

distinction and rejected Szidatia and therefore<br />

Szidatiinae. Instead, he created Gogatinae to<br />

contain all species of Gogatea, with G. serpentum<br />

as the type species. Dollfus (1953), Sudarikov<br />

(1962), and Yamaguti (1971) all accepted<br />

the generic distinctions established by Dubois<br />

(1938) and considered Gogatinae a junior synonym<br />

for Szidatiinae, retaining G. serpentum<br />

and S. joyeuxi as the type species for their respective<br />

genera. We concur with these authors<br />

and think that the different configuration of the<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


226 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

vitellarium can be used as an informative generic<br />

level taxonomic distinction.<br />

Fixation techniques<br />

A wide variety of techniques has been used<br />

by parasitologists to fix specimens. Most of<br />

those techniques yield satisfactory and consistent<br />

results; however, those that produce results<br />

inconsistent with other procedures should be<br />

avoided. We advocate collecting digeneans by<br />

initially placing them live in physiological saline<br />

solution (7.7—8.5 g NaCl per liter of distilled water).<br />

They should never be exposed to distilled<br />

or tap water while alive. Unless specimens are<br />

to be used for ultrastructural or other specific<br />

puiposes, they should be killed rapidly with<br />

heat. They can be killed by a flame under a slide<br />

with worms in a small amount of saline or by<br />

pouring a relatively large volume of hot or boiling<br />

saline or tap water over specimens immersed<br />

in little or no saline. The specimens then should<br />

be transferred, without touching them with forceps,<br />

into 5—10% buffered formalin solution<br />

soon after being killed. Killing with hot formalin<br />

solution or other fixatives is acceptable but produces<br />

harsh fumes. Killing with heat produces<br />

consistently fixed specimens, ideal for making<br />

comparative measurements. Fixation with pressure<br />

may be useful for examining certain organ<br />

systems such as the female reproductive complex<br />

or the terminal genitalia, but specimens<br />

fixed under pressure should be used with care<br />

for taxonomic purposes because the entire specimen<br />

or specific structures may be distorted.<br />

Comparison of heat-killed specimens with<br />

specimens bathed in fresh water and then coldkilled<br />

revealed differences. Specimens of S. vietnamensis<br />

that were osmotically stressed prior to<br />

fixation were a different shape, they were wider,<br />

the pharynx and esophagus were distorted, the<br />

ceca were slightly shorter, the testes were larger,<br />

and the cirrus sac was oriented differently. Any<br />

one of these conditions might be used to misidentify<br />

a species, incorrectly describe specimens,<br />

or provide misleading information.<br />

Stressed specimens of 5. taiwanensis exhibited<br />

some distortions at the specific level, but more<br />

importantly, the confluent vitelline follicles represent<br />

a generic distinction for Gogatea. Lack of<br />

knowledge about the methods used on specimens<br />

for descriptions of some species of Gogatea<br />

and Szidatia shows the need to reevaluate<br />

those species with heat-killed specimens. Until<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

such material is available, we prefer to treat the<br />

genera separately.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank Cathy Schloss and Kristine Wilkie<br />

of the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory for helping<br />

with some of the literature. We also thank<br />

Eric Hoberg and Pat Pilitt from the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />

National Parasite Collection, Beltsville, Maryland,<br />

for the loan of a specimen and Dr. Richard<br />

Heckmann of Brigham Young University for his<br />

interest in the project. Partial support for this<br />

study was provided by International Paper.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Chakrabarti, K. K. 1967. On a new echinostome<br />

(Singhiatrema lali n. sp.) from the intestine of a<br />

turtle. Science and Culture 33:407-408.<br />

Chattopadhyaya, D. R. 1967. On a new trematode of<br />

the genus Singhiatrema Simha, 1954, from the<br />

cloaca of the Indian cobra in Hyderabad. Indian<br />

Journal of Helminthology 18:45-49.<br />

Dollfus, R. P. 1953. Miscellanea helminthologica<br />

Maroccana VII. Les Szidatia de Matrix viperina<br />

(Latreille, 1802) [Trematoda Digenea]. Archives<br />

de 1'Institut Pasteur du Maroc 4:505-512.<br />

Dubois, G. 1938. Monographic des Strigeida (Trematoda).<br />

Memoires de la Societe Neuchateloise des<br />

Sciences Naturelles 6:1—535.<br />

. 1951. Nouvelle cle de determination des groupes<br />

systematiques et des genres de Strigeida<br />

Poche (Trematoda). Revue Suisse de Zoologie<br />

58(39):639-691.<br />

-. 1953. Liste Systcmatique des Strigeida (Trematoda)<br />

de 1'Inde. Pages 77-88 in J. Dayal and K.<br />

Singh, eds. Thapar, G. S., Commemoration Volume.<br />

University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India.<br />

Dwivedi, M. P. 19<strong>68</strong>. On a new species of the genus<br />

Singhiatrema Simha, 1954 (Trematoda: Echinostomidae).<br />

Indian Journal of Helminthology 19:<br />

141-144.<br />

Fischthal, J. H., and R. E. Kuntz. 1975. Some trernatodes<br />

of amphibians and reptiles from Taiwan.<br />

Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of<br />

Washington 42:1-13.<br />

Hughes, R. C. 1929. Studies on the trematode family<br />

Strigeidae (Holostomidae) No. XIV. Two new species<br />

of diplostomula. Occasional Papers of the<br />

Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 202:<br />

1-29 + 1 pi.<br />

Joyeux, C., and J. G. Baer. 1934. Sur un trematode<br />

de couleuvre. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 41:203-<br />

215.<br />

Langeron, M. 1924. Recherches sur les cercaires des<br />

piscines de Gafsa et enquete sur la bilharziose<br />

Tunisienne. Archives de FInstitut Pasteur de Tunis<br />

13:19-67.<br />

Lutz, A. 1935. Observances e consideracoes sobre<br />

Cyathocotylineas e Prohemistomineas. Memorias<br />

do Institute Oswaldo Cruz 30:157-182.<br />

Mehra, H. R. 1947. Studies on the family Cyathoco-


tylidae Poche: Part 2. A contribution to our<br />

knowledge of the subfamily Prohemistominae<br />

Lutz, 1935, with a discussion on the classification<br />

of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy<br />

of Sciences, India 17:1-52.<br />

Simha, S. S. 1954. On a new trematode genus Singhiatrema<br />

singhia n. g., n. s. from rat snake Ptyas<br />

(Zamenis) miicosus from Hyderabad-Deccan. Proceedings<br />

of the Indian Science Congress (1954)<br />

Part IV 41:32.<br />

. 1958. Studies on the trematode parasite of<br />

reptiles found in Hyderabad state. Zeitschrift fur<br />

Parasitenkunde 18:161-218.<br />

, and D. R. Chattopadhyaya. 1967. A discussion<br />

on the systematic position of the subfamily<br />

Singhiatreminae Simha, 1962. Indian Journal of<br />

Helminthology 18(seminar supplement):54-58.<br />

CURRAN ET AL.—TWO VIETNAMESE SNAKE DIGENEANS 227<br />

Symposium Announcement<br />

Sudarikov, V. E. 1962. Order Strigeidida (La Rue,<br />

1926) Sudarikov, 1959. Trematodes of Animals<br />

and Man. Principles of Trematodology, Academy<br />

of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. Helminthological Laboratory,<br />

Moscow 19:267-469. (In Russian.)<br />

Szidat, L. 1936. Parasiten aus Seeschwalben 1. Uber<br />

neue Cyathocotyliden aus dem Darm von Sterna<br />

hirundo L. und Sterna paradisea. Zeitschrift fur<br />

Parasitenkunde 8:285-317.<br />

Yamaguti, S. 1958. Systema Helminthum. Volume I.<br />

The Digenetic Trematodes of Vertebrates, Part I.<br />

Interscience Publishers, New York, New York.<br />

979 pp.<br />

. 1971. Synopsis of Digenetic Trematodes of<br />

Vertebrates. 2 volumes. Keigaku Publishing Company,<br />

Tokyo, Japan. 1074 pp. + 349 pis.<br />

PARASITOLOGY IN SCIENCE AND SOCIETY<br />

Sponsored by The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Saturday, October 27, <strong>2001</strong>, 1:00-5:00 pm<br />

S. Dillon Ripley Center of the South Quadrangle, Room 3111<br />

National Museum of Natural History of the Smithsonian Institution<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

The 676th meeting of the Helminthological Society of Washington, to be held on October 27, <strong>2001</strong> at<br />

the Smithsonian Institution, will be a special event. The Helminthological Society of Washington, in<br />

cooperation with The American Society of Parasitologists, will conduct a symposium entitled <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

in Science and Society. The purpose of the symposium is to assess the state of parasitology as a discipline,<br />

clearly define the role of parasitology in science, and explore ways that various parasitological and related<br />

societies and governmental agencies can work together to strengthen our discipline. Dr. Richard O'Grady,<br />

Executive Director of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, will speak on the power and importance<br />

of collaborative efforts in science. Dr. Eric P. Hoberg of the United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture's<br />

Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, will discuss the seminal importance of phylogenetic studies<br />

and taxonomic inventories and collections to contemporary parasitology. Additionally, leaders of various<br />

parasitological and related societies and governmental agencies are being asked to clearly articulate the<br />

missions and visions of their organizations as they relate to parasitology. Because each society and agency<br />

is a unique entity, we all have special strengths to offer to our broader discipline. Further, participants are<br />

being asked to identify contemporary societal issues which the discipline of parasitology can address, and<br />

indicate specific ways that their organization is, and can aid in, addressing these issues. We invite you to<br />

make every effort to attend this important meeting of the Helminthological Society of Washington.<br />

INVITED SOCIETIES, AGENCIES, AND ORGANIZATIONS<br />

American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists<br />

American Heartworm Society<br />

American Institute of Biological Sciences<br />

American Society of Parasitologists<br />

American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene<br />

Canadian Zoological Society<br />

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<br />

Entomological Society of America<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

National Institutes of Health<br />

National Science Foundation<br />

Society of Nematologists<br />

Society of Protozoologists<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Department of the Interior<br />

Wildlife Disease Association<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 228-235<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. (Nematoda: Rhabdiasidae) from the<br />

North American Spotted Salamander Ambystoma inaculatum<br />

(Amphibia: Ambystomatidae)<br />

YURIY KUZMIN,' VASYL V. TKACH,1-2 AND SCOTT D. SNYDER3'4<br />

1 Department of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Institute of Zoology, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, 15 Bogdan<br />

Khmelnitsky Street, Kiev-30, MSP, 01601, Ukraine,<br />

2 Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda Street 51/55, 00-818, Warsaw, Poland, and<br />

3 Department of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: snyder@uwosh.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. is described on the basis of specimens found in the lungs and body<br />

cavity of the spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) from northwestern Wisconsin, U.S.A. The new species<br />

differs from Rhabdias bermani in tail shape, arrangement of circumoral lips, and position of vulva, from Rhabdias<br />

tokyoensis in the morphology and size of the buccal capsule and the shape of the esophagus, and from<br />

Rhabdias americanus in the absence of pseudolabia at the cephalic extremity and the shape of the tail. Rhabdias<br />

ambystomae sp. n. is the first species of the genus described from salamanders in North America.<br />

KEY WORDS: Nematoda, Rhabdiasidae, Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n., salamanders, Ambystoma maculatum,<br />

Wisconsin, U.S.A.<br />

Nematodes of the genus Rhabdias Stiles and<br />

Hassall, 1905, are globally distributed lung parasites<br />

of amphibians and reptiles. Among amphibian<br />

hosts, the vast majority of Rhabdias species<br />

have been reported from anurans (frogs and toads),<br />

whereas only 2 species of the genus have been<br />

described from caudatans (salamanders): Rhabdias<br />

bermani Rausch, Rausch, and Atrashkevich, 1984,<br />

from the Siberian newt Salamandrella keyserlingii<br />

Dybowski, 1870, in the eastern Palearctic (Rausch<br />

et al., 1984) and Rhabdias tokyoensis Wilkie,<br />

1930, from Cynops spp. in Japan (Wilkie, 1930).<br />

In North America, Rhabdias spp. previously have<br />

been found in the lungs and body cavities of several<br />

species of salamanders (Lehmann, 1954; Dyer<br />

and Peck, 1975; Price and St. John, 1980; Coggins<br />

and Sajdak, 1982; Muzzall and Schinderle, 1992;<br />

Bolek and Coggins, 1998; Goldberg et al., 1998).<br />

These nematodes were identified as either Rhabdias<br />

sp., Rhabdias ranae Walton, 1929, or Rhabdias<br />

joaquinensis Ingles, 1935, the latter 2 species<br />

normally restricted to anuran amphibians.<br />

In the course of investigations of the helminth<br />

fauna of Wisconsin amphibians, infections by a<br />

species of Rhabdias were detected in the lungs and<br />

body cavities of 2 specimens of the spotted salamander<br />

Ambystoma maculatum (Shaw, 1802).<br />

Morphological examination revealed these worms<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

228<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

to represent a new species of the genus Rhabdias.<br />

This species is described herein as Rhabdias ambystomae<br />

sp. n.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Amphibians were collected from a roadside wetland<br />

near Pigeon Lake, Bayfield County, Wisconsin, U.S.A. A<br />

total of 26 gravid and 110 subadult nematodes were<br />

found in 2 of 4 A. maculatum. Nematodes were fixed in<br />

hot formalin and postfixed in 70% ethanol. Prior to light<br />

microscopic examination, worms were cleared in glycerol<br />

by gradual evaporation from a 5% solution of glycerol in<br />

70% ethanol. Nematodes to be examined with scanning<br />

electron microscopy (SEM) were postfixed in ethanol, dehydrated<br />

in a graded series of ethanol and acetone, and<br />

critical point dried in a Desk II Critical Point Dryer®<br />

(Denton Vacuum, Inc., Moorestown, New Jersey, U.S.A.)<br />

with CO2 as the transition fluid. The specimens were<br />

mounted on stubs, coated with gold, and examined with<br />

a Hitachi 2460N® scanning electron microscope (Hitachi<br />

USA, Mountain View, California, U.S.A.) at an accelerating<br />

voltage of 10-15 kV<br />

Five specimens of R. bermani from S. keyserlingii collected<br />

in Magadanskaya Region, Russia, 10 specimens of<br />

R. tokyoensis from the brown newt Cynops ensicauda<br />

(Hallowell, 1860) collected on Okinawa Island, Japan, 20<br />

specimens of R. ranae from the northern leopard frog<br />

Rana pipiens (Schreber, 1782) collected in Wisconsin,<br />

U.S.A., and 18 specimens of Rhabdias americanus Baker,<br />

1978, from the American toad Bufo americanus Hoibrook,<br />

1836, collected in Wisconsin, U.S.A. were examined<br />

by light microscopy and measured after being<br />

cleared as above. All measurements are given in micrometers<br />

unless otherwise stated. Measurements are given<br />

for the holotype followed by minimum and maximum<br />

measurements of paratypes in parentheses.


KUZMIN ET AL.—RHABDIAS AMBYSTOMAE SP. N. 229<br />

Table 1. Measurements taken from gravid Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. (type series; n = 18) (measurements<br />

in micrometers unless otherwise noted).<br />

Character<br />

Body length (mm)<br />

Body width<br />

Buccal capsule depth<br />

Buccal capsule width<br />

Width of esophagus, anterior end<br />

Width of esophagus, muscular region<br />

Minimum width of esophagus, glandular region<br />

Esophageal bulb width<br />

Distance, anterior end of esophagus to nerve ring<br />

Distance, anterior end of esophagus to nerve ring (as % of esophagus length)<br />

Esophagus length<br />

Esophagus length (as % of body length)<br />

Distance from anterior end to vulva (mm)<br />

Distance from anterior end to vulva (as % of body length)<br />

Tail length<br />

Tail length (as % of body length)<br />

Description<br />

Results<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n.<br />

(Figs. 1-15)<br />

Because both gravid and subadult nematodes<br />

were found in the same host specimens, each of<br />

these stages is described separately.<br />

GRAVID SPECIMENS (Table 1): Body elongated<br />

12.6 (6.8-13.0) mm long, 350 (210-430) wide.<br />

Anterior end rounded, posterior end tapered. Body<br />

cuticle swollen, especially on anterior and posterior<br />

thirds of body. Irregularly arranged transverse<br />

folds formed by cuticular surface. Round oral<br />

opening surrounded by 6 small lips, each bearing<br />

1 elongated conical inner papilla and 2 minute outer<br />

papillae. Inner papillae directed toward oral<br />

opening. Flat cuticular ring separating each lip<br />

from edge of oral opening. Buccal capsule cuplike<br />

in lateral view, round in apical view. Buccal<br />

capsule depth 15 (12-15), width 17 (15-17).<br />

Esophagus club-shaped, 560 (450-590) in length,<br />

with short anterior muscular portion and long posterior<br />

glandular portion. Nerve ring at level of border<br />

between muscular and glandular regions of<br />

esophagus, 160 (130-180) from esophagus anterior<br />

end. Large optically dense hypodermal cells<br />

prominent along glandular region of esophagus.<br />

Excretory glands indistinct, excretory duct short.<br />

Two large anterior coelomocytes situated between<br />

posterior end of esophagus and loop of anterior<br />

genital limb. Intestine thick, filled with brown or<br />

Holotype<br />

12.6<br />

350<br />

15<br />

17<br />

45<br />

50<br />

57<br />

90<br />

160<br />

28.6<br />

560<br />

4.5<br />

7<br />

56<br />

210<br />

1.7<br />

Paratypes<br />

(mean [min.— max.])<br />

10.5 (6.8-13.0)<br />

342 (210-430)<br />

14 (12-15)<br />

17 (15-17)<br />

43 (40-45)<br />

54 (45-67)<br />

59 (42-67)<br />

85 (65-100)<br />

159 (130-180)<br />

28.9 (22.8-34.6)<br />

546 (450-590)<br />

5.4 (4.1-7.4)<br />

5.8 (3.8-7.4)<br />

55 (47.4-58.2)<br />

236 (190-300)<br />

2.3 (1.6-3.1)<br />

black contents. Intestinal walls thinner in posterior<br />

than in anterior region of body. Muscular sphincter<br />

between intestine and rectum present. Rectum<br />

lined with thick cuticle. Tail wide, conical, 210<br />

(190-300) in length. Vulva usually postequatorial<br />

with indistinct lips. Genital system amphidelphic.<br />

Ovaries straight or slightly twisted, lying along intestine.<br />

Proximal regions of both ovaries overlap<br />

level of vulva. Both limbs of genital system bend<br />

backward at level of oviducts. Anterior oviduct occasionally<br />

forms 2 loops as it bends. Seminal receptacles<br />

short, thick walled. Uteri wide, thin<br />

walled, filled with numerous eggs. Egg size 112-<br />

130 X 55-65.<br />

SUBADULT SPECIMENS (Table 2): Body length<br />

4.15 (3.3-4.8) mm, width 111 (100-120). Anterior<br />

end rounded, posterior end tapered. Body cuticle<br />

thin and smooth, slightly swollen at anterior and<br />

posterior ends. Head structures similar to those in<br />

gravid worms. Lateral lips situated farther from<br />

oral opening than submedian lips. Buccal capsule<br />

and esophagus shapes similar to those in adults.<br />

Buccal capsule 12 (10-12) deep, 17 (15-17) wide.<br />

Esophagus 432 (400-460) long. Two elongated<br />

narrow excretory glands stretch from posterior<br />

edge of nerve ring to anterior end of intestine. Pair<br />

of coelomocytes situated subventrally, close to anterior<br />

limb of genital system. Intestine thick, reddish.<br />

Rectum sclerotized. Tail elongated, 171<br />

(150-190) in length. Bulbous projection of body<br />

wall slightly posteriad to anal opening. Vulva postequatorial.<br />

Vulva lips indistinct. Genital system<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


230 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figures 1-4. Rhabdias ainbystomae sp. n., adult. 1. Anterior end. 2. Head end, lateral view. 3. Cephalic<br />

extremity, apical view. 4. Posterior end. 1, 2, 4, holotype; 3, paratype.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


KUZMIN ET AL.—RHABD1AS AMBYSTOMAE SP. N. 231<br />

Table 2. Measurements of Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. subadult specimens (n = 15) (measurement in<br />

micrometers unless otherwise noted).<br />

Character<br />

Body length (mm)<br />

Body width<br />

Buccal capsule depth<br />

Buccal capsule width<br />

Width of esophagus, anterior end<br />

Width of esophagus, muscular region<br />

Minimum width of esophagus, glandular region<br />

Esophageal bulb width<br />

Distance, anterior end of esophagus to nerve ring<br />

Distance, anterior end of esophagus to nerve ring (as % of esophagus length)<br />

Esophagus length<br />

Esophagus length (as % of body length)<br />

Distance from anterior end to vulva (mm)<br />

Distance from anterior end to vulva (as % of body length)<br />

Tail length<br />

Tail length (as % of body length)<br />

completely developed, but eggs absent. Proximal<br />

regions of gonads overlap level of vulva. Each gonad<br />

forms a single loop as it bends. Uteri narrow,<br />

lacking eggs.<br />

Taxonomic summary<br />

TYPE HOST: Spotted salamander Arnbystoma<br />

maculatum (Shaw, 1802).<br />

TYPE LOCALITY: Roadside wetland near Pigeon<br />

Lake, Bayfield County, Wisconsin, U.S.A.;<br />

46°20'84"N, 91°20'58"W.<br />

SITES OF INFECTION: Lungs, body cavity.<br />

TYPE SPECIMENS: The type series consists of<br />

the gravid specimens only. Holotype: U.S. National<br />

Parasite Collection, Beltsville, Maryland,<br />

U.S.A., USNPC 90869. Paratypes: USNPC<br />

90870 (9 specimens); Department of <strong>Parasitology</strong>,<br />

Institute of Zoology, Kiev, Ukraine, Vial N<br />

847 (8 specimens).<br />

ETYMOLOGY: The new species is named in<br />

reference to the generic name of its type host.<br />

PREVALENCE AND INTENSITY: Two of 4 specimens<br />

of spotted salamander; 20-116 specimens<br />

of R. ambystomae (5-21 adult nematodes in<br />

lungs and 15-95 subadults in body cavity).<br />

Remarks and Discussion<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. is most similar<br />

morphologically to R. bermani and R. tokyoensis,<br />

the only other species of Rhabdias described<br />

from salamanders. The 3 species are similar in<br />

body size and shape and in egg size (Table 3).<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. differs from R. ber-<br />

Mean<br />

4.2<br />

11 1<br />

12<br />

17<br />

37<br />

39<br />

42<br />

57<br />

149<br />

34.4<br />

432<br />

10.5<br />

2.4<br />

57.4<br />

171<br />

4.1<br />

Minimum<br />

3.3<br />

100<br />

10<br />

15<br />

35<br />

35<br />

37<br />

50<br />

110<br />

26.8<br />

400<br />

8.8<br />

1.9<br />

54.4<br />

150<br />

3.5<br />

Maximum<br />

4.9<br />

120<br />

12<br />

17<br />

40<br />

42<br />

47<br />

60<br />

170<br />

37.8<br />

460<br />

12.0<br />

2.8<br />

61.8<br />

190<br />

5.0<br />

mani in the absence of a lancet-like cuticular<br />

swelling of the posterior extremity characteristic<br />

of the latter species. In R. bermani, the circumoral<br />

lips are arranged in 2 lateral groups; in each<br />

group, the lateral lip is situated closer to the oral<br />

opening than are the submedian lips (Rausch et<br />

al., 1984). In contrast, the lateral lips of R. ambystomae<br />

sp. n. are situated farther from the oral<br />

opening than are the submedian lips, a character<br />

more prominent in subadult worms than in<br />

adults (Figs. 3, 7). Additionally, the vulva of R.<br />

ambystomae sp. n. is usually postequatorial,<br />

whereas it is equatorial in R. bermani (Rausch<br />

et al., 1984). The most apparent differences between<br />

R. ambystomae sp. n. and R. tokyoensis<br />

are the markedly smaller buccal capsule and narrower<br />

esophagus of R. ambystomae (Table 3).<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. can be distinguished<br />

readily from 2 Rhabdias species common<br />

in North American amphibians, R. atnericanus<br />

and R. ranae, by the absence of lateral<br />

pseudolabia on the cephalic end. The presence<br />

and shape of pseudolabia in R. americanus and<br />

R. ranae were well documented by Baker (1978)<br />

and confirmed by examination of specimens collected<br />

as part of the present study. In addition,<br />

R. americanus has a more elongated tail (cf.<br />

Baker, 1978, fig. 3) compared with that of R.<br />

ambystomae sp. n.<br />

Parasitic nematodes of the genus Rhabdias<br />

have been reported in several species of salamanders<br />

from the midwestern U.S.A. Price and<br />

St. John (1980) reported finding an undeter-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


232 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figures 5-9. Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n., subadult. 5. Anterior end. 6. Head end, lateral view. 7.<br />

Cephalic extremity, apical view. 8. Posterior end. 9. Anterior loop of genital system and coelomocytes.<br />

mined species of Rhabdias in the smallmouth ( = subadult) nematodes were found in the body<br />

salamander Ambystoma texanum (Matthes, cavity. Bolek and Coggins (1998) found unde-<br />

1855) from Illinois. Adult specimens were found termined subadult Rhabdias in the body cavity<br />

in the lungs of the host, whereas "larval" of the lungless red-backed salamander Pletho-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


KUZMIN ET AL.—RHABDIAS AMBYSTOMAE SP. N. 233<br />

Figures 10-15. External morphology of Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. 10. Cephalic extremity of adult.<br />

11. Cephalic extremity of subadult; note amphid marked with an arrow. 12. Vulva of adult. 13. Vulva of<br />

subadult; note obliteration of the female genital opening at this stage. 14. Anus of adult. 15. Anus of<br />

subadult. Scale bars =<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


234 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

•2 55<br />

tu<br />

O<br />

|<br />

|<br />

•3<br />

•a<br />

13 Cffl<br />

S<br />

1-H<br />

^1<br />

1<br />

U<br />

•o cn<br />

4 u<br />

* «<br />

^<br />

J2<br />

IB<br />

es<br />

's a<br />

1<br />

•c M<br />

a<br />

1 1<br />

g<br />

='?<br />

d o<br />

BS gj<br />

^J flj<br />

a aa<br />

s'i<br />

s *cS<br />

^<br />

^1<br />

~ 0<br />

3 S<br />

50 4}<br />

•S c<br />

•e S<br />

a 2<br />

•a 1<br />

VI h<br />

i< y<br />

|1<br />

2.S « r^<br />

»fl .j£<br />

u c<br />

55 E<br />

mparison<br />

(measure<br />

r°, o<br />

U ^i<br />

OS<br />

r»5 -<br />

V<br />

IS<br />

££<br />

ensis<br />

0<br />

J? g<br />

*<br />

•g<br />

1<br />

^J<br />

2<br />

RJ<br />

S<br />

1<br />

1<br />

3<br />

as<br />

" vi<br />

S<br />

rt u<br />

c<br />

•0 £<br />

11<br />

o2<br />

3<br />

60<br />

«> ^<br />

C ^<br />

5 S<br />

"^ -H<br />

U<br />

3 ,— ^<br />

i? °<br />

o -<br />

1 ^<br />

II<br />

S 'o<br />

S u<br />

.2P «<br />

6 ^<br />

t3 ?T<br />

i2 oo<br />

n 2<br />

oi •—-<br />

UH ;<br />

u ca<br />

< u<br />

-o<br />

H<br />

1 a<br />

J3<br />

U<br />

1 1 1 1 1<br />

P CX D< U (U<br />

.2 i<br />

g^<br />

vo m 10<br />

10 04<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

rfon cinereus (Green, 1818) from collecting sites<br />

within a few kilometers of where R. ambystomae<br />

sp. n. was collected as part of the present study<br />

(J. R. Coggins, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee,<br />

personal communication). Oddly<br />

enough, no Rhabdias were found in A. maculaturn<br />

collected by Bolek and Coggins (1998)<br />

from the same area. This information suggests<br />

that R. ambystomae sp. n. may also parasitize P.<br />

cinereus in northern Wisconsin but cannot reach<br />

maturity in this lungless amphibian. Further examinations<br />

will be necessary for confirmation.<br />

Other authors identified lung nematodes collected<br />

from salamanders in Wisconsin and Michigan<br />

as R. ranae (Coggins and Sajdak, 1982;<br />

Muzzall and Schinderle, 1992). This species has<br />

been recorded in a number of North American<br />

anurans, most of which belong to the family<br />

Ranidae (Baker, 1978; Yoder and Coggins,<br />

1996; Bursey and DeWolf, 1998). In our opinion,<br />

the determination of the material from salamanders<br />

as R. ranae is questionable because of<br />

the high level of host specificity demonstrated<br />

by most representatives of Rhabdias; members<br />

of this genus have never been found to parasitize<br />

hosts from more than a single order (Rausch et<br />

al., 1984). Similarly, the report by Goldberg et<br />

al. (1998) of a frog parasite, Rhabdias joaquinensis<br />

Ingles, 1935, from salamanders in California<br />

may also represent a misidentification and<br />

is in need of confirmation.<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n. is the first species<br />

of this genus described from North American<br />

salamanders. The rich salamander fauna of<br />

North America and the strict specificity of rhabdiasids<br />

to their hosts indicate that further studies<br />

of material from the field or museum collections<br />

may reveal the presence of more species of<br />

Rhabdias unique to the salamanders of the New<br />

World.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank Dr. Gennadiy Atrashkevich, who<br />

kindly provided several specimens of 5. keyserlingii<br />

for our investigation, and Dr. Hideo Hasegawa<br />

for the loan of R. tokyoensis. We are<br />

grateful to Dr. Robert Wise for assistance with<br />

SEM. Collection of amphibians in Wisconsin<br />

was conducted under a permit provided by the<br />

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.<br />

This research was supported by a grant from the<br />

Vander Putten International Fund of the University<br />

of Wisconsin Oshkosh.


Literature Cited<br />

Baker, M. R. 1978. Morphology and taxonomy of<br />

Rhabdias spp. (Nematoda: Rhabdiasidae) from<br />

reptiles and amphibians of southern Ontario. Canadian<br />

Journal of Zoology 56:2127-2141.<br />

Bolek, M. G., and J. R. Coggins. 1998. Helminth<br />

parasites of the spotted salamander Ambystoma<br />

maculatum and red-backed salamander Plethodon<br />

c. cinereus from northwestern Wisconsin. Journal<br />

of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

65:98-102.<br />

Bursey, C. R., and W. R. DeWolf. 1998. Helminths<br />

of the frogs, Rana catesbeiana, Rana clamitans,<br />

and Rana palustris, from Coshocton County,<br />

Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 98:28-29.<br />

Coggins, J. R., and R. A. Sajdak. 1982. A survey of<br />

helminth parasites in the salamanders and certain<br />

anurans from Wisconsin. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 49:99-102.<br />

Dyer, W. G., and S. B. Peck. 1975. Gastrointestinal<br />

parasites of the cave salamander, Eurycea lucifuga<br />

Rafinesque, from the south-eastern United <strong>State</strong>s.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 53:52-54.<br />

Goldberg, S. R., C. R. Bursey, and H. Cheam. 1998.<br />

Composition and structure of helminth communities<br />

of the salamanders, Aneides lugubrls, Batrachoseps<br />

nigriventris, Ensatina eschscholtzii<br />

(Plethodontidae), and Taricha torosa (Salamandridae)<br />

from California. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

84:248-251.<br />

KUZMIN ET AL.—RHABDIAS AMBYSTOMAE SP. N. 235<br />

Lehmann, D. L. 1954. Some helminths of west coast<br />

urodels. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 40:231.<br />

Muzzall, P. M., and D. B. Schinderle. 1992. Helminths<br />

of the salamanders Ambystoma t. tigrinum<br />

and Ambystoma laterale (Caudata, Ambystomatidae)<br />

from southern Michigan. Proceedings of the<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington 59:201-<br />

205.<br />

Price, R. L., and T. St. John. 1980. Helminth parasites<br />

of the small-mouth salamander, Ambystoma<br />

texamim Matthes, 1855, from William County, Illinois.<br />

Proceedings of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 47:273-274.<br />

Rausch, R. L., V. R. Rausch, and G. I. Atrashkevich.<br />

1984. Rhabdias bermani sp. n. (Nematoda,<br />

Rhabdiasidae) from the Siberian salamander (Hynobius<br />

keyseiiingi) from the north-east of Asia.<br />

Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal 63:1297-1303. (In Russian.)<br />

Wilkie, J. S. 1930. Some parasitic nematodes from<br />

Japanese Amphibia. Annals and Magazine of Natural<br />

History 6:606-614.<br />

Yamaguti, S. 1935. Studies on the helminth fauna of<br />

Japan. Part 10. Amphibian nematodes. Japanese<br />

Journal of Zoology 6:387-392.<br />

Yoder, H. R., and J. R. Coggins. 1996. Helminth<br />

communities in the northern spring peeper, Pseudacris<br />

crucifer Wied, and the wood frog, Rana<br />

sylvatica Le Conte, from southeastern Wisconsin.<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

63:211-214.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 236-241<br />

Supplemental Diagnosis of Myxobolus gibbosus (Myxozoa), with a<br />

Taxonomic Review of Myxobolids from Lepomis gibbosus<br />

(Centrarchidae) in North America<br />

DAVID K. CONE<br />

Department of Biology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3C3<br />

(e-mail: david.cone@stmarys.ca)<br />

ABSTRACT: Myxobolus gibbosus Herrick, 1941 (Myxosporea) is reported from the connective tissue of gills of<br />

Lepomis gibbosus (Centrarchidae) in Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada. The new material (formalin-preserved)<br />

is used to supplement the original taxonomic diagnosis of nearly 60 yr ago. Spores are round to oval in valvular<br />

view, 11-14 jjim long and 10-11 jxm wide, with a distinctly blunt capsular region. The polar capsules are<br />

relatively large for the size of the spore, measuring 6-7 jxm long and 3.5-4.0 (Jim wide, and aligned almost<br />

parallel to each other. There are 8-12 loose filament coils lying up to 45° to the long axis of the capsule. The<br />

taxonomy of species of Myxobolus described or reported from L. gibbosus in North America is examined, and<br />

the following are considered to be valid taxa: Myxobolus dechtiari Cone and Anderson, 1977; M. gibbosus;<br />

Myxobolus magnasphcrus Cone and Anderson, 1977; Myxobolus osburni Herrick, 1936; Myxobolus paralintoni<br />

Li and Desser, 1985; and Myxobolus uvidiferus Cone and Anderson, 1977. <strong>Comparative</strong> photographs of spores<br />

accompany differential diagnoses of the 6 species. Myxobolus gibbosus Li and Desser, 1985, and Myxobolus Hi<br />

Desser, 1993, are junior synonyms of M. uvidiferus. Myxobolus lepomicus Li and Desser, 1985, is considered a<br />

species inquirendae, and the reports of Myxobolus cyprinicola Reuss, 1906, and Myxobolus poecilichthidis<br />

Fantham, Porter, and Richardson, 1939, from L. gibbosus are considered misidentifications.<br />

KEY WORDS: Myxobolus gibbosus, Myxosporea, redescription, differential diagnoses, pumpkinseed sunfish,<br />

Lepomis gibbosus, Centrarchidae, Algonquin Park, Canada.<br />

Myxobolus gibbosus Herrick, 1941 (Myxozoa)<br />

was described from connective tissue of the<br />

gill arch of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)) from the island region<br />

of western Lake Erie (Herrick, 1941). In subsequent<br />

surveys of myxosporean parasites of<br />

pumpkinseed (Cone and Anderson, 1977a, b; Li<br />

and Desser, 1985; Hayden and Rogers, 1997),<br />

the parasite was not encountered. However, during<br />

a new survey of myxosporeans of fish in<br />

Algonquin Park, a single pseudocyst of M. gibbosus<br />

was discovered. This rare find enabled the<br />

author to assess information provided in the<br />

original species description and to critically<br />

compare the parasite with other species of the<br />

genus reported from pumpkinseed. The present<br />

study describes the new material and reviews the<br />

taxonomy of myxobolids from pumpkinseed in<br />

North America.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Nine pumpkinseed (6-8.9 cm in total length) were<br />

collected in baited trapnets set 20 June 1994 and 21<br />

June 1995 in the shallows of Lake Sasajewan<br />

(45°35'N; 78°30'W), Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada.<br />

The fish were pithed and necropsied. All body organs<br />

and tissues were examined microscopically for<br />

myxosporean pseudocysts, and, when found, they were<br />

236<br />

fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Fixed pseudocysts<br />

were punctured and the spore contents stabilized in<br />

temporary mounts prepared with 1% agar (Lom,<br />

1969). Spores were photographed with interference<br />

contrast optics. Enlarged photographic prints of individual<br />

spores were used to determine spore dimensions.<br />

Descriptive terminology follows Lom and Dykova<br />

(1992). Measurements are presented in micrometers.<br />

The sample of M. gibbosus was compared with<br />

other species of Myxobolus in the author's collection,<br />

namely Myxobolus dechtiari Cone and Anderson,<br />

1977; Myxobolus magnaspherus Cone and Anderson,<br />

1977; Myxobolus osburni Herrick, 1936; Myxobolus<br />

paralintoni Li and Desser, 1985; and Myxobolus uvitliferus<br />

Cone and Anderson, 1977. Syntype slides of M.<br />

gibbosus (NMCICP 1984-0359), Myxobolus lepomicus<br />

(NMCICP 1984-0362), and M. paralintoni (NMCICP<br />

1984-0364) housed in the parasite collection of the Canadian<br />

Museum of Nature were also examined. A photo-voucher<br />

(negative film) is deposited in the United<br />

<strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection (USNPC), Beltsville,<br />

Maryland, U.S.A.<br />

Results<br />

Myxobolus gibbosus Herrick, 1941<br />

(Figs. 1 and 2)<br />

Supplementary diagnosis<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Pseudocyst egg-shaped, gray-white and minute<br />

(250 long), embedded in connective tissue<br />

surrounding base of gill arch. Spores round to


Figure 1. Spores of Myxobolus gibbosus. Scale bar = 10 [Jim.<br />

oval in valvular view, with blunt capsular edge.<br />

Spores 11.8 ± 0.9 (11-14, « = 10) long and<br />

10.6 ± 0.5 (10-1 1) wide. Width-to-length ratio<br />

1:1.09 ± 0.08 (1.05-1.3). Polar capsules oval,<br />

6.8 ± 0.3 (6-7) long and 4.0 ± 0.3 (3.5-4) wide,<br />

aligned almost parallel to each other. Polar filaments<br />

in 8-12 loose coils, lying up to 45° to long<br />

axis of capsule. Capsulogenic nuclei prominent,<br />

triangular. Shallow intercapsular appendix evident<br />

in some spores. Sutural ridge thin and<br />

smooth.<br />

Taxonomic summary<br />

HOST: Pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus)<br />

(Centrarchidae); total length 6.2 cm, 1 +<br />

yr old.<br />

LOCALITY/COLLECTION DATE: Lake Sasajewan,<br />

Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada (45°35'N;<br />

78°30'W), 20 June 1994.<br />

CONE—DIAGNOSIS OF MYXOBOLUS 237<br />

SITE OF INFECTION: Connective tissue of gill<br />

arch.<br />

PREVALENCE AND INTENSITY OF INFECTION: One<br />

of 9 fish infected with 1 pseudocyst.<br />

SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Photo-voucher USNPC<br />

No. 091157.00.<br />

Remarks<br />

Myxobolus gibbosus has not been reported in<br />

surveys of myxozoans in L. gibbosus from Algonquin<br />

Park (Cone and Anderson 1977a, b; Li<br />

and Desser, 1985). It was probably not overlooked,<br />

for the parasite has several distinct diagnostic<br />

features. It forms small but obvious<br />

pseudocysts in the connective tissue of the gill<br />

arch and produces round spores with a blunt<br />

capsular end. The polar capsules are relatively<br />

large, the length being about half the length of<br />

the spore, and they are arranged almost parallel<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


238 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 1. Comparison of pertinent taxonomic information about Myxobolus gibbosus reported in the original<br />

species description and that observed in the present study.<br />

Host<br />

Locality<br />

Tissue site<br />

Pseudocyst<br />

Spore length<br />

Spore width<br />

Spore thickness<br />

Polar capsule length<br />

Polar capsule width<br />

Polar filament coils<br />

Herrick (1941)*<br />

Lepomis gibbosus<br />

Lake Erie<br />

Connective tissue of gill<br />

Round, 0.75 mm<br />

10.6-12.3<br />

9.8-12.3<br />

6.5-8.2<br />

5.7-7.4<br />

3.3-4.1<br />

8-12<br />

* Based on fresh material in a hanging drop preparation.<br />

t Based on formalin-fixed material in asar wet mounts.<br />

to each other. It appears then that M. gibbosus<br />

is simply rare in this region. The dimensions of<br />

the preserved spores found in the present study<br />

are similar to those described by Herrick (1941)<br />

from fresh material (Table 1). It should be noted<br />

that dimensions of fixed spores are often smaller<br />

than those of fresh spores because shrinkage can<br />

take place during fixation. This means that fresh<br />

spores of M. gibbosus in Algonquin Park may<br />

be slightly larger than those described originally<br />

by Herrick (1941).<br />

Spores of other species of Myxobolus (M. dechtiari,<br />

M. magnaspherus, M. osburni, M. paralintoni,<br />

and M. uvuliferus) from L. gibbosus are<br />

presented for comparative purposes (Figs. 3—7).<br />

Each species has a distinct spore shape and specific<br />

tissue site in which it develops and is readily<br />

identified by these indicators. Myxobolus<br />

paralintoni (Fig. 4) has oval spores in frontal<br />

view and develops in the bulbus arteriosus of the<br />

heart (Hayden and Rogers, 1997; Cone and<br />

Overstreet, 1998). Myxobolus dechtiari (Fig. 5)<br />

has spores that are broadly pyriform in frontal<br />

view and develops in gill tissue (Cone and Anderson,<br />

1977a). Myxobolus uvuliferus has slightly<br />

compressed spores in frontal view usually<br />

with the width greater than length, often has polar<br />

capsules dissimilar in the length, and develops<br />

in the connective tissue capsule surrounding<br />

the metacercaria of Uvulifer ambloplites<br />

(Hughes, 1927) Dubois, 1938 (Cone and Anderson,<br />

1977a). Myxobolus osburni has round<br />

spores in frontal view and develops in the exocrine<br />

tissue of the pancreas (Cone and Anderson,<br />

1977a). Myxobolus magnaspherus has round<br />

spores in frontal view that are huge, often 20<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Present studyt<br />

Lepomis gibbosus<br />

Lake Sasajewan<br />

Connective tissue of gill<br />

Round, 0.25 mm<br />

11-14<br />

10-11<br />

—<br />

6-7<br />

3.5-4<br />

8-11<br />

|xm in diameter, and develops in connective tissue<br />

of the body, including the peritoneum (Cone<br />

and Anderson, 1977a).<br />

Taxonomic Key to the Species of Myxobolus<br />

Infecting Pumpkinseed Sunfish<br />

la. Spore length more than 16 jjim<br />

M. magnaspherus (Fig. 8)<br />

Ib. Spore length less than 16 |xm 2<br />

2a. Polar capsules aligned more or less parallel -<br />

M. gibbosus (Fig. 9)<br />

2b. Polar capsules converged anteriorly 3<br />

3a. Spore circular in frontal view M. osburni (Fig. 10)<br />

3b. Spore not circular in frontal view 4<br />

4a. Spore width greater than spore length<br />

M. uvuliferus (Fig. 11)<br />

4b. Spore width less than spore length 5<br />

5a. Spore oval in frontal view M. paralintoni (Fig. 12)<br />

5b. Spore broadly pyriform in frontal view<br />

M. dechtiari (Fig. 13)<br />

Discussion<br />

Ten species of Myxobolus Butschli, 1882<br />

(Myxosporea) have been reported from L. gibbosus<br />

in North America (Herrick, 1936, 1941;<br />

Cone and Anderson, 1977a, b; Ingram and<br />

Mitchell, 1982; Li and Desser, 1985; Desser,<br />

1993; Cone and Overstreet, 1998). The author<br />

has necropsied L. gibbosus from Algonquin Park<br />

and from Lake Erie and has to date encountered<br />

6 of the 10 species, namely M. dechtiari, M.<br />

gibbosus, M. magnaspherus, M. osburni, M.<br />

paralintoni, and M. uvuliferus.<br />

The reports of Myxobolus cyprinicola Reuss,<br />

1906, and Myxobolus poecilichthidis Fantham,<br />

Porter, and Richardson, 1939, from the brain and<br />

heart and from the gills, respectively, of L. gib-


CONE—DIAGNOSIS OF MYXOBOLUS 239<br />

Figures 2-7. Photographs of spores in frontal view of species of Myxobolus known to parasitize Lepomis<br />

gibbosus in North America. 2. Myxobolus gibbosus (formalin-preserved). 3. Myxobolus paralintoni (formalin-preserved).<br />

4. Myxobolus dechtiari (formalin-preserved). 5. Myxobolus uvuliferus (formalin-preserved).<br />

6. Myxobolus osburni (formalin-preserved). 7. Myxobolus magnaspherus (fresh spore). Scale bar<br />

= 10 jjim and applies to all figures.<br />

bosus in Algonquin Park (Li and Desser, 1985)<br />

are considered misidentifications. Both of these<br />

species have similarities in tissue site and spore<br />

morphology to M. dechtiari and M. paralintoni<br />

and could have easily been confused with them.<br />

Li and Desser (1985) were apparently unaware<br />

of the study by Cone and Anderson (1977a) in<br />

nearby Ryan Lake.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


240 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

8<br />

12<br />

Figures 8-13. Drawings of spores in frontal view of species of Myxobolus known to parasitize Lepomis<br />

gibbosus in North America. 8. Myxobolus gibbosus. 9. Myxobolus paralintoni. 10. Myxobolus dechtiari. 11.<br />

Myxobolus uvuliferus. 12. Myxobolus osburni. 13. Myxobolus magnaspherus. Scale bar = 5 (Jim and applies<br />

to all figures.<br />

The type material of M. lepomicus Li and<br />

Desser, 1985, described from a variety of organs<br />

of L. gibbosus, has deteriorated, and spores are<br />

not to be found on the slide. The species description<br />

includes a schematic drawing of the<br />

spore. Until additional samples are obtained the<br />

species is considered a species inquirendae.<br />

Myxobolus gibbosus Li and Desser, 1985, is a<br />

homonym of M. gibbosus Herrick, 1941. Desser<br />

(1993) proposed Myxobolus Hi as a nomen novum<br />

to replace M. gibbosus Li and Desser, 1985.<br />

However, Landsberg and Lom (1991) considered<br />

M. gibbosus Li and Desser, 1985, to be a<br />

junior synonym of M. uvuliferus, and thus both<br />

M. gibbosus and M. Hi become junior synonyms<br />

of M. uvuliferus. The report by Hoffman (1998)<br />

that M. gibbosus Li and Desser, 1985, is a junior<br />

synonym of M. osburni cannot be supported on<br />

the basis of spore shape.<br />

The 6 confirmed species of Myxobolus mentioned<br />

above are known to parasitize L. gibbosus<br />

or related centrarchid fishes in North America.<br />

Myxobolus magnaspherus and M. paralintoni<br />

have been found in redear sunfish (Lepomis microlophus<br />

(Giinther, 1859)) in Mississippi,<br />

U.S.A. (D. K. Cone, Saint Mary's University,<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

and R. M. Overstreet, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory,<br />

unpublished data) and redbreast sunfish<br />

(Lepomis auritus (Linnaeus, 1758)) in Maryland,<br />

U.S.A. (Hayden and Rogers, 1997), respectively.<br />

Myxobolus osburni has been reported<br />

(Herrick, 1936; Otto and Jahn, 1943) from bluegill<br />

sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque,<br />

1819), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu<br />

Lacepede, 1802), and black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus<br />

(Lesueur, 1829)). The genus clearly<br />

has undergone a diverse radiation in these<br />

hosts, and it is of ecological interest that all 6<br />

species are found in L. gibbosus in Algonquin<br />

Park and that all occupy distinct and very specific<br />

tissue sites in this host species.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The research was funded by a Natural Sciences<br />

and Engineering Research Council of<br />

Canada (NSERC) Research Grant awarded to<br />

the author. Thanks are extended to the staff of<br />

the Harkness Research Laboratory for their help<br />

and hospitality and to Sherwin Desser, University<br />

of Toronto, for providing constructive comments<br />

on a draft of the paper.


Literature Cited<br />

Cone, D. K., and R. C. Anderson. 1977u. Myxosporidan<br />

parasites of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus<br />

L.) from Ontario. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

63:657-666.<br />

, and . 1977b. Parasites of pumpkinseed<br />

(Lepomis gibbosus L.) from Ryan Lake, Algonquin<br />

Park, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

55:1410-1423.<br />

-, and R. M. Overstreet. 1998. Species of Myxobolus<br />

(Myxozoa) from the bulbus arteriosus of<br />

centrarchid fishes in North America, with a description<br />

of two new species. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

84:371-374.<br />

Desser, S. S. 1993. Myxobolus Hi nom. nov.: a replacement<br />

for M. gibbosus Li and Desser, 1985 (Myxosporea:<br />

Myxozoa), preoccupied. Canadian Journal<br />

of Zoology 71:1461.<br />

Hayden, K. J., and W. A. Rogers. 1997. Redescription<br />

of Myxobolus paralintoni (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae),<br />

with notes regarding new host and locality.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:283-286.<br />

Herrick, J. A. 1936. Two new species of Myxobolus<br />

from fishes of Lake Erie. Transactions of the<br />

American Microscopical Society 55:194-198.<br />

. 1941. Some myxosporidian parasites of Lake<br />

Erie fishes. Transactions of the American Microscopical<br />

Society 66:163-170.<br />

CONE—DIAGNOSIS OF MYXOBOLUS 241<br />

Hoffman, G. L. 1998. Parasites of North American<br />

Freshwater Fishes, 2nd ed. Comstock Publishing<br />

Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New<br />

York, U.S.A., and London, U.K. 539 pp.<br />

Ingram, K. M., and L. G. Mitchell. 1982. Pancreatic<br />

infections of Myxobolus osburni Herrick (Myxozoa:<br />

Myxosporea) in the pumpkinseed, Lepomis<br />

gibbosus (Linnaeus), in Iowa. Journal of Wildlife<br />

Diseases 18:75-80.<br />

Landsberg, J. H., and J. Lorn. 1991. Taxonomy of<br />

the genera of the Myxobolus/Myxosoma group<br />

(Myxobolidae: Myxosporea), current listing of<br />

species and revision of synonyms. Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

18:165-186.<br />

Li, L., and S. S. Desser. 1985. The protozoan parasites<br />

of fish from two lakes in Algonquin Park,<br />

Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:1846-<br />

1858.<br />

Loin, J. 1969. On a new taxonomic character in<br />

Myxosporidia, as demonstrated in descriptions of<br />

two new species. Folia Parasitologica 16:97-103.<br />

, and I. Dykova. 1992. Protozoan Parasites of<br />

Fishes. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries<br />

Science 26. Elsevier, Amsterdam, London,<br />

New York, Tokyo. 315 pp.<br />

Otto, G. R., and T. L. Jahn. 1943. Internal myxosporidian<br />

infections of some fishes of the Okobojii<br />

region. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science<br />

50:323-335.<br />

<strong>2001</strong>-2002 MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE<br />

HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON<br />

27 October <strong>2001</strong><br />

28 October <strong>2001</strong><br />

28 November <strong>2001</strong><br />

January 2002<br />

March 2002<br />

May 2002<br />

Symposium—<strong>Parasitology</strong> in Science. 1:00 PM. Smithsonian Institution,<br />

Quad Building, (Room 3111), Washington, DC<br />

(Contact Persons: Bill Moser, 202-357-2473 or Dennis Richardson, 203-<br />

582-8607).<br />

Presidential Summit of <strong>Parasitology</strong> Societies. 8:30 AM.<br />

Smithsonian Institution, Quad Building, (Room 3112), Washington, DC<br />

(Contact Persons: Bill Moser, 202-357-2473 or Dennis Richardson, 203-<br />

582-8607).<br />

Anniversary Dinner. 6:30 PM. 94th Aero Squadron, <strong>College</strong> Park, MD<br />

(Contact Person: Bill Moser, 202-357-2473).<br />

Date, time, and place to be announced.<br />

Date, time, and place to be announced.<br />

Date, time, and place to be announced.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 242-248<br />

Cuticular Changes in Fergusobiid Nematodes Associated with<br />

Parasitism of Fergusoninid Flies<br />

ROBIN M. GiBLiN-DAVis,1-5 KERRIE A. DAViES,2 DONNA S. WiLLiAMS,3 AND<br />

TED D. CENTER4<br />

1 Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 3205 <strong>College</strong> Avenue, Davie, Florida<br />

33314-7799, U.S.A. (e-mail: giblin@ufl.edu),<br />

2 Department of Applied and Molecular Ecology, Adelaide University, Glen Osmond, 5064 South Australia<br />

(e-mail: kerrie.davies@adelaide.edu.au),<br />

3 Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, P.O. Box 1 10700, Gainesville, Florida 3261 1-0700,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: dswill@ufl.edu), and<br />

4 United <strong>State</strong>s Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory,<br />

3205 <strong>College</strong> Avenue, Davie, Florida 33314-7799, U.S.A. (e-mail: tcenter@ars.usda.gov).<br />

ABSTRACT: In the stylet-bearing nematode Fergusobia sp. (Tylenchida: Neotylenchidae), we hypothesize an<br />

additional separation (apolysis) and loss (ecdysis) of the adult cuticle, without the formation of a new cuticle,<br />

during the transition from the preparasitic to parasitic female. This pattern is in direct contrast to the characteristic<br />

4-molt pattern accepted for most nematodes. Transmission electron microscope comparisons of the cuticle of an<br />

adult parthenogenetic female, male, and preparasitic female from the plant-parasitic phase of the fergusobiid life<br />

cycle revealed a relatively simple cuticle with an epicuticle, amorphous cortical/median zone, and a striated<br />

basal zone that is underlain by a relatively thin epidermis and striated somatic muscles. In contrast, the parasitic<br />

female from the adult fly was without its stylet and cuticle, the epidermis was enlarged, the outer edges of the<br />

epidermis were modified into microvilli, and the somatic muscles and esophagus were degenerate. The apparent<br />

hypertrophy and development of epidermal microvilli greatly expand the surface area of the parasitic female<br />

and presumably increase the nematode's ability to absorb nutrients directly through the epidermis from the host's<br />

hemolymph without cuticular interference.<br />

KEY WORDS: Fergusobia, parasitism, Fergusonina, cuticle, epidermis, TEM, molting, nematode, fly, Myrtaceae,<br />

Australia.<br />

In the only known mutualistic association between<br />

nematodes and insects (Maggenti, 1982),<br />

nematodes of the genus Fergusobia Currie,<br />

1937, together with flies of the genus Fergusonina<br />

Currie, 1937, induce galls in young meristematic<br />

tissues of myrtaceous hosts in Australasia<br />

(Giblin-Davis et al., <strong>2001</strong>). The nematode is apparently<br />

responsible for gall induction (Currie,<br />

1937; R. M. Giblin-Davis, unpublished data),<br />

and the fly for dispersal and sustenance of the<br />

nematode. The female fly deposits its eggs and<br />

juvenile nematode parasites in plant tissue (Currie,<br />

1937). As these nematodes feed, a gall begins<br />

to form, and the nematodes develop into<br />

parthenogenetic females that lay eggs giving rise<br />

to amphimictic male and female nematodes. Inseminated<br />

preparasitic females are infective and<br />

invade mature female third-instar fly larvae. Inside<br />

the fly, the nematodes develop into parasitic<br />

females that deposit eggs in the fly's hemolymph.<br />

Juvenile nematodes that hatch from these<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

242<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

eggs move to the oviducts of the adult fly and,<br />

together with the fly's eggs, are deposited into<br />

appropriate plant tissue to begin the next generation.<br />

During dissections of mature third-instar fly<br />

larvae from a variety of myrtaceous hosts<br />

(swamp bloodwood Corymbia ptychocarpa (F.<br />

Mueller, 1859), South Australian blue gum Eucalyptus<br />

leucoxylon F. Mueller, 1855, and broadleaved<br />

paperbark Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cavanilles,<br />

1797) S. T. Blake, 1958), we observed<br />

apparent separation (apolysis) and loss (ecdysis)<br />

of the adult cuticle during transition from the<br />

preparasitic to parasitic female without the formation<br />

of a new cuticle (K. A. Davies, unpublished<br />

data). This assumes that the first molt occurs<br />

in the egg in Fergusobia, as with other Tylenchida,<br />

and that 3 molts occur after emergence<br />

from the egg through to the preparasitic female.<br />

This pattern is surprising because nematodes<br />

characteristically undergo 4 molts in their development<br />

from the juvenile to the adult stage<br />

(Bird and Bird, 1991). We report on the ultra-


G1BLIN-DAVIS ET AL.—CUTICULAR CHANGES IN FERGUSOBIID NEMATODES 243<br />

structure of the cuticle of adults at different<br />

phases of the life cycle of Fergusobia.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Multilocular flower bud galls of undescribed species<br />

of Fergusobia and Fergusonina were collected on 9<br />

August 1999 from C. ptychocarpa at the Sherwood<br />

Arboretum in Sherwood, Queensland, Australia<br />

(27°32.06'S; 152°58.39'E). Galls were dissected. Adult<br />

parthenogenetic female and amphimictic male and preparasitic<br />

infective female nematodes present in the<br />

plant tissue were placed separately into Trump's fixative<br />

for transmission electron microscopy or in formalin-aceto-alcohol<br />

fixative (Southey, 1970). Mature<br />

fly larvae (third-instar) and adults were dissected from<br />

the galls in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2). Parasitic<br />

female nematodes were removed from the hemocoel<br />

and placed into Trump's fixative. Specimens<br />

were postfixed in 2% formaldehyde (prepared from<br />

paraformaldehyde), 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate<br />

buffer at pH 7.2 for 18 hr at 4°C. After repeated<br />

rinsing in buffer, specimens were postfixed in<br />

2% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2 for 3<br />

days at 4°C. Nematodes were rinsed in water, fixed<br />

with 1 % aqueous uranyl acetate, dehydrated through<br />

100% ethanol into 100% acetone, and infiltrated with<br />

Spurr's epoxy resin. Blocks were sectioned on an<br />

RMC® ultramicrotome. Sections were poststained with<br />

5% aqueous uranyl acetate and lead citrate before<br />

viewing on a Zeiss EM 10® transmission electron microscope<br />

at 80 kV.<br />

Results<br />

Examination of the cuticle of an adult parthenogenetic<br />

female and a male nematode revealed<br />

a relatively simple cuticle with a striated basal<br />

zone, an amorphous cortical/median zone, and a<br />

distinct epicuticle (Figs. 1, 2). It is underlain by<br />

relatively thin epidermis that covers the striated<br />

somatic muscles.<br />

Comparisons of the preparasitic female nematode<br />

from the plant gall and the parasitic female<br />

nematode from the adult fly show dramatic differences<br />

(Figs. 3-7). The preparasitic female has<br />

cuticle, epidermis, and muscles similar to those<br />

described for the male and parthenogenetic female<br />

from the plant host (Figs. 3, 4). However,<br />

the cuticle appears thinner (200-250 nm vs.<br />

450-550 nm for the parthenogenetic female and<br />

630—<strong>68</strong>0 nm for the male). The parasitic form<br />

of the nematode from the adult fly has no cuticle.<br />

The epidermis is greatly enlarged, and the<br />

outer edge of the epidermis appears to be modified<br />

into microvilli (Figs. 5—7). The somatic<br />

muscles appear degenerated (Fig. 6).<br />

During the transition from the preparasitic to<br />

the parasitic female nematode in the larval fly,<br />

the stylet is lost and the esophagus and intestine<br />

appear to degenerate. In a parasitic female from<br />

a fly larva, the remnant of the adult epicuticle<br />

was present (Fig. 5), but it was not present in<br />

the parasitic female from an adult fly (Figs. 6,<br />

7). The apparent hypertrophy and development<br />

of epidermal microvilli greatly expand the surface<br />

area of the parasitic female and presumably<br />

increase the nematode's ability to absorb nutrients<br />

directly through its epidermis from the<br />

host's hemolymph without cuticular interference.<br />

Interestingly, the cuticle represents a form<br />

of protection against insect host defense mechanisms.<br />

However, these mechanisms may be<br />

modified or lacking in the female larva, pupa,<br />

and adult fly in this mutualistic association.<br />

Whether there is a strong defense system in male<br />

flies to prevent parasitism by Fergusobia or the<br />

nematodes fail to penetrate the male fly larvae<br />

is not known.<br />

Discussion<br />

Riding (1970) reported that microvilli were<br />

present on the outside of the parasitic female<br />

stage of Howardula husseyi Richardson, Hesling,<br />

and Riding, 1977 (=Bradynema sp.) (Allantonematidae),<br />

a tylenchid parasite of the<br />

phorid fly, Megaselia halterata Wood, 1910. A<br />

cuticle was not observed in this stage of the<br />

nematode, suggesting that the microvilli were of<br />

epidermal origin and that there could have been<br />

an additional apolysis and ecdysis without cuticular<br />

replacement, as appears to occur in Fergusobia.<br />

The epidermis in this nematode was hypertrophied.<br />

In addition, the stylet and esophagus<br />

are not present in this form of H. husseyi<br />

(Poinar, 1979). Subbotin et al. (1994) reported<br />

that entomoparasitic females of Wachekitylenchus<br />

bovieni (Wachek, 1955) Slobodyanyuk,<br />

1986 (Parasitylenchidae), and Bradynema rigidum<br />

(von Siebold, 1836) zur Strassen, 1892 (Allantonematidae),<br />

had similar body wall morphology<br />

to H. husseyi. Entomoparasitic females<br />

of the tylenchid Skarbilovinema laumondi Chizhov<br />

and Zakharenkova, 1991 (lotonchiidae),<br />

exhibited a body wall composed of a "spongy"<br />

layer of the epidermis formed by interwoven<br />

and fused microvilli without a cuticle (Subbotin<br />

et al., 1993).<br />

In contrast, the epicuticle is apparently retained<br />

by the entomoparasitic amphimictic female<br />

of Paraiotonchium nicholasi Slobodyanyuk,<br />

1975 (=Heterotylenchus sp.) (lotonchiidae)<br />

(Nicholas, 1972). Ultrastructural differences<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


244 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

629 nm<br />

;./::•" •':6,'-, -,:•••::•.,;-;<br />

mkdM \•<br />

Figures 1, 2. Longitudinal sections of the cuticle of Fergusobia sp. ex Corymbia ptychocarpa from galled<br />

flower buds. 1. Adult parthenogenetic female. 2. Adult male. BS = basal striations; C/M = cortical/median<br />

zone; E = epicuticle.<br />

were observed between the amphimictic female,<br />

parthenogenetic female, and amphimictic-phase<br />

juvenile of P. nicholasi from the body cavity of<br />

the Australian bush fly Musca vetustissima<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Walker, 1857 (Nicholas, 1972). Fourth-stage juvenile<br />

(J4) nematodes are deposited into cow<br />

dung where they mate, "metamorphose" into<br />

the infective form, penetrate the fly larva, and


-<br />

GIBLIN-DAVIS ET AL.—CUTICULAR CHANGES IN FERGUSOBIID NEMATODES 245<br />

..<br />

'•••':«•'<br />

-<br />

244 nm<br />

•'?"... -<br />

• .<br />

Figures 3, 4. Longitudinal sections of the cuticle of a preparasitic adult female of Fergusobia sp. ex<br />

Corymbia ptychocarpa from galled flower buds. 3. Close-up showing epidermal folds. 4. Different section.<br />

BS = basal striations; C/M = cortical/median zone; E = epicuticle; Ep = epidermis; M = muscle.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


246 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

CR Mv<br />

V/"7f:.:v r^25"/ '••'•:%6&^!£^^±-^<br />

- > V - : : . : ;•- '


GIBLIN-DAVIS ET AL.—CUTICULAR CHANGES IN FERGUSOBIID NEMATODES 247<br />

harenkova and Chizhov, 1991, and Allantonema<br />

rnirabile Leuckart, 1884 (Allantonematidae),<br />

were similar to those of P. nicholasi, being composed<br />

of a hypertrophied epidermis with microvilli<br />

that was covered by a cuticle-like layer<br />

(Subbotin et al., 1994).<br />

Insect hemolymph characteristically has high<br />

levels of amino acids, trehalose, other nonamino<br />

organic acids, and salts (Chapman, 1972), making<br />

it a nutrient-rich environment for parasites<br />

that can overcome innate host defense mechanisms.<br />

Insect-parasitic tylenchid nematodes have<br />

adapted to the challenges of obtaining nutrition<br />

from a living insect host in a variety of ways,<br />

including acquisition per os (through the<br />

mouth), through a modified or absent cuticle, or<br />

through prolapsis and modification of the uterus<br />

as in the Sphaerulariinae (Sphaerulariidae). Tylenchids<br />

from the Neotylenchidae, Allantonematidae,<br />

lotonchiidae, and Parasitotylenchidae<br />

have insect-parasitic forms that are obese and<br />

have degenerate esophagi, intestines that are degenerate<br />

or modifed as storage organs, and the<br />

stylet often sunken into the body or even lacking<br />

(Siddiqi, 2000), suggesting that they employ<br />

some form of transcuticular or transepidermal<br />

uptake.<br />

Deladenus (Neotylenchidae), Paraiotonchium<br />

(lotonchiidae), Howardula (Allantonematidae),<br />

Skarbilovinerna (lotonchiidae), and Fergusobia<br />

(Neotylenchidae) may represent contemporary<br />

examples of an evolutionary trend from per os<br />

to transepidermal nutrient acquisition in insectparasitic<br />

Tylenchida. Of course, this is a highly<br />

speculative exercise until more information<br />

about the transition between preparasitic and<br />

parasitic females is known and some independent<br />

phylogenetic data are available. The evolutionary<br />

trend is hypothesized to be: 1) Per os<br />

acquisition via a stylet, esophagus, and gut. This<br />

strategy takes advantage of the existing stylet for<br />

feeding on fungi, plants, or other invertebrates.<br />

It is a less energy- and time-efficient method of<br />

nutrient acquisition for a hemocoelic parasite because<br />

obtaining food through the stylet requires<br />

expending energy to maintain and operate its<br />

esophagus and intestine. 2) Per os acquisition<br />

with thinning and partial apolysis of the cuticle<br />

and coincident epidermal folding to increase surface<br />

area for supplemental transcuticular uptake<br />

of nutrients (possibly Deladenus spp.). 3) Early<br />

per os acquisition followed by apolysis, partial<br />

absorption of the cuticle without the creation of<br />

a new cuticle, and folding of the epidermis such<br />

that uptake is transcuticular and somatic muscles,<br />

esophagus, and gut degenerate (e.g., Paraiotonchium).<br />

4) Early per os acquisition followed<br />

by full apolysis and ecdysis without the<br />

creation of a new cuticle. There is hypertrophy<br />

and folding of the epidermis, and nutrient uptake<br />

is transepidermal, somatic muscles and esophagus<br />

degenerate, and the gut degenerates or is<br />

transformed into a storage organ (e.g., Howardula,<br />

Skarbilovinema, and Fergusobia). The epidermal<br />

hypertrophy and folding are superficially<br />

similar to the formation of plicae (epidermal<br />

folds) during the development of a new cuticle<br />

(Bird and Bird, 1991) but are more extensive<br />

and apparently are not accompanied by the formation<br />

of a new cuticle.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank Drs. Bill Howard and Thomas<br />

Weissling for review of the manuscript and Matthew<br />

Purcell, Jeff Makinson, and Dr. John<br />

Goolsby for making the senior author's visit to<br />

the Australian Biological Control laboratory in<br />

Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia, such a<br />

productive and enjoyable experience. This project<br />

was funded in part by USDA-ARS Specific<br />

Cooperative Agreement No. 58-6629-9-004<br />

from the USDA Invasive Plant Research Laboratory<br />

in Davie, Florida, U.S.A. This is Florida<br />

Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series<br />

No. R-07870.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bird, A. F., and J. Bird. 1991. The Structure of Nematodes,<br />

2nd ed. Academic Press, Inc., New York,<br />

U.S.A. 316 pp.<br />

Chapman, R. F. 1972. The Insects: Structure and<br />

Function. American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.,<br />

New York, U.S.A. 819 pp.<br />

Currie, G. A. 1937. Galls on Eucalyptus trees: A new<br />

type of association between flies and nematodes.<br />

Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South<br />

Wales 62:147-174.<br />

Giblin-Davis, R. M., K. A. Davies, G. S. Taylor, and<br />

W. K. Thomas. <strong>2001</strong>. Entomophilic nematode<br />

models for studying biodiversity and cospeciation.<br />

Pages 00-00 in Z. X. Chen, S. Y. Chen, and D.<br />

W. Dickson, eds. Nematology, Advances and Perspectives.<br />

Tsinghua University Press/Springer-<br />

Verlag, New York, U.S.A. (In press.)<br />

Maggenti, A. R. 1982. General Nematology. Springer-<br />

Verlag, New York. 372 pp.<br />

Nicholas, W. L. 1972. The fine structure of the cuticle<br />

of Heterotylenchus. Nematologica 18:138-140.<br />

Poinar, G. O., Jr. 1979. Nematodes for Biological<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


248 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Control of Insects. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Subbotin, S. A., V. N. Chizhov, and N. N. Zakhar-<br />

Florida, U.S.A. 277 pp.<br />

Riding, I. L. 1970. Microvilli on the outside of a nematode.<br />

Nature 226:179-180.<br />

Siddiqi, M. R. 2000. Tylenchida: Parasites of Plants<br />

and Insects, 2nd ed. CABI Publishing, St. Albans,<br />

U.K. 848 pp.<br />

Southey, J. F., ed. 1970. Laboratory methods for work<br />

with plant and soil nematodes, 5th ed. Technical<br />

Bulletin 2 of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries<br />

and Food. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London,<br />

U.K. 148 pp.<br />

enkova. 1993. Ultrastructure of the body wall of<br />

parasitic and infective females of Skarbilovinema<br />

laumondi (Tylenchida: lotonchiidae). Fundamental<br />

and Applied Nematology 16:1-4.<br />

, , and . 1994. Ultrastructure of<br />

the integument of parasitic females in entomoparasitic<br />

tylenchids. 1. Two species of the genus<br />

Wachekitylenchus, Allantonema mirabile and Bradynema<br />

rigidum. Russian Journal of Nematology<br />

2:105-112.<br />

Report on the Brayton H. Ransom Memorial Trust Fund<br />

The Brayton H. Ransom Memorial Trust Fund was established in 1936 to "Encourage and promote the<br />

study and advance of the Science of <strong>Parasitology</strong> and related sciences." Income from the Trust currently<br />

provides token support of <strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong> and limited support for publication of meritorious<br />

manuscripts by authors lacking institutional or other backing. Donations or memorial contributions may<br />

be directed to the Secretary-Treasurer. Information about the Trust can be found in the following articles:<br />

Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington (1936) 3:84-87; (1983) 50:200-204 and<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington (1993) 60:144-150.<br />

Financial Report for 2000<br />

Balance on hand, January 1, 2000 $24,459.06<br />

Receipts: $ 1,402.64<br />

Contributions from Members of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

will be credited in <strong>2001</strong><br />

Interest received in 2000 $1,402.64<br />

Disbursements ($6.00)<br />

Grant to the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

for 2000—$50.00 (to be debited in <strong>2001</strong>)<br />

Membership in the American Association for Zoological Nomenclature<br />

for 2000—$50.00 (to be debited in <strong>2001</strong>)<br />

Bank charges ($6.00)<br />

On hand, December 31, 2000 $25,855.70<br />

J. Ralph Lichtenfels, President<br />

Robin N. Huettel, Secretary-Treasurer<br />

Morgan Golden<br />

Trustees of the Brayton H. Ransom Memorial Trust Fund<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

J. Ralph Lichtenfels<br />

Acting for Secretary-Treasurer<br />

USDA:ARS:BARC-East, No. 1180<br />

Beltsville, MD 20705-2350<br />

David J. Chitwood<br />

Nancy D. Pacheco<br />

Harley G. Sheffield


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 249-255<br />

Tegumentary Ultrastructure (SEM) of Preadult and Adult<br />

Lobatostoma jungwirthi Kritscher, 1974 (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea)<br />

ANALIA PAOLA' AND MARIA CRISTINA DAMBORENEA2<br />

Departamento Cientffico Zoologia Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo,<br />

Paseo del Bosque s/n° -1900- La Plata, CONICET.PIP 4728/96 Argentina<br />

(e-mail: 'apaola@museo.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar; 2cdambor@museo.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar)<br />

ABSTRACT: Larval Lobatostoma jungwirthi Kritscher, 1974 (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea) parasitize the digestive<br />

gland of Heleobia parchappii (d'Orbigny, 1835) (Mollusca: Hydrobiidae) and, as adults, the posterior intestine<br />

of the chameleon cichlid Cichlasotna facetum (Jenyns, 1842) (Pisces, Cichlidae). Currently, L. jungwirthi is the<br />

only aspidogastrid reported from freshwater fishes in Argentina. Tegumentary structures of preadults and adults<br />

of L. jungwirthi were observed under scanning electron microscopy. In the preadult, 2 types of sensory receptors<br />

were observed: monociliate papillae of intermediate length on the walls and crests of the ventral adhesive disc<br />

as well as on the disc periphery and oral lobules, and nonciliate dome-shaped papillae on the crests of the<br />

ventral adhesive disc, neck, and oral lobules. In adults, other types of sensory receptors could be observed: in<br />

the posterior dorsal region, monociliate papillae with longer cilia than those found in the preadult, and a multiciliate<br />

structure in the dorsal region at the posterior third of the body. This is the first record of a surface<br />

multiciliate receptor in aspidogastreans. The pores of marginal glands were found only between the anterior<br />

alveoli.<br />

KEY WORDS: Aspidogastrea, Lobatostoma jungwirthi, tegument, sensory papillae, SEM, Argentina.<br />

Lobatostoma jungwirthi Kritscher, 1974<br />

(Trematoda: Aspidogastrea), is the only species<br />

of the genus that parasitizes freshwater fishes. It<br />

was first found in 1974, in the stripefin eartheater<br />

Gymnogeophagus rhabdotus (Hensel,<br />

1870), in the Sinus River, Brazil (Kritscher,<br />

1974). Lunaschi (1984) found it in the posterior<br />

intestine of the chameleon cichlid Cichlasoma<br />

facetum (Jenyns, 1842) (Pisces: Cichlidae) at 2<br />

localities in Buenos Aires Province. Later, Zylber<br />

and Ostrowski de Nunez (1999) described<br />

the larval stages of L. jungwirthi from the gonad<br />

of Heleobia castellanosae (Gaillard, 1974) (Gastropoda:<br />

Hydrobiidae) collected in an artificial<br />

pond in Buenos Aires City.<br />

To date, the morphology of the larval (Zylber<br />

and Ostrowski de Nunez, 1999) and adult<br />

(Kritscher, 1974; Lunaschi, 1984) stages of this<br />

species is known only at the light microscopy<br />

level. Several investigators have described the<br />

tegumentary ultrastructure of adult aspidogastrids,<br />

such as Aspidogaster conchicola Baer,<br />

1826 (Halton and Lyness, 1971), and Cotylogaster<br />

occidentalis Nickerson, 1902 (Ip and<br />

Desser, 1984). The variability of tegumentary<br />

sensory structures of the cotylocidia of C. occidentalis<br />

(Fredericksen, 1978), the development<br />

and growth of the ventral adhesive disc of C.<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

249<br />

occidentalis and A. conchicola (Fredericksen,<br />

1980), and the sensory receptors of the larval<br />

stage of Lobatostoma manteri Rohde, 1973<br />

(Rohde and Watson, 1989a, b, 1992), and Multicotyle<br />

purvisi Dawes, 1941 (Rohde and Watson,<br />

1990b, c, d), were also studied. The aim of<br />

the present paper is to describe the tegumentary<br />

ultrastructure of juvenile and adult specimens of<br />

L. jungwirthi under scanning electron microscopy<br />

(SEM).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Parasites removed from the posterior intestine of C.<br />

facetum were identified as L. jungwirthi on the basis<br />

of the descriptions of Kritscher (1974) and Lunaschi<br />

(1984). Juvenile stages were found in the digestive<br />

gland of Heleobia parchappii (d'Orbigny, 1835) (Mollusca:<br />

Hydrobiidae), and adult specimens were obtained<br />

from the posterior intestine of C. facetum. Both<br />

host species were naturally parasitized by this aspidogastrid<br />

in Saladita Pond, Avellaneda District, Buenos<br />

Aires.<br />

The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and<br />

washed in distilled water. They were dehydrated by 2<br />

changes in 35, 50, 70, and 90% acetone for 15 min<br />

each and 3 changes in 100% acetone. The material was<br />

critical point dried, then mounted on stubs and coated<br />

for SEM observation (JEOL 100).<br />

The immature stage was named the postacetabular<br />

juvenile, following the nomenclature used by Fredericksen<br />

(1980). Two stages could be distinguished according<br />

to the development of the ventral adhesive<br />

disc: a recently formed postacetabular juvenile, with<br />

little differentiation of alveoli and the buccal opening<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


250 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

without oral lobules; and a preadult characterized by<br />

the presence of oral lobules and a distinct differentiation<br />

between alveoli, with the external morphology<br />

similar to that of the adult.<br />

Results<br />

Postacetabular juvenile<br />

In the recently formed postacetabular juvenile<br />

(Fig. 1), the oral disc characteristic of the adult<br />

phase is not observed. The mouth is a simple<br />

opening, without lobules (Fig. 2).<br />

The preadult shows a rough dorsal cone. Central<br />

and marginal alveoli, completely differentiated<br />

and varying in number, are observed on the<br />

ventral adhesive disc (Fig. 3). The posterior alveoli<br />

are less developed. Monociliate sensory<br />

papillae are found in the internal wall of the<br />

marginal alveoli (Fig. 4). The pores of the marginal<br />

bodies can be observed on the external<br />

border between the marginal alveoli. They are<br />

more developed in the anterior region of the<br />

ventral disc (Figs. 4, 5). The oral disc has 3 ventral<br />

and 2 dorsal lobules as in the adult, though<br />

they are not completely developed (Fig. 6).<br />

Monociliate sensory papillae and dome-shaped<br />

papillae are observed on the posterior surface of<br />

the oral disc. In this region, there is no regular<br />

distribution pattern of sensory structures (Fig.<br />

7).<br />

In the dorsal region of the neck, immediately<br />

behind the oral disc, there are pores and domeshaped<br />

papillae (Fig. 8). The monociliate papillae<br />

each have a cilium emerging from a bulbous<br />

surface.<br />

Adult<br />

The ventral adhesive disc has 16 marginal<br />

pairs and 32 central alveoli. The limit between<br />

both groups of central alveoli cannot be clearly<br />

observed (Fig. 9). The anterior region of the<br />

ventral adhesive disc shows a neat differentiation<br />

among the alveoli, with many sensory structures<br />

(Fig. 10). Completely differentiated pores<br />

of the marginal bodies are found between the<br />

marginal alveoli (Fig. 11). Monociliate papillae<br />

are located on the internal wall of each alveolus,<br />

arranged in 2 concentric circles. Two rows of<br />

dome-shaped papillae occur on the external edge<br />

of the marginal alveoli (Figs. 11-13). Monociliate<br />

and dome-shaped papillae (Fig. 14) are<br />

present on both sides of the transverse dividing<br />

line between the central alveoli. The excretory<br />

pore can be seen in the dorsal cone (Fig. 15).<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Two kinds of monociliate receptors (Fig. 16) and<br />

a single multiciliate structure (Fig. 17) were observed<br />

in the posterior dorsal region.<br />

Discussion<br />

The external morphology of the preadult of L.<br />

jungwirthi is very similar to that of the adult<br />

from C. facetum. Both juveniles and adults show<br />

a single excretory pore that ends at the channel<br />

formed by the union of the lateral ducts, as described<br />

by Lunaschi (1984). In agreement with<br />

the observations of Kritscher (1974) and Lunaschi<br />

(1984), the adult stage does not show a pore<br />

of Laurer's canal.<br />

Four types of sensory receptors were observed<br />

by SEM:<br />

MONOCILIATE PAPILLAE WITH A SHORT CILIUM:<br />

This type of receptor was irregularly distributed<br />

on the dorsal tegument, in the posterior surface<br />

of the oral lobules, and in the neck of juvenile<br />

L. jungwirthi. A denned pattern of distribution<br />

was observed only on the edges of the alveoli<br />

of the ventral adhesive disc. Rohde and Watson<br />

(1992) described this structure as a receptor<br />

formed by a cilium of intermediate length, being<br />

the most common type on the surface of L. manteri.<br />

Halton and Lyness (1971) described this<br />

type of papilla as the most frequent receptor on<br />

the body surface of A. conchicola. This receptor<br />

is more abundant in the oral lobules and in the<br />

central, marginal, and peripheral regions of the<br />

ventral adhesive disc of L. jungwirthi. This distribution<br />

agrees with that observed by Halton<br />

and Lyness (1971) in A. conchicola. The type of<br />

monociliate papilla found in L. jungwirthi may<br />

also correspond to that described by Fredericksen<br />

in the juvenile acetabulum of C. occidentalis<br />

and the simple uniciliate sensory structures observed<br />

in the cotylocidium larva of the same<br />

species (Fredericksen, 1978). Likewise, they are<br />

similar to type I sensilla found in adult C. occidentalis<br />

(Ip and Desser, 1984). Monociliate receptors<br />

were observed in Lobatostoma sp. (Rohde,<br />

1972), and the type I receptor has been observed<br />

in the tegument of posterior suckerlets of<br />

larval Multicotyle purvisi (Rohde and Watson,<br />

1990c). Monociliate tegumental receptors were<br />

also found in the buccal complex of Polylabroides<br />

australis (Murray, 1931) (Monogenea, Microcotylidae)<br />

(Rohde and Watson, 1995b) and in<br />

Udonella sp. (Platyhelminthes) (Rohde et al.,<br />

1989).<br />

MONOCILIATE PAPILLAE WITH A LONG CILIUM:


PAOLA AND DAMBORENEA—TEGUMENT OF LOBATOSTOMA JUNGWIRTHI 251<br />

Figures 1-5. Immature stages of Lobatostoma jungwirthi. 1. Postacetabular juvenile showing a simple<br />

buccal cavity (without lobules) and the ventral adhesive disc with poorly differentiated alveoli. 2. Frontal<br />

view of the buccal cavity of the postacetabular juvenile. 3. Alveoli of the ventral adhesive disc, oral lobules,<br />

and a rough posterior cone (dorsal) (black arrow) in latero-ventral view of the preadult. 4. Marginal<br />

alveoli of the ventral adhesive disc of the preadult, with sensory receptors of the monociliate type (white<br />

arrow), dome-shaped receptor (arrowhead), and the pores of the marginal glands not yet formed between<br />

the posterior alveoli (black arrow). 5. Pore of a marginal gland (^marginal body) of the preadult. Scales:<br />

1, 2 = 10 |xm; 3 = 50 fim; 4 = 25 |xm; 5 = 10 |xm.<br />

These were found only on the surface of the<br />

dorsal cone of the adult. This type of receptor<br />

may correspond to the receptor with a long cilium<br />

in the larva of L. manteri (Rohde and Watson,<br />

1992). It is also similar to the receptor type<br />

A described by Ip et al. (1982) in adult C. occidentalis.<br />

NONCILIATE DOME-SHAPED RECEPTORS: These<br />

were found on the posterior surface of the oral<br />

lobules and in the neck of the juvenile. They<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


252 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figures 6-10. Preadult and adult of Lobatostoma jungwirthi. 6. Frontal view of the preadult showing<br />

the 5 oral lobules. 7. Posterior surface of the oral lobules showing monociliate papillae (arrow) and domeshaped<br />

papillae arranged without defined pattern. 8. Neck region (ventral) with pores (white arrow) (in<br />

some cases with secretion) and dome-shaped papillae. 9. General ventral view of the adult. A clear differentiation<br />

of the longitudinal septum of the ventral adhesive disc cannot be observed. 10. Anterior end<br />

of the ventral adhesive disc showing dome-shaped and monociliate papillae (arrow) on the edge of the<br />

walls. Scales: 6 = 50 u,m; 7, 8 = 10 u,m; 9 = 25 u,m; 10 = 100 u,m.<br />

also were distributed on the borders between the<br />

alveoli of the adhesive disc of both juvenile and<br />

adult worms. Nonciliate sensory receptors were<br />

found by Rohde and Watson (1990b) in the external<br />

ventral tegument of the ventral suckerlets<br />

in M. purvisi. This structure may correspond to<br />

the nonciliate disc-shaped receptors or to the<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

nonciliate type with a long root described by<br />

Rohde and Watson (1992) in the larva of L.<br />

manteri. Nonciliate tegumental receptors were<br />

also found in the juvenile of Astramphilina elongata<br />

Johnston, 1931 (Monogenea) (Rohde and<br />

Watson, 1990a).<br />

A SINGLE MULTICILIATE RECEPTOR: This Was


PAOLA AND DAMBORENEA—TEGUMENT OF LOBATOSTOMA JUNGWIRTHI 253<br />

Figures 11-14. Ventral adhesive disc of adult Lobatostoma jungwirthi. 11. General view of the marginal<br />

alveoli on the marginal region at midbody level of the ventral adhesive disc. 12. Walls of the marginal<br />

alveoli showing 2 circles of dome-shaped papillae (arrow) and marginal gland pore. 13. Detail of the<br />

internal wall with almost 1 complete circle of monociliate papillae (arrows). 14. Ventral view: transverse<br />

septum with monociliate (black arrow) and nonciliate papillae (white arrow). Scales: 11 = 50 u,m; 12 =<br />

25 u,m; 13, 14 = 10 jrni.<br />

observed in the posterior third of the dorsal region<br />

of the adult of L. jungwirthi. Paired multiciliate<br />

receptor complexes with 10 short cilia<br />

were described by Rohde and Watson (1990d)<br />

to be located dorsally to the mouth cavity of<br />

larval M. purvisi, but our record is the first of a<br />

surface multiciliate receptor in aspidogastreans.<br />

However, multiciliate receptors are found in other<br />

groups of parasitic Platyhelminthes, i.e., in the<br />

taste organ of the buccal complex of Pricea tnultae<br />

Chauhan, 1945 (Monogenea, Gastrocotylidae).<br />

Rohde and Watson (1996) found these receptors<br />

concentrated in small pits. Additionally,<br />

multiciliate pit-receptors were observed in the<br />

buccal complex of Polylabroides australis (Rohde<br />

and Watson, 1995b) and in specimens of an<br />

undescribed species of Proseriata (Monocelididae:<br />

Minonidae) (Rohde and Watson, 1995a).<br />

Pores of the marginal bodies were observed<br />

on the external border between the marginal alveoli<br />

of juveniles and adults of L. jungwirthi.<br />

Kritscher (1974) found similar structures in the<br />

adult of the species. These pores were described<br />

as part of a glandular system in the adhesive disc<br />

of aspidogastrids (Rohde, 1994).<br />

Unlike the preadult, the youngest juvenile<br />

does not have oral lobules. A few less-developed<br />

alveoli were observed on the ventral adhesive<br />

disc. Two sensory receptors were found in the<br />

preadult of L. jungwirthi'. a ciliate receptor with<br />

a cilium of intermediate length, and a nonciliate<br />

dome-shaped receptor. These correspond to 2 of<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


254 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figures 15-17. Tegument of posterior dorsal region<br />

of Lobatostoma jungwirthi. 15. Excretory pore<br />

on the dorsal cone. 16. Type of monociliate papilla<br />

in the posterior cone region. 17. Multiciliate sensory<br />

receptor in the posterior dorsal region. Scales: 15,<br />

17 = 5 (Jim; 16 = 10 fjim.<br />

the 4 types of receptors described by Rohde and<br />

Watson (1992) in the larva of L. manteri. In addition,<br />

a third kind of receptor was observed that<br />

corresponds to the marginal body complex in the<br />

adult. However, the complex formed by the marginal<br />

bodies was observed as described for the<br />

adult, though the pores of these glands are not<br />

yet developed in the posterior region of the ventral<br />

adhesive disc in the preadult.<br />

The most common receptors in the preadult<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

and in the adult were the intermediate length<br />

monociliate and the nonciliate dome-shaped papillae.<br />

The monociliate structures may correspond<br />

to some of the types I to V of monociliate<br />

dome-shaped papillae described for adult L.<br />

manteri (Rohde and Watson, 1989a). The nonciliate<br />

dome-shaped papillae may be homologous<br />

to those of type VI A and B found in the<br />

adult of L. manteri. Both types of receptors were<br />

abundant over the entire body, arranged in circles<br />

on the ventral adhesive disc. Longer monociliate<br />

papillae and multiciliate receptors were<br />

found exclusively in the adult. Probably more<br />

than one type of nonciliate and monociliate papillae<br />

may exist. It would be interesting to study<br />

these papillae further under transmission electron<br />

microscopy.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Fredericksen, D. 1978. The fine structure and phylogenetic<br />

position of the cotylocidium larva of Cotylogaster<br />

occidentalis Nickerson, 1902 (Trematoda,<br />

Aspidogastrea). Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 64:<br />

961-966.<br />

. 1980. Development of Cotylogaster occidentalis<br />

Nickerson, 1902 (Trematoda, Aspidogastridae)<br />

with observations on the growth of the ventral<br />

adhesive disc in Aspidogaster conchicola<br />

Baer, 1827. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 66:973-984.<br />

Halton, D. W., and R. A. W. Lyness. 1971. Ultrastructure<br />

of the tegument and associated structures<br />

of Aspidogaster conchicola (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea).<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 57:1198-1210.<br />

Ip, H., and S. Desser. 1984. Transmission electron<br />

microscopy of the tegumentary sense organs of<br />

Cotylogaster occidentalis (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea).<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 70:563-575.<br />

, , and I. Weller. 1982. Cotylogaster<br />

occidentalis (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea): scanning<br />

electron microscopic observations of sense organs<br />

and associated surface structures. Transactions of<br />

the American Microscopical Society 101:253-<br />

261.<br />

Kritscher, V. E. 1974. Lobatostoma jungwirthi nov.<br />

spec. (Aspidocotylea, Aspidogastridae) aus Geophagus<br />

brachiurus Cope 1894 (Pise., Cichlidae).<br />

Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien<br />

78:381-384.<br />

Lunaschi, L. 1984. Helmintos parasites de peces de<br />

agua dulce de Argentina. II. Presencia de Lobatostoma<br />

jungwirthi Kritscher, 1974 (Trematoda:<br />

Aspidogastrea) en Cichlasoma facetum (Jenyns).<br />

Neotropica 20:187-193.<br />

Rohde, K. 1972. Sinnesrezeptoren von Lobatostoma<br />

n. sp. (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Die Naturwissenschaften<br />

59:1<strong>68</strong>-169.<br />

. 1994. The Aspidogastrea, especially Multicotyle<br />

purvisi Dawes, 1941. Advances in <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

10:78-151.<br />

, and N. Watson. 1989a. Sense receptors in


PAOLA AND DAMBORENEA—TEGUMENT OF LOBATOSTOMA JUNGWIRTH1 255<br />

Lobatostoma manteri (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea).<br />

International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 19:847-858.<br />

, and . 1989b. Ultrastructure of the marginal<br />

glands of Lobatostoma manteri (Trematoda,<br />

Aspidogastrea). Zoologischer Anzeiger 223:301-<br />

310.<br />

, and . 1990a. Ultrastructural studies of<br />

juvenile Austramphilina elongata: transmission<br />

electron microscopy of sensory receptors. <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

Research 76:336-342.<br />

, and . 1990b. Non-ciliate sensory receptors<br />

of larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda,<br />

Aspidogastrea). <strong>Parasitology</strong> Research 76:585-<br />

590.<br />

, and . 1990c. Uniciliate sensory receptors<br />

of larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea).<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> Research 76:591-596.<br />

, and . 1990d. Paired multiciliate receptor<br />

complexes in larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda,<br />

Aspidogastrea). <strong>Parasitology</strong> Research 76:<br />

597-601.<br />

, and . 1992. Sense receptors of larval<br />

Lobatostoma manteri (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea).<br />

International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 22:35-42.<br />

New Books Available<br />

-, and -. 1995a. Sensory receptors and<br />

epidermal structures of a meiofaunal turbellarian<br />

(Proseriata: Monocelididae: Minoninae). Australian<br />

Journal of Zoology 43:69-81.<br />

, and . 1995b. Ultrastructure of the buccal<br />

complex of Polylabroides australis (Monogenea,<br />

Polyopisthocotylea, Microcotylidae). International<br />

Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 25:307-318.<br />

, and . 1996. Ultrastructure of the buccal<br />

complex of Pricea multae (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea,<br />

Gastrocotylidae). Folia Parasitologica43:117-132.<br />

-, and F. Roubal. 1989. Ultrastructure<br />

of flame bulbs, sense receptors, tegument and<br />

sperm of Udonella (Platyhehninthes) and the phylogenetic<br />

position of the genus. Zoologischer Anzeiger<br />

222:143-157.<br />

Zylber, M. I., and M. Ostrowski de Nunez. 1999.<br />

Some aspects of the development of Lobatostoma<br />

jungwirthi Kritscher, 1974 (Aspidogastrea) in<br />

snails and cichlids fishes from Buenos Aires, Argentina.<br />

Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 94:<br />

31-35.<br />

The Flagellates: Unity, Diversity and Evolution. Barry S. C. Leadbeater and J. C. Green, Editors. 2000.<br />

The Systematics Association Special Volume Series 59, Taylor and Francis Limited, 29 West 35th Street,<br />

New York, NY 10001-2299. i-xi, 401 pp. ISBN 0-7484-0914-9. 7" X 9%", hard cover. Cost: US$130.00<br />

or Canadian $195.00, per copy plus shipping and handling. Abstract: 35 Authors have contributed to the<br />

17 chapters of this examination of the blood parasite group. "[The] book sets out to examine flagellates<br />

from a multidisciplinary standpoint. Of primary concern are the unifying structures, mechanisms and<br />

processes involved in flagellate biology. [It begins] with a review of the complex history of flagellate<br />

studies from the first use of microscopes ... to the present. [This is] followed by a series of chapters on<br />

common aspects of flagellates, . . . [including] a discussion of the problems inherent in being a flagellate,<br />

and reviews of the structure and function of the flagellum itself, the cytoskeleton, surface structures and<br />

sensory mechanisms. The diversity of flagellates is recognized in the next series of chapters, which include<br />

reviews of trophic strategies of both free-living and parasitic groups, and contributions on ecology, biogeography<br />

and population genetics. The final chapters . . . are concerned with the occurrence and loss of<br />

organelles, and other aspects of flagellate evolution and phylogeny."<br />

Interrelationships of the Platyhelminths. D. T. J. Littlewood and R. A. Bray, Editors. <strong>2001</strong>. The Systematics<br />

Association Special Volume Series 60, Taylor and Francis Limited, 29 West 35th Street, New<br />

York, NY 10001-2299. i-xii, 356 pp. ISBN 0-7484-0903-3. 8W X 11", hard cover. Cost: US$125.00 or<br />

Canadian $188.00, per copy plus shipping and handling. Abstract: This book's 27 chapters have been<br />

prepared by no fewer than 50 different expert contributors. It "has been split into four sections, rather<br />

dissimilar in length, that highlight the underlying goals [of bringing together workers from divergent areas<br />

to produce a work unified by modern approaches to phylogenetic analysis]. The first section takes a broader<br />

perspective on the status of the Platyhelminthes, its monophyly, placement in relation to other Metazoa<br />

and the nature of the basal taxa. The second section deals with the interrelationships of major free-living<br />

taxa, and the third on symbiotic and parasitic taxa. The final section encompasses contributions that view<br />

phylogeny and phylogenetic inference from the point of view of particular characters or techniques."<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 256-259<br />

Research Note<br />

Infectivity and <strong>Comparative</strong> Pathology of Echinostoma caproni,<br />

Echinostoma revolutum, and Echinostoma trivolvis (Trematoda) in the<br />

Domestic Chick<br />

SHANNON K. MULLIGAN,' JANE E. HUFFMAN,1-3 AND BERNARD FRIED2<br />

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Fish and Wildlife Microbiology Laboratory, East Stroudsburg University,<br />

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania 18301, U.S.A. (e-mail: jhuffman@po-box.esu.edu) and<br />

2 Department of Biology, Lafayette <strong>College</strong>, Easton, Pennsylvania 18042, U.S.A.<br />

ABSTRACT: We examined the clinical and pathological<br />

effects of 3 species of 37-collar-spined Echinostoma in<br />

domestic chicks. Three groups of 6 chicks each were<br />

infected with 50 metacercariae of either Echinostoma<br />

caproni, Echinostoma revolutum, or Echinostoma trivolvis.<br />

A group of 6 chicks was not infected and<br />

served as the uninfected controls. The chicks were<br />

necropsied on day 14 postinfection (PI). Infectivity and<br />

worm recovery rates for E. caproni were 100% and<br />

24%, respectively; for E. revolutum, they were 67%<br />

and 9%, respectively; and for E. trivolvis, they were<br />

83% and 15%, respectively. Echinostoma caproni was<br />

located in the middle third of the small intestine,<br />

whereas E. revolutum and E. trivolvis were located in<br />

the lower third, showing that niche selection of the<br />

different echinostomes varied. The echinostomes became<br />

ovigerous on days 10, 12, and 14 PI for E. caproni,<br />

E. trivolvis, and E. revolutum, respectively. Goblet<br />

cell proliferation in the host intestinal mucosa occurred<br />

in all infections.<br />

KEY WORDS: Echinostoma caproni, Echinostoma<br />

trivolvis, Echinostoma revolutum, Trematoda, domestic<br />

chicks, echinostomiasis, pathology, clinical effects,<br />

goblet cell, infectivity.<br />

Because echinostomiasis has produced significant<br />

mortality in ducks raised for commercial<br />

production in Europe and Asia (Kishore and<br />

Sinha, 1982), studies on experimental avian<br />

models to define the clinical and pathological<br />

features of the echinostomes are needed. Except<br />

for the experimental studies by Kim and Fried<br />

(1989) on gross and histopathological effects of<br />

Echinostoma caproni Richard, 1964, in an experimental<br />

avian model, such studies are lacking.<br />

In North America, avian hosts in the wild are<br />

often infected with Echinostoma trivolvis (Cort,<br />

1914) and Echinostoma revolutum (Froelich,<br />

1802) and species of Echinoparyphium (43- and<br />

3 Corresponding author.<br />

256<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

45-collar-spined echinostomes). Interestingly,<br />

the habitat of species of Echinoparyphium in the<br />

gut of birds is more anteriad than that of either<br />

E. trivolvis or E. revolutum. Echinostoma caproni<br />

also tends to localize more anteriad in the<br />

avian gut than either E. trivolvis or E. revolutum,<br />

and may serve as a useful model for Echinoparyphium<br />

infections. Therefore, information<br />

obtained from single infections of the 3 echinostome<br />

species examined in this study may be<br />

useful to wildlife studies of birds naturally infected<br />

with 3 or more species of echinostomes.<br />

The objectives of this study were to determine<br />

the following parameters in E. caproni', E. revolutum-,<br />

and E. trivolvis-infected birds: packed<br />

cell volume, hemoglobin concentration, and the<br />

relative splenic and hepatic weights of infected<br />

and noninfected domestic chicks. Parasite recovery<br />

and location were recorded from infected<br />

animals. We also examined tissues grossly and<br />

microscopically for evidence of pathological<br />

changes. Metacercarial cysts of E. caproni and<br />

E. trivolvis were obtained from the kidneys and<br />

pericardial sacs of laboratory-infected Biornphalaria<br />

glabrata (Say, 1816) snails (Huffman<br />

and Fried, 1990). Metacercarial cysts of E. revolutum<br />

were obtained from experimentally infected<br />

Lymnaea elodes (Say, 1821) snails (Sorenson<br />

et al., 1997). Twenty-four-d-old unfed<br />

domestic chicks were obtained from Reich Poultry<br />

Farm (Marietta, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.). All<br />

chicks were infected on day 1 prior to feeding.<br />

All animals were provided food (Country Egg<br />

Producer®, Agway Inc., Syracuse, New York,<br />

U.S.A.) and water ad libitum throughout the<br />

study. Group A (N = 6) was not infected and<br />

served as controls for the study. Chicks in<br />

Groups B-D each received 50 metacercarial<br />

cysts per os of either E. caproni (Group B, N =<br />

6), E. trivolvis (Group C, N = 6), or E. revolu-


RESEARCH NOTES 257<br />

Table 1. Mean worm recovery, mean percentage of recovery, percentage infected, and range of parasites<br />

recovered from chicks infected with Echinostoma caproni (Group B, TV = 6), Echinostoma trivolvis (Group<br />

C, N = 6), and Echinostoma revolutum (Group D, N = 6). Uninfected controls are represented by Group<br />

A (TV = 6).<br />

Group<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

No. cysts<br />

administered<br />

0<br />

50<br />

50<br />

50<br />

Mean no. worms<br />

recovered (range)<br />

0(0)<br />

12 (8-20)<br />

8 (0-21)<br />

5 (0-16)<br />

turn (Group D, /V = 6). Fecal samples were collected<br />

from each infected animal and checked<br />

for echinostome eggs daily, starting on day 8<br />

postinfection (PI). Approximately 1 g of feces<br />

was emulsified in distilled water and examined<br />

by light microscopy. Animals were weighed every<br />

2 d to monitor weight gain in the chicks.<br />

Blood samples were collected from the jugular<br />

veins of all chicks on day 14 PI into tubes<br />

containing 0.13 M sodium citrate, refrigerated,<br />

and processed within 24 hr. Packed cell volume<br />

and hemoglobin concentration were measured<br />

and recorded.<br />

All chicks (Groups A-D) were necropsied on<br />

day 14 PI. The small intestines, ceca, and cloacas<br />

were opened, and the location and number<br />

of echinostomes in the infected chicks were recorded.<br />

Hepatic, splenic, and intestinal tissue<br />

samples from all groups were fixed in 10% neutral<br />

buffered formalin for 48 hr and then dehydrated<br />

in a series of graded alcohols, cleared in<br />

xylene, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at<br />

6 (xm. At necropsy, the relative spleen and liver<br />

weights were determined.<br />

Infected and control tissues were stained in<br />

hematoxylin and eosin to evaluate histopathological<br />

effects. The occurrence of immunological<br />

cells from the infected and control tissues<br />

was also evaluated.<br />

Echinostome eggs were first seen in the fecal<br />

samples of all chicks from Group B on day 10,<br />

of 5 chicks from Group C on day 12, and of 4<br />

chicks from Group D on day 14 PI. All chicks<br />

exposed to E. caproni became infected. The<br />

number of worms recovered from their intestines<br />

ranged from 8 to 20, with a 24% recovery. The<br />

number of parasites recovered from Group C<br />

ranged from 0 to 21, a 15% recovery. Four of 6<br />

chicks (67%) exposed to E. revolutum cysts<br />

were infected, and the numbers of worms recov-<br />

Mean percentage<br />

of worms recovered<br />

0<br />

24<br />

15<br />

9<br />

Day of first<br />

appearance<br />

of eggs in feces<br />

0<br />

10<br />

12<br />

14<br />

Percentage of<br />

chicks infected<br />

0<br />

100<br />

83<br />

67<br />

ered ranged from 0 to 16, averaging 9%. These<br />

data are summarized in Table 1.<br />

The locations of the recovered worms from<br />

the infected chicks varied according to species.<br />

Echinostoma caproni was located in the midthird<br />

of the intestine, between the pylorus and<br />

the cloaca. Both E. trivolvis and E. revolutum<br />

were found toward the end of the intestine near<br />

the cloaca, but typically, E. revolutum was found<br />

more posteriad than E. trivolvis. No differences<br />

were noted between the number of parasites recovered<br />

per chick and the location of the worms.<br />

Echinostoma caproni tended to be in groups, but<br />

single worms were also found. Echinostoma revolutum<br />

and E. trivolvis were found singly and<br />

in groups.<br />

There was no significant weight loss (P ><br />

0.05) in chicks infected with any species of echinostome<br />

versus the uninfected (control) group.<br />

No differences were seen in liver or spleen<br />

weights of the infected chicks versus the control<br />

group, nor were there differences in liver or<br />

spleen weights between the infected groups.<br />

There were no notable differences in either the<br />

measured packed cell volume or hemoglobin<br />

concentration of the infected chicks compared<br />

with the uninfected chicks.<br />

Histologically, the liver and spleen tissues of<br />

Groups B-D showed no sign of immunological<br />

response or damage from the parasites. Damage<br />

to the intestinal villi of chicks infected with E.<br />

caproni was observed at the site of parasite attachment,<br />

villi were atrophic, and the circular<br />

musculature was hypertrophied with collagenlike<br />

fibers present. There was a proliferation of<br />

goblet cells. Hemorrhage occurred at the site of<br />

attachment. In chicks infected with E. trivolvis,<br />

damage to villi also occurred, with lymphocytic<br />

infiltration and goblet cell proliferation but with<br />

no hemorrhage noted. The response to E. revo-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


258 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

lutuin was less severe than with the other 2 parasites,<br />

but damage to the intestinal villi was observed.<br />

The presence of eggs in the host's feces is<br />

used for diagnosis of echinostomiasis. The time<br />

of deposition of eggs in the feces will vary<br />

among species (Huffman and Fried, 1990). In<br />

this study, E. caproni eggs were first noted in<br />

the chick's feces on day 10 PI, followed by E.<br />

trivolvis eggs on day 12 PI, and eggs of E. revolutum<br />

were found on day 14 PI.<br />

Infectivity in the chicks varied between the<br />

different Echinostoma species in this study. Factors<br />

such as age, size of cyst inoculum, pretreatment<br />

of metacercarial cysts, and host-gut emptying<br />

time influence the infectivity of E. trivolvis<br />

in experimentally infected chicks (Fried et al.,<br />

1997). Huffman and Fried (1990) reported E.<br />

trivolvis to have infectivity varying between 50<br />

and 69%. Fried (1984) reported 100% infectivity<br />

when preselected cysts were used. In this study,<br />

the E. trivolvis metacercariae administered to the<br />

chicks averaged 83% infectivity. Experimental<br />

infection with E. caproni cysts in this study resulted<br />

in 100% infectivity, agreeing with a previous<br />

study on this species conducted by Fried<br />

et al. (1988), which reported 97% infectivity.<br />

Echinostoma revolutum infectivity in this study<br />

(67%) is congruent with the report of Humphries<br />

et al. (1997) on the species in experimentally<br />

infected chicks (64%).<br />

Huffman and Fried (1990) summarized findings<br />

of average worm recoveries for E. trivolvis<br />

in experimentally infected chicks. These results<br />

varied between 6 and 21%. In this study, a mean<br />

of 15% of the flukes were recovered from chicks<br />

infected with E. trivolvis. Echinostoma caproni<br />

infections resulted in 24% worm recovery, concurring<br />

with the report by Fried et al. (1988) of<br />

28% worm recovery. An average of 9% of the<br />

administered cysts were recovered as adult<br />

worms in the E. revolutum infections. This differed<br />

from the 32% worm recovery of E. revolutum<br />

reported by Humphries et al. (1997) and<br />

the 21 % worm recovery reported for the same<br />

species of Echinostoma in domestic chicks<br />

(Fried et al., 1997).<br />

Echinostoma trivolvis distribution along the<br />

intestine of the domestic chick varied in numerous<br />

past studies (Huffman and Fried, 1990). On<br />

day 14 PI of our study, E. trivolvis was found<br />

mainly in the lower intestine near the cloaca.<br />

Echinostoma revolutum also was seen in the<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

posterior aspect of the intestine, congruent with<br />

results by Humphries et al. (1997) and Fried et<br />

al. (1997). Echinostoma caproni was found<br />

more anteriad than the other echinostomes in<br />

this study, mainly clustered in the midthird of<br />

the intestine.<br />

Weight gain, spleen and liver weights, packed<br />

cell volume, and hemoglobin concentrations of<br />

the infected chicks compared with the controls<br />

were not affected by the presence of any of the<br />

echinostomes. As noted in previous studies, liver<br />

or spleen tissue damage did not occur. Huffman,<br />

Iglesias, and Fried (1986) noted increased pathology<br />

in golden hamsters infected with echinostomes<br />

and increased pathology when greater<br />

numbers of parasites infected the host. Infectivity<br />

in the present study was less compared with<br />

other studies. In the study by Fried and Wilson<br />

(1981), high worm burdens caused a decrease in<br />

chick weight. Changes in blood parameters and<br />

tissue damage (Huffman, Michos, and Fried,<br />

1986) have been noted in rodent hosts infected<br />

with echinostomes.<br />

In conclusion, there are differences in the<br />

host—parasite relationships for each of the echinostomes<br />

used in this study. An understanding<br />

of these differences will contribute to better understanding<br />

the biosystematics of the 37-collarspined<br />

echinostome group. Some of these differences<br />

may help elucidate species distinctions<br />

when echinostomes are recovered from naturally<br />

infected hosts in both single and multiple infections.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Fried, B. 1984. Infectivity, growth, and development<br />

of Echinostoma revolutum (Trematoda) in the domestic<br />

chick. Journal of Helminthology 58:241-<br />

244.<br />

, R. A. Donovick, and S. Emili. 1988. Infectivity,<br />

growth, and development of Echinostoma<br />

liei (Trematoda) in the domestic chick. International<br />

Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 18:413-414.<br />

, T. J. Mueller, and B. A. Frazer. 1997. Observations<br />

of Echinostoma revolutum and Echinostoma<br />

trivolvis in single and concurrent infections<br />

in domestic chicks. International Journal for<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 27:1319-1322.<br />

-, and B. D. Wilson. 1981. Decrease in body<br />

weight of domestic chicks infected with Echinostoma<br />

revolutum (Trematoda) or Zygocotyle lunata<br />

(Trematoda). Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 48:97-98.<br />

Huffman, J. E., and B. Fried. 1990. Echinostoma and<br />

echinostomiasis. Advances in <strong>Parasitology</strong> 29:<br />

215-269.


, D. Iglesias, and B. Fried. 1986. Echinostoma<br />

revolutum pathology of intestinal infections of the<br />

golden hamster. International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

18:873-874.<br />

-, C. Michos, and B. Fried. 1986. Clinical and<br />

pathological effects of Echinostoma trivolvis (Digenea:<br />

Echinostomatidae) in the golden hamster,<br />

Mesocricetus auratus. <strong>Parasitology</strong> 93:505=515.<br />

Humphries, J. E., A. Reddy, and B. Fried. 1997.<br />

Infectivity and growth of Echinostoma revolutum<br />

(Froelich, 1802) in the domestic chick. International<br />

Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 27:129-130.<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 259-261<br />

Research Note<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 259<br />

Kim, J., and B. Fried. 1989. Pathological effects of<br />

Echinostoma caproni (Trematoda) in the domestic<br />

chick. Journal of Helminthology 63:227-230.<br />

Kishore, N., and D. P. Sinha. 1982. Observations of<br />

Echinostoma revolutum infection in the rectum of<br />

domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticiis).<br />

Agricultural Science Digest 2:57-60.<br />

Sorenson, R. E., I. Kanev, B. Fried, and D. Minchella.<br />

1997. The occurrence and identification of<br />

Echinostoma revolutum from North American<br />

Lymnaea elodes snails. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:<br />

169-170.<br />

Excystation and Distribution of Metacercariae of Echinostoma<br />

caproni in ICR Mice<br />

BERNARD FRIED,' ADITYA REDDY, AND CAROLINE D. BALFOUR<br />

Department of Biology, Lafayette <strong>College</strong>, Easton, Pennsylvania 18042, U.S.A. (e-mail: friedb@lafayette.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: In vivo excystation and distribution of<br />

newly excysted metacercariae of Echinostoma caproni<br />

Richard, 1964, were studied in 16 ICR mice, each fed<br />

400 metacercarial cysts and necropsied at various intervals<br />

from 1 to 24 hr postinfection (p.i.). Excysted<br />

metacercariae were recovered from the stomach and<br />

intestine (duodenum and jejunum) at 1 hr p.i. In vivo<br />

excystation in this echinostome occurred in the stomach<br />

and the anterior part of the small intestine. Encysted<br />

metacercariae were recovered from the stomach,<br />

small intestine, and cecum-large intestine at 1 and<br />

2 hr p.i. Recovery of encysted metacercariae was rare<br />

at 3 hr and nil at 4 and 24 hr. At 3, 4, and 24 hr, the<br />

encysted metacercariae had either excysted or were<br />

voided. Excysted metacercariae were widely scattered<br />

throughout the small intestine at all times, with about<br />

75% located in segments 1, 2, and 3 (duodenal-jejunum<br />

zone) of the small intestine at 3, 4, and 24 hr p.i.<br />

KEY WORDS: trematodes, in vivo excystation, Echinostoma<br />

caproni, metacercariae, ICR mice.<br />

Although information is available (Fried and<br />

Emili, 1988; Fried, 1994; Ursone and Fried,<br />

1995) on chemical excystation of metacercarial<br />

cysts of Echinostoma caproni Richard, 1964,<br />

there are no studies on in vivo excystation of<br />

this echinostome in mice. Metacercariae of most<br />

intestinal digeneans excyst in the vertebrate<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

small intestine, but details on in vivo excystation<br />

and the microhabitat where excystation occurs<br />

are poorly understood in the Digenea. Simonsen<br />

et al. (1989) stated that E. caproni metacercarial<br />

cysts excysted in the duodenum of the mouse<br />

and the newly excysted metacercariae migrated<br />

to the posterior third of the small intestine. However,<br />

Simonsen et al. did not do experimental<br />

studies on in vivo excystation of the metacercarial<br />

cyst.<br />

The purpose of this research was to examine<br />

in vivo excystation of E. caproni metacercariae<br />

at various times up to 24 hr postinfection (p.i.)<br />

and to determine the distribution of newly excysted<br />

metacercariae in ICR mice. The ICR<br />

mouse is widely used as a laboratory host for<br />

this echinostome (see review in Fried and Huffman,<br />

1996). The only previous study that has<br />

reported distribution of preovigerous worms of<br />

E. caproni is that of Manger and Fried (1993),<br />

who showed that, by 2 days p.i., more than 90%<br />

of the juvenile worms were located in segment<br />

3 posterior to the pylorus (equivalent to the jejunum)<br />

in the ICR mouse.<br />

Metacercarial cysts of E. caproni were removed<br />

from the pericardial cavity and kidney of<br />

experimentally infected Biomphalaria glabrata<br />

Say, 1818, snails and fed (400 cysts/mouse) via<br />

stomach tube to 16 6-8-wk old, outbred, female<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


260 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Table 1. Percentage of encysted (EN) and excysted (EX) metacercariae (M) of Echinostoma caproni from<br />

16 mice, each fed 400 cysts.<br />

Time<br />

postinfection<br />

Group* (hr)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

24<br />

M<br />

EN<br />

EX<br />

EN<br />

EX<br />

EN<br />

EX<br />

EN<br />

EX<br />

EN<br />

EX<br />

Stomach<br />

0.9<br />

1.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1.5<br />

1.9<br />

0.5<br />

2.4<br />

0<br />

2.6<br />

0<br />

2.3<br />

0<br />

1.6<br />

Segments of the small intestine<br />

2<br />

1.3<br />

1.6<br />

0.5<br />

1.8<br />

0.1<br />

2.9<br />

0<br />

2.6<br />

0<br />

2.7<br />

3<br />

0.7<br />

2.5<br />

0.4<br />

1.3<br />

0<br />

3.1<br />

0<br />

2.9<br />

0<br />

3.3<br />

* Groups A and B each with 2 mice; Groups C, D, and E each with 4 mice.<br />

ICR mice (Hosier and Fried, 1991). Preliminary<br />

studies on 2 mice each fed 100 metacercarial<br />

cysts and necropsied at 1 and 2 hr p.i. showed<br />

metacercarial recoveries (combined data of excysted<br />

and encysted metacercariae) of about<br />

10% at necropsy. The preliminary work showed<br />

the inherent difficulties in recovering these small<br />

organisms (excysted metacercariae measuring<br />

about 250 (xm in length and encysted metacercariae<br />

about 150 (Jim in diameter) from the intestinal<br />

tract. Moreover, the color, size, and motility<br />

of the villi made it difficult to distinguish<br />

them from excysted metacercariae. Empty cysts<br />

were also seen at necropsy but were not counted.<br />

On the basis of our experiences with the preliminary<br />

study, we increased the cyst inoculum to<br />

400 per host in the study reported herein.<br />

Groups of 2 mice each were necropsied at 1<br />

and 2 hr p.i. (Groups A and B, respectively; Table<br />

1), and groups of 4 mice each were necropsied<br />

at 3, 4, and 24 hr p.i. (Groups C, D, and E,<br />

respectively; Table 1). The numbers of encysted<br />

and excysted metacercariae in the stomach, in 5<br />

intestinal segments of equal length (approximately<br />

10 cm each), beginning at the pylorus<br />

and ending at the ileocecal valve, and in the<br />

combined cecum—large intestine were counted.<br />

Empty cysts were seen but not counted in hosts<br />

necropsied at 1 and 2 hr p.i. The numbers were<br />

converted to percentages and the information is<br />

presented in Table 1. In Group A, the greatest<br />

percentage of encysted metacercariae was in<br />

segment 1 of the small intestine, and excysted<br />

metacercariae were recovered as far posteriad as<br />

segment 4 of the small intestine. Most of the<br />

4<br />

0.4<br />

0.5<br />

0.5<br />

1.7<br />

0.1<br />

2.0<br />

0<br />

1.7<br />

0<br />

2.2<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

5<br />

0.4<br />

0<br />

0.2<br />

0.6<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

0<br />

0.4<br />

0<br />

0.5<br />

Cecumlarge<br />

intestine<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Total<br />

5.4<br />

7.5<br />

2.5<br />

8.6<br />

0.4<br />

11.4<br />

0<br />

10.1<br />

0<br />

10.3<br />

excysted metacercariae recovered at 1 hr p.i.<br />

were located in segment 3. Some excysted metacercariae<br />

were in the stomach at 1 hr and were<br />

alive and active. These organisms either had excysted<br />

in the stomach or, possibly, could have<br />

excysted in the small intestine and migrated anteriad<br />

to the stomach. In Group A, the finding<br />

of most excysted metacercariae in segments 1,<br />

2, and 3 of the small intestine (duodenum-jejunum<br />

region) provides support for claims that in<br />

vivo excystation takes place in the anterior part<br />

of the small intestine. This finding supports the<br />

statement of Simonsen et al. (1989) referenced<br />

above.<br />

With time, the ratio of encysted to excysted<br />

metacercariae declined (see last column in Table<br />

1), and by 4 hr p.i., encysted metacercariae were<br />

not found. These findings suggest that by 4 hr<br />

p.i. most of the encysted metacercariae had excysted<br />

or were voided. The idea of metacercariae<br />

being voided by 4 hr p.i. is consistent with<br />

the fact that the usual transit time for ingested<br />

food in the mouse digestive tract is 4 hr (Barrachina<br />

et al., 1997). Fecal examinations to determine<br />

the possible presence of excysted or encysted<br />

metacercariae in the stool were not made.<br />

About 75% of the excysted metacercariae in<br />

Groups C, D, and E were located in segments 1,<br />

2, and 3. Hence, newly excysted juveniles, up to<br />

at least 24 hr p.i., are more dispersed in the gut<br />

than are older worms. Manger and Fried (1993)<br />

showed that by day 2 p.i. more than 90% juvenile<br />

E. caproni were localized in segment 3 (the<br />

jejunum), and by day 4 and beyond, worms<br />

tended to migrate even more posteriad, with


most being found in segment 4 (jejunum-ileum<br />

zone).<br />

In conclusion, this study provides information<br />

on in vivo excystation of E. caproni metacercariae<br />

during the first day after infection in ICR<br />

mice. The in vivo studies show that most metacercariae<br />

excyst in the duodenum and migrate to<br />

the jejunum to become juveniles. The distribution<br />

of excysted metacercariae is quite variable<br />

during the first 24 hr of infection. The low recovery<br />

rates of organisms (only about 10%<br />

when mice received 100 cysts, and from 10.1%<br />

to 12.9% when mice received 400 cysts) attest<br />

to the fact that these organisms are difficult to<br />

detect in the first 24 hr after excystation. Perhaps<br />

some of these missing larvae are in sites other<br />

than the intestinal lumen, e.g., ducts or crypts<br />

associated with the intestine or other unknown<br />

locations. Manger and Fried (1993) did not report<br />

recovery percentages of juvenile worms of<br />

E. caproni from ICR mice at 2 d p.i. They did<br />

report a wide range of worm recoveries (18 to<br />

95%) from 2 to 8 d p.i. The fact that their recoveries<br />

were higher than the 10—13% in this<br />

study would suggest that some of the newly excysted<br />

metacercariae had been overlooked or<br />

had reemerged from extra-luminal sites.<br />

Support for this work was provided in part by<br />

funds from the Kreider Professorship to Dr. Ber-<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 261-264<br />

Research Note<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 261<br />

nard Fried. We thank Ms. Vivienne R. Felix for<br />

typing the manuscript.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Barrachina, M. D., V. Martinez, J. Y. Wei, and Y.<br />

Tache. 1997. Leptin-induced decrease in food intake<br />

is not associated with changes in gastric emptying<br />

in lean mice. American Journal of Physiology<br />

272:1007-1011.<br />

Fried, B. 1994. Metacercarial excystment of trematodes.<br />

Advances in <strong>Parasitology</strong> 33:91-144.<br />

, and S. Emili. 1988. Excystation in vitro of<br />

Echinostoma liei and E. revolutum (Trematoda)<br />

metacercariae. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 74:98-102.<br />

, and J. E. Huffman. 1996. The biology of the<br />

intestinal trematode Echinostoma caproni. Advances<br />

in <strong>Parasitology</strong> 38:311-3<strong>68</strong>.<br />

Hosier, D. W., and B. Fried. 1991. Infectivity,<br />

growth, and distribution of Echinostoma caproni<br />

(Trematoda) in the ICR mouse. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

77:640-642.<br />

Manger, P. M., Jr., and B. Fried. 1993. Infectivity,<br />

growth and distribution of preovigerous adults of<br />

Echinostoma caproni in ICR mice. Journal of Helminthology<br />

67:158-160.<br />

Simonsen, P. E., E. Bindseil, and M. K0ie. 1989.<br />

Echinostoma caproni in mice: studies on the attachment<br />

site of an intestinal trematode. International<br />

Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 19:561-566.<br />

Ursone, R. L., and B. Fried. 1995. Light microscopic<br />

observations of Echinostoma caproni metacercariae<br />

during in vitro excystation. Journal of Helminthology<br />

69:253-257.<br />

Helminths Collected from Rattus spp. in Bac Ninh Province, Vietnam<br />

XUAN-DA PHAM,1'5 Cffl-LlEM TRAN,2 and HIDEO HASEGAWA3'4<br />

1 Department of Infectious Disease Control, Oita Medical University, Hasama, Oita 879-5593, Japan<br />

(e-mail: DA@oita-med.ac.jp),<br />

2 Ministry of Health, 138A Giang Vo, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam, and<br />

3 Department of Biology, Oita Medical University, Hasama, Oita 879-5593, Japan<br />

(e-mail: hasegawa@oita-med.ac.jp)<br />

ABSTRACT: Helminthological examination was made<br />

on 35 rats (12 Rattus tanezumi, 14 Rattus argentiventer,<br />

and 9 Rattus losea) captured in 3 different habitats,<br />

i.e., residential, paddy field, and hilly areas, all in Bac<br />

Ninh Province, northern Vietnam. One trematode (Notocotylus<br />

sp.), 2 cestodes (Raillietina celebensis, Hymenolepis<br />

diminuta), 6 nematodes (Strongyloides ratti,<br />

Strongyloides venezuelensis, Nippostrongylus brasi-<br />

liensis, Orientostrongylus cf. tenorai, Syphacia muris,<br />

Gongylonema neoplasticum), and 1 acanthocephalan<br />

(Moniliformis monilifortnis) were collected. The species<br />

composition and prevalence of these helminths<br />

differed among the habitats, apparently because of biological<br />

characters of the parasites and environmental<br />

conditions of the localities.<br />

KEY WORDS: helminths, rat, Rattus tanezumi, Rattus<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


262 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

argentiventer, Rattus losea, Trematoda, Notocotylus<br />

sp., Cestoda, Raillietina celebensis, Hymenolepis diminuta,<br />

Nematoda, Strongyloides ratti, Strongyloides venezuelensis,<br />

Nippostrongyhis brasiliensis, Orientostrongylus<br />

cf. tenorai, Syphacia muris, Gongylonema<br />

neoplasticum, Acanthoccphala, Moniliformis moniliformis,<br />

prevalence, ecology, Vietnam.<br />

There have been only limited reports on the<br />

parasites of rats from Vietnam (see Segal et al.,<br />

19<strong>68</strong>). Most previous surveys were carried out<br />

before 1970, and no data are available to assess<br />

the parasitological condition of rats at the present<br />

time. In 1999, we had an opportunity to<br />

examine helminths collected from rats trapped<br />

near Hanoi, northern Vietnam. Ten helminth<br />

species, including some of taxonomic and ecological<br />

interest, were found as recorded herein.<br />

Rats were collected with live traps in 3 different<br />

habitats, i.e., residential areas, paddy<br />

fields, and low hilly areas, all in Bac Ninh Province,<br />

Vietnam, in December 1999. They were<br />

anesthetized with ether and killed. Their viscera<br />

were fixed in 10% formalin solution and transported<br />

to the Oita Medical University, Oita, Japan.<br />

Their heads were also fixed in 10% formalin<br />

for species identification on the basis of<br />

skull morphology. On examination, the lung,<br />

heart, and liver were minced in water with fine<br />

forceps under a stereomicroscope to detect helminths<br />

parasitic in these organs. Then, the alimentary<br />

canal was cut open and washed on a<br />

stainless steel sieve with aperture size of 0.1<br />

mm. The residues left on the sieve were transferred<br />

to a Petri dish and observed under a stereomicroscope<br />

to recover helminths. The stomach<br />

wall was observed under a stereomicroscope<br />

with transillumination to find nematodes dwelling<br />

in the wall.<br />

Helminths collected were cleared in a glycerol-alcohol<br />

solution by evaporating alcohol<br />

and mounted on glass slides with a 50% glycerol<br />

solution. Some trematodes were stained<br />

with alum carmine or Heidenhain's iron hematoxylin,<br />

dehydrated in an alcohol series<br />

with ascending concentration, cleared in xylene<br />

and creosote, and mounted with Canada<br />

balsam. Voucher parasite specimens and host<br />

4 Corresponding author.<br />

5 Present address: Department of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Hanoi<br />

Medical <strong>College</strong>, 1st Ton That Tung, Dong Da,<br />

Hanoi, Vietnam (e-mail: thuda<strong>2001</strong>@yahoo.com).<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

skulls are deposited in the National Science<br />

Museum, Tokyo (NSMT), Japan, with the accession<br />

numbers NSMT-P1 5073-5076,<br />

NSMT-As 2944-2953, and NSMT-M 31601-<br />

31606.<br />

The 35 rats examined included 12 black rats<br />

Rattus tanezumi Temminck, 1844 ( = so-called<br />

Asian-type Rattus rattus Linnaeus, 1758; cf.<br />

Musser and Carleton (1993)), 14 ricefield rats<br />

Rattus argentiventer (Robinson and Kloss,<br />

1916), and 9 lesser ricefield rats Rattus losea<br />

(Swinhoe, 1871). Helminths were not detected<br />

from the lung and liver, although Angiostrongylus<br />

cantonensis (Chen, 1935) and Calodium<br />

hepaticum (Bancroft, 1893) (syn. Capillaria<br />

hepatica (Bancroft, 1893)) have been previously<br />

recorded from those organs of rats in<br />

Vietnam (cf. Segal et al., 19<strong>68</strong>). Meanwhile,<br />

10 helminth species, comprising 1 trematode,<br />

2 cestodes, 6 nematodes, and 1 acanthocephalan,<br />

were collected from the alimentary canal<br />

(Table 1). Most of these helminths are common<br />

rat parasites, being widely distributed in<br />

the surrounding countries (Myers and Kuntz,<br />

1964, 1969; Ow-Yang, 1971; Singh and<br />

Cheong, 1971; Wiroreno, 1978; Sinniah, 1979;<br />

Ow-Yang and Durette-Desset, 1983; Hasegawa,<br />

1990; Hasegawa et al., 1992, 1994; Hasegawa<br />

and Syafruddin, 1995). Orientostrongylus<br />

sp. was found only in 2 rats from the<br />

paddy fields. Because no males were found,<br />

species identification is withheld, although it<br />

is strongly suggested to be Orientostrongylus<br />

tenorai Durette-Desset, 1970, a common rat<br />

parasite widely distributed from Afghanistan<br />

to Taiwan (Durette-Desset, 1970; Ow-Yang<br />

and Durette-Desset, 1983; Ohbayashi and Kamiya,<br />

1980; Hasegawa, 1990; Hasegawa et al.,<br />

1994; Hasegawa and Syafruddin, 1995).<br />

Among the parasites recovered, 2 cestodes,<br />

Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) and<br />

Raillietina celebensis (Janicki, 1902); 1 nematode,<br />

Gongylonema neoplasticum (Fibiger et<br />

Ditlevsen, 1914); and 1 acanthocephalan, Moniliformis<br />

monilifonnis (Bremser, 1811) have<br />

been recorded previously from Vietnamese<br />

rats (Segal et al., 19<strong>68</strong>). Notocotylus sp. is of<br />

special interest because trematodes of this genus<br />

have been reported only rarely from rats<br />

of the subfamily Murinae, although some<br />

members have often been recorded from voles<br />

of the subfamily Arvicolinae (cf. Yamaguti,


RESEARCH NOTES 263<br />

Table 1. Helminthic infections among rats collected from 3 different habitats in Bac Ninh Province,<br />

Vietnam.<br />

Rattus species:<br />

No. rats examined:<br />

Head and trunk length (cm) range:<br />

(Mean):<br />

Trematoda<br />

Notocotylus sp.<br />

Cestoda<br />

Raillietina celebensis<br />

Hymenolepis diminuta<br />

Nematoda<br />

Strongyloides spp.f<br />

Nippostrongylus brasiliensis<br />

Orientostrongylus cf. tenorai<br />

Syphacia murls<br />

Gongylonema neoplasticum<br />

Acanthocephala<br />

Moniliformis monilifonnis<br />

Habitat: Residential<br />

R. tanezumi<br />

10<br />

14-19<br />

(16.7)<br />

—<br />

2 (20)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

1 (10)<br />

—<br />

6 (60)<br />

4 (40)<br />

1 (10)<br />

* No. rats infected (prevalence in parentheses).<br />

t Strongyloides ratti and/or S. venezuelensis.<br />

1971). The morphological characteristics of<br />

Notocotylus sp. are summarized below.<br />

DESCRIPTION: Notocotylus sp. Trematoda:<br />

Notocotylidae. Body foliate, attenuated anteriorly,<br />

1.39-2.64 mm long by 0.57-0.91 mm<br />

wide; 3 longitudinal rows of prominent ventral<br />

glands present on ventral surface, each row<br />

composed of 12 to 14 glands; oral sucker terminal;<br />

esophagus short; ceca diverticulated,<br />

terminating just posterior to ovary; testes<br />

lobed, located lateral to terminal portion of<br />

ceca; genital pore immediately posterior to<br />

oral sucker; ovary intertesticular, lobed; vitellaria<br />

in lateral fields, extending from middle<br />

of body to anterior margins of testes; metraterm<br />

and cirrus sac almost equal in length; egg<br />

ellipsoidal, 22-24 by 11-12 |xm, with polar<br />

filaments, 2 to 3 times longer than egg length.<br />

HOSTS: Rattus argentiventer (Robinson et<br />

Kloss, 1916) and Rattus losea (Swinhoe, 1871).<br />

SITE IN HOSTS: Intestine.<br />

LOCALITY: Paddy field and low hilly area in<br />

Bac Ninh Province (21°7'N; 105°59'E), Vietnam.<br />

SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: National Science Museum,<br />

Tokyo, NSMT-P1 5073, 5074.<br />

REMARKS: In the neighboring areas of Vietnam,<br />

only 2 Notocotylus species have been<br />

recorded from mammals: Notocotylus mamii<br />

Hsu, 1954, of which adults were experimen-<br />

R. argentiventer<br />

1<br />

12-20<br />

(15.4)<br />

1 (14%)*<br />

—<br />

1 (14)<br />

2 (29)<br />

6 (86)<br />

1 (14)<br />

4 (57)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

Paddy field Low hilly area<br />

R. losea<br />

1<br />

10-18<br />

(14.2)<br />

2 (29)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

3 (43)<br />

3 (43)<br />

1 (14)<br />

3 (43)<br />

—<br />

R. tanezumi<br />

2<br />

17-17.5<br />

(17.3)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

—<br />

—<br />

2 (100)<br />

—<br />

2 (100)<br />

—<br />

R. argentiventer<br />

1<br />

16-21<br />

(17.5)<br />

3 (43)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

1 (14)<br />

7 (100)<br />

—<br />

2 (29)<br />

—<br />

•<br />

R. losea<br />

2<br />

13-14<br />

(13.5)<br />

1 (50)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

—<br />

2 (100)<br />

—<br />

2 (100)<br />

—<br />

tally raised in rabbits, and Notocotylus ratti<br />

Yie, Qiu, Weng, Li, and Li, 1956, the only<br />

representative exclusively known from Rattus,<br />

both from southern China (Hsu, 1954; Yie et<br />

al., 1956). Notocotylus mamii resembles the<br />

present form in the position of the genital pore<br />

but is readily distinguished in that the ceca are<br />

simple and the eggs have extremely elongated<br />

filaments, often more than 10 times longer<br />

than the egg length (Hsu, 1954, 1957). Although<br />

N. ratti resembles the present species<br />

in having diverticulated ceca, it is clearly distinguished<br />

by possessing a genital pore located<br />

posterior to the cecal bifurcation and only 5 to<br />

6 ventral glands in the median row (Yie et al.,<br />

1956). Presumably, the present worms represent<br />

a new species. However, proposal of a<br />

new taxon is withheld because the present<br />

worms were contracted by unsuitable fixation,<br />

obscuring some of the key structures.<br />

The species composition and prevalence of<br />

the rat helminths differed greatly among the<br />

habitats surveyed. Only Nippostrongylus brasiliensis<br />

(Travassos, 1914) and Syphacia muris<br />

(Yamaguti, 1935) were common to all 3 habitats.<br />

Raillietina celebensis, G. neoplasticum,<br />

and M. moniliformis were collected only from<br />

the rats captured around houses. Strongyloidid<br />

and trematode infections were not found in the<br />

rats captured around houses. Notocotylus sp.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />


264 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

was recovered from the rats collected in the<br />

paddy and hilly areas but not from those in the<br />

residential area.<br />

The differences in species composition and<br />

prevalence among the habitats could be explained<br />

by the biological characters of each<br />

helminth and by the environmental conditions.<br />

Because members of Notocotylus require a<br />

freshwater snail as the intermediate host (cf.<br />

Yamaguti, 1975), their presence in the paddy<br />

fields is reasonable. The hilly area surveyed in<br />

the present study contained many small ponds<br />

that might provide habitats for the snails. Also<br />

not unexpected is that G. neoplasticum and M.<br />

moniliformis were found only in the rats captured<br />

around the houses, because their intermediate<br />

hosts, usually cockroaches, are abundant<br />

in the residential areas. Nippostrongylus<br />

brasiliensis and Strongyloides spp. require<br />

moist soil for their embryonic and larval development<br />

and transmission. Their low prevalence<br />

or absence in the residential areas<br />

seems to be due to the dried soil around the<br />

houses in that season. Syphacia muris, the<br />

only helminth with relatively stable prevalence<br />

among the habitats, has a quite simple<br />

life cycle passed nearly entirely within the<br />

body of the host, and hence, its prevalence is<br />

less affected by the external environment.<br />

We are deeply indebted to Dr. G. G. Musser,<br />

American Museum of Natural History, for his<br />

kindness in identifying the rat species and to<br />

Dr. S. Kamegai, Meguro Parasitological Museum,<br />

for his kind consultation on Notocotylus<br />

sp.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Durette-Desset, M. C. 1970. Caracteres primitifs de<br />

certains Nematodes Heligmosomes parasites de<br />

Murides et de Cricetides orientaux. Definition<br />


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 265-269<br />

Research Note<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 265<br />

Nematodes of the Tribe Cyathostominea (Strongylidae) Collected<br />

from Horses in Scotland<br />

J. RALPH LlCHTENFELS,1'5 AlOBHINN MCDONNELL,2 SANDY LOVE,3 AND<br />

JACQUELINE B. MATTHEWS4<br />

1 Biosystematics Unit, Parasite Biology, Epidemiology, and Systematics Laboratory, The Henry A. Wallace<br />

Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />

Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350, U.S.A. (rlichten@anri.barc.usda.gov),<br />

2 Department of Veterinary <strong>Parasitology</strong>, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road,<br />

Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom,<br />

3 Weipers Centre for Equine Welfare, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road,<br />

Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom (S.Love@vet.gla.ac.uk), and<br />

4 Division of Equine Studies, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science and Animal Husbandry, Faculty of<br />

Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst CH64 7TE, United Kingdom (J.B.Matthews@liv.ac.uk)<br />

ABSTRACT: Nematodes of the tribe Cyathostominea<br />

are important parasites of horses. They live in large<br />

numbers in the large intestine and include over 50 species<br />

worldwide. This report describes an enumeration<br />

study of species found in a small population of horses<br />

in western Scotland. As found previously in a wide<br />

range of geographic regions, the 7 most abundant species<br />

of Cyathostominea, of the 18 recorded in this<br />

study, accounted for over 94% of the total population.<br />

One major exception to the results of previous studies<br />

was the presence of the most common species in this<br />

population, Cylicocyclus ashworthi. This species has<br />

not been recorded in the U.K. since its original description<br />

in 1924 and is morphologically very similar<br />

to another member of the same genus, Cylicocyclus<br />

nassatus, from which it has not been distinguished in<br />

previous studies in this geographical region. A rare<br />

species, Tridentoinfundibulum gobi, was found in low<br />

numbers in 3 of 4 horses.<br />

KEY WORDS: Nematoda, Cyathostominea, species<br />

survey, prevalence, intensity, horses, morphological<br />

identification, Scotland.<br />

Nematodes of the tribe Cyathostominea are<br />

the most common helminth parasites of the<br />

horse and are ubiquitous in all breeds. Members<br />

of the tribe Cyathostominea (Strongylidae) have<br />

been commonly referred to as small strongyles,<br />

cyathostomins (for the tribe), or cyathostomes<br />

(for the genus Cyathostomum Molin, 1861)<br />

(Hartwich, 1986). However, in order to avoid<br />

possible confusion with members of the nema-<br />

5 Corresponding author.<br />

tode genus Cyathostoma Blanchard, 1849 (Syngamidae),<br />

which are sometimes referred to as<br />

cyathostomes, we will use the common name<br />

cyathostomins to refer to the 51 species included<br />

in the tribe Cyathostominea as listed by Lichtenfels<br />

et al. (1998). Infections with these nematodes<br />

are complex: 51 species of cyathostomins<br />

have been recorded in horses, donkeys, and zebras<br />

worldwide (Lichtenfels et al., 1998), but 10<br />

of these species have been reported only from<br />

zebras or donkeys, and a few other species are<br />

known to have very limited distributions. However,<br />

most horses carry a burden of 5 to 10 common<br />

species, including many thousands (sometimes<br />

more than 100,000) of lumen-dwelling<br />

adult nematodes and as many larval stages in the<br />

walls of the large intestine (Reinemeyer et al.,<br />

1984; Bucknell et al., 1995). Clinically, cyathostomins<br />

are associated with various syndromes,<br />

the most dramatic of which is larval cyathostominosis,<br />

a fatal enteritis that occurs secondary to<br />

synchronized reactivation of arrested larvae<br />

from the intestinal mucosa (Giles et al., 1985;<br />

van Loon et al., 1995). The major obstacles to<br />

understanding, and therefore controlling, these<br />

parasites are their complexity, our inability to<br />

identify eggs in the feces, and the difficulty in<br />

identifying larvae on pasture. Until recently, the<br />

parasitic stages of cyathostomins could be identified<br />

only by adult worm morphology. However,<br />

recent studies have examined the molecular relationship<br />

of these species with a view to developing<br />

molecular probes for use in identifica-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


266 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

tion of both preparasitic and parasitic stages. For<br />

such studies, it is critical that the cyathostomins<br />

be identified and classified as consistently as<br />

possible. Modern identification manuals exist<br />

(Lichtenfels, 1975; Hartwich, 1986; Dvojnos<br />

and Kharchenko, 1994), but problems in identifying<br />

several species persist (Lichtenfels et al.,<br />

1997). In 1997, workers convened an international<br />

workshop to clarify the systematics of the<br />

Cyathostominea (Sun City, Republic of South<br />

Africa), and an agreement was reached on a consensus<br />

recommendation for the taxonomy of 51<br />

species as detailed in Lichtenfels et al. (1998).<br />

Despite the importance of these parasites, information<br />

is still lacking on species prevalence<br />

in Britain, especially since the development of<br />

widespread anthelmintic resistance. The last detailed<br />

study of species prevalence and infection<br />

intensity in the U.K. was in 1976 (Ogbourne,<br />

1976). The present report describes the species<br />

of cyathostomins present in the large intestine of<br />

a population of ponies from western Scotland.<br />

The nematodes were collected to provide DNA<br />

sequence information for the development of diagnostic<br />

tools and for phylogenetic analysis of<br />

the nematodes.<br />

Adult parasites were collected from intestinal<br />

contents of 4 Welsh-Shetland cross ponies aged<br />

from 9 to 15 mo originating from a local horse<br />

population. The history of anthelmintic treatment<br />

of the ponies is unknown. These animals<br />

were euthanized at the University of Glasgow<br />

Veterinary School for reasons other than parasite<br />

infestation. Intestinal contents were coarse-filtered<br />

with household plastic sieves. After sieving,<br />

the contents were passed through a Baermann<br />

apparatus with milk filters and then<br />

through SS-jjim wire-mesh sieves. Individual<br />

adult parasites were washed in sterile phosphatebuffered<br />

saline (137 mM NaCl, 8.1 mM<br />

Na2HPO4, 2.7 mM KC1, 1.47 mM KH2PO4, pH<br />

7.2). Where possible, a total of 200 parasites<br />

were collected from the ventral and dorsal colon;<br />

however, the cecum often contained fewer<br />

than 50 adult parasites. With the aid of a dissection<br />

microscope, the heads were excised with a<br />

scalpel because the bodies were subsequently<br />

used for DNA extraction. The heads were stored<br />

in 200 (JL! of 5% buffered formalin, then mounted<br />

on glass slides in a few drops of phenolalcohol<br />

(80% melted phenol crystals and 20%<br />

absolute ethanol) to which glycerine had been<br />

added at about 5% of the volume, and studied<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

with an Olympus BX50® differential interference<br />

contrast microscope. The parasites were<br />

identified according to the key of Lichtenfels<br />

(1975), supplemented by more recent descriptions<br />

of certain species (Lichtenfels and Klei,<br />

1988; Kharchenko et al., 1997; Lichtenfels et al.,<br />

1997, 1999). The taxonomy used in this report<br />

follows the checklist of genera and species recommended<br />

by the 1997 international workshop<br />

(Lichtenfels et al., 1998). Representative heads<br />

of 14 species of cyathostomins and Craterostomum<br />

acuticaudatum and photomicrographs of 2<br />

species of cyathostomins have been deposited in<br />

the U.S. National Parasite Collection, U.S. Department<br />

of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland<br />

20705-2350 as accession numbers 90698-<br />

90714. Two species of cyathostomins, Cylicocyclus<br />

elongatus and Cylicocyclus radiatus, and<br />

Gyalocephalus capitatus could not be documented<br />

by either method.<br />

Eighteen cyathostomin species, representing 5<br />

genera, were identified. Table 1 shows the total<br />

numbers of parasite species per animal identified<br />

morphologically and the relative numbers of<br />

each species collected from each animal. Eight<br />

species occurred in all 4 ponies. One rare species,<br />

Tridentoinfundibulum gobi, was found in<br />

•Scotland for the first time. It had been reported<br />

previously only in Asia and North America<br />

(Lichtenfels et al., 1998). In addition, individuals<br />

of the genera Craterostomum and Gyalocephalus<br />

were isolated but in smaller numbers<br />

than most of the cyathostomin species. The 7<br />

most abundant cyathostomin species were, in<br />

descending order, Cylicocyclus ashworthi, Cyathostomum<br />

catinatum, Cylicostephanus longibursatus,<br />

Cyclostephanus minutus, Cylicocyclus<br />

nassatus, Cylicocyclus insigne, and Cylicostephanus<br />

goldi. These species comprised over<br />

94% of the total cyathostomin burden. These results<br />

are similar to recent enumeration studies<br />

performed in several geographically distinct regions,<br />

for example in the U.S.A., Europe, and<br />

Australia (Reinemeyer et al., 1984; Mfitilodze<br />

and Hutchinson, 1985; Bucknell et al., 1995;<br />

Gawor, 1995). In addition, in terms of local studies<br />

performed previously in the U.K., the species<br />

identified here were very similar to those reported<br />

by Mathieson in Scotland (1964); Ogbourne<br />

in southwest England (1976), and Love<br />

and Duncan in Scotland (1992). Ogbourne<br />

(1976) performed the most extensive study and<br />

identified 21 species in 86 horses of various ages


RESEARCH NOTES 267<br />

Table 1. Numbers of specimens of nematodes, by species, collected from 4 ponies from western Scotland.<br />

Parasite species<br />

Cylicocyclus ashworthi (Le Roux, 1924) Mclntosh, 1933<br />

Cylicocycliis nassatus (Looss, 1900) Chaves, 1930<br />

Cylicocyclus insigne (Boulenger, 1917) Chaves, 1930<br />

Cylicocyclus ultrajectinus (Ihle, 1920) Ershov, 1939<br />

Cylicocyclus leptostomum (Kotlan, 1920) Chaves, 1930<br />

Cylicocyclus radiatus (Looss, 1900) Chaves, 1930<br />

Cylicocyclus elongatus (Looss, 1 900) Chaves 1 930<br />

Cyathostomum car ina turn Looss, 1900<br />

Cyathostomum pateratum (Yorke and Macfie, 1919) K'ung, 1964<br />

Coronocyclus coronatus (Looss, 1900) Hartwich, 1986<br />

Coronocyclus labiatus (Looss, 1900) Hartwich, 1986<br />

Cylicostephanus calicatus (Looss, 1900) Ihle, 1922<br />

Cylicostephanus longibitrsatiis (Yorke and Macfie, 1918) Cram, 1924<br />

Cylicostephanus minutiis (Yorke and Macfie, 1918) Cram, 1924<br />

Cylicostephanus goldi (Boulenger, 1917) Lichtenfels, 1975<br />

Cylicostephanus bidentatus (Ihle, 1925) Lichtenfels, 1975<br />

Cylidodontophoms bicoronatus (Looss, 1900) Ihle, 1922<br />

Tridentoinfundibulum gobi Tshoijo, in Popova, 1958<br />

Craterostomum acuticaudatum (Kotlan, 1919) Ihle, 1920<br />

Gyalocephalus capitatus Looss, 1900<br />

and breeds. In the latter study, 80% of these<br />

horses had C. longibursatus, C. goldi, C. calicatus,<br />

C. catinatum, C. coronatus, and C. nassatus.<br />

The most notable exception between the<br />

current study and all of these previous studies is<br />

the presence of C. ashworthi, the most prevalent<br />

species identified in our population. Cylicocyclus<br />

ashworthi was last reported in the U.K. as<br />

a new species (Le Roux, 1924) and has not been<br />

reported there since. Of note is that, in a comparable<br />

study performed several years earlier on<br />

worm populations derived from the same pastures<br />

as those used here, Love and Duncan<br />

(1992) identified 6 species, and C. nassatus was<br />

one of the most numerous. Cylicocyclus ashworthi<br />

and C. nassatus are morphologically very<br />

similar, and it is highly likely that these and other<br />

workers misidentified C. ashworthi as C. nassatus<br />

prior to the recent redescriptions of these<br />

species (Lichtenfels et al., 1997). Cylicocyclus<br />

nassatus is characterized by a cuticular shelf on<br />

the inner surface of the buccal capsule, a dorsal<br />

gutter that is as long as 50% of the buccal capsule<br />

depth, and 20 elements in the external leaf<br />

crown. Cylicocyclus ashworthi can be distinguished<br />

from C. nassatus by the absence of the<br />

shelf from the inner surface of the buccal capsule,<br />

by its much shorter dorsal gutter, and by<br />

25-29 external leaf crown elements that differ<br />

in shape from those of C. nassatus (Lichtenfels<br />

1<br />

94<br />

10<br />

24<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

20<br />

9<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

24<br />

32<br />

26<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

77<br />

51<br />

6<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

51<br />

0<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2<br />

1 1<br />

55<br />

13<br />

4<br />

2<br />

1<br />

3<br />

0<br />

Pony<br />

3<br />

81<br />

47<br />

43<br />

1<br />

3<br />

1<br />

1<br />

80<br />

6<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3<br />

85<br />

6<br />

19<br />

9<br />

0<br />

3<br />

0<br />

0<br />

4<br />

83<br />

15<br />

14<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

73<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

23<br />

49<br />

4<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

et al., 1997). The ability to clearly observe the<br />

cuticular shelf in the buccal capsule is dependent<br />

on the clearing agent used, and this may have<br />

contributed to the difficulty in identifying this<br />

unique feature in previous studies.<br />

In addition to the historical difficulty in separating<br />

C. nassatus and C. ashworthi, C. ashworthi<br />

has also been misidentified as C. triramosus,<br />

which has also been confused with C.<br />

nassatus prior to its recent redescription (Kharchenko<br />

et al., 1997). We now know that C. triramosus<br />

is exclusively a parasite of zebras. It is<br />

imperative that C. nassatus and C. ashworthi be<br />

correctly differentiated because they are 2 of the<br />

most common nematodes found in the ventral<br />

colon of horses, and if DNA probes are to be<br />

developed on the basis of morphological delineation,<br />

then consistent identification is a prerequisite.<br />

Interestingly, Hung et al. (1997) performed<br />

sequencing of the first (ITS-1) and second<br />

(ITS-2) internal transcribed spacers of 5.8S<br />

ribosomal DNA of these species and found that<br />

C. nassatus and C. ashworthi, differentiated by<br />

head morphology, were sufficiently different at<br />

the DNA level to assign them to separate species.<br />

These results are similar to work performed<br />

on the intergenic spacer region of the nuclear<br />

DNA, where over 50% DNA sequence difference<br />

was found between these 2 species (Kaye<br />

et al., 1998), with low intraspecific variation<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


2<strong>68</strong> COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

(0.3% for C. ashworthi and 1.9% for C. nassatus).<br />

Subsequently, oligoprobes designed from<br />

these IGS sequences have been used successfully<br />

to distinguish DNA of individual C. nassatus<br />

and C. ashworthi (Hodgkinson et al., <strong>2001</strong>). Furthermore,<br />

pairwise evolutionary distances, calculated<br />

under maximum likelihood with a GTR<br />

model estimated from data from the mitochondrial<br />

large ribosomal RNA subunit and ITS-2<br />

DNA, showed a 9.5% difference between the 2<br />

species (McDonnell et al., 2000).<br />

A consistent feature of all of the species incidence<br />

studies, including the present work, is<br />

that a small number of species, usually 5 to 10,<br />

constitute more than 80% of the infective load.<br />

Furthermore, the proportions of species have remained<br />

remarkably stable over many years, despite<br />

the widespread use of anthelmintics and<br />

the development of resistance. The rarer species<br />

are found at less consistent levels, but this is<br />

expected because the small populations may<br />

have gone undetected in cases where small subsamples<br />

of the worm populations have been examined<br />

for practical reasons. Consequently,<br />

much of the data on the least commonly discovered<br />

species are certain to underestimate true<br />

prevalence. Chapman et al. (1999) reported that<br />

9 to 15 species were found in a single animal<br />

when 200 specimens were identified, but the<br />

number increased to 20 to 29 when all nematodes<br />

in an entire 5% aliquot were identified.<br />

In the current study, Strongylus species were<br />

not found. This is probably indicative of the efficacy<br />

of anthelmintics and their strategic use in<br />

parasite control programs. In older studies, 100%<br />

prevalence of Strongylus species was reported<br />

(Le Roux, 1924; Foster and Ortiz, 1937). More<br />

recently, Bucknell et al. (1995) reported a prevalence<br />

of 38% Strongylus species in a study in<br />

which the deworming history of the horses was<br />

not known. Here, it was observed that, whereas<br />

relatively few species occurred exclusively in one<br />

or other parts of the intestines, most followed distinct<br />

site distributions (not shown), strongly biased<br />

in favor of a particular region, and (with the<br />

exception of C. ashworthi) these distributions<br />

were as described by Ogbourne (1976). Here, as<br />

in Ogbourne's study, the majority of C. pateraturn,<br />

C. insigne, and C. longibursatus individuals<br />

were found in the dorsal colon, whereas most of<br />

the C. nassatus, C. ultrajectinus, C. catinatum,<br />

and C. goldi adults were found in the ventral colon.<br />

Some caution must be taken in the interpre-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

tation of these data because some of the species<br />

were found only in very low numbers. Also consistent<br />

with the findings of Ogbourne (1976) was<br />

that the cecum was the most sparsely populated<br />

region of the large intestine.<br />

This work was supported by a project grant<br />

funded by the Home of Rest for Horses near<br />

Lacey Green, Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire,<br />

U.K. We thank James McGoldrick<br />

and colleagues at the Department of Veterinary<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong>, University of Glasgow, for assistance<br />

in preparing the nematode heads. We<br />

thank Patrick Shone of Olympus for providing<br />

a microscope.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bucknell, D. G., R. B. Gasser, and I. Beveridge.<br />

1995. The prevalence and epidemiology of gastrointestinal<br />

parasites of horses in Victoria, Australia.<br />

International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 25:711-724.<br />

Chapman, M. R., D. D. French, and T. R. Klei.<br />

1999. Intestinal helminths of ponies; a comparison<br />

of species prevalent in Louisiana pre- and postivermectin.<br />

P. 74 in Proceedings of the American<br />

Association of Veterinary Parasitologists 44th Annual<br />

Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, July 10-<br />

13, 1999. (Abstract.)<br />

Dvojnos, G. M., and V. A. Kharchenko. 1994. Strongylidae<br />

in domestic and wild horses. Publishing<br />

House Naukova Dumka, Kiev, Ukraine. 234 pp.<br />

[In Russian.]<br />

Foster, A. O., and P. Ortiz O. 1937. A further report<br />

on the parasites of a selected group of equines in<br />

Panama. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 23:360-364.<br />

Gawor, J. J. 1995. The prevalence and abundance of<br />

internal parasites in working horses autopsied in<br />

Poland. Veterinary <strong>Parasitology</strong> 58:99-108.<br />

Giles, C. J., K. A. Urquhart, and J. A. Longstaffe.<br />

1985. Larval cyathostomiasis (immature trichonema-induced<br />

enteropathy): a report of 15 clinical<br />

cases. Equine Veterinary Journal 17:196-201.<br />

Hartwich, G. 1986. On the Strongylus tetracanthus<br />

problem and the systematics of the Cyathostominae<br />

(Nematoda, Strongyloidea). Mitteilungen aus<br />

dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 62:61-102.<br />

Hodgkinson, J. E., S. Love, J. R. Lichtenfels, S. Palfreman,<br />

Y. H. Ramsey, and J. B. Matthews.<br />

<strong>2001</strong>. Evaluation of the specificity of five oligoprobes<br />

for identification of Cyathostomin species<br />

from horses. International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

31:197-204.<br />

Hung, G. C., N. B. Chilton, I. Beveridge, A. Mc-<br />

Donnell, J. R. Lichtenfels, and R. B. Gasser.<br />

1997. Molecular delineation of Cylicocyclus nassatus<br />

and C. ashworthi (Nematoda: Strongylidae).<br />

International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 27:601-605.<br />

Kaye, J. N., S. Love, J. R. Lichtenfels, and J. B.<br />

McKeand. 1998. <strong>Comparative</strong> sequence analysis<br />

of the intergenic spacer region of cyathostome<br />

species. International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 28:<br />

831-836.


Kharchenko, V. A., G. M. Dvojnos, and J. R. Lichtenfels.<br />

1997. A redescription of Cylicocyclus triramosus<br />

(Nematoda: Strongyloidea): a parasite of<br />

the zebra, Equus burchelli antiquorum. Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:922-926.<br />

Le Roux, P. L. 1924. Helminths collected from<br />

equines in Edinburgh and in London. Journal of<br />

Helminthology 2:111-134.<br />

Lichtenfels, J. R. 1975. Helminths of domestic equids.<br />

Illustrated keys to the genera and species with emphasis<br />

on North American forms. Proceedings of<br />

the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

42(special issue): 1-92.<br />

, V. A. Kharchenko, R. C. Krecek, and L.<br />

M. Gibbons. 1998. An annotated checklist by genus<br />

and species of 93 species level names for 51<br />

recognized species of small strongyles (Nematoda:<br />

Strongyloidea: Cyathostominae) of horses, asses<br />

and zebras of the world. Veterinary <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

79:65-79.<br />

-, C. Sommer, and M. Ito. 1997. Key<br />

characters for the microscopical identification of<br />

Cylicocyclus nassatus and Cylicocyclus ashworthi<br />

(Nematoda: Cyathostominea) of the horse, Equus<br />

caballus. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />

of Washington 64:120-127.<br />

, and T. R. Klei. 1988. Cylicostephanus torbertae<br />

sp. n. (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) from Equus<br />

caballus with a discussion of the genera Cylicostephanus,<br />

Petrovinema and Skrjabinodentus.<br />

Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of<br />

Washington 55:165-170.<br />

, P. A. Pilitt, V. A. Kharchenko, and G. M.<br />

Dvojnos. 1999. Differentiation of Coronocychis<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 269-272<br />

Research Note<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 269<br />

sagittatus and Coronocychis coronatus (Nematoda:<br />

Cyathostominea) of horses. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 66:56-66.<br />

Love, S., and J. L. Duncan. 1992. Development of<br />

cyathostome infection of helminth naive foals.<br />

Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 13:93-98.<br />

Mathieson, A. O. 1964. A study into the distribution<br />

of, and host tissue responses associated with,<br />

some internal parasites of the horse. Thesis, University<br />

of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K. 160 pp.<br />

McDonnell, A., S. Love, A. Tait, J. R. Lichtenfels,<br />

and J. B. Matthews. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis<br />

of partial mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase C<br />

subunit I and large ribosomal RNA sequences and<br />

nuclear internal transcribed spacer I sequences<br />

from species of Cyathostominae and Strongylinae<br />

(Nematoda, Order Strongylida), parasites of the<br />

horse. <strong>Parasitology</strong> 121:649-659.<br />

Mfitilodze, M. W., and G. W. Hutchinson. 1985.<br />

Prevalence and abundance of equine strongyles<br />

(Nematoda: Strongyloidea) in tropical Australia.<br />

Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 76:487-494.<br />

Ogbourne, C. P. 1976. The prevalence, relative abundance<br />

and site distribution of nematodes in the<br />

subfamily Cyathostominae in horses killed in Britain.<br />

Journal of Helminthology 50:203-214.<br />

Reinemeyer, C. R., S. A. Smith, A. A. Gabel, and<br />

R. P. Herd. 1984. The prevalence and intensity<br />

of internal parasites in horses in the USA. Veterinary<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 15:75-83.<br />

van Loon, G., P. Deprez, E. Muylle, and B. Sustronck.<br />

1995. Larval cyathostomiasis as a cause<br />

of death in two regularly dewormed horses. Journal<br />

of Veterinary Medicine, Series A 42:301-306.<br />

Helminth Parasites of the Green Frog (Rana clamitans} from<br />

Southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A.<br />

H. RANDALL YODER,' JAMES R. CoooiNS,2 AND J. CORBETT REINBOLD<br />

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee,<br />

Wisconsin 53201, U.S.A. (e-mail: 2coggins@uwm.edu)<br />

ABSTRACT: Between 13 August and 3 September 1999,<br />

26 green frogs Rana clamitans Rafinesque, 1820, were<br />

collected from 2 ponds at the University of Wisconsin-<br />

Milwaukee Field Station in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin,<br />

U.S.A. Hosts were euthanized and organs were examined<br />

for helminth parasites. All host individuals were infected<br />

1 Corresponding author. Current address: Department<br />

of Biology, Lamar University, P.O. Box 10037,<br />

Beaumont, Texas 77710, U.S.A. (e-mail:<br />

y oderhr @ hal .lamar.edu)<br />

with 1 or more helminth parasites. A total of 11 helminth<br />

species infected ./?. clamitans at this location: 9 platyhelminths<br />

(7 trematodes, 2 cestodes) and 2 nematodes. Mean<br />

abundance of infection was 65.5 ± 79.7 worms per host<br />

(range = 1-330). This is the first report of Clinostomum<br />

sp. from green frogs in Wisconsin.<br />

KEY WORDS: Amphibia, aquatic, Cestoda, Clinostomum,<br />

ephemeral pond, Haematoloechus varioplexus,<br />

green frog, helminth, Nematoda, parasites, Rana<br />

clamitans, survey, temporary pond, Trematoda, Wisconsin,<br />

U.S.A.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


270 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

The green frog Rana clamitans Rafmesque,<br />

1820, occurs from Newfoundland, where the<br />

population was introduced (Conant and Collins,<br />

1991), to western Ontario, Canada, in the northern<br />

extent of its range and from North Carolina<br />

to eastern Oklahoma, U.S.A. in the south (Vogt,<br />

1981). Although reports of green frog parasites<br />

are numerous, only 3 studies have been conducted<br />

in Wisconsin, U.S.A. (Williams and Taft,<br />

1980; Coggins and Sajdak, 1982; Bolek, 1998).<br />

A total of 26 green frogs were collected by hand<br />

between 13 August and 3 September 1999 from 2<br />

temporary ponds at the University of Wisconsin-<br />

Milwaukee Field Station, Ozaukee County, Wisconsin<br />

(43°23'N; 88°2'W). Frogs were transported<br />

to the laboratory and euthanized in MS-222 (ethyl<br />

m-aminobenzoate sulfonic acid). Body surface,<br />

mouth, eustachian tubes, celom, lungs, stomach,<br />

small intestine, colon, urinary bladder, liver, kidneys,<br />

and leg musculature in individual containers<br />

were examined with a dissecting microscope for<br />

the presence of helminth parasites. Nematodes<br />

were preserved in 70% ethanol and mounted in<br />

glycerin for identification. Larval and adult platyhelminths<br />

were fixed in alcohol-formalin-acetic<br />

acid, stained with acetic carmine, and mounted in<br />

Canada balsam. Voucher specimens were deposited<br />

at the H. W. Manter Helminth Collection, University<br />

of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska (Table 1).<br />

Use of ecological terms follows the suggestions of<br />

Bush et al. (1997).<br />

All host individuals were infected with 1 or<br />

more helminths (prevalence = 100%). The component<br />

community of green frogs consisted of 11<br />

helminth species: 7 trematodes, 2 cestodes, and 2<br />

nematodes (Table 1). Overall mean abundance of<br />

helminths was 65.5 ± 79.7 worms per frog (range<br />

= 1—330). Haematoloechus varioplexus occurred<br />

with highest mean abundance, mean intensity, and<br />

prevalence of infection (Table 1). Nematodes occurred<br />

in low numbers and in few hosts (Table 1).<br />

Adult green frogs breed in a variety of permanent<br />

bodies of water (May-July in Wisconsin) and<br />

inhabit the periphery of these aquatic habitats<br />

throughout the summer (Vogt, 1981). During this<br />

time, adult frogs feed upon a variety of animals,<br />

including several species of insects with aquatic<br />

life histories (Jenssen and Klimstra, 1966). Whereas<br />

green frogs are known to migrate prior to hibernation,<br />

they are thought to seek out aquatic<br />

habitats that are well oxygenated and do not freeze<br />

entirely in winter (Lamoureux and Madison,<br />

1999). The ponds sampled in the present study are<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

ephemeral. Even in years when some water remains<br />

over winter, these ponds freeze solid. The<br />

green frogs that we collected seem to have moved<br />

into these ponds as a place to feed prior to hibernating<br />

in other areas.<br />

The species composition and numbers of helminths<br />

in green frog infracommunities at this location<br />

were similar to those reported previously<br />

(Rankin, 1945; Bouchard, 1951; Najarian, 1955;<br />

Campbell, 19<strong>68</strong>; Williams and Taft, 1980; Coggins<br />

and Sajdak, 1982; Muzzall, 1991; McAlpine,<br />

1997; Bolek, 1998; McAlpine and Burt, 1998).<br />

The aquatic habitat and diet of green frogs correspond<br />

with helminth communities consisting mostly<br />

of platyhelminths with indirect life cycles and<br />

relatively few direct life cycle nematodes. In the<br />

present study, H. varioplexus occurred with the<br />

highest values of prevalence, mean intensity, and<br />

mean abundance. These values are also high compared<br />

with those reported in previous studies.<br />

Muzzall (1991) reported 57% of 120 green frogs<br />

infected with H. parviplexus, synonymous with H.<br />

varioplexus (Kennedy, 1981), with a mean intensity<br />

of 29. Najarian (1955) reported 48% of 40<br />

green frogs infected with H. parviplexus and 42%<br />

prevalence for H. breviplexus but did not provide<br />

values for intensity or abundance of infection. Bolek<br />

(1998) reported a prevalence of 44% for H.<br />

varioplexus from 75 green frogs with a mean intensity<br />

of 5.3. Others have reported prevalence values<br />

of 25% or less for Haematoloechus spp. from<br />

R. clamitans (Rankin, 1945; Bouchard, 1951;<br />

Campbell, 19<strong>68</strong>; Williams and Taft, 1980; Mc-<br />

Alpine and Burt, 1998). Haematoloechus varioplexus<br />

has been reported previously from wood<br />

frogs (Rana sylvatica Le Conte, 1825) and spring<br />

peepers (Pseudacris crucifer Wied, 1839) from the<br />

same ponds sampled in the current study (Yoder<br />

and Coggins, 1996). It is therefore likely that infected<br />

intermediate hosts are present in these<br />

ponds. Additionally, large numbers of immature H.<br />

varioplexus were recovered from green frogs, indicating<br />

that hosts are being infected while feeding<br />

at these locations. Odonates serve as second intermediate<br />

hosts for species of Haematoloechus.<br />

Muzzall (1991) reported that the absence of fish<br />

predators may have increased the number of adult<br />

odonates emerging from Turkey Marsh, Michigan,<br />

U.S.A., resulting in richer helminth communities<br />

than those occurring in habitats where both frogs<br />

and fish occur. The absence of fish from these<br />

ephemeral ponds may have had a similar result in<br />

terms of high values of parasitism by H. vario-


id<br />

s<br />

„<br />

~<br />

55<br />

**5<br />

|<br />

Ǥ<br />

u<br />

' *^<br />

U<br />

£<br />

..<br />

'i><br />

GO<br />

•J)<br />

,c e<br />

_£ D<br />

d<br />

Z<br />

Helminth species<br />

(accession no.)<br />

rrn<br />

J si I<br />

(N<br />

O<br />

ON<br />

£ eg<br />

GO<br />

s<br />

H<br />

5<br />

•ematoda<br />

9Haematoloechi<br />

Mature<br />

Immature<br />

fc-i S<br />

en m<br />

.• ^<br />

+ 1 +1<br />

CM NO<br />

in t~~<br />

^<br />

00 —<br />

1 1<br />

C- Cin<br />

NO<br />

in — •<br />

+ 1 +1<br />

NO OO<br />

C*"i ON<br />

r-- (N<br />

O ON<br />

00 NO<br />

J J<br />

in r-<br />

ON t —<br />

0<br />

o-,<br />

ID<br />

O<br />

C*~l<br />

ON ^<br />

r- d<br />

+1 +1<br />

CO (N<br />

(N O<br />

NO<br />

S<br />

fo 1 ^^<br />

C- CN 1<br />

(N rt<br />

00 O<br />

+1 +1<br />

CN O<br />

T)- (N<br />

NO r~-<br />

^j- [ —<br />

00<br />

H<br />

J E<br />

m<br />

NO<br />

— T<br />

00<br />

ON oo<br />

J<br />

"H in Lri<br />

'.frici/i- Thomas, 1939 (HWML<br />

Glypthelmins quieta<br />

Stafford, 1900 (HWML 1<br />

Gorgoderina bilobata<br />

Rankin, 1937 (HWML<br />

Megalodiscus temperatus<br />

Stafford, 1905 (HWI<br />

Clinostomum sp.<br />

Leidy, 1856 (HWML 15382)<br />

Metacercariat<br />

sstoda<br />

Proteocephalus sp. Weinland, 1858 (HWML 1<br />

Mesocestoides sp.<br />

Vaillant, 1863 (HWML 153<br />

ematoda<br />

Oswaldocruzia / npiens Walton, 1929 (HWML<br />

Cosmocercoides sp. Wilkie, 1930 (HWML 15:<br />


272 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

plexus. This is the first report of Clinostomum sp.<br />

from Wisconsin green frogs.<br />

We thank the U.W.M. Field Station Committee<br />

and staff for their support of this project.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bolek, M. G. 1998. A seasonal comparative study of<br />

helminth parasites in nine Wisconsin amphibians.<br />

M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,<br />

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A. 134 pp.<br />

Bouchard, J. L. 1951. The Platyhelminthes parasitizing<br />

some northern Maine Amphibia. Transactions<br />

of the American Microscopical Society 70:<br />

245-250.<br />

Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />

Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />

own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />

Campbell, R. A. 19<strong>68</strong>. A comparative study of the<br />

parasites of certain Salientia from Pocahontas<br />

<strong>State</strong> Park, Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science<br />

19:13-20.<br />

Coggins, J. R., and R. A. Sajdak. 1982. Survey of<br />

helminth parasites in the salamanders and certain<br />

anurans from Wisconsin. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 49:99-100.<br />

Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1991. A Field Guide<br />

to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern and Central<br />

North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston,<br />

Massachusetts, U.S.A. 450 pp.<br />

Jenssen, T. A., and W. D. Klimstra. 1966. Food habits<br />

of the green frog, Rana clamitans, in southern<br />

Illinois. American Midland Naturalist 76:169-<br />

182.<br />

Kennedy, M. J. 1981. A revision of the genus Haematoloechus<br />

Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Haemato-<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 272-274<br />

Research Note<br />

loechidae) from Canada and the United <strong>State</strong>s.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:1836-1846.<br />

Lamoureux, V. S., and D. M. Madison. 1999. Overwintering<br />

habitats of radio-implanted green frogs,<br />

Rana clamitans. Journal of Herpetology 33:430-<br />

435.<br />

McAlpine, D. F. 1997. Helminth communities in bullfrogs<br />

(Rana catesbeiand), green frogs (Rana<br />

clamitans), and leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) from<br />

New Brunswick, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />

75:1883-1890.<br />

, and M. D. B. Burt. 1998. Helminths of bullfrogs,<br />

Rana catesbeiana, green frogs, R. clamitans,<br />

and leopard frogs, R. pipiens in New Brunswick.<br />

Canadian Field-Naturalist 112:50-<strong>68</strong>.<br />

Muzzall, P. M. 1991. Helminth infracommunities of<br />

the frogs Rana catesbeiana and Rana clamitans<br />

from Turkey Marsh, Michigan. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />

77:366-371.<br />

Najarian, H. H. 1955. Trematodes parasitic in the Salientia<br />

in the vicinity of Ann Arbor, Michigan.<br />

American Midland Naturalist 55:195-197.<br />

Rankin, J. L. 1945. An ecological study of the helminth<br />

parasites of amphibians and reptiles of<br />

western Massachusetts and vicinity. Journal of<br />

<strong>Parasitology</strong> 31:142-150.<br />

Vogt, R. C. 1981. Natural History of Amphibians and<br />

Reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum<br />

and Friends of the Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,<br />

U.S.A. 205 pp.<br />

Williams, D. D., and S. J. Taft. 1980. Helminths of<br />

anurans from NW Wisconsin. Proceedings of the<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington 47:278.<br />

Yoder, H. R., and J. R. Coggins. 1996. Helminth<br />

communities in the northern spring peeper, Pseudacris<br />

c. crucifer Weid, and the wood frog, Rana<br />

sylvatica Le Conte, from southeastern Wisconsin.<br />

Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

63:211-214.<br />

Gastrointestinal Helminths of Spinner Dolphins Stenella longirostris<br />

(Gray, 1828) (Cetacea: Delphinidae) Stranded in La Paz Bay,<br />

Baja California Sur, Mexico<br />

ROGELIO AcuiLAR-AouiLAR,1 ROSA GRISELDA MORENO-NAVARRETE, GUILLERMO SALGADO-<br />

MALDONADO, and BERNARDO VILLA-RAMIREZ<br />

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Institute de Biologia, Apartado Postal 70-153, Mexico, D. F,<br />

CP 04510, Mexico<br />

ABSTRACT: Thirty-one spinner dolphins Stenella longirostris<br />

stranded in La Paz Bay, Baja California Sur,<br />

Mexico, were examined for endoparasitic helminths.<br />

The following species were identified: Zalophotrema<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

pacificum and Hadwenius tursionis (Digenea); Strobilocephalus<br />

triangularis, Trigonocotyle sp., and Tetraphyllidea<br />

gen. sp. larva (Cestoda); immature Bolbosoma<br />

hamiltoni (Acanthocephala); and Anisakis typica


(Nematoda). Except for H. tursionis, all the identified<br />

helminths are reported for the first time in Mexico.<br />

Stenella longirostris represents a new host for H. tursionis<br />

and A. typica.<br />

KEY WORDS: Cetacea, spinner dolphin, Stenella<br />

longirostris, parasites, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda,<br />

Acanthocephala, Gulf of California, Mexico.<br />

Although cetaceans, including dolphins, are<br />

common in marine waters of Mexico, their parasite<br />

fauna is poorly known. To date, only 2 reports<br />

on the helminth parasites of cetaceans in<br />

Mexico have been published. Lamothe-Argumedo<br />

(1987) identified the trematode Hadwenius<br />

tursionis (Marchi, 1873) in the intestine of<br />

the vaquita Phocoena sinus Norris and Mc-<br />

Farland, 1958 (Phocoenidae), from the northern<br />

Gulf of California, and Morales-Vela and Olivera-G6mez<br />

(1993) reported the trematode Nasitrema<br />

globicephala Neiland, Rice, and Holden,<br />

1970, and the nematodes Stenurus globicephalae<br />

Baylis and Daubney, 1925, Stenurus minor<br />

(Kuhn, 1829), and Crassicauda sp. in the pilot<br />

whale Globicephala macrorhynchus Gray, 1846<br />

(Delphinidae), from Cozumel Island, Quintana<br />

Roo (Caribbean Sea). The present report provides<br />

data on helminth occurrence in spinner<br />

dolphins Stenella longirostris (Gray, 1828) from<br />

the state of Baja California Sur, Mexico.<br />

In August 1993, 31 spinner dolphins were<br />

stranded in La Paz Bay (24°07'-24°21'N;<br />

110°17'-110°40'W), 20 km SW of the city of La<br />

Paz, Baja California Sur. The stranded dolphins<br />

consisted of 17 males (total length 130-188 cm,<br />

weight 19—57 kg, ages 1-18 yr) and 14 females<br />

(161-186 cm, 33-45 kg, 5.5-15 yr). The animals<br />

died of unknown causes during the strand,<br />

and they were kept deep frozen ( —22°C) until<br />

examination. During necropsy, the digestive<br />

tract of each animal was separated from its other<br />

viscera and examined for parasites. Trematodes<br />

and cestodes were fixed with Bouin's fluid and<br />

preserved in 70% ethanol, and acanthocephalans<br />

and nematodes were fixed and preserved in 70%<br />

ethanol. All helminths identified during the examination<br />

have been deposited in the Coleccion<br />

Nacional de Helmintos (National Helminth Collection)<br />

(CNHE) of the Universidad Nacional<br />

Autonoma de Mexico.<br />

Seven helminth species were recovered from<br />

1 Corresponding author (e-mail:<br />

raguilar@mail.ibiologia.unam.mx).<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 273<br />

the 31 dolphins. These include 2 trematodes:<br />

Zalophotrema pacificum Dailey and Perrin, 1973<br />

(bile ducts, prevalence 19%, mean intensity 6<br />

worms per parasitized host, range 1—16, CNHE<br />

No. 4018) and Hadwenius tursionis (Marchi,<br />

1873) (intestine, 6%, 1, 1-1, CNHE No. 4017);<br />

3 cestodes: Strobilocephalus triangularis (Diesing,<br />

1850) (rectum, 6%, 2, 2-2, CNHE No.<br />

4019), Trigonocotyle sp. (intestine, 90%, 5, 1-<br />

27, CNHE No. 4021; the poor condition of specimens<br />

preclude identification of species), and<br />

larval stages of Tetraphyllidea (intestine, 16%,<br />

31, 5-69, CNHE No. 4020); the nematode Anisakis<br />

typica (Diesing, 1860) (stomach, 77%, 18,<br />

1-98, CNHE No. 4023); and the immature acanthocephalan<br />

Bolbosoma hamiltoni Baylis, 1929<br />

(posterior intestine, 51%, 4, 1-9, CNHE No.<br />

4022).<br />

The helminth parasites of 5. longirostris have<br />

been reported by Delyamure (1955), Dailey and<br />

Brownell (1972), and Dailey and Perrin (1973).<br />

The previously recorded helminth fauna for this<br />

dolphin species includes the following: the trematodes<br />

Oschmarinella laevicaecum (Yamaguti,<br />

1942), Campula rochebruni (Poirier, 1886), Delphinicola<br />

tenuis Yamaguti, 1933, Lecithodesmus<br />

nipponicus Yamaguti, 1942, and Z. pacificum;<br />

the cestodes Diphyllobothrium fuhrmanni Hsu,<br />

1935, S. triangularis, Tetrabothrium forsteri<br />

(Krefft, 1871), Phyllobothrium delphini (Bosc,<br />

1802), Phyllobothrium sp., Monorygma grymaldii<br />

(Moniez, 1881), and Monorygma sp.; the<br />

nematodes Anisakis simplex (Rudolphi, 1809),<br />

Halocercus delphini Baylis and Daubney, 1925,<br />

and Mastigonema stenellae Dailey and Perrin,<br />

1973; and the acanthocephalans Bolbosoma vasculosum<br />

(Rudolphi, 1819), Bolbosoma balaenae<br />

(Gmelin, 1790), and Corynosoma sp. In the<br />

present study, the previously recorded Z. pacificum<br />

and S. triangularis are identified, and new<br />

host records are reported for H. tursionis, Trigonocotyle<br />

sp., tetraphyllidean B. hamiltoni, and<br />

A. typica. All but 1 of the identified species (H.<br />

tursionis) are recorded for the first time in Mexico.<br />

We thank Dr. Luis Fleischer and Hector<br />

Perez-Cortes, Centro Regional de Investigacion<br />

Pesquera, La Paz, Baja California Sur, for permission<br />

to examine dolphins; Dr. Tomas Scholz<br />

for confirmation of cestodes; Dr. Brent Nickol<br />

for review of the manuscript; Dr. Krzysztof<br />

Zdzitowiecki for providing helpful comments<br />

about the acanthocephalan; and Alejandro San-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


274 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

chez-Rios, Alejandra Nieto, and Francisco Anguiano<br />

for technical assistance. Collection of cetaceans<br />

was permitted by the Secretaria de Pesca,<br />

Mexico (authorization number 2275).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Dailey, M. D., and R. L. Brownell. 1972. A checklist<br />

of marine mammal parasites. Pages 528-589 in S.<br />

H. Ridgeway, ed. Mammals of the Sea: Biology<br />

and Medicine. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois,<br />

U.S.A.<br />

, and W. F. Perrin. 1973. Helminth parasites<br />

of porpoises of the genus Stenella in the eastern<br />

tropical Pacific, with description of two new species:<br />

Mastigonema stenellae gen. et sp. n. (Nematoda:<br />

Spiruroidea) and Zalophotrerna pacificurn<br />

n. sp. (Trematoda: Digenea). Fishery Bulletin 71:<br />

455-471.<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 274-276<br />

Research Note<br />

Delyamure, S. L. 1955. The Helminth Fauna of Marine<br />

Mammals. Ecology and Phylogeny. Izdatel'stov<br />

Akademii Nauk SSSR. Translated 19<strong>68</strong>,<br />

Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem,<br />

Israel. 522 pp.<br />

Lamothe-Argumedo, R. 1987. Trematodos de mamfferos<br />

III. Hallazgo de Synthesium tursionis (Marchi,<br />

1873) Stunkard y Alvey, 1930 en Phocoena<br />

sinus (Phocoenidae) en el Golfo de California,<br />

Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Serie<br />

Zoologia 58:11-20.<br />

Morales-Vela, D., and L. D. Olivera-Gomez. 1993.<br />

Varamiento de calderones Globicephala macrorhynchus<br />

(Cetacea: Delphinidae) en la Isla de<br />

Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Anales del Instituto<br />

de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />

de Mexico, Serie Zoologia 64:177-180.<br />

The Lung Nematodes (Metastrongyloidea) of the Virginia Opossum<br />

Didelphis virginiana in Southern California, U.S.A.<br />

VICTORIA E. MATEY,M BORIS I. KUPERMAN,' JOHN M. KiNSELLA,2 G. F. LLOYD,' AND<br />

S. J. LANE3<br />

1 Department of Biology and Center for Inland Waters, San Diego <strong>State</strong> University, San Diego, California 92182,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: kuperman@sunstroke.sdsu.edu),<br />

2 Department of Pathobiology, <strong>College</strong> of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611,<br />

U.S.A. (e-mail: wormdwb@aol.com), and<br />

3 Project Wildlife, P.O. Box 80696, San Diego, California 92138, U.S.A (e-mail: sjlane7@home.com)<br />

ABSTRACT: The lungworm Heterostrongylus heterostrongylus<br />

(Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) is reported<br />

for the first time from the Virginia opossum Didelphis<br />

virginiana in North America. Seventeen of 31 opossums<br />

(55%) examined from San Diego County, California,<br />

U.S.A., were infected with H. heterostrongylus,<br />

with intensities ranging from 8 to 128 worms per host<br />

(mean 41). Another species of metastrongyloid nematode,<br />

Didelphostrongylus hayesi, was found in 74% of<br />

the lungs examined, with intensity ranging from 2 to<br />

1,328 worms per host (mean 312).<br />

KEY WORDS: lungworm, Heterostrongylus heterostrongylus,<br />

Nematoda, opossum, Didelphis virginiana,<br />

Didelphostrongylus hayesi, California, U.S.A.<br />

The Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana<br />

Ken; 1792, is the only marsupial inhabiting<br />

Corresponding author.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

North America, occurring in tropical, subtropical,<br />

and temperate habitats from southern Canada<br />

to Costa Rica (Gardner, 1973). California,<br />

U.S.A., was outside the original range of D. virginiana<br />

until its accidental introduction into Los<br />

Angeles County and the San Jose area from various<br />

eastern states between 1890 and 1910. By<br />

1958, D. virginiana was distributed widely in all<br />

the areas of California below 1,500 m altitude<br />

(Hunsaker, 1977).<br />

Until recently, the metastrongyloid lungworms<br />

of D. virginiana have been studied only<br />

in the midwestern and eastern U.S.A. Alden<br />

(1995) reviewed helminth records from the Virginia<br />

opossum and listed records of Didelphostrongylus<br />

hayesi Prestwood, 1976, from North<br />

Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, and Tennessee,<br />

U.S.A. Subsequently, Baker et al. (1995) record-


RESEARCH NOTES 275<br />

Figure 1. Cephalic end of the lung nematode Heterostrongylus heterostrongylus from the Virginia opossum<br />

Didelphis virginiana. Male, frontal view. SEM. Am = amphid; Cl = collarette; Cp = cephalic papilla;<br />

L = lip; M = mouth opening; R = ring surrounding mouth. Scale bar = 20 u,m.<br />

ed D. hayesi from the Virginia opossum from<br />

Sacramento County in northern California. The<br />

objective of our study was to determine the identity<br />

and prevalence of lung parasites in feral Virginia<br />

opossums from southern California.<br />

Thirty-one Virginia opossums from San Diego<br />

County, California, killed by cars or euthanized<br />

after trauma, were examined for lung parasites<br />

from March 1999 to June 2000. All samples<br />

were obtained from a local nonprofit organization,<br />

Project Wildlife, Opossum Team,<br />

members of which also carried out the necropsy<br />

of the animals. All specimens were categorized,<br />

on the basis of weight, into juveniles (0.14-0.90<br />

kg) or adults (1.2-3.4 kg). The lungs with attached<br />

trachea of 7 juveniles and 24 adults were<br />

examined grossly and under the dissecting microscope.<br />

The trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles<br />

were split, and the lung parenchyma was teased<br />

apart gently. Worms recovered were fixed in 5%<br />

formalin or alcohol-formalin-acetic acid (AFA).<br />

For light microscopy, worms were examined as<br />

temporary whole mounts in glycerine after<br />

clearing in glycerine-alcohol with a Diastar®<br />

microscope equipped with a Photostar® camera<br />

system and were measured in micrometers. For<br />

scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the specimens<br />

were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide,<br />

followed by dehydration in an ethanol series,<br />

critical point dried with liquid CO2, sputter coated<br />

with gold-palladium, and examined with a<br />

Hitachi S-2700® scanning electron microscope.<br />

Voucher specimens of nematodes were deposited<br />

in the H. W. Manter Laboratory of <strong>Parasitology</strong>,<br />

University of Nebraska <strong>State</strong> Museum, Lincoln,<br />

Nebraska, U.S.A. (accession numbers<br />

15617-15619).<br />

In all, 7,381 lungworms were found in adult<br />

and juvenile animals examined. The parasites<br />

were identified as metastrongyloid nematodes.<br />

Of these, 91.1% were identified as D. hayesi and<br />

8.9% were identified as Heterostrongylus heterostrongylus<br />

Travassos, 1925. This is the first<br />

record of H. heterostrongylus from D. virginiana<br />

and the first record of this nematode in<br />

North America. Previous records of H. heterostrongylus<br />

were from another species of opossum,<br />

Didelphis marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758,<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


276 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

from Colombia and Brazil, South America (Travassos,<br />

1925; Vaz and Pereira, 1934; Anderson<br />

et al., 1980).<br />

Morphologic and morphometric features of H.<br />

heterostrongylus in the opossums from southern<br />

California resembled those of specimens from<br />

South America described by Anderson et al.<br />

(1980). In D. virginiana, the male worms were<br />

slightly smaller, and the female worms were<br />

larger than in D. marsupialis. The mean length<br />

and width of H. heterostrongylus males from D.<br />

virginiana were correspondingly 6.5 mm (5.0—<br />

7.2) and 280 |xm (245-320). For females, the<br />

mean length was 9.7 mm (8.6-13.4) and the<br />

mean width was 380 jxm (350-475). SEM study<br />

showed some features of the cephalic structures<br />

that were not noted by Anderson et al. (1980).<br />

The 6 lips are completely fused, and each of<br />

them, in addition to 2 cephalic papillae, bears an<br />

amphid opening on the surface by an amphidial<br />

canal (Fig. 1). The shape of the mouth opening<br />

varies from triangular to circular (Fig. 1). A delicate<br />

ring surrounding the mouth opening and a<br />

collarette formed by a dilated cuticle are considered<br />

as permanent structures (Fig. 1). A new<br />

character of the female caudal extremity found<br />

in our study is a pair of small caudal papillae<br />

near the tip of the short blunt tail. The morphology<br />

of the male bursa, with its large lobe<br />

formed by the dorsal ray and short (93-100 |xm),<br />

complex and slightly arcuate spicules, is the<br />

same as previously reported.<br />

In the infected opossums, H. heterostrongylus<br />

were found lying freely in the bronchi. In 1 case,<br />

worms were recovered from the trachea.<br />

Seventeen of 31 opossums (55%) were infected<br />

with H. heterostrongylus, and intensities<br />

of infection ranged from 8 to 128 (mean 41).<br />

Infections were found in 58% of adult animals,<br />

with 12 to 128 worms per host (mean 41), and<br />

43% of juveniles, with intensities of 8 to 80<br />

worms per host (mean 44). The other species of<br />

lung nematodes, D. hayesi, was found under the<br />

pleura and was piercing lung tissue in 23 of 31<br />

opossums (74%). Intensities of infection ranged<br />

from 2 to 1,328 worms per host (mean 312). All<br />

animals infected by H. heterostrongylus were<br />

also infected by D. hayesi.<br />

Baker et al. (1995) reported on the prevalence<br />

and treatment of D. hayesi infections in opos-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

sums collected in Yolo, Solano, and Sacramento<br />

counties in northern California. Infections were<br />

found in 23 of 33 opossums (70%). Because<br />

most of their infections were diagnosed by the<br />

presence of metastrongylid larvae in the feces<br />

and only 2 infections were confirmed by necropsies,<br />

it is possible that mixed infections of H.<br />

heterostrongylus and D. hayesi were also present<br />

in that area of California. Examination of<br />

additional host samples is desirable both in California<br />

and the eastern U.S.A. to determine the<br />

local range of H. heterostrongylus.<br />

We are deeply indebted to the Opossum Team<br />

of Project Wildlife, especially its leader, Blair<br />

Lee, and coleader, Beverly Rosas, and Meryl<br />

Faulkner, Mary Platter-Reiger, and numerous<br />

volunteers for collecting and providing specimens<br />

of the Virginia opossum for our studies.<br />

We are very grateful to D.V.M. Alfonso Guajardo,<br />

San Diego County Veterinarian Office, and<br />

Julie Irwin, student at San Diego <strong>State</strong> University<br />

(SDSU), for the necropsy of the opossums.<br />

Thanks are also due to SDSU student Susan<br />

Henderson for her technical assistance. We also<br />

thank 2 anonymous reviewers whose suggestions<br />

improved this paper.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Alden, K. J. 1995. Helminths of the opossum, Didelphis<br />

virginiana, in southern Illinois, with a compilation<br />

of all helminths reported from this host in<br />

North America. Journal of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 62:197-208.<br />

Anderson, R. C., M. D. Little, and U. R. Strelive.<br />

1980. The unique lungworms (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea)<br />

of the opossum (Didelphis marsupialis<br />

Linnaeus). Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong> 2:1-8.<br />

Baker, D. G., L. F. Cook, E. M. Johnson, and N.<br />

Lamberski. 1995. Prevalence, acquisition, and<br />

treatment of Didelphostrongylus hayesi (Nematoda:<br />

Metastrongyloidea) infection in opossums (Didelphis<br />

virginiana). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife<br />

Medicine 26:403-408.<br />

Gardner, A. L. 1973. The systematics of the genus<br />

Didelphis (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in North and<br />

Middle America. Special Publications of the Museum,<br />

Texas Tech University 4:3-45.<br />

Hunsaker, D. 1977. Ecology of New World marsupials.<br />

Pages 95-156 in D. Hunsaker II, ed. The<br />

Biology of Marsupials. Academic Press, New<br />

York-San Francisco-London.<br />

Travassos, L. 1925. Un nouveau type de Metastrongylidae.<br />

Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Societe<br />

de Biologic, Paris 93:1259-1262.<br />

Vaz, Z., and C. Pereira. 1934. Some new Brazilian<br />

nematodes. Journal of the Washington Academy<br />

of Sciences 24:54.


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 277-282<br />

Research Note<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 277<br />

New Host and Distribution Records of Cosmocephalus obvelatus<br />

(Creplin, 1825) (Nematoda: Acuariidae), with Morphometric<br />

Comparisons<br />

JULIA I. DiAZ,1 GRACIELA T. NAVONE, AND FLORENCIA CREMONTE<br />

Centre de Estudios Parasitologicos y de Vectores (CONICET-UNLP), Calle 2 NQ 584, 1900 La Plata,<br />

Argentina (e-mail: cepave@netverk.com.ar)<br />

ABSTRACT: This is the first record of Cosmocephalus<br />

obvelatus (Creplin, 1825) Seurat, 1919 (Nematoda:<br />

Acuariidae), from Argentina (Valdes Peninsula, province<br />

of Chubut) and from the Magellanic penguin<br />

Spheniscus magellanicus (Aves: Spheniscidae). The<br />

prevalence of this parasite was 31.3% and the mean<br />

intensity was 5.4. Despite the wide geographic distribution<br />

and the great variety of hosts parasitized by C.<br />

obvelatus (14 families belonging to 8 orders), there<br />

were no significant differences in morphological characteristics<br />

and measurements from previous records.<br />

Both the wide distribution and the morphometrical stability<br />

of C. obvelatus may be explained by its ecology<br />

and mode of transmission.<br />

KEY WORDS: Cosmocephalus obvelatus, Acuariidae,<br />

Nematoda, Spheniscus magellanicus, Spheniscidae,<br />

marine birds, Argentina.<br />

Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Creplin, 1825)<br />

Seurat, 1919, an acuariid nematode with a wide<br />

distribution, has been previously reported in Europe,<br />

Asia, Africa, New Zealand, and North<br />

America (Wong and Anderson, 1982). In South<br />

America, there is only 1 record of C. obvelatus,<br />

described as Cosmocephalus tanakai by Rodrigues<br />

de Olivera and Vicente (1963) from the<br />

black-backed gull Larus dominicanus Lichtenstein,<br />

1823, in Brazil. Later, C. tanakai was synonymized<br />

with C. obvelatus by Anderson and<br />

Wong (1981). This parasite has a wide range of<br />

hosts, having been previously recorded in members<br />

of Lariidae, Pelecanidae, Rynchopidae,<br />

Sternidae, Anatidae, Podicipedidae, Phalacrocoracidae,<br />

Gaviidae, Ardeidae, Stercoraridae,<br />

Haematopodidae, Treschiornitidae, and Accipitridae<br />

(Barus and Majudmar, 1975; Borgsteede<br />

and Jansen, 1980; Anderson and Wong, 1981;<br />

1 Corresponding author (e-mail: jid027@yahoo.<br />

com.ar).<br />

Tuggle and Schmeling, 1982). Among members<br />

of the Spheniscidae, C. obvelatus has been cited<br />

only from the rockhopper penguin Eudyptes<br />

crestatus (Miller, 1784) caught in Chile and<br />

transferred to the Japanese Zoological Garden<br />

(Azuma et al., 1988).<br />

This note reports the first record of C. obvelatus<br />

in the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus<br />

(Forster, 1781) (Aves: Spheniscidae).<br />

It is also the first time that C. obvelatus has been<br />

found in Argentina. Measurements of the specimens<br />

in this study are compared with those given<br />

by previous authors. Morphological details<br />

seen in the scanning electron microscope (SEM)<br />

and dates of prevalence and mean intensity are<br />

provided.<br />

At irregular intervals from 1996 to 2000, 16<br />

specimens of S. magellanicus, all of which had<br />

recently died of unknown but presumably natural<br />

causes, were collected along the coasts of the<br />

Valdes Peninsula (42°04'-42°53'S, 63°38'-<br />

64°30'W), province of Chubut, Argentina. After<br />

dissection, the digestive tract was fixed in 10%<br />

formalin. Acuariid nematodes were removed<br />

from the esophagus and stored in 70% ethanol.<br />

The specimens were cleared in lactophenol and<br />

studied under the light microscope. Some specimens<br />

were dried by the critical point method,<br />

examined by SEM (Jeol/SET 100®), and photographed.<br />

Voucher specimens were deposited in<br />

the Helminthological Collection of the Museo de<br />

La Plata (CHMLP), La Plata, Argentina (Accession<br />

no. 4811).<br />

The measurements of our specimens and<br />

those given by previous authors are listed in Table<br />

1. Morphological details are shown in Figures<br />

1-6. The prevalence was 31.25% and the<br />

mean intensity was 5.4. The esophagus was the<br />

only site of infection. We observed several de-<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Table 1. <strong>Comparative</strong> measurements of Cosmocephalus obvelatus from different hosts and localities.<br />

Rodrigues de<br />

Olivera and Anderson and Wong<br />

Vicente (1963) (1981)<br />

Cram (1927) Khalil (1931) Rao (1951)<br />

La<br />

Larus sp.<br />

Host* Several Pelecanus sp. Larus sp.<br />

Ne<br />

Larus delawarensis<br />

Canada<br />

Brazil<br />

Locality Europe Egypt Canada<br />

4<br />

10<br />

27<br />

—<br />

39<br />

45<br />

—<br />

—<br />

—<br />

3.3<br />

En<br />

44<br />

10<br />

19.4 (15.8-22.3)<br />

393 (320-500)<br />

615 (570-730)<br />

<strong>68</strong>4 (640-770)<br />

<strong>68</strong>5 (610-790)<br />

813 (705-940)<br />

1.3 (1.2-1.5)<br />

4.7 (4.1-5.1)<br />

6.0 (5.2-6.6)<br />

End of lateral alae<br />

8.4 (7.4-10.4)<br />

1<br />

12.5<br />

277<br />

363<br />

—<br />

—<br />

—<br />

0.77<br />

3.43<br />

4.2<br />

Female<br />

n — 1 immature —<br />

Total length (mm) 9.7-20 5.7 37122<br />

Maximum width (|xm) 300-380 — 200-400<br />

Buccal capsule ((Am) — — —<br />

Nerve ring (n-m) — — —<br />

Deirids (u.m) 490 — —<br />

Excretory pore (|xm) — — —<br />

Muscular esophagus (mm) — — —<br />

Glandular esophagus (mm) — — —<br />

Total esophagus (jxm) — <strong>68</strong>0 —<br />

Postdeirids — — —<br />

Vulva (from anterior end) (mm) 5.5 Midbody Midbody<br />

6.2<br />

—<br />

—<br />

39<br />

21<br />

—<br />

Long<br />

Short<br />

43 (40-45)<br />

25<br />

301 (220-380)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

36<br />

19<br />

175<br />

Vagina vera (pun) — — —<br />

Vagina uterina (|xm) — — —<br />

Egg length (p,m) 36 — 35-37<br />

Egg width (fi,m) 20 — 17-18<br />

Tail ((i,m) 230 180 —<br />

10<br />

10<br />

27<br />

—<br />

—<br />

46<br />

55<br />

—<br />

—<br />

5.2<br />

60<br />

10<br />

12.4 (9.9-14.3)<br />

279 (200-350)<br />

418 (380-510)<br />

474 (420-530)<br />

450 (350-540)<br />

583 (500-<strong>68</strong>0)<br />

1.1 (1.0-1.3)<br />

4.0 (3.6-4.3)<br />

5.1 (4.6-5.4)<br />

End of lateral alae<br />

2<br />

9.5-12<br />

250-280<br />

369<br />

462<br />

399<br />

532-630<br />

0.98-1.32<br />

2.85-4.61<br />

3.83-5.93<br />

—<br />

Male<br />

n — 2 —<br />

Total length (mm) 5.7-12.2 7.6 37085<br />

Maximum width (jjum) 240-255 — 150-270<br />

Buccal capsule (\j.m) — — —<br />

Nerve ring ((JUTI) — — —<br />

Deirids (p,m) 430 — —<br />

Excretory pore (u,m) — — —<br />

Muscular esophagus (mm) — — —<br />

Glandular esophagus (mm) — — —<br />

Total esophagus (|j,m) — 930 —<br />

Postdeirids — — —<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

COMP>


c<br />

Tj ;^ fn<br />

in<br />

ON<br />

o<br />

m<br />

ON<br />

"3<br />

s<br />

ON<br />

gcd<br />

u<br />

r? >ri ?<br />

— i r- r-<br />

7 i T<br />

CN r~ oc<br />

C- S C<br />

CN NO NC<br />

NO CN •r-i<br />

in


280 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Figures 1-6. Cosmocephalus obvelatus from Spheniscus magellanicus. 1. Apical view. 2. Anterior extremity<br />

showing lateral alae (arrow), dorsal view. 3. Anterior extremity showing cephalic papillae (arrow),<br />

inflexions of chordons and deirid (arrow), lateral view. 4. Detail of deirid. 5. Detail of postdeirid located<br />

near end of lateral alae (arrow). 6. Posterior extremity of male with left spicule protruded and showing<br />

papillae arrangement with proximal pair of precloacal papillae lying out of line of distribution (arrow),<br />

latero-ventral view. Scale bars: 1 = 50 ixm, 2 = 500 (mm, 3 = 100 u.m, 4 = 10 (xm, 5 = 20 (Jim, and 6 =<br />

200 fjim.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


ticeps (Rudolphi, 1819), which also is cosmopolitan<br />

but has a narrower range of hosts, Etchegoin<br />

et al. (2000) found differences in measurements<br />

among specimens from different localities.<br />

The shape of the cordons, the morphology and<br />

size of the cervical papillae, and the location in<br />

the definitive host (habitats) seem to be of fundamental<br />

importance when establishing relationships<br />

in the acuariid group (Barus and Majudmar,<br />

1975). The cordons of Cosmocephalus have<br />

a complex structure and are relatively wide.<br />

Cosmocephalus obvelatus is always located in<br />

the esophagus of the host. The genera Synhimantus<br />

and Cosmocephalus are closely related;<br />

they have similar cordons and cervical papillae,<br />

but members of the former genus live under the<br />

cuticle of the gizzard. Etchegoin et al. (2000)<br />

reported morphometric differences that they<br />

considered as intraspecific variations in specimens<br />

from different hosts and localities. However,<br />

we observed that C. obvelatus varies little,<br />

even in different hosts and localities. This morphometrical<br />

stability may indicate that Cosmocephalus<br />

is better adapted to different hosts and<br />

diverse localities because all hosts have similar<br />

environmental and feeding habits (eating fish).<br />

The intermediate hosts of C. obvelatus are amphipods,<br />

and it uses fish as paratenic hosts (Anderson,<br />

1992). These characteristics may play an<br />

important role in the cosmopolitan distribution<br />

of C. obvelatus. Moreover, the distributions of<br />

many species of fish-eating birds overlap in their<br />

breeding and/or wintering grounds.<br />

The intensity of infection recorded here is<br />

similar to the intensities found by Keppner<br />

(1973) from the California gull Larus californicus<br />

Lawrence, 1854 (Lariidae) (prevalence [P]<br />

= 23.5% and mean intensity [I] = 4.25), by<br />

Courtney and Forrester (1974) from the brown<br />

pelican Pelecanus occidentalis Linnaeus, 1776<br />

(Pelecanidae), in North America (P = 40% and<br />

I = 4), and by Lafuente et al. (1999) from Audouin's<br />

gull Larus audouinii Payraudeau, 1826<br />

(Lariidae), in the Mediterranean Sea (P =<br />

82.76% and I = 5.08). This intensity is higher<br />

than that given by Threlfall (19<strong>68</strong>) from the<br />

black-backed gull Larus marinus Linnaeus,<br />

1758 (Lariidae), in Newfoundland (P = 9.39%<br />

and I = 1).<br />

Boero and Led (1970) described a new species,<br />

Cosmocephalus argentinensis, from 1 female<br />

specimen found in a Magellanic penguin<br />

RESEARCH NOTES 281<br />

in the Zoological Garden in La Plata, Argentina.<br />

We consider this acuariid as a species inquirendae<br />

because the description is very poor and no<br />

type materials (which were never deposited in a<br />

museum collection) are available for our examination.<br />

We gratefully acknowledge the staff of the<br />

Servicio de Microscopia Electronica de Barrido,<br />

Museo de La Plata, for their technical assistance<br />

and Lucy Shirlaw for revision of the English.<br />

This study was funded by the Consejo Nacional<br />

de Investigaciones Cientfficas y Tecnicas (CON-<br />

ICET) and by the Comision de Investigaciones<br />

Cientfficas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires<br />

(CIC).<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Anderson, R. C. 1992. Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates.<br />

Their Development and Transmission.<br />

CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, U.K. 578<br />

pp.<br />

, and P. L. Wong. 1981. Redescription of Cosmocephalus<br />

obvelatus (Creplin, 1825) (Nematoda:<br />

Acuarioidea) from Larus delawarensis Ord (Laridae).<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:1897-<br />

1902.<br />

Azuma, H., M. Okamoto, M. Ohbayashi, Y. Nishine,<br />

and T. Mukai. 1988. Cosmocephalus obvelatus<br />

(Creplin 1825) (Nematoda: Acuariidae) collected<br />

from esophagus of rockhopper penguin, Eudyptes<br />

crestatus. Japanese Journal of Veterinary<br />

Research 36:73-77.<br />

Barus, V., and G. Majudmar. 1975. Scanning microscopic<br />

studies on the cordon structures of Acuariid<br />

genera (Nematoda: Acuariidae). Folia Parasitologica<br />

22:125-131.<br />

Boero, J. J., and J. E. Led. 1970. El parasitismo de<br />

La Fauna Autoctona. VI. Los parasites de la avifauna<br />

argentina I. Actas de las 5a Jornadas de Veterinaria,<br />

Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad<br />

Nacional de La Plata: 65-71.<br />

Borgsteede, F. H. M., and J. Jansen. 1980. Spirurata<br />

in wild birds in The Netherlands. Tropical and<br />

Geographic Medicine 32:91-92.<br />

Bowie, J. Y. 1981. Redescription of Cosmocephalus<br />

tanakai Rodriguez and Vicente (Nematoda-Acuariidae)<br />

a parasite of the southern black-backed<br />

gull in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology<br />

8:249-253.<br />

Courtney, C. H., and D. J. Forrester. 1974. Helminth<br />

parasites of the brown pelican in Florida<br />

and Louisiana. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington 41:89-93.<br />

Cram, E. B. 1927. Bird parasites of the suborders<br />

Strongylata, Ascaridata and Spirurata. Bulletin of<br />

the United <strong>State</strong>s National Museum 140:1-465.<br />

Etchegoin, J. A., F. Cremonte, and G. T. Navone.<br />

2000. Synhimantus (Synhimantus) laticeps (Rudolphi,<br />

1819) Railliet, Henry et Sisoff, 1912<br />

(Nematoda, Acuariidae) parasitic in Tyto alba<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


282 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

(Gmelin) (Aves, Tytonidae) in Argentina. Acta<br />

Parasitologica 45:99-106.<br />

Keppner, E. J. 1973. Some parasites of California<br />

gull, Lams californicus Lawrence, in Wyoming.<br />

Transactions of the American Microscopical Society<br />

92:288-291.<br />

Khalil, M. B. 1931. On two new species of nematodes<br />

from Pelecanus onocrotalus. Annals of Tropical<br />

Medicine and <strong>Parasitology</strong> 25:455-460.<br />

Lafuente, M., V. Roca, and E. Carbonell. 1999. Cestodos<br />

y nematodos de la gaviota de Audouin, Lams<br />

audouinii Payraudeau, 1826 (Aves: Laridae)<br />

en las Islas Chafarinas (Mediterraneo sudoccidental).<br />

Boletin de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia<br />

Natural (Sec. Biol.) 95:13-20.<br />

Rao, N. 1951. Cosmocephalus firlottei n. sp. (family<br />

JOHN S. MACKIEWICZ<br />

Elected to Life Membership in the Helnlinthological<br />

Society of Washington November 15, 2000<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Acuariidae) from the sea gull Larus argentatus.<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 25:173-177.<br />

Rodrigues de Olivera, H., and J. J. Vicente. 1963.<br />

Nova especie do genero Cosmocephalus Molin,<br />

1858 (Nematoda, Spiruroidea). Revista Brasilera<br />

de Biologia 23:389-392.<br />

Threlfall, W. 19<strong>68</strong>. The helminth parasites of three<br />

species of gulls in Newfoundland. Canadian Journal<br />

of Zoology 46:827-830.<br />

Tuggle, B. N., and S. K. Schmeling. 1982. Parasites<br />

of the bald eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus) of<br />

North America. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 18:<br />

501-506.<br />

Wong, P. L., and R. C. Anderson. 1982. The transmission<br />

and development of Cosmocephalus obvelatus<br />

(Nematoda: Acuarioidea) of gulls (Laridae).<br />

Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:1426-1440.<br />

GRAHAM C. KEARN<br />

Elected to Life Membership in the Helminthological<br />

Society of Washington November 15, 2000


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 283-284<br />

Anniversary Award<br />

The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

NANCY D. PACHECO<br />

Harley G. Sheffield, left, presents the 2000 Anniversary Award to Nancy D. Pacheco<br />

As Chairman of the Anniversary Award Committee of the Helminthological Society of Washington,<br />

it is my duty to present the 2000 Anniversary Award to Nancy Pacheco. Not only is it a<br />

duty, it is an honor and a pleasure to be able to present this award to such an outstanding member<br />

of the Society.<br />

The Award is authorized by the Society's Constitution and is to be given to a member for one<br />

or more achievements of the following nature: an outstanding contribution to the science of parasitology<br />

or related sciences that brings honor and credit to the Society, an exceptional paper read<br />

at a meeting of the Society or published in the Society's journal, outstanding service to the Society,<br />

or another achievement or contribution of distinction that warrants the highest recognition by the<br />

Society. The Awards Committee determined that Nancy qualifies in all of the above categories.<br />

Nancy was born and educated in Kansas. During her junior year of high school, she was fortunate<br />

to be an exchange student under the American Field Service Program and lived 6 months in New<br />

Zealand. She subsequently received the Bachelor of Science Degree from Washburn University in<br />

Topeka. Following graduation, she came to the National Institutes of Health and received a position<br />

as a biologist in the National Heart Institute. Working with physicians and postdocs, Nancy was<br />

engaged in studies on cardiac muscle physiology. Maybe there was a lot of twitching in that job<br />

because for some reason, she saw the light and soon turned to parasitology. In 19<strong>68</strong>, and for the<br />

283<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


284 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

next 8 years, she worked as a biologist in the Animal <strong>Parasitology</strong> Institute (API) of the U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture doing research on poultry and bovine parasites. Shortly after her arrival<br />

at API, I received a call from her supervisor, Dr. Vetterling, saying that he had hired a new person<br />

for his electron microscopy lab, and I should come over to meet her. That began our long scientific<br />

and social association. In 1976, Nancy moved to the Naval Medical Research Institute as a research<br />

microbiologist. There, she studied parasite immunology in relation to the development of malaria<br />

vaccines and later worked on cytokine regulation in wound repair. In 1994, she somehow slipped<br />

out of parasitology, without seeking advice of the Helminthological Society of Washington, and<br />

worked in the Wound Repair Program at NMRI until her retirement in 1997.<br />

Nancy's resume lists numerous publications. They illustrate her research contributions in the<br />

ultrastructure of intracellular parasites, techniques for isolation of large numbers of malaria parasites,<br />

which is a prerequisite to vaccine development, development of an oral vaccine against Campylobacter<br />

infection, development of a method to study local inflammatory action, and the study of the<br />

effects of cytokines in preventing translocation of bacteria in hemorrhagic shock.<br />

A predominant factor in the Committee's decision was Nancy's excellent service to the Society,<br />

of which, undoubtably, most of you are aware. She has a record that is hard to beat. To the best<br />

of my knowledge, and with a little help from her curriculum vitae, Nancy has served in every<br />

office and has been on every committee of the Society, with the exception of Editor and the Editorial<br />

Committee. After holding the position of vice president in 1980, she moved up to president the<br />

next year. She must have done something right because she was re-elected president in 1991, a feat<br />

that, with one exception, has been unmatched in recent Society history. In 1999, she was elected<br />

to the position of corresponding secretary-treasurer, which she currently holds.<br />

In spite of the considerable time that she has donated to the Society, Nancy has offered her<br />

expertise in various roles in other societies such as the American Society of Parasitologists and the<br />

American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Outside of the scientific area, she has been<br />

active in many church-related events with her husband Jim. There is one other activity that might<br />

be noted. As mentioned before, Nancy spent a number of years working with poultry coccidia. You<br />

all know what people in that field do—they search through chicken droppings and count the coccidial<br />

oocysts that they find. Well, Nancy must have developed a high degree of excellence in<br />

counting because she has steadily moved upward through the ranks in the H&R Block organization<br />

and is now a senior tax preparer.<br />

Nancy, I am very pleased to present to you, on the behalf of the Anniversary Awards Committee,<br />

the Helminthological Society of Washington's Anniversary Award for 2000.<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 284-285<br />

MINUTES<br />

Harley G. Sheffield, Ph.D.<br />

November 15, 2000<br />

Six Hundred Seventy-First through the Six Hundred Seventy-Fifth<br />

Meeting of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

671st Meeting: George Washington University, meeting. Dr. Eckerlin introduced the speakers.<br />

Washington, DC, 12 October 2000. President Robert Gwadz gave an overview of the National<br />

Dennis Richardson conducted the business Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded malaria remeeting.<br />

Ralph Eckerlin welcomed members search in Mali. This NIH program funds elecand<br />

their guests and introduced the President, lives for students with interests in either basic<br />

who briefly summarized the Executive Council sciences or clinical aspects of malaria. Albert<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Nieto reviewed recent advances in the use of<br />

synthetic peptides for cystic hydatid disease serology.<br />

John Hawdon provided an account of his<br />

research on potential hookworm vaccine candidates.<br />

Finally, Dr. Eckerlin reviewed his studies<br />

of fleas from flying squirrels in Virginia. New<br />

and renewal members included Russell C. Van<br />

Horn (U.S.A.), Eric Panitz (U.S.A.), and Riccardo<br />

Fiorillo (U.S.A.).<br />

672nd Meeting: 94th Aero Squadron, <strong>College</strong><br />

Park, Maryland, 15 November 2000. The anniversary<br />

dinner meeting and program were presided<br />

over by President Dennis Richardson. The<br />

slate of officers for <strong>2001</strong> were elected and installed<br />

by the membership in attendance: Dennis<br />

J. Richardson, president; William E. Moser, vice<br />

president; W. Patrick Carney and Nancy D. Pacheco<br />

continue as reporting secretary and corresponding<br />

secretary-treasurer, respectively.<br />

Nancy Pacheco was presented the Anniversary<br />

Award by Harley Sheffield. John S. Mackiewicz<br />

and Graham C. Kearn were elected to Life<br />

Membership (accepted for him by Gene Hayunga)<br />

and Honorary Membership (accepted for<br />

him by Sherman Hendrix), respectively.<br />

673rd Meeting: Nematology Laboratory, Agricultural<br />

Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,<br />

Maryland, 17 January <strong>2001</strong>. President Dennis<br />

Richardson presided over the business meeting,<br />

and Vice President Lynn Carta presided over the<br />

scientific session. Peter Maser summarized his<br />

paper "<strong>Comparative</strong> Biochemistry of Parasitic<br />

and Free-Living Nematodes." William Wergin<br />

gave an overview of "Low Temperature Scanning<br />

Microscopy and its Application in Agriculture."<br />

Dr. Carta finished the session with "Integrating<br />

Nematode Morphology and Molecules<br />

in Plant-Parasitic and Free-Living Nematodes."<br />

Two new members were announced: Wellington<br />

MINUTES 285<br />

A. Oyibo (Nigeria) and Analfa Cristina Paola<br />

(Argentina).<br />

674th Meeting: Walter Reed Army Institute of<br />

Research/Naval Medical Research Center, Silver<br />

Spring, Maryland, 12 March <strong>2001</strong>. President<br />

Dennis Richardson presided over the business<br />

meeting and Eileen Franke-Villasante presided<br />

over the scientific session. Ed Rowton reviewed<br />

the "Status of the Recent Outbreak of Canine<br />

Leishmaniasis in the United <strong>State</strong>s." His paper<br />

was followed by David Fryauff's report on "A<br />

New Twist on an Old Drug: Recent DOD Studies<br />

of Primaquine for Malaria Prophylaxis."<br />

Kent Kester summarized "Advances in Pre-<br />

Erythrocytic Malaria Vaccine Development,"<br />

and Dr. Ling presented the final paper on "The<br />

Labor Involved in Malaria Field Studies in Indonesia."<br />

675th Meeting: Biology Department, Gettysburg<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 5 May<br />

<strong>2001</strong>. President Richardson presided over the<br />

business meeting. Robin Overstreet, vice president<br />

of the American Society of Parasitologists<br />

(ASP), was welcomed and introduced to the<br />

members and guests by the president. Dr. Overstreet<br />

advised members that ASP has resources<br />

to provide travel grants for students who present<br />

papers at ASP meetings and to support speakers<br />

who are invited to present papers at meetings of<br />

affiliated societies. Sherman Hendrix presided<br />

over the scientific session. The first paper, presented<br />

by Dr. Overstreet, covered "Shrimp Parasites<br />

and Diseases," followed by Eric Hoberg's<br />

paper on the "Ancient Mariner—A History of<br />

Seabirds and Tapeworms on the Deep Blue<br />

Sea." Ann Barse summarized "New Host and<br />

Geographic Records of Monogenea of Billfishes."<br />

Sherman Hendrix presented the final paper<br />

on "Some Aspects of Biology of Bothitrema<br />

bothi (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea)."<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, p. 286<br />

Abaigar, T., 134<br />

Abrams, A., 177<br />

Agarwal, N., 87<br />

Aguilar-Aguilar, R., 204, 272<br />

Aguirre-Macedo, M. L., 42, 76,<br />

190<br />

Al-Sady, R. S. S., 108<br />

Amin, O. M., 103, 108<br />

Arjona-Torres, G., 42, 190<br />

Baez-Vale, R., 196<br />

Balfour, C. D., 126, 259<br />

Bassat, S. E, 108<br />

Ben Hassine, O. K., 91<br />

Boeger, W. A., 66<br />

Bolek, M. G., 164<br />

Brailovsky, D., 196<br />

Brooks, D. R., 177<br />

Burge, A. N., 52<br />

Bursey, C. R., 21, 138<br />

Cabanas-Carranza, G., 196, 204<br />

Caira, J. N., 52<br />

Cano, M., 134<br />

Carreno, R. A., 177<br />

Caspeta-Mandujano, J. M., 196, 204<br />

Center, T. D., 242<br />

Coggins, J. R., 164, 269<br />

Cone, D. K., 236<br />

Cremonte, E, 277<br />

Criscione, C. D., 149, 156<br />

Curran, S. S., 219<br />

Curtis, M. A., 112<br />

Damborenea, M. C., 249<br />

Dang, T. T., 219<br />

Davies, K. A., 242<br />

Demarais, S., 116<br />

Diaz, J. I., 277<br />

Dumailo, S., 42, 190<br />

Durden, L. A., 177<br />

Eckerlin, R. P., 143<br />

Espeso, G., 134<br />

Comp. Parasitol.<br />

<strong>68</strong>(2), <strong>2001</strong>, pp. 286-291<br />

AUTHOR INDEX FOR VOLUME <strong>68</strong><br />

Euzet, L., 91<br />

Fedynich, A. M., 116<br />

Font, W. E, 149, 156<br />

Forrester, D. J., 130, 173<br />

Foster, G. W., 130, 173<br />

Fried, B., 126, 256, 259<br />

Garcia-Prieto, L., 9<br />

Garijo, M. M., 134<br />

Giblin-Davis, R. M., 242<br />

Goldberg, S. R., 21, 138<br />

Gonzalez-Sob's, D., 42, 190<br />

Hasegawa, H., 261<br />

Hoberg, E. P., 177<br />

Hogue, C. C., 36<br />

Huffman, J. E., 256<br />

Jimenez-Ruiz, E A., 9<br />

Joy, J. E., 185<br />

Kharchenko, V. A., 97<br />

Kinsella, J. M., 130, 274<br />

Krecek, R. C., 97<br />

Kritsky, D. C., 66, 87<br />

Kuperman, B. I., 274<br />

Kuzmin, Y., 228<br />

Lane, S. J., 274<br />

Lichtenfels, J. R., 97, 265<br />

Lloyd, G. E, 274<br />

Love, S., 265<br />

Matey, V. E., 274<br />

Matthews, J. B., 265<br />

Mayen-Pena, E., 196<br />

McDonnell, A., 265<br />

Mendoza-Garfias, B., 9<br />

Mhaisen, E T., 108<br />

Milek, J. A., 122<br />

Monasmith, T., 116<br />

Moreno-Navarrete, R. G., 204, 272<br />

Mullican, S. K., 256<br />

Navone, G. T., 277<br />

Neifar, L., 91<br />

Nguyen, T. L., 219<br />

Ortiz, J. M., 134<br />

Overstreet, R. M., 219<br />

Paola, A., 249<br />

Parmelee, J. R., 21<br />

Peng, J. S., 36<br />

Perez-Ponce de Leon, G., 1, 9<br />

Pham, X.-D., 261<br />

Posel, P., 42, 190<br />

Reddy, A., 259<br />

Reinbold, J. C., 269<br />

Robaldo, R. B., 66<br />

Rossi, M. L., 126<br />

Ruiz de Ybanez, M. R., 134<br />

Salgado-Maldonado, G., 196, 204,<br />

272<br />

Sanchez-Nava, P., 204<br />

Scholz, T., 42, 76, 190<br />

Seville, R. S., 122<br />

Siu-Estrada, E., 42, 190<br />

Snyder, S. D., 228<br />

Soto-Galera, E., 196, 204<br />

Thul, J. E., 173<br />

Tkach, V. V., 228<br />

Tran, C.-L., 261<br />

Tucker, R. B., 185<br />

Vidal-Martinez, V. M., 42, 76, 190<br />

Villa-Ramirez, B., 272<br />

Williams, D. S., 242<br />

Wright, M. E., 112<br />

Yadav, V. S., 87<br />

Yoder, H. R., 269<br />

KEYWORD AND SUBJECT INDEX FOR VOLUME <strong>68</strong><br />

Acanthobothrium dollyae sp. n., 52<br />

Acanthobothrium maryanskii sp.<br />

n., 52<br />

Acanthobothrium royi sp. n., 52<br />

Acanthocephala, 9, 36, 103, 108,<br />

130, 190, 196, 204, 261, 272<br />

286<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Acanthocephalan cystacanth, 21<br />

Acuariidae gen. sp., 21, 196<br />

Adenomera andreae, 21


Adenomera hylaedactyla, 21<br />

Algansea tincella, 204<br />

Algonquin Park, Canada, 236<br />

Allocreadiidae gen. sp., 190<br />

Allocreadium mexicanum, 204<br />

Ancyrocephalus etropli, 87<br />

Ambystoma maculatum, 228<br />

American toad, 228<br />

Amphibia, 1, 21, 149, 164, 185,<br />

228, 269<br />

Amphilophus alfari, 42, 76, 190<br />

Anas platyrhynchus, 1<br />

Anisakis sp., 36<br />

Anisakis typica, 272<br />

Anolis carolinensis, 149<br />

Anura, 1, 21, 149, 164, 185<br />

Apharyngostrigea sp., 42<br />

Apicomplexa, 122<br />

Aplectana hylambatis, 21<br />

Aponurus sp., 36<br />

Archocentrm nigrofasciatus, 42,<br />

76<br />

Arctic chair, 112<br />

Arctic lakes, 112<br />

Argentina, 249, 277<br />

Ascocotyle (Ascocotyle) tenuicollis,<br />

42<br />

Ascocotyle (Phagicola) diminuta,<br />

42<br />

Ascocotyle (Phagicola) mollienisicola,<br />

42<br />

Ascocotyle (Phagicola) nana, 42<br />

Ashworthius sp., 177<br />

Aspidogastrea, 249<br />

Astyanax fasciatus, 1, 42, 190,<br />

196<br />

Athene cunicularia, 130<br />

Atherinella crystallina, 204<br />

Australia, 242<br />

Autonomous Region of the South<br />

Atlantic, Nicaragua, 42<br />

Aves, 1, 130, 173, 277<br />

Awaous tajasica, 204<br />

Aythya collaris, 173<br />

Azteca chub, 204<br />

Baja California Sur, Mexico, 272<br />

Balsas River, Mexico, 196<br />

Balsas catfish, 196<br />

Balsas shiner, 196<br />

Balsas splitfin, 196<br />

Barn owl, 130<br />

Barred owl, 130<br />

Basin white-lipped frog, 21<br />

Batracholandros magnavulvaris,<br />

185<br />

Batracholandros spectatus, 21<br />

Beireis' treefrog, 21<br />

Biodiversity, 1, 177<br />

Biogeography, 149<br />

Biomphalaria glabrata, 126<br />

Black-bellied garter snake, 9<br />

Blackbelt cichlid, 42, 76, 190<br />

Blackfin goodea, 196, 204<br />

Blackfin silverside, 204<br />

Blood parasites, 173<br />

Bluegill, 204<br />

Bolbosoma hamiltoni, 272<br />

Bolivian bleating frog, 21<br />

Bolivian white-lipped frog, 21<br />

Boophilus microplus, 177<br />

Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, 9,<br />

196, 204<br />

Brachylairna mcintoshi, 130<br />

Brachylecithum rarum, 130<br />

Brazil, 66<br />

Brevimulticaecum sp., 21, 42<br />

Brilliant-thighed poison frog, 21<br />

Broad-leaved paperbark, 242<br />

Brown egg frog, 21<br />

Brown newt, 228<br />

Bubo virginianus, 130<br />

Buenos Aires Province, Argentina,<br />

249<br />

Bufo americanus, 228<br />

Bufo glaberrimus, 21<br />

Bufo marinus, 1, 21<br />

Bufo typhonius, 21<br />

Burchell's zebra, 97<br />

Burrowing owl, 130<br />

Butterfly cichlid, 42, 76, 190<br />

California, U.S.A., 36, 274<br />

Canada, 112, 236<br />

Cane toad, 1, 21<br />

Capillaria cyprinodonticola, 196<br />

Capillaria dispar, 130<br />

Capillaria falconis, 130<br />

Capillaria sp., 130<br />

Capillaria tenuissima, 130<br />

Capillariidae gen. sp., 204<br />

Capillariinae gen. sp., 9<br />

Casmerodius albus, 1<br />

Catenotaenia sp., 116<br />

Centrocestus formosanus, 204<br />

Centropomidae, 66<br />

Centropomus undecimalis, 66<br />

Centrorhynchiis kuntzi, 130<br />

Centrorhynchus spinosus, 130<br />

Centrocestus formosanus, 196<br />

Cepedietta michiganensis, 185<br />

Cestoda, 21, 42, 52, 112, 116,<br />

130, 138, 149, 156, 164, 196,<br />

261, 269, 272<br />

Cestoidea, 9, 36<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

INDEX 287<br />

Chandleronema longigutturata,<br />

130<br />

Channel catfish, 196<br />

Chelonia mydas, 1<br />

Checklist, 204<br />

Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico, 116<br />

Chirostoma humboldtianiim, 204<br />

Chirostoma jordani, 204<br />

Chirostoma labarcae, 204<br />

Chirostoma riojai, 206<br />

Choanotaenia speotytonis, 130<br />

Chubut, Argentina, 277<br />

Cichlasoma beani, 204<br />

Cichlasoma geddesi, 1<br />

Cichlasoma faceturn, 249<br />

Cichlasoma istlanum, 196<br />

Cichlasoma maculicauda, 42, 76,<br />

190<br />

Cichlasoma managuense, 42, 76,<br />

190<br />

Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum, 196<br />

Cichlasoma synspillum, 1<br />

Cichlasoma urophthalmus, 1<br />

Ciliata, 185<br />

Cladocystis trifolium, 42<br />

Clethrionomys gapperi, 122<br />

Clinical effects, 256<br />

Clinostoinum complanatum, 42,<br />

196, 204<br />

Clinostoinum sp., 42, 269<br />

Coccidia, 134<br />

Coccidiosis, 134<br />

Colostethus marchesianus, 21<br />

Colubridae, 219<br />

Common carp, 204<br />

Common oval frog, 21<br />

Common snook, 66<br />

Community ecology, 116<br />

Component communities, 1 16<br />

Contracaecum sp., 9, 42, 196, 204<br />

Convict cichlid, 42, 76, 190, 196<br />

Copepods, 112<br />

Coronocyclus coronatus, 265<br />

Coronocyclus labiatus, 265<br />

Coryrnbia ptychocarpa, 242<br />

Coiynosoma sp., 36<br />

Cosmocephalus argentinensis, 277<br />

Cosmocephalus obvelatus, 277<br />

Cosmocerca brasiliense, 21<br />

Cosmocerca parva, 21<br />

Cosmocerca podicipinus, 21<br />

Cosmocercella phyllomedusae, 21<br />

Cosmocercoides sp., 164, 269<br />

Costa Rica, 177<br />

Cosymbotus platyurus, 138<br />

Cow Knob salamander, 185<br />

Crassicutus cichlasomae, 190


288 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

Craterostomum acuticaudatum,<br />

265<br />

Crepidostomum sp., 190<br />

Crowding effects, 156<br />

Crump's treefrog, 21<br />

Cryptogonimidae gen. sp., 42, 204<br />

Ctenophryne geayi, 21<br />

Cundinamarca toad, 21<br />

Cuticle, 242<br />

Cuvier's gazelle, 134<br />

Cyathocotylidae, 219<br />

Cyathostominea, 265<br />

Cyathostomurn catinatum, 265<br />

Cyathostomum montgomeryi, 97<br />

Cyathostomurn pateratum, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus ashworthi, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus elongatus, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus insigne, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus leptostomum, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus nassatus, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus radiatus, 265<br />

Cylicocyclus ultrajectinus, 265<br />

Cylicostephanus bidentatiis, 265<br />

Cylicostephanus calicatus, 265<br />

Cylicostephanus longibursatus,<br />

265<br />

Cylicostephanus minutus, 265<br />

Cylicostephanus goldi, 265<br />

Cylidodontophorus bicoronatus,<br />

265<br />

Cylindrotaenia americana, 21<br />

Cynops ensicauda, 228<br />

Cyprinus carpio, 204<br />

Cyst storage, 126<br />

Cysticercus, 116, 177<br />

Dactylogyridae, 76, 87<br />

Darkedged splitfin, 204<br />

Demerara Falls treefrog, 21<br />

Dermatemys mawii, 1<br />

Development, 149<br />

Diaptomus (Aglaodiaptornus) leptopus,<br />

112<br />

Diaptomus (Leptodiaptornus) minutus,<br />

112<br />

Didelphis virginiana, 1, 274<br />

Didelphostrongylus hayesi, 274<br />

Digenea, 1, 9, 36, 42, 190, 196,<br />

204<br />

Diphyllobothrium dendriticum,<br />

112<br />

Diplectanidae, 66<br />

Diplobatis ommata, 52<br />

Diplostomum sp., 204<br />

Diplostomum (A.) compactutn, 42,<br />

196<br />

Diplostomum (Tylodelphys) sp., 9<br />

Dipodomys merriami, 116<br />

Dispharynx affinis, 130<br />

Dispharynx nasuta, 130<br />

Domestic chicks, 256<br />

Dorcas gazelle, 134<br />

Dracunculus ophidensis, 9<br />

Dull rocket frog, 21<br />

Eastern screech-owl, 130<br />

Echinostoma caproni, 126, 256,<br />

259<br />

Echinostoma revolutum, 256<br />

Echinostoma trivolvis, 256<br />

Echinostomiasis, 256<br />

Ecology, 261<br />

Edalorhina perezi, 21<br />

Eimeria clethrionomyis, 122<br />

Eimeria elegatis, 134<br />

Eimeria gazella, 134<br />

Eimeria pallida, 134<br />

Eirunepe snouted treefrog, 21<br />

Elachistocleis avails, 21<br />

Elasmobranchii, 52, 91<br />

Electron microscopy, 52, 228,<br />

242, 249, 274, 277<br />

Eleutherodactylus cruralis, 21<br />

Eleutherodactylus fenestratus, 21<br />

Eleutherodactylus imitatrix, 21<br />

Eleutherodactylus peruvianus, 21<br />

Eleutherodactylus toftae, 21<br />

Ency station, 126<br />

Enhydris chinensis, 219<br />

Enhydris plumbea, 219<br />

Epidermis, 242<br />

Epipedobates femoralis, 21<br />

Epipedobates pictus, 21<br />

Equus burchelli antiquorum, 97<br />

Zssctt: americanus, 103<br />

Estado de Mexico, Mexico, 9,<br />

196, 204<br />

Etroplus suratensis, 87<br />

Eucalyptus leucoxylon, 242<br />

Eustrongylides sp., 9, 42, 196,<br />

204<br />

Excisa excisiformis, 130<br />

Excretion pattern, 134<br />

Excystation, 126, 259<br />

Experimental infection, 112<br />

Falcaustra affinis, 9<br />

Falcaustra mexicana, 9<br />

Falcaustra wardi, 9<br />

Falcaustra sp., 42<br />

Fence lizards, 149<br />

Fergusobia sp., 242<br />

Fergusonina sp., 242<br />

Filaria sp., 116<br />

Fixation artifacts, 156, 219<br />

Flat-bodied house gecko, 138<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Florida, U.S.A., 130, 149, 173<br />

Fourth International Congress of<br />

Nematology, 172<br />

Fourth International Symposium<br />

on Monogenea, 142<br />

Freshwater mullet, 108<br />

Gazella cuvieri, 134<br />

Gazella dama mhorr, 134<br />

Gazella dorcas neglecta, 134<br />

Gazelle, 134<br />

Gehyra mutilata, 138<br />

Gekkonidae, 138, 149<br />

Genyonemus lineatus, 36<br />

Georgia, U.S.A., 103<br />

Girardinichthys multiradiatus, 204<br />

Glossocercus auritus, 196<br />

Glypthelmins parva, 21<br />

Glypthelmins quieta, 164, 269<br />

Gnathostoma sp., 204<br />

Goblet cell, 256<br />

Gold-striped frog, 21<br />

Golden hamster, 112<br />

Gongylonema dipodomysis, 116<br />

Gongylonema neoplasticum, 261<br />

Gongylonema pulchrum, 177<br />

Goodea atripinnis, 196, 204<br />

Gorgoderina bilobata, 269<br />

Great horned owl, 130<br />

Green anole, 149<br />

Green chromide, 87<br />

Green frog, 164, 269<br />

Guanajuato, Mexico, 204<br />

Guerrero, Mexico, 196<br />

Gulf of California, 52<br />

Gunther's banded treefrog, 21<br />

Guppy, 196<br />

Gussevia herotilapiae sp. n., 76<br />

Gyalocephalus capitatus, 265<br />

Gymnura altavela, 91<br />

Gyrodactylus elegans, 204<br />

Gyrodactylus sp., 196, 204<br />

Hadwenius tursionis, 212<br />

Haemaphysalis juxtakochi, 177<br />

Haematoloechus varioplexus, 164,<br />

269<br />

Haemoproteus nettionis, 173<br />

Halipegus eccentricus, 164, 269<br />

Hamptophryne boliviano, 21<br />

Hedruris siredonis, 9<br />

Heleobia parchappii, 249<br />

Helminth larvae, 42<br />

Helminthological Society of<br />

Washington:<br />

Anniversary Award, 283<br />

Dues Increase, 163<br />

Editors' Acknowledgments, 155


Honorary Membership, 282<br />

Life Membership, 282<br />

Meeting Schedule, 121<br />

Mission and Vision <strong>State</strong>ments,<br />

147<br />

Symposium Announcement,<br />

227<br />

Helminths, 9, 36, 116, 130, 149,<br />

156, 177, 185, 190, 196, 204,<br />

219, 228, 242, 249, 256, 259,<br />

261, 265, 269, 272, 274, 277<br />

Hematozoa, 173<br />

Hemidactylus frenatus, 138<br />

Hemidactylus garnotii, 138, 149<br />

Hemidactylus turcicus, 149, 156<br />

Hemiphyllodactylus typus, 138<br />

Henle's snouted treefrog, 21<br />

Herotilapia multispinosa, 42, 76,<br />

190<br />

Heterandria bimaculatus, 196<br />

Heteromoxyuris deserti, 116<br />

Heteronchocotyle gymnurae sp.<br />

n., 91<br />

Heterophyidae gen. sp., 42<br />

Heterostrongylus heterostrongylus,<br />

274<br />

Hexabothriidae, 91<br />

Horses, 265<br />

Host specificity, 149<br />

House gecko, 138<br />

Hybopis boucardi, 196<br />

Hyla boans, 21<br />

Hyla brevifrons, 21<br />

Hyla calcarata, 21<br />

Hyla fasciata, 21<br />

Hyla granosa, 21<br />

Hyla koechlini, 21<br />

Hyla leali, 21<br />

Hyla leucophyllata, 21<br />

Hyla marmorata, 21<br />

Hyla parviceps, 21<br />

Hyla rhodopepla, 21<br />

Hyla schubarti, 21<br />

Hymenolepis diminuta, 261<br />

Hysterothylacium sp., 196<br />

Ictalunis balsanus, 196<br />

Ictalurus punctatus, 196<br />

Ilyodon whitei, 196<br />

Imitator robber frog, 21<br />

India, 87<br />

Indo-Pacific geckos, 138, 149<br />

Infectivity, 126, 256<br />

Insecta, 242<br />

Iraq, 108<br />

Ixodes affinis, 177<br />

Jaguar cichlid, 42, 76, 190<br />

Jaguar leaf frog, 21<br />

Jalisco, Mexico, 9, 196, 204<br />

Japan, 228<br />

Jeweled splitfin, 204<br />

Juvenile nematodes, 36<br />

Key, 236<br />

Kinosternon hirtipes, 9<br />

Koechlin's treefrog, 21<br />

Lacistorhynchus dollfusi, 21<br />

La Paz robber frog, 21<br />

Leal's treefrog, 21<br />

Lecithochirium sp., 21<br />

Lemdana wernaati, 130<br />

Lepidochelys olivacea, 1<br />

Lcpidodactylus aurcolincatus, 138<br />

Lepornis gibbosus, 236<br />

Lepomis macrochirus, 206<br />

Leptodactylus bolivianus, 21<br />

Leptodactylus leptodactyloides, 21<br />

Leptodactylus mystaceus, 21<br />

Leptodactylus pentadactylus, 21<br />

Leptodactylus petersii, 21<br />

Leptodactylus rhodonotus, 21<br />

Lerma chub, 204<br />

Lerma livebearer, 196, 204<br />

Lerma-Santiago river basin, Mexico,<br />

204<br />

Leucocytozoon simondi, 173<br />

Life cycle, 112<br />

Ligula intestinalis, 204<br />

Lithodytes lineatiis, 21<br />

Liza abu, 108<br />

Lobatostoma jungwirthi, 249<br />

Long-whiskered catfish, 190<br />

Los Angeles Harbor, U.S.A., 36<br />

Louisiana, U.S.A., 149, 156<br />

Lowland tropical bullfrog, 21<br />

Madre de Dios treefrog, 21<br />

Magellanic penguin, 277<br />

Magnivitellinum simplex, 190, 196<br />

Mammalia, 1, 97, 112, 116, 122,<br />

126, 134, 177, 259, 261, 265,<br />

272, 274<br />

Manaus slender-legged treefrog,<br />

21<br />

Manteriella sp., 36<br />

Marbled treefrog, 21<br />

Margotrema bravoae, 204<br />

Maritrema sp., 130<br />

Mastophorus dipodomis, 116<br />

Mediterranean geckos, 149, 156<br />

Mediterranean Sea, 91<br />

Megalodiscus temperatus, 269<br />

Melaleuca quinquenervia, 242<br />

Merriam's kangaroo rat, 116<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

INDEX 289<br />

Mesa Central, Mexico, 9<br />

Mesa silverside, 204<br />

Mesocestoides sp., 164, 269<br />

Mesocricetus auratus, 112<br />

Metacercariae, 42, 126, 164, 259,<br />

269<br />

Mexican garter snake, 9<br />

Mexican molly, 196, 204<br />

Mexican mud turtle, 9<br />

Mexican tetra, 196<br />

Mexico, 1, 9, 52, 196, 204, 272<br />

Michoacan, Mexico, 9, 196, 204<br />

Microfilaria, 173<br />

Microphallus sp., 130<br />

Mississippi, U.S.A., 149<br />

Mohor gazelle, 134<br />

Mollusca, 126, 249<br />

Molly, 190<br />

Molting, 242<br />

Moniliformis moniliformis, 261<br />

Monogenea, 9, 76, 91, 196, 204<br />

Monogenoidea, 66, 87<br />

Morelos, Mexico, 196<br />

Morphology, 97, 156, 265, 277<br />

Mugilidae, 108<br />

Mus musculus, 126, 259<br />

Myrtaceae, 242<br />

Myxobolus cyprinicola, 236<br />

Myxobolus dechtiari, 236<br />

Myxobolus gibbosus, 236<br />

Myxobolus Hi, 236<br />

Myxobolus lipomicus, 236<br />

Myxobolus magnaspherus, 236<br />

Myxobolus osburni, 236<br />

Myxobolus paralintoni, 236<br />

Myxobolus poecilichthidis, 236<br />

Myxobolus uvuliferus, 236<br />

Myxozoa, 236<br />

Namibia, 97<br />

Napo's tropical bullfrog, 21<br />

Natalus mexicanus, 1<br />

Nayarit, Mexico, 204<br />

Nematoda, 9, 21, 42, 97, 116,<br />

130, 138, 164, 185, 190, 196,<br />

204, 228, 242, 261, 265, 269,<br />

272, 274, 277<br />

Neodiplostomum americanum, 130<br />

Neodiplostomum reflexum, 130<br />

Neoechinorhynchidae, 103, 108<br />

Neoechinorhynchus didelphis sp.<br />

n., 103<br />

Neoechinorhynchus golvani, 190,<br />

196, 204<br />

Neoechinorhynchus iraqensis sp.<br />

n., 108<br />

New books, 102, 107, 176, 255<br />

New combination, 87, 219


290 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

New genus, 87<br />

New geographical record, 9, 21,<br />

42, 52, 66, 76, 87, 122, 130,<br />

134, 138, 173, 177, 185, 190,<br />

196, 204, 236, 261, 265, 269,<br />

272, 274, 277<br />

New host record, 9, 21, 36, 42,<br />

52, 66, 76, 87, 112, 122, 130,<br />

134, 138, 164, 177, 185, 204,<br />

261, 272, 274, 277<br />

New Mexico, U.S.A., 116<br />

New species, 52, 76, 91, 103,<br />

108, 219, 228<br />

New synonymy, 236<br />

Nicaragua, 42, 76, 190<br />

Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, 261<br />

Northern leopard frog, 228<br />

Notocotylus sp., 261<br />

Notropis sallei, 204<br />

Nycticorax nycticorax, 1<br />

Oaxaca, Mexico, 196<br />

Obituary:<br />

W. Henry Leigh, 143<br />

Obituary Notice:<br />

Julius Feldmesser, 41<br />

Ocellated electric ray, 52<br />

Ochetosoma brevicaecum, 9<br />

Ochoterenella vellardi, 21<br />

Odocoileus virginianus, 177<br />

Oligogonotylus manteri, 42, 190<br />

Ommatobrephidae, 219<br />

Ondoorstepoort Helminthological<br />

Collection, 195<br />

Ontario, Canada, 236<br />

Oochoristica javaensis, 138, 149,<br />

156<br />

Oocyst, 122, 134<br />

Ophidascaris sp., 21<br />

Orientostrongylus cf. tenorai, 261<br />

Orinoco lime treefrog, 21<br />

Osteocephalus taurinus, 21<br />

Oswaldocruzia lopesi, 21<br />

Oswaldocruzia pipiens, 164, 269<br />

Otus asio, 130<br />

Pachitea robber frog, 21<br />

Parapharyngodon maplestoni, 138<br />

Parelaphostrongylus tennis, 177<br />

Parvitaenia cochlearii, 196<br />

Parvitaenia macropeos, 196<br />

Pastel cichlid, 42, 76, 190<br />

Pathology, 256<br />

Perciformes, 66, 87<br />

Perez's snouted frog, 21<br />

Pernambuco, Brazil, 66<br />

<strong>Peru</strong>, 21<br />

<strong>Peru</strong> robber frog, 21<br />

<strong>Peru</strong> white-lipped frog, 21<br />

Petenia splendida, 1<br />

Peter's frog, 21<br />

Phalacrocorax olivaceus, 1<br />

Philander opossum, 1<br />

Philippine Islands, 138<br />

Phrynohyas coriacea, 21<br />

Phrynohyas venulosa, 21<br />

Phyllomedusa atelopoides, 21<br />

Phyllomedusa pcdliata, 21<br />

Phyllomedusa tomopterna, 21<br />

Phyllomedusa vaillanti, 21<br />

Physaloptera sp., 21<br />

Physalopteroides venancioi, 21<br />

Pipa pipa, 21<br />

Pisces, 1, 36, 42, 66, 76, 87, 103,<br />

108, 112, 190, 196, 204, 236,<br />

249<br />

Plagiorchis sp., 130<br />

Platyhelminthes, 1<br />

Plethodon punctatus, 185<br />

Plethodon wehrlei, 185<br />

Pneumatophilus variabilis, 9<br />

Poecilia reticulata, 196<br />

Poecilia sphenops, 196, 204<br />

Poecilia veil/era, 42, 190<br />

Poeciliopsis gracilis, 196<br />

Poeciliopsis infans, 196, 204<br />

Poeciliopsis sp., 204<br />

Polymorphic brevis, 9, 204<br />

Polystornoidella oblonga, 9<br />

Porrocaecum depressmn, 130<br />

Porrocaecum sp., 21<br />

Porthole livebearer, 196<br />

Posthodiplostomurn minimum, 9,<br />

42, 196, 204<br />

Postorchigenes ovatus, 138<br />

Prescribed fire, 116<br />

Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus)<br />

neocaballeroi, 190<br />

Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus)<br />

rebecae, 190<br />

Prosthenhystera obesa, 190<br />

Prosthogonirnus ovatus, 130<br />

Proteocephalidea gen. sp., 42, 204<br />

Proteocephalus sp., 269<br />

Proteocephalus variabilis, 9<br />

Proterodiplostomidae gen. sp., 42<br />

Proterodiplostomum sp., 204<br />

Pseudis paradoxa, 21<br />

Pseudocapillaria tomentosa, 204<br />

Pterygodermatites dipodomis, 116<br />

Puebla, Mexico, 196<br />

Puerto Rico, 66<br />

Pumpkinseed sunfish, 236<br />

Quebec, Canada, 112<br />

Queretero, Mexico, 204<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

Queensland, Australia, 242<br />

Raillietina celebensis, 261<br />

Raillietnema gubernaculatum, 21<br />

Rana clamitans, 269<br />

Rana clamitans melanota, 164<br />

Rana montezumae, 1<br />

Rana pipiens, 228<br />

Rana sphenocephala, 149<br />

Rana vaillanti, 1<br />

Ransom Trust Report, 248<br />

Rattus argiventer, 261<br />

Rattus losea, 261<br />

Rattus tanezumi, 261<br />

Rear-fanged water snake, 219<br />

Redescription, 236<br />

Redfin pickerel, 103<br />

Redside cichlid, 196<br />

Red-skirted treefrog, 21<br />

Red-snouted treefrog, 21<br />

Reptilia, 1, 9, 138, 149, 156, 219<br />

Reserva Cuzco Amazonico, 21<br />

Rhabdias ambystomae sp. n., 228<br />

Rhabdias americanus, 228<br />

Rhabdias bermani, 228<br />

Rhabdias fuscovenosa, 9<br />

Rhabdias ranae, 228<br />

Rhabdias tokyoensis, 228<br />

Rhabdiasidae, 228<br />

Rhabdochona canadensis, 196<br />

Rhabdochona kidderi kidderi, 190,<br />

196<br />

Rhabdochona lichtenfelsi, 196<br />

Rhabdochoma mexicana, 196<br />

Rhabdosynochus hargisi sp. n.,<br />

66<br />

Rhabdosynochus hudsoni sp. n.,<br />

66<br />

Rhabdosynochus rhabdosynochus,<br />

66<br />

Rhamdia nicaraguensis, 42, 190<br />

Ring-necked duck, 173<br />

Rio Mamore robber frog, 21<br />

River goby, 204<br />

Russia, 228<br />

Rusty treefrog, 21<br />

Saccocoelioides sogandaresi, 190,<br />

196<br />

Saccocoelioides spp., 190<br />

Salamanders, 185, 228<br />

Salamandrella kaiserlingii, 228<br />

Salmonidae, 112<br />

Salvelinus alpinus, 112<br />

Sarayacu treefrog, 21<br />

Scarthyla ostinodactyla, 21<br />

Sceloporus u. iindulatus, 149<br />

Schrankiana inconspicata, 21


Schrankiana larvata, 21<br />

Schrankiana schrankai, 21<br />

Schrankianella brasili, 21<br />

Schubart's Rondonia treefrog, 21<br />

Sciadicleithrum bicuensc sp. n.,<br />

76<br />

Sciadicleithrum maculicaudae sp.<br />

n., 76<br />

Sciadicleithrum meekii, 76<br />

Sciadicleithrum mexicanum, 76<br />

Sciadicleithrum nicaraguense sp.<br />

n., 76<br />

Sciadicleithrum sp., 204<br />

Scinax garbei, 21<br />

Scinax icterica, 21<br />

Scinax pedromedinai, 21<br />

Scinax ruba, 21<br />

Sclerocleidoid.es gen. n., 87<br />

Sclerocleidoides etropli comb, n.,<br />

87<br />

Scotland, 265<br />

Seasonal study, 164<br />

Sensory papillae, 249<br />

Serpinema trispinosum, 9, 42<br />

Sharpnose silverside, 204<br />

Shortfin silverside, 204<br />

Siberian newt, 228<br />

Sinaloan cichlid, 204<br />

Singhiatrema vietnamensis sp. n.,<br />

219<br />

Skrjabinelazia machidai, 138<br />

South Africa, 97<br />

South American bullfrog, 21<br />

South American common toad, 21<br />

South Australian blue gum, 242<br />

Southern leopard frog, 149<br />

Southern red-backed vole, 122<br />

Spain, 134<br />

Spauligodon hemidactylus, 138<br />

Sphaenorhynchus lacteus, 21<br />

Spheniscus magellanicus, 211<br />

Spinitectus osorioi, 9<br />

Spinner dolphin, 272<br />

Spiny butterfly ray, 91<br />

Spirocamallanus sp., 36<br />

Spiroxys contorta, 9<br />

Spiroxys sp., 42, 196, 204<br />

Spiroxys susanae, 9<br />

Spirurids, 130<br />

Splendidofilaria fallisensis, 173<br />

Spot-legged poison frog, 21<br />

Spottail chub, 204<br />

Spottail killifish, 196<br />

Spotted salamander, 228<br />

Stenella longirostris, 272<br />

Stephana stomum californicum, 36<br />

Stephanostomum tristephanum, 36<br />

Stomylotrema vicarium, 130<br />

Strigea elegans, 130<br />

Strix varia, 130<br />

Strobilocephalus triangularis, 272<br />

Strongylidae, 97<br />

Strongyloides ratti, 261<br />

Strongyloides sp., 130<br />

Strongyloides venezuelensis, 261<br />

.Stump-toed gecko, 138<br />

Stunkardiella minima, 42<br />

Subulura forcipata, 130<br />

Subulura reclinata, 130<br />

Surinam golden-eyed treefrog, 21<br />

Surinam toad, 21<br />

Survey, 9, 21, 42, 76, 130, 138,<br />

164, 173, 177, 185, 190, 196,<br />

261, 265, 269<br />

vSwamp bloodwood, 242<br />

Swimming frog, 21<br />

Synhimantus laticeps, 130<br />

Syphacia muris, 261<br />

Szidatia taiwanensis comb, n.,<br />

219<br />

Tadarida brasiliensis, 1<br />

Taxonomy, 9, 52, 66, 76, 87, 91,<br />

97, 103, 108, 149, 156, 204,<br />

219, 228, 236<br />

Tegument, 249<br />

Telorchis corti, 9<br />

Tetra, 42, 190<br />

Tetrameres microspinosa, 130<br />

Tetrameres strigiphila, 130<br />

Tetraphyllidea, 36, 52, 272<br />

Thailand, 138<br />

Thamnophis eques, 9<br />

Thamnophis melanogaster, 9<br />

Ticks, 177<br />

Tiger-striped leaf frog, 21<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

INDEX 291<br />

Toady leaf frog, 21<br />

Toluca silverside, 204<br />

Tree gecko, 138<br />

Trematoda, 21, 126, 130, 138,<br />

164, 249, 256, 259, 261, 269,<br />

272<br />

Tribolium castaneum, 149<br />

Tridentoinfundibulum gobi, 265<br />

Trigonocotyle sp., 272<br />

Troschel's treefrog, 21<br />

Tunisia, 91<br />

Tyto alba, 130<br />

Ultrastructure, 242, 249<br />

Urocledoides cf. costaricensis,<br />

196<br />

Uvulifersp., 42, 196<br />

U.S.A., 36, 103, 116, 122, 132,<br />

149, 156, 164, 173, 185, 228,<br />

269, 274<br />

Valipora minuta, 196<br />

Variation, 156<br />

Veined treefrog, 21<br />

Vietnam, 219, 261<br />

Virginia opossum, 274<br />

Waltonella sp., 164<br />

Wehrle's salamander, 185<br />

West Virginia, U.S.A., 185<br />

White croaker, 36<br />

White-lined leaf frog, 21<br />

White-tailed deer, 177<br />

Wisconsin, U.S.A., 164, 228, 269<br />

Worm recovery, 126<br />

Wyoming, U.S.A., 122<br />

Xenotoca variatus, 204<br />

Yellow-lined smooth-scaled gecko,<br />

138<br />

Yellow-snouted treefrog, 21<br />

Yucatan molly, 42<br />

Yurirea alta, 204<br />

Zalophotrema pacificum, 212<br />

Zebra, 97<br />

Zoogonoides sp., 36


292 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOC7Y, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />

APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP<br />

in the<br />

HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON<br />

(Please Type or Print Legibly)<br />

Name:<br />

Mailing Address:<br />

Present Position and Name of Institution (If you are a student, write "Student" and indicate the<br />

degree you are working for and the university and department):<br />

Phone: FAX:<br />

E-Mail:<br />

Highest Degree Earned and the Year Received:<br />

Fields of Interest:<br />

May the Society publish your mailing address, phone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses in its<br />

membership directory listing on the web site? If not, what information should be withheld?<br />

Signature of Applicant Date<br />

Signature of Sponsor (a member) Date<br />

Mail the completed application along with a check (on a U.S. bank) or money order (in U.S.<br />

currency) for the first year's dues [US$25 (<strong>2001</strong>) or US$30 (2002) for domestic active members<br />

and US$28 (<strong>2001</strong>) or US$33 (2002) for foreign active members] to the Corresponding Secretary-<br />

Treasurer, Nancy D. Pacheco, 9708 DePaul Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, U.S.A.<br />

If you wish to pay by credit card (Visa or MasterCard only), please complete the following:<br />

Credit Card: EH Visa® D MasterCard® Expiration Date: /<br />

Credit Card Number: 0000 DODO DODO DODO<br />

Signature of Card Holder: Amount Charged: US$<br />

Printed Name Exactly as <strong>State</strong>d on Card:<br />

Helminthological Society of Washington Home Page: http://www.gettysburg.edu/shendrix/helmsoc.html<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington


*Edna M. Buhrer<br />

"Mildred A. Doss<br />

* Allen Mclntosh<br />

* Jesse R. Christie<br />

"Gilbert F. Otto<br />

*George R. LaRue<br />

•"William W. Cort<br />

* Gerard Dikmans<br />

"Benjamin Schwartz<br />

*Willard H. Wright<br />

*Aurel O. Foster<br />

"Carlton M. Herman<br />

*May Belle Chitwood<br />

*Elvio H. Sadun<br />

E. J. Lawson Soulsby<br />

David R. Lincicome<br />

Margaret A. Stirewalt<br />

*Leo A. Jachowski, Jr.<br />

"Horace W. Stunkard<br />

"Kenneth C. Kates<br />

"Everett E. Wehr<br />

* George R. LaRue<br />

"Vladimir S. Ershov<br />

"Norman R. Stoll<br />

"Horace W. Stunkard<br />

"Justus F. Mueller<br />

John F. A. Sprent<br />

Bernard Bezubik<br />

Hugh M. Gordon<br />

E. J. Lawson'Soulsby<br />

"W. E. Chambers<br />

"Nathan A. Cobb<br />

"Howard Crawley<br />

"Winthrop D. Foster<br />

"Maurice C. Hall<br />

"Albert Hassall<br />

"Charles W. Stiles<br />

"Paul Bartsch<br />

"Henry E. Ewing<br />

"William W. Cort<br />

"Gerard Dikmans<br />

"Jesse R. Christie<br />

"Gotthold Steiner<br />

"Emmett W. Price<br />

"Eloise B. Cram<br />

"Gerald Thome<br />

"Allen Mclntosh<br />

"Edna M. Buhrer<br />

"Benjamin G. Chitwood<br />

"Aurel O. Foster<br />

"Gilbert F. Otto<br />

"Theodor von Brand<br />

"May Belle Chitwood<br />

"Carlton M. Herman<br />

Lloyd E. Rozeboom<br />

"Albert L. Taylor<br />

David R. Lincicome<br />

Margaret A. Stirewalt<br />

"Willard H. Wright<br />

"Benjamin Schwartz<br />

"Mildred A. Doss<br />

* Deceased.<br />

HONORARY MEMBERS<br />

1959<br />

1962<br />

1976<br />

1977<br />

1978<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1990<br />

"Philip E. Garrison<br />

"Joseph Goldberger<br />

"Henry W. Graybill<br />

LIFE MEMBERS<br />

1931<br />

1931<br />

1931<br />

1937<br />

1945<br />

1952<br />

1953<br />

1956<br />

1956<br />

1956<br />

1956<br />

1961<br />

1963<br />

1963<br />

19<strong>68</strong><br />

1972<br />

1972<br />

1975<br />

1975<br />

1975<br />

1975<br />

1975<br />

1976<br />

1976<br />

1976<br />

1976<br />

1977<br />

*O. Wilford Olsen<br />

*Frank D. Enzie<br />

Lloyd E. Rozeboom<br />

*Leon Jacobs<br />

Harley G. Sheffield<br />

A. Morgan Golden<br />

•Louis S. Diamond<br />

*Everett L. Schiller<br />

Milford N. Lunde<br />

J. Ralph Lichtenfels<br />

A. James Haley<br />

*Francis G. Tromba<br />

Thomas K. Sawyer<br />

Ralph P. Eckerlin<br />

Willis A. Reid, Jr.<br />

Gerhard A. Schad<br />

Franklin A. Neva<br />

Burton Y. Endo<br />

Sherman S. Hendrix<br />

Frank W. Douvres<br />

Nancy D. Pacheco<br />

Roy C. Anderson<br />

Louis Euzet<br />

John C. Holmes<br />

Purnomo<br />

Naftale Katz<br />

*Robert Traub<br />

*Alan F. Bird<br />

Graham C. Kearn<br />

"Maurice C. Hall<br />

"Albert Hassall<br />

"George F. Leonard<br />

"Everett E. Wehr<br />

"Marion M. Farr<br />

"JohnT. Lucker, Jr.<br />

George W. Luttermoser<br />

"John S. Andrews<br />

"Leo A, Jachowski, Jr.<br />

"Kenneth C. Kates<br />

"Francis G. Tromba<br />

A. James Haley<br />

"Leon Jacobs<br />

"Paul C. Beaver<br />

"Raymond M. Cable<br />

Harry Herlich<br />

Glenn L. Hoffman<br />

Robert E. Kuntz<br />

Raymond V Rebois<br />

Frank W. Douvres<br />

A. Morgan Golden<br />

Thomas K. Sawyer<br />

"J. Allen Scott<br />

Judith H. Shaw<br />

Milford N. Lunde<br />

"Everett L. Schiller<br />

Harley G. Sheffield<br />

Louis S. Diamond<br />

Mary Hanson Pritchard<br />

John S. Mackiewicz<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1982<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

J985<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

"Charles A. Pfender<br />

"Brayton H. Ransom<br />

"Charles W. Stiles<br />

1977<br />

1979<br />

1979<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1981<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

1986<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1988<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1989<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1991<br />

1991<br />

1994<br />

1994<br />

2000


VOLUME <strong>68</strong> JULY <strong>2001</strong> NUMBER 2<br />

CONTENTS<br />

(Continued from Front Cover)<br />

CONE, D. K. Supplemental Diagnosis ofMyxobolus gibbosus (Myxozoa), with a Taxonomic Review of<br />

Myxobolids from Lepomis gibbosus (Centrarchidae) in North America . 236<br />

GIBLIN-DAVIS, R. M., K. A. DAVIES, D. S. WILLIAMS, AND T. D. CENTER. Cuticular Changes in Fergusobiid<br />

Nematodes Associated with Parasitism of Fergusoninid Flies 242<br />

PAOLA, A., AND M. C. OAMBORENEA. Tegumentary infrastructure (SEM) of Preadult and Adult Lobatostoma<br />

jungwiithi Kritscher, 1974 (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea) _ 249<br />

RESEARCH NOTES<br />

MULLIGAN, S. K., J. E. HUFFMAN, AND B. FRIED. Infectivity and <strong>Comparative</strong> Pathology of Echinostoma<br />

caproni, Echinostoma revolution, and Echinostoma trivolvis (Trematoda) in the Domestic Chick 256<br />

FRIED, B., A. REDDY, AND C. D. BALFOUR. Excystation and Distribution of Metacercariae of Echinostoma<br />

caproni in ICR Mice ... 259<br />

PHAM, X.-D., C.-L. TRAN, AND H. HASEGAWA. Helminths Collected from Rattus spp. in Bac Ninh<br />

Province, Vietnam . 261<br />

LICHTENFELS, J. R., A. MCDONNELL, S. LOVE, AND J. B. MATTHEWS. Nematodes of the Tribe Cyathostominea<br />

(Strongylidae) Collected from Horses in Scotland 265<br />

YODER, H. R., J. R. COGGINS, AND J. C. RjEiNBOLD. Helminth Parasites of the Green Frog (Rana clamitans)<br />

from Southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A 269<br />

AGUILAR-AGUILAR, R., R. G. MORENO-NAVARRETE, G. SALGADO-MALDONADO, AND B. VILLA-RAM!REZ.<br />

Gastrointestinal Helminths of Spinner Dolphins Stenella longirostris (Gray, 1828) (Cetacea: Delphinidae)<br />

Stranded in La Paz Bay, Baja California Sur, Mexico . 272<br />

MATEY, V E., B. I. KUPERMAN, J. M. KINSELLA, G. F. LLOYD, AND S. J. LANE. The Lung Nematodes<br />

(Metastrongyloidea) of the Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana in Southern California, U.S.A. 274<br />

DIAZ, J. I., G. T. NAVONE, AND F. CREMONTE. New Host and Distribution Records of Cosmocephahis<br />

obvelatus (Creplin, 1925) (Nematoda: Acuariidae), with Morphometric Comparisons 277<br />

ANNOUNCEMENTS<br />

EDITORS ' ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 15 5<br />

NOTICE OF DUES INCREASE 163<br />

FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF NEMATOLOGY . . 172<br />

NEW 'BOOKS AVAILABLE 176,255<br />

ONDERSTEPOORT HELMINTHOLOGICAL COLLECTION . 195<br />

SYMPOSIUM: PARASITOLOGY IN SCIENCE AND SOCIETY , 227<br />

HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON MEETING SCHEDULE 241<br />

REPORT ON THE BRAYTON H. RANSOM MEMORIAL TRUST FUND , 248<br />

LIFE MEMBERSHIP: JOHN S. MACKIEWICZ . ...... 282<br />

HONORARY MEMBERSHIP: GRAHAM C. KEARNE 282<br />

PRESENTATION OF 2000 ANNIVERSARY AWARD 283<br />

MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 284<br />

AUTHOR INDEX FOR VOLUME <strong>68</strong> 286<br />

KEY WORD AND SUBJECT INDEX FOR VOLUME <strong>68</strong> 286<br />

MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 292<br />

Date of publication, 31 July <strong>2001</strong><br />

* * *<br />

PRINTED BY ALLEN PRESS, INC., LAWRENCE, KANSAS 66044, U.S.A.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!